More Than 60 DC Congregations Join Network To Fight Deportation Of Illegals

More than 60 congregations in Washington, D.C., are banding together to fight President Donald Trump’s plan to deport illegal immigrants.

Foundry United Methodist Church pastor Ginger Gaines-Cirelli announced the creation of the DMV Sanctuary Congregation Network Tuesday, which has the goal of stemming the tide of deportations by providing physical sanctuary to illegals and educating them on their rights, Washington City Paper reports.

“We have seen this administration’s demonizing and fear-driven rhetoric become concrete in ways that deny the humanity and dignity of our immigrant neighbors, friends, co-workers, and family members,” said Gaines-Cirelli.

Numerous Christian denominations joined together for Tuesday’s press conference, in addition to representatives of other faiths.

After the press conference concluded, supporters marched to the White House to loudly signal opposition to Trump’s plan to enforce immigration law.

Bishop Mariann Edgar Budde, who heads the Washington National Cathedral, participated in the march.

Although the congregations plan to provide physical sanctuary for illegals, the Trump administration is not hampering itself the same way the Obama administration did. In other words, schools and churches are not off-limits to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents. Additionally, ICE agents no longer have to abide by the Obama administration’s self-imposed restriction that only illegals convicted of violent crimes should be deported.

The website for the DMV Sanctuary Congregation Network lists multiple ways churches can assist illegals, from accompanying them to ICE check-ins and legal hearings, to hosting families who could face deportation.

“We are a network of congregations in the DC/MD/VA region that are providing support and solidarity to neighbors, friends, and family who fear being detained, deported or profiled,” the group’s Facebook page states. “Our faith will not allow us to permit the criminalization and scapegoating of immigrants and people of color. In the face of hate and discrimination we are committed to showing love, compassion and hospitality.”

Article reposted with permission from The Daily Caller

Must-See: Shockingly Blatant Propaganda As Washington Post Changes Immigration Headline: “Doesn’t Want You To Know Illegals Are On Benefits Paid By… You”

They’re not even trying to hide their bias anymore.

Despite efforts by the mainstream media to convince an ever disinterested public that they are still relevant and non-partisan, a last minute headline change by the Washington Post proves just how desperate they are to maintain their big government narrative.

After running an immigration article entitled “Immigrants are now cancelling their food stamps for fear that Trump will deport them,” someone at the Post decided it just wasn’t impactful enough. That illegal immigrants were cancelling food stamp benefits seemed to suggest the Trump administration was acting in the interest of overworked and underpaid American taxpayers.

And we definitely don’t want to give anyone the idea that undocumented immigrants entering the country illegally are somehow putting a burden on the system. Thus, the only solution is to flip-flop the story so that it looks like President Trump and Americans who support common-sense immigration policies are putting a horrific burden on the people collecting government benefits illegally.

In response to this disastrous mistake to their own narrative, the Washington Post modified their title to ensure all of the blame was put directly at the feet of Donald Trump:

“Immigrants are going hungry so Trump won’t deport them”

And boom, just like that they are able to mold the minds of their millions of myrmidon followers.

https://twitter.com/juliangwan/status/842456829938548736

There’s no doubt that this report will immediately be dismissed as fake news with claims that we and others have completely made this up since a record of this no longer exists at the Washington Post.

Not to worry, there’s another screen shot that confirms the legitimacy, as noted by the following Tweet:

https://twitter.com/juliangwan/status/842458257436336128

Article reposted with permission from SHTF Plan

DC Councilmember Holds Meeting Teaching Illegals How To Resist ICE

D.C. City Council Member Brianne Nadeau organized a meeting Thursday to help local illegals in Washington, D.C., resist Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents.

The meeting took place at the Carlos Rosario International Public Charter School auditorium and was filled with translators and illegal aliens, as part of the D.C. City Council’s effort to stymie the federal government crackdown on illegal immigration, DCist reports.

“The new presidential administration has raised fears in our immigrant community,” Nadeau said. “It’s difficult as an elected official who supports you all to calm the fears because they’re very real.”

During the meeting, attendees were told not to take any pictures, so as to avoid identifying information of anyone leaking out into the public.

Nadeau’s office invited Abel Nunez, executive director of the Central American Resource Center, to tell illegals they have right not to open their doors and refuse entrance if ICE agents do not have a warrant.

D.C. is home to a fairly substantial illegal immigrant community, with estimates placing the number at approximately 25,000.

Nunez added that while the Obama administration refused to allow ICE agents to enter churches and schools to detain illegals, the Trump administration is unwilling to hamper ICE agents in the same way.

Mayor Muriel Bowser has reaffirmed her intent that D.C. remain a sanctuary city, even going so far as to launch a $500,000 program to provide representation for illegals undergoing deportation hearings in court.

“Washington will value all immigrants, regardless of immigration status,” Jackie Reyes, the executive director of the Mayor’s Office on Latino Affairs, told DCist. “We do get calls about people being scared, and that has increased, but we want to be on message: keep repeating and repeating that we’re a sanctuary city.”

D.C. functioning as a sanctuary city offers illegals a limited amount of protection by prohibiting local police from asking people about their immigration status when stopped.

However, it’s possible that D.C. could lose up to a billion dollars in funding if it continues to oppose the federal government.

Article reposted with permission from The Daily Caller

A Day Without Illegal Immigrants

You may have heard that yesterday was nationwide, “A Day Without Immigrants” day.

NPR Reported that, “In cities around America, thousands of construction companies, restaurants and other businesses are bracing for ‘A Day Without Immigrants,’ a combination boycott/strike that highlights the contributions of immigrants to U.S. business and culture.”

“The movement is a response to President Trump’s immigration agenda, which includes a pledge to seal the U.S. border with Mexico and a travel ban on citizens of seven majority-Muslim countries (which is now on hold),” NPR added.

Demonstrations in many major cities throughout the U.S. took place. By sheer coincidence, most of the cities involved just happen to be of the sanctuary persuasion.

Interestingly, and 100% predictably – of the dozen or so articles I read regarding the “massive” walkouts, from construction companies to schools and restaurants – not one even attempted to make a distinction between legal and illegal immigration.

And isn’t that the point and end for the left – to purposely blur the line between the two – repeat the narrative so often that the two effectively become indistinguishable. Always remember: those who control the language, control the narrative.

Is it really the case that all these companies employ this many illegals that they were forced to close for the day? If that is truly the case, the Trump immigration authorities should really take notice. When the time comes to begin mass deportation proceedings, a list of these facilities will make I.C.E. agents’ jobs a lot easier in locating them.

But seriously, this got me thinking about a day without immigrants, or more precisely, a day without illegals – and just who might be, or who would certainly have been glad to see a day without illegal immigrants.

July 1, 2015, would have been a great day without illegals. That’s the day that the scum bag illegal, Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez, murdered Kate Steinle. I’m sure all the family and friends of Kate would have been thrilled to have celebrated “no illegals” that day.

January 31, 2016, would been another good day for the celebration of no illegals. That was day that Sarah Root was killed by Eswin Mejia, an illegal alien from Honduras, who was street-racing. He is still out there somewhere, due to Douglas County Nebraska’s sanctuary policy. Sarah had just graduated college with a 4.0 GPA and was preparing to begin her life, when Mejia snuffed it out.

How about January 22, 2015. A day the Ronnebeck family would have enjoyed celebrating no illegals day. That was the day Apolinar Altamirano, an illegal alien from Mexico, murdered Grant Ronnebeck in Mesa, Arizona. Altamirano was out on bond when he murdered Grant over a pack of cigarettes while Ronnebeck was working his shift at a convenience store.

I could continue for days just listing the American citizens who would be overjoyed to have celebrated a day without illegals, but you get the point.

Now how about some facts regarding these oh-so-crucial members of American society.

The Daily Wire, with the help of Fox News, compiled these stunning statistics regarding our beloved “illegal” population.

Illegals make up 3.5% of America’s population, yet commit 13.6% of all crimes in the country. They account for 12% of all murders and 16% of all drug and human trafficking sentences. Almost 50 percent of all federal crimes are committed near the Mexico border, and illegal immigrants accounted for nearly 75% of federal drug sentences in 2014.

“Of the 61,529 criminal cases initiated by federal prosecutors in 2015, more than 40%—or 24,746—were filed in court districts neighboring the Mexican border,” but I’m sure this is just coincidental.

So let us join with all the thousands of victims throughout the nation and celebrate a day, a week, month, year – no – a lifetime, without the scourge of illegal immigrants.

No Home for Drunk Illegals

We are devastated. My children are crying, but we know there’s nothing more we can do.” – “victim” Giovani Jimenez of Fredericksburg, VA

Like her “devastated” hubby, Virginia squatter Wendy Uruchi Contreras, 33, is illegal. Apparently, this menace can’t go from point ‘A’ to point ‘B’ without violating numerous American laws. For her misdeeds, this sauced Spaniard—ironically an immigrant rights activist for CASA—inadvertently turned the spotlight of hypocrisy on herself. Thus, her own undocumented status was exposed. She was arrested last year, pleaded guilty to DUI, and is subsequently being held in custody. Today, her deportation is imminent. Sorry, Charlie: too bad, so sad! Welcome to Trump’s America.

Is it any wonder why this lawbreaker couldn’t get the laws of this land to suddenly work for her? After an overlong six-month process (including denied last-ditch appeals), Uruchi is to be repatriated to Madrid forthwith. (Symbolically, an appropriate capper to Donald Trump’s rapid-fire first week as a newly minted law and order president. Happily, like Ronald Reagan, but on steroids!)

Oh, the wailing and gnashing of teeth in casa de Uruchi-Jimenez. One feels a measure of sympathy for their American-born children, Alex, 13, and Lucia, 7. Yet, overriding this consideration is the fact that both parents intentionally flouted our legal immigration process. The couple then chose to procreate. A ripple effect of poor choices, ultimately resulting in this family’s geographic dissolution. Still, the cause—and the fault—remains squarely with them.

Knee-jerk liberals make the contrived argument that America’s immigration laws are draconian: “anti-family unity” or somehow contrary to the “best interests of children.” Well, what if this lead-footed lush had killed someone else’s child? Such an act would permanently—and irrevocably—end another person’s God-given right to exist, shattering that family’s unity. What of the rights of law-abiding citizens—our innocents and their loved ones?

For eight years, golfing ex-president Obama turned a blind eye. Even worse, he abetted the rising body count (exemplified by record-breaking Chicago: the nation’s murder capitol for five years of his presidency). A cause of this disgrace was highlighted in Mr. Trump’s August 2016 speech in Phoenix:

“Since 2013 alone, the Obama administration has allowed 300,000 criminal aliens to return back into United States communities. These are individuals encountered or identified by ICE, but who were not detained or processed for deportation because it wouldn’t have been politically correct.”

So much for longstanding progressive “sympathy” for actual victims of illegals’ crimes like Kate Steinle. Cry baby ideologues make subject-changing excuses for them by demonizing the rest of us as “intolerant.” Therefore, these “do-gooders”—philosophically twisted like pretzels around their own axles—are not to be believed, or trusted. For they are destructive harbingers of leftist chaos: advocating the twin scourges of open borders and illegals’ illusory rights. Indeed, the characteristic defining the polarized Obama years was their subversive efforts to aid the torrent of violence, drugs and lawlessness.

Our democratically-created laws are fair. They have one purpose: to preserve life. Within our sovereign boundaries, they protect men, women—and most of all—children. The heartbreaking number murdered at the hands of this invading underclass is unknown.

In 2002, Uruchi arrived on a 90-day visa waiver program. So, she’s already been a de facto criminal for fifteen years. Moreover, by what right did this speeding drunkard endanger public safety in 2016? Someone with neither legal standing nor moral fiber has no automatic right to reside in our country. Naturally, her brood is exempt from her wrongdoing. They can return here when they reach maturity. As adults and legal citizens, America will graciously extend them the welcome mat.

Why is Trump Waiting to Rescind DACA?

I have written a lot of rather supportive articles lately about president Trump. I decided going in that I would praise him when it was warranted and criticize him when needed.

It’s only been a few days, and so far, he’s done more good than not. Yet, I refuse to be one of Trump’s pom-pom boys (H/T Mark Levin) that cheer every word he utters.

This is one of those times when I feel I must, as others have, question the President.

One of the major issues – perhaps the major issue, and the one that put Trump on the map – was and is illegal immigration: specifically, building the wall and deportations.

It was my hope and understanding – and I’m certainly not the only one – that one of the very first issues Trump would address was immigration. Yet, in a flurry of very positive Executive Orders, I didn’t see a single one pertaining to Obama’s unconstitutional Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) Executive Order. I personally was looking for the President to end the program on day one.

Some will undoubtedly say, “Well, he can’t do everything in his first few days.” True enough, but one would think this would be one of the first. Some might then say that the wall is most important – that if your boat is leaking and at the same time you discovered the leak, you also found stowaways, would you not fix the leak first, then worry about the stowaways? Yep, if these were just stowaways. But DACA “children” just happen to be stowaways, which, left unchecked, will soon become part of the crew – like it or not.

Two nights ago, Mark Levin interviewed Mark Krikorian, the Executive Director of the Center for Immigration Studies, and author of an article entitled, “Is Trump Going to Cancel DACA or Not?

Levin asked him why Trump had not yet issued an Order putting a stop to DACA. Krikorian answered: “Was this just a screw up – it could be that it’s just stuck in somebody’s inbox – but – it doesn’t look that way.” You are correct, Mr. Krikorian. It doesn’t look that way.

This past Sunday, Trump Chief of Staff Reince Priebus told Fox News that, “I think we’re going to work with the House and Senate leadership, as well as to get a long-term solution on that issue.” You mean the same leadership that didn’t lift a finger to stop Obama in the first place? That leadership?

According to Politico, the most recent public statistics from the third quarter of last year state that, “an average of about 140 initial applications and 690 renewals were approved each calendar day.” And you can bet your bottom dollar that the numbers have drastically increased since then. That’s 5,810 (at least) for each week he waits.

Krikorian said: “What I did not expect was for Trump to break an explicit promise regarding his headline issue on the administration’s first business day in office.” He is referring to the promise Trump made in August, during his Phoenix Immigration speech.

Trump said that, “We will immediately terminate President Obama’s two illegal executive amnesties, in which he defied federal law and the constitution to give amnesty to approximately 5 million illegal immigrants.”

Although DACA was the only one that went into effect, the two he was referring to were/are “DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals – for illegals who came as kids, often called ‘DREAMers’) and DAPA (Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents).”

Then just yesterday, Breitbart posted a piece quoting Trump on the DREAMers. Trump said in an interview with ABC News that, “We’ll be coming out with policy on that over the next period of four weeks.” He then added that, “They are here illegally. They shouldn’t be very worried. I do have a big heart. We’re going to take care of everybody. Where you have great people that are here that have done a good job, they should be far less worried.”

Huh? First, they are still here illegally, regardless of how they arrived. Second – how does he or anyone know that “they are great people that have done a great job?” And third – they are here illegally!

Enough with the exceptions! They have to go. Trump said it all during the campaign and people believed him. Even if he does handle it in four weeks, that’s almost 24,000 illegals which now have effective legal status.

Is the President now agreeing with Obama that it’s okay to defy “federal law and the Constitution to give amnesty to approximately 5 million illegal immigrants?” Sure sounds like it.

Trump has done great in his first few days, but I don’t agree with this at all! Not when he could have put a halt to it with the stroke of a pen.

Mass Deportations Loom: 7 Ways To Get Kicked Out Of America If You Are Here Illegally

As of this writing there are reportedly scores of individuals being detained at airports across the country because they originate from countries on President Trump’s “ban list.” Though the ban is indefinite for refugees from war-torn Syria, the White House’s Executive Order stops short of permanently restricting access for those in other predominantly Muslim countries on the list. The purpose of the order based on its language is to ensure that the United States has extensive screening and biometric procedures in place prior to opening our borders again. The process, according to the order, should be completed within 120 days, something that seems to have been under reported by the mainstream media, likely in order to fuel further tensions such as the widespread protests we are seeing at international airports in the United States. Further, the Trump administration has now made it clear the holders of green cards are legal immigrants and will not be affected by the order.

The tensions we are witnessing today across the country will likely be raised significantly in coming days because in addition to the Executive Order banning immigration from certain countries, the Trump administration has also enacted an order to deal with illegal aliens who are already in the United States. It was a major position for the President in the run-up to the election and now Trump looks to be making good on his promise to deal with illegal immigration head on.

Dubbed Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States, this Executive Order outlines numerous guidelines for dealing with undocumented immigrants who are in the United States illegally.

The order uses a sweeping definition for “criminal” activity, likely threatening millions of people with the real possibility of deportation, even if they have lived in the United States for many years. What’s more, it appears that a single immigration officer now has the power to make the determination for who can or can’t stay in the country.

If you are an illegal alien in America, here are seven ways you can be deported should you be detained by law enforcement.

Sec. 5.  Enforcement Priorities.  In executing faithfully the immigration laws of the United States, the Secretary of Homeland Security (Secretary) shall prioritize for removal those aliens described by the Congress in sections 212(a)(2), (a)(3), and (a)(6)(C), 235, and 237(a)(2) and (4) of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(2), (a)(3), and (a)(6)(C), 1225, and 1227(a)(2) and (4)), as well as removable aliens who:

(a)  Have been convicted of any criminal offense;

(b)  Have been charged with any criminal offense, where such charge has not been resolved;

(c)  Have committed acts that constitute a chargeable criminal offense;

(d)  Have engaged in fraud or willful misrepresentation in connection with any official matter or application before a governmental agency;

(e)  Have abused any program related to receipt of public benefits;

(f)  Are subject to a final order of removal, but who have not complied with their legal obligation to depart the United States; or

(g)  In the judgment of an immigration officer, otherwise pose a risk to public safety or national security.

Full Text

In short, this means that anyone who has committed a criminal offense, including fraudulently claiming public benefits, can be immediately deported. As well, if you are deemed to be a threat to public safety for any reason, you’re gone.

We suspect that many of the initiatives in Trump’s Executive Orders will come under legal fire, and as we saw in the last 24 hours, will be amended or struck down by the Judicial branch.

However, the Executive Branch does have power over immigration and because illegal aliens have already broken Federal law by entering the United States, there are likely not many legal protections which can be afforded them.

Moreover, it appears that a single immigration officer now has the power to initiate deportation procedures, so the vast majority of people will likely already have been returned to their home country before attorneys have a chance to get involved.

The protests taking place today are nothing compared to what will happen when tens of thousands of immigrants living in the United States start getting sent back home. 

We urge our readers to get prepared for mass chaos from coast to coast. The protests and riots will be unprecedented.

Article reposted with permission from SHTF Plan

Self-Deportation is Working Again

A question. What has been the constant and malodorous refrain of both the left and establishment “Chamber of Commerce” right when it comes to illegal immigration? That’s right – “What are going to do – deport them all?”

Early on in the presidential campaign, that’s exactly what president-elect Trump said – that they all must go. Recall he said that he would “keep families together, but they have to go.”

To that, the democrats went predictably berserk. How dare he deport them before most got a chance to vote…for democrats.

Unfortunately for our side – the right and legal side – very few, if any, ever offer an adequate rebuttal to just how a mass deportation would or could take place. What we heard are diatribes (correct as they be) about the Constitution and the rule-of-law.

For many in America, these arguments are simply yawn-fests. People are not interested in academic soliloquies. They look at a number like 20 million illegals as utterly overwhelming. It would take our entire military to achieve such a task.

The argument we on the right should have advanced from the beginning is one of self-deportation. It works every time it’s tried. President Eisenhower successfully rid our nation of 3 million illegals, back in the Fifties. And the vast majority left of their own accord.

I’ve written extensively on what and how Ike did it. You may review a couple of my articles, entitled “Illegal Immigration – Ike Showed Us the Way,” and “Was Eisenhower an Immoral Angry White Man?

Yeah, the left may say – that was long ago and things change, yada, yada, yada. True enough – but it’s happening again.

Refugees and migrants who entered Germany over the past few years are leaving the country. International Business Times reports that, “2016 has seen a significant rise in the number of migrants opting to leave Germany voluntarily rather than be deported by local authorities. According to the government, in 2016, close to 55,000 migrants who were not eligible for or were likely to be denied asylum in the country, chose to go back to their homelands; 20,000 more than the 2015 numbers.”

You mean they just left without “being rounded up” by heavily-armed authorities? They left without massive protests and demonstrations, decrying that “We are all citizens,” or some such nonsense. They left without thousands of videos posted of small children being ripped away from their helpless parents?

Yep. Germany has finally wised up (to some extent) and gotten serious about the massive immigrant problem created by Angela Merkel.

“Interior Ministry spokesman Harald Neymanns told the press, adding that already, the figures had climbed to 54,123 through 27 December. ‘The increase is welcome. It’s always preferable when people leave the country voluntarily instead of being deported.’”

The German government deported approximately 20,000 immigrants in 2016. The result was that more than double that amount left on their own.

And it’s fair to say that Germany hasn’t exactly been steadfastly committed to the task. But the word got out in the “immigrant community” to leave or be deported. It’s exactly the way it happened during Eisenhower’s presidency.

Once again, it’s been demonstrated that even with minimal effort, self-deportation works every time it’s tried. And once more, I will reiterate that we should never allow the argument to go unchallenged that it “just can’t be done.”

Fort Bliss Soldiers Looking At Up To 10 Years In Prison For Smuggling Illegals

Two Army soldiers from Fort Bliss are staring down a prison sentence of 10 years for trying to smuggle illegals across the U.S. border.

The soldiers, 19-year-old Marco Antonio Nava Jr. and 25-year-old Joseph Edmond Cleveland, were willing to risk it all for just $1,500 and ended up pleading guilty Tuesday to human smuggling, The Associated Press reports.

They could also face a fine of up to $250,000 and three years of probation.

The two will be sentenced next year Feb. 9, and in the meantime, a federal judge in Corpus Christi ruled they can stay out of jail while on bond. The judge, not being tied down to the terms of the plea agreement, can even sentence the men to more than 10 years in prison.

Both men donned civilian clothes and attempted to drive two Mexicans across the Fulfurrias U.S. Border Patrol checkpoint June 18 in South Texas, but were caught. The two Mexicans were sitting in the back passenger seats.

A border patrol agent asked one of the Mexicans, Marcelino Oliveros-Padilla, where he was heading in English. Oliveros-Padilla responded: “San Antonio.”

Another question tripped him up. The agent asked Oliveros-Padilla what his name was. He responded: “San Antonio.”

Agents arrested all four at the checkpoint. Neither of the Mexicans had proper identification.

After extensive questioning, the illegals fessed up and admitted they had entered the U.S. eight days prior and stayed at trailer homes. The location of those trailer homes is still unknown. Following their entrance into the U.S., they were informed they would be picked up and driven to Houston. On June 18, Nava showed up in a black Mazda, and the two men got in.

Nava and Cleveland were part of the 377th Transportation Company, 1st Armed Division in El Paso.

In 2015, border patrol agents arrested 337,000 illegals trying to enter the U.S.

Article reposted with permission from The Daily Caller

Already Broke Cities and States Pour Money into Illegal Immigrant Defense Funds

The Electoral College drama has ended and Donald Trump is the next president of the United States. Turns out it was much ado about nothing, as there were few surprises. Now it’s on to the implementation of his agenda and whether his actions will match his campaign and post-election rhetoric.

Front and center of his agenda items will, or should, be what brought him to the dance in the first place. I’m speaking of course of illegal immigration. He must build the wall, construction of which he says will commence in March of 2017. The other issue will be to begin deportation of illegals.

Although he will get pushback over construction of the wall, it won’t be nearly as virulent as the deportation issue. After all, we can’t really put a face to the wall, which liberal groups will surely do regarding deportation. The Trump administration had better be prepared for a fight, as cities and states across the country are already preparing what they are calling “Immigration Defense Funds.”

Cities like Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Chicago, as well as the States of California and New York, intend to flood these “funds” with tens of millions of dollars – money which none of them have.

The Buffalo News writes that, “The Cuomo administration described the new fund as a first-in-the-nation program to provide emergency legal representation to immigrants – regardless of whether the person is in the country illegally or not. It will be run through the state’s Office for New Americans in partnership with some colleges, law firms and advocacy groups.” Office for New Americans? Really. I have friends in New York, and they’ll be thrilled to know that their tax money is being spent in such a responsible and legal manner.

Leftist hack Governor Cuomo has yet to announce how much this folly will cost, but it’s likely to be north of $10 million. Others, though, have begun to assign a dollar figure to their illegal projects.

Thus far, Chicago Mayor Rahm Emmanuel has received approval of $1.3 million for his city’s defense fund. Recall on CBS’s 60 minutes that Emmanuel defiantly stated that, “Chicago has in the past been a sanctuary city. … It always will be a sanctuary city.”

This is the same city that is up to its neck in debt; yet, they can funnel over a million dollars (so far) to protect illegal aliens. Chicago is currently running a $137.6 million budget shortfall. And that is above and beyond the $18.6 billion owed to the municipal workers fund and the $15.2 billion owed to the three other retirement accounts combined.

“Los Angeles elected officials said Monday that they are working with private foundations to set up a $10 million fund, while some California state lawmakers have proposed spending tens of millions of dollars to provide lawyers to immigrants facing deportation,” reports ABC News.

That’s great news for illegals. Not being citizens, I suppose they don’t have to concern themselves with the city of Los Angeles’s current budget shortfall of $170 million and their pension liability, estimated to be $35 billion.

The city of San Francisco, like the others, has a massive operating deficit and debt, but has added another $1.5 million to fund already setup.

At a recent Chicago city council meeting, Nicholas Sposato said: “I’m not a hater,” but at “Any given day, 1,000 homeless veterans are out there. What are we doing for them?”

Nothing, Nicholas – absolutely nothing. They are too busy further bankrupting their cities and States in an effort to cultivate the next potential block of democrat voters.

Are Trump and Universities Headed for a Mexican Standoff?

Things are going to get very interesting, very quickly. At virtually every post-election speech, Donald Trump continues to emphasize the point of building the wall along our Southern border. He has also reiterated his hard-line stance of ending sanctuary cities. And he’s not the only one. States are following his lead.

On December 1st, Texas Governor Greg Abbott tweeted that, “Texas will not tolerate sanctuary campuses or cities. I will cut funding for any state campus if it establishes sanctuary status.”

Two days later, Georgia lawmaker, Earl Ehrhart, said he plans to propose “legislation to defund Universities shielding illegals.”

Meanwhile, major and prestigious universities are girding their loins in preparation for a government crackdown. Harvard University and the University of California have formally announced that they will not comply, should Trump follow through with this threat – which, by the way, is not a threat. What it is is a decision by the president-elect to finally enforce Constitutional and legally-passed federal immigration laws.

Yet, former Director of Homeland Security and now president of the University of California Janet Napolitano has mandated that her office will, “vigorously protect the privacy and civil rights of the undocumented members of the UC community and will direct its police departments not to undertake joint efforts with any government agencies to enforce federal immigration law.”

Yes, the former director of Homeland Security, the person charged with “protecting” our nation from invaders, has made the conscious decision to illegally shield those very invaders. But considering how well she performed her federal duties, we should expect nothing less, or more, depending on your perspective.

Napolitano also attempted to legitimize her lawless decision by stating that, “Prioritizing the use of resources in law enforcement is nothing new. It is known as ‘prosecutorial discretion,’ and we can see it all around us…” Wrongo, Janet! There is no federal law which stipulates that allowing a certain amount of illegals to stay in this country is okay – or which permits them to enter illegally in the first place. That’s not up for debate or “discretion.”

Harvard University is taking an identical stance. Harvard President Drew Gilpin Faust said that, “the Harvard University Police Department would not cooperate with federal immigration officials without a warrant, and that the university would be making additional legal resources available to illegal aliens affiliated with Harvard.”

This radical hard line stance is evidently shared by other Harvard pointy-heads, as “the dean of Harvard College, Rakesh Khurana, ‘will prioritize protecting Harvard’s undocumented undergraduates.’”

The New York Sun quotes the Harvard Crimson, who reports that a petition circulated throughout the school has already garnered over 4,000 signatures and the endorsement of three academic departments in favor of shielding illegals.

The petition is “demanding that Harvard ‘create an office specifically meant to cater to undocumented student needs.’” Don’t you just love liberals. They never make requests – but always make demands, like some hostage taker.

They are also the first to applaud illegal unilateral action from their leftist president Obama, when he “can’t wait on Congress to get things done,” yet bemoan and refuse to comply with what they describe as unilaterally making immigration policy by president-elect Trump. This, to any reasonable person, is a non-issue, as Trump clearly has the law on his side.

But then again, I didn’t attend Harvard Law. Maybe they teach them something other than upholding long-standing federal immigration law there.

As I said – things are going to get very interesting very soon.

Liberal Hypocrisy Never Takes a Day Off

Now that Donald Trump has become the president elect, we should assume no shortage of leftist double standards to come. As the republicans will now have control of the legislative and executive branches, the expectation is that they will use the same governmental procedures to roll back Obama’s oppressive agenda items that the dems used to implement them.

From the democrats, we should then fully anticipate cries of foul play. As Trump rolls back the illegal executive actions thrust on us by Obama, the left will inexplicably conclude that he has not the authority to just write decrees. We’ll have to wait and see on that, but one such double-standard has already surfaced, months before Trump taking office.

I take you back to last spring, when the State of North Carolina had the nerve to pass a law stating that if you were born a male, you must use only the male restrooms and locker rooms, and vice versa. I still cannot believe that was and is controversial. To the left, however, anything which attempts to maintain American or even reasonable human values is somehow abhorrent, and must be disassembled or destroyed in favor of the lunatic fringe.

Rather than begrudgingly accept federalism and the right of States to pass such internal measures which affect no other State, the Obama administration did what statists do: they called the measure unconstitutional. I guess if any administration knows what is unconstitutional, this one does. Of course, they are wrong, but no matter. The forced implementation of the radical LGBT agenda is all that matters.

When the Governor of N.C. refused to comply with the Reichstag in D.C., Obama threatened the State with withholding federal funding for schools, highways, and housing. Even if you agree with the federal government sending money to States, which I do not and nor did the founders, this is a clear cut case of extortion.

In April, the New York Times wrote that, “Cutting off any federal money — or even simply threatening to do so — would put major new pressure on North Carolina to repeal the law… A loss of federal money could send the state into a budget crisis and jeopardize services that are central to daily life.”

Now the shoe is the other foot, and the incoming Trump administration is said to be weighing the possibility of withholding federal funds to “sanctuary cities.” During the campaign, Trump was adamant about cutting off all funding if cities and States attempt to block the feds from deporting illegals.

Okay, hold it. Isn’t this also just extortion? How is this any different from what Obama threatened?

What Obama did was extortion and what Trump is proposing is not. There is a major difference in that, unlike bestowing extra-constitutional rights on a single class of people, as Obama wished, immigration enforcement and border control is an actual constitutional function of the federal government. Also, N.C. is well within its rights to pass such a “bathroom bill,” which affects no other State. However, sanctuary cities are taking federal government money and spending it illegally. Big difference!

But already, cities like New York, San Francisco. Los Angeles, and Chicago have vowed not only to not help the feds, but as Mayor Rahm Emmanuel exclaimed, “To all those who are, after Tuesday’s election, very nervous and filled with anxiety as we’ve spoken to, you are safe in Chicago, you are secure in Chicago, and you are supported in Chicago,” Emanuel said. “Chicago will always be a sanctuary city.”

He and other leftist Mayors of their respective failed cities, who can ill-afford to fund the illegals, are being hailed as courageous and heroes to all immigrants.

Yes, they are courageous and heroic and 100% hypocrites, as not a single person on the left considered the Governor of North Carolina in the same light.

The funny thing is that if the multiple billions of dollars of federal funding were to dry up, the actual citizens living in these cities, who are also dependent on federal largess, will turn on these illegals in a heartbeat. When citizens realize the only reason they too are cut off from services is because their Mayor is siding with illegals over them, revolts will soon follow.

Did You Know that Over 7700 Terrorists Were Encountered Trying to Enter the Country?

If you were to ask the average American how many terrorists have been caught trying to sneak into the country, you would probably get a small response. The average American would not think that it was a very common thing to find terrorists sneaking in because they have not heard of any being caught.

But even if you asked a pessimistic person, they are likely to get it wrong. Again, this is because no one is hearing about the apparent wave of terrorists trying to get into America via our Southern border.

According to Breitbart:

Leaked documents with sensitive FBI data exclusively obtained by Breitbart Texas reveal that 7,712 terrorist encounters occurred within the United States in one year and that many of those encounters occurred near the U.S.-Mexico border. The incidents are characterized as “Known or Suspected Terrorist Encounters.” Some of the encounters occurred near the U.S.-Mexico border at ports-of-entry and some occurred in between, indicating that persons known or reasonably suspected of being terrorists attempted to sneak into the U.S. across the border. In all, the encounters occurred in higher numbers in border states.

So, what this tells us is that there are a lot of terrorists using the same routes to enter our country as the illegal immigrants. And we have caught 7712 of them either as they enter or right after.  Who would have thought that such a thing could happen?

As I have said before, this does not mean that we cut off all immigration; that is not the answer. But, there is a good case to be made for tightening things up. What will it take for us to wake up to this problem?

Article reposted with permission from Constitution.com

Illegal Aliens Help Social Security – Not

Yahoo News posted an article by the Atlantic attempting to defend and legitimize illegal aliens by trying to convince the reader that illegals are actually a net asset for America, as they pay billions into the Social Security system and get little in return.

“Every year, the Social Security Administration collects billions of dollars in taxes that it doesn’t know who paid. Whenever employers send in W-2 forms that have Social Security numbers that don’t match with anyone on record, the agency routes the paperwork to what’s called the Earnings Suspense File, where it sits until people can prove the wages were theirs, allowing them to one day collect retirement benefits,” the article claims.

Stephen Goss, the chief actuary of the Social Security Administration, estimates that about 1.8 million immigrants were working with fake or stolen Social Security cards in 2010, and he expects that number to reach 3.4 million by 2040. He calculates that undocumented immigrants paid $13 billion into the retirement trust fund that year and only got about $1 billion in benefits.

“We estimate that earnings by unauthorized immigrants result in a net positive effect on Social Security financial status generally, and that this effect contributed roughly $12 billion to the cash flow of the program for 2010,” Gross concluded, in a 2013 review of the impact of undocumented immigrants on Social Security.

Okay – so around 2 million illegals (six years ago) are using fake and stolen Social Security numbers? Is this not a felony? If a citizen like you or me were to do that, would we not end up in prison? But it’s okay because illegals are supposed to be a net positive? Isn’t that just fabulous! Of course, we also know this is a lie. The current estimate is that illegals cost us well over $113 billion a year. And why are they even getting one dollar in benefits, much less $1 billion? That was rhetorical – we all know the answer.

But the Atlantic story is a fantasy on its face. Even if the working criminal alien class is a net positive, it would make no difference, as they fail to explain the Ponzi scheme that is Social Security.

It has been explained dozens of times, I’m sure, but let’s go through it again.

Employers send to the government a regular lump sum payment consisting of income, social security, and medicare payroll taxes. Most believe the Treasury then breaks up these tax revenues and forwards the portion to the Social Security Administration (SSA) to pay benefits. WRONGO!

FedSmith explains that, “The Treasury both receives the payroll taxes (and income taxes that higher-income retirees pay on their Social Security benefits) and pays monthly benefits on behalf of the Social Security Administration (SSA). The money stays in the Treasury’s hands until it is either paid out as Social Security benefits or otherwise spent by the government [for other programs]. In fact, no money ever goes into the trust fund,” nor does the SSA ever see a dime. One could therefore logically conclude that the SSA is a useless government department.

Treasury estimates the difference between what was supposed to go into the “trust fund” and what was paid out as benefits. Any money (which has already been spent on other programs) left over after benefits have been paid is then converted into bonds, which are called “special issues of the Treasury.” That’s a fancy term for an IOU. These phony bonds are the only thing in the SSA trust fund.

Unlike other Treasury notes or bonds, which can be traded or sold on the open market, these “special issue bonds” have ZERO market value. They are strictly an accounting gimmick. Even the interest that Treasury is supposed to be paying on what they “borrow” from the SSA is in the form of these special and worthless bonds. Every dime in the SSA trust fund has been long ago spent and replaced with non-marketable government IOUs. They could not be sold to anyone, even for a penny on the dollar.

In 2012, the Social Security Trustees Report estimated “that the gap between revenue and the cost of full benefits will be $53.2 billion this year [2012], $95.0 billion in 2020, and a whopping $318.7 billion in 2030. This means that the government will have to find $318.7 billion in its tight budget, and transfer it to Social Security, in order for full benefits to be paid in 2030.”

Yet, Yahoo and the Atlantic want us to believe that the paltry $13 billion of which criminal aliens kick in will make a difference.

George Soros Lauds Efforts to Let Illegals Vote

In a Monday morning tweet, billionaire activist George Soros sent out some public praise for his own Open Society’s work to make U.S. elections – in his mind – fairer, but which is really, in the views of constitutional, rule-of-law type Americans, aimed at giving illegal immigrants the ability to vote this November.

Soros is already on record supporting Hillary Clinton.

In July, Politico reported this:

“Soros has donated or committed more than $25 million to boost Hillary Clinton and other Democratic candidates and causes, according to Federal Election Commission records and interviews with his associates and Democratic fundraising operatives. And some of his associated say they expect Soros, who amassed a fortune estimated at $24.9 billion through risky currency trades, to give even more as Election Day nears.”

Moreover, his personal political adviser, Michael Vachon, had this to say in the same story:

“[T]his year, the political stakes are exceptionally high. They were high even before Trump became the nominee because of the hostility on the other side toward many of the issues George cares most about and has worked to support for many years, including immigration reform, criminal justice reform and religious tolerance.”

And now this, from Soros’ own Twitter account, @georgesoros, just Monday morning.

He first posted a photograph and beginning of a story entitled “Why the U.S. Elections Just Got a Little Fairer,” that read: “A series of court rulings ensures hundreds of thousands of eligible voters will be able to exercise their rights at the polls this November.”

And he praised the “advocates’ work,” mirroring what the story said about their ensuring “eligible U.S. voters” can actually cast ballots this November.

Only problem is: Click on the story, which was written in August for Soros’ own Open Society Foundations, and you’ll see the “eligible voters” he’s talking about are mostly those who are anything but eligible.

The story, written by Erica Teasley Linnick, reads in part:

“Three years ago this summer, the U.S. Supreme Court gutted a key portion of the 1965 Voting Rights Act. The court’s ruling in Shelby County v. Holder left voters in 15 states without protections previously afforded them under the landmark civil rights legislation. State legislators whose election policies had previously been deemed discriminatory by the Justice Department were emboldened to enact voter ID and other suppressive measures that negatively impact voters of color, using false arguments about the prevalence of fraud to fuel their efforts.

“In response to these challenges, the Open Society Foundations created the Shelby Response Fund, bringing together litigators, researchers, state and local advocates, communications strategists, and organizers. The fund’s members worked on a number of fronts to try to restore voting rights protections stripped away by the high court ruling.

“Lately, one aspect of their efforts in particular has been bearing fruit. In recent weeks, our voting rights grantees have celebrated court victories ensuring that hundreds of thousands of eligible voters will be able to exercise their rights at the polls this November.

“On August 11, a federal district court in North Carolina held that the state legislature had unconstitutionally used race in redrawing district boundaries in 2011, unnecessarily increasing the percentage of black voters in districts where they had been successfully electing their candidates of choice for years. This case, filed by the Southern Coalition for Social Justice, was five years in the making—an example of how long justice can take, as well as the importance of the courts as a corrective.

“Last month, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ruled that North Carolina’s 2013 voter ID legislation was enacted with discriminatory intent in violation of both the Voting Rights Act and the U.S. Constitution. This voter ID measure was infamously referred to as the “monster bill” because of its far-reaching impact on voting rights—it also eliminated early voting, same-day registration, preregistration for 16- and 17-year-olds, and out-of-precinct voting.

“Also in July, a federal court decided to provide a safety net for Wisconsin voters who, under a 2011 law, are required to present voter ID at the polls. With this ruling, the court gives voters who have a difficult time getting qualifying ID the option to vote by affidavit and receive a regular ballot instead of a provisional one. The court found that the state’s interests could not justify disenfranchising voters who cannot obtain ID with reasonable effort.In Texas, after three years of litigation, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled that the state’s 2013 voter ID law does indeed violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act by denying black and Latino voters an equal opportunity to cast a ballot.

“And in North Dakota, a federal court ruled that North Dakota’s voter ID law placed a disproportionate burden on Native American voters who didn’t have driver’s licenses or a tribal ID that included an address. “[N]o eligible voter, regardless of their station in life, should be denied the opportunity to vote,” the court held.

The story ends with one final note of caution for citizens – legal ones – concerned about the possibility for shenanigans at the polls this fall.

“This work is by no means done,” it read. “These recent victories will help bolster the advocates’ efforts in the coming months and years, and ensure that so many voters disenfranchised by suppressive laws have an opportunity to participate fully in the elections this November.”

Article reposted with permission from PamelaGeller.com

Pamela Geller’s commitment to freedom from jihad and Shariah shines forth in her books

Candidate Trump on Immigration – Which One do We Believe

Trump said he will follow the immigration laws. Actually – no he didn’t. Trump stated in his town hall interview with Sean Hannity: “We wanna follow the laws. You know we have very strong laws…in this country…and I don’t know if you know but Bush and even Obama sends people back. We can be more aggressive in that, but we want to follow the laws.” Want to and will are not synonymous.

Before I go any further, I wish to state that this is not a bash-Trump article. Readers know I am not a Trump guy, but I am not treating Trump any differently than I would any candidate, on either side. I am only attempting to be intellectually honest and consistent.

I was all for Trump’s original immigration policy. I’m thankful he brought it up in the first place. And we constitutionalists are still in favor of his original policy. If you are here illegally, you must go – period. There was no time frame attached to his original claim – nor is there a statute of limitations in the myriad of immigration laws on the books.

If The Donald does what he originally said he would do, which earned him the nomination and the dedicated following he has, he would, in fact, be adhering to the immigration laws. And he would be the first one since Eisenhower in 1954 to do so. On this, I defended Trump about this time last year.

However, the policy he is beginning to roll out–the kinder-gentler Jeb Bush immigration policy–is not what his followers/supporters signed on to, and, in my opinion, he would not have won the nomination with such a softened policy.

Yet, his supporters say he’s just saying this to get elected. But isn’t that what we hate about politicians – they’ll do and say anything just to get elected? How is this any different – because this time, the people believe him? To me, this is neither consistent nor intellectually honest.

Yet it appears to me that some may have too much invested in Trump to back out now or suffer buyer’s remorse. So instead of questioning their choice, they choose to excuse what he is saying now, in favor of the hard line they heard at the beginning of the campaign.

Therefore, in my opinion, his supporters are projecting onto Trump their own values, choosing only to believe that, if elected, Trump will stand by his original immigration positions – build the wall and deport the illegals.

If we are to take Trump at his word – if we are supposed to “believe him” that he will do what he says – then which Trump are we supposed to believe? Because there is more evidence we should believe the softer Trump of today than the hard-nosed Trump of months ago.

In post election 2012, Trump criticized Mitt Romney’s too-tough stance on illegal immigration, when he said: “He had a crazy policy of self deportation which was maniacal. It sounded as bad as it was, and he lost all of the Latino vote,” Trump notes. “He lost the Asian vote. He lost everybody who is inspired to come into this country.”

The GOP has to develop a comprehensive policy “to take care of this incredible problem that we have with respect to immigration, with respect to people wanting to be wonderful productive citizens of this country,” Trump said. Comprehensive?! Isn’t that another one of those politician-speak danger words?

Sorry, folks, but to me – what he said in 2012 and what he is currently saying sounds more like Jeb Bush and his “they come “out of love” comments.

So, Trump supporters – I want to understand why and how you believe a candidate (any candidate) who has changed his position on a key issue three times in less than four years – because I don’t get it.

Hillary To Use Illegals to Organize the Latino Voters

It is not an unusual thing to see a crook using criminals for their benefit. The criminal is more comfortable around those who have no regard for the law. So, we should not be surprised that this is the first trick Clinton pulls from her bag.

Breitbart reports:

Hillary Clinton’s campaign is launching a new effort to tap into the political power of young, undocumented immigrants, hoping to capitalize on Donald Trump’s promises to make deporting them a top priority of his presidency.

The 730,000 young people brought to the U.S. as children without legal status are prohibited from voting. Known as Dreamers, they’ve proven themselves to be a powerful organizing force in American politics, mounting a high-profile public campaign that pressured President Barack Obama to grant many of them and their parents reprieves from deportation through two executive orders.

Hillary wishes to use this vast group to get registration up among the Latino community. Those who are eligible to vote will be called on to stop Trump. This should be very effective, considering the things Trump has said concerning immigration.

Breitbart continues:

Clinton believes she can harness their power in a more formal way, particularly given her opponent. Trump’s anti-immigrant rhetoric has sparked outrage and fear within the Latino community.

He’s promised to revoke Obama’s executive orders within the first 100 days of his presidency, calling them the “most unconstitutional actions ever undertaken by a president.”

This may be hard for Trump to overcome. This is particularly the case if we consider the latest polls.

Time will tell.

Article reposted with permission from Constitution.com

INSANITY: Sacramento Under Siege By Neo-Nazis?

UPDATE: We apologize. The video is from a neo-Nazi protest. While I certainly don’t stand with neo-Nazis, it was never reported that they caused any violence. The violence came from others in the crowd, which even led to stabbings. The title of the article has been changed to reflect this information.

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-neo-nazi-stabbed-20160626-snap-htmlstory.html

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-neo-nazi-event-stabbings-capitol-20160627-snap-story.html

http://www.sacbee.com/news/local/crime/article86099332.html

http://www.politicususa.com/2016/06/26/trump-supporting-neo-nazis-stab-5-people-protest-sacramento.html

It is no longer safe to sit outside in a public park in Sacramento, the capital of California. Look at these men who are hitting people with what appear to be long wooden sticks or baseball bats. Chaos ensues and people get up off of their blankets to get away from the violence. This is Obama’s “hope and change.”

Bruce Porter, Jr. @NetworksManager

LOOK Sacramento we under siege n our own country ATTACKED by muslims & illegals@WDFx2EU2@georgesoros@LorettaLynch

Article reposted with permission from Constitution.com

Report: Illegal Immigrants Get More Food Stamp Benefits Than Poor American Citizens: “$2 Billion A Year”

There’s a reason Americans are angered over illegal immigration and despite what liberal-leaning socialists like Hillary Clinton and the Huffington Post may suggest, it has absolutely nothing to do with racism.

It’s an economics issue, plain and simple.

And as highlighted by a new report from the Washington Examiner, it’s actually American citizens who are feeling the brunt of the pain and being treated unfairly, not the other way around:

Illegal immigrant households tapping into the federal food stamp program are receiving $1.4 billion to $2.1 billion a year despite their ineligibility, according to a new analysis of the Agriculture Department program.

And rules guiding who can get food stamps favor households with illegal immigrants over all-U.S. citizen homes, according to the detailed report from the Center for Immigration Studies released Monday morning.

David North of cis.org explain how the scam works:

Let’s say that the all-citizen family consisted of three people, employed father, stay-at-home mother, and a small child. Dad makes $2,400 a month. The family’s income is too high for food stamps since the maximum monthly income is $2,177 for a family of three.

Then next door there is a mixed family, also three people, with the father being the only worker, also earning $2,400 a month. The difference is that the father is an ineligible alien and so, under many states’ regulations, one-third of the family’s income is ignored (prorated is the word in SNAP circles), leaving the family with a nominal income of $1,600 a month that allows the family to get a food stamps allotment, but only for the two citizens, not for all three in the family.

There is thus a band of households of three with earnings in the range of $2,177/mo. at the bottom to $2,589/mo. at the top that would be eligible for food stamps but only if the wage earner is a non-eligible alien in the eyes of USDA; all-citizen households in this band would not be eligible for food stamps. (Here’s the math: $2,589 = 150 percent of $1,726, the maximum income allowable for a family of two when there is a 33.3 percent discount on the illegal’s wages).

That $2 billion a year in free food offered to people who shouldn’t be in this country in the first place is only part of it.

An already overburdened American taxpayer is also forced, by way of the gun, to pay for illegal immigrants’ health care, college tuition, and other social services.

But if you argue against illegal immigration or the “free” services they consume you are a racist.

We’d argue you’re a realist, especially if you understand that all of these free services only work until the government runs out of other peoples’ money.

Article reposted with permission from SHTF Plan

Illegals Get to Stay Which Makes ThinkProgress Happy

The ultra-leftist site ThinkProgress is happier today. And why are they happier? Well, once again, liberal open-boarders politics may trump what is right and what is the law.

“A federal appeals court handed down a very brief, two paragraph order on Monday that represents good news for the tens of thousands of immigrants currently subject to a campaign of intimidation from a trial judge,” they write.

Of course they aren’t talking about “immigrants.” They are referring to illegal aliens who were/are allowed to stay in the U.S. under the President’s also illegal “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals” (DACA) decree.

It is interesting and infinitely predictable, the metamorphosis of the term – from illegal alien, to illegal immigrant, to undocumented immigrant, to now just immigrant, making the law breakers completely indistinguishable from those saps who chose to enter legally and play by the rules.

And what has federal Judge Andrew Hanen of the Southern District of Texas done that was so intimidating and egregious? He insisted that Obama Department of Justice lawyers act ethically in his courtroom and not lie to his face. The nerve of some judges.

As you may be aware, 26 states have filed a lawsuit against the feds over the unlawful DACA program. The suit was originally filed in Texas, which is how Judge Hanen became involved. The states claim, and rightly so, that DHS had no right to issue deferments, allowing illegals to stay.

When the DOJ attorneys were in front of Judge Hanen, they lied to his face, claiming that “the president’s immigration amnesty plan that included three-year deferrals was not being implemented — when, in fact, they knew it was being implemented to the tune of over 100,000 aliens.”

Well, the Judge discovered they had lied and generally acted unethically, although I don’t know why he would be surprised. They’ve probably learned from the master – Obama himself. You know – if you like your doctor, yada, yada, yada, ad infinitum.

And Hanen didn’t just call them out. He “listed the specific statements made by DOJ lawyers in court and on conference calls that were outright lies, and then he lists all of the applicable ethics rules that the DOJ lawyers violated.”

The punishment for these intentional deceptions is for DOJ to hand over all documentation of the thousands of illegals who were illegally “deferred” and for every DOJ attorney who has appeared in any court of the 26 plaintiff states to attend mandatory remedial ethics classes, which amounts to hundreds of smarmy DOJ lawyers.

But to the radicals at ThinkProgress, lying to a Judge’s face in court is a “minor issue,” as the Obama Justice Department attempted to explain the lies away by saying that “the lawyers ‘lost focus’ or that the ‘fact[s] receded in memory or awareness.’” If nothing else, you have to be impressed by the sheer Chutzpah of these dirtbags.

Since Hanen’s ruling, the DOJ has twice sought relief in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, but to no avail. Yet this week, ThinkProgress reported with measured optimism that three new judges from the Appeals Court reviewed Hanen’s punishment and issued their “very brief, two paragraph order,” allowing “tens of thousands of immigrants to breath a sigh of relief.”

It seems that two of three judges “have relatively moderate records on immigration.” That’s code for they are pro-illegal alien. One of the judges, Eugene Davis, has even previously stated that the Obama administration has “broad discretion in matters related to immigration.”

But as it turns out, the liberal judges and their “very brief, two paragraph order” may not have been necessary. On June 7th, judge Hanen inexplicably stayed his own orders, both the document requirement and the ethic classes, until August 22nd. The orders will remain in effect unless they are withdrawn by Hanen or struck down by the Fifth Circuit.

I hope the judge doesn’t go wobbly on these rulings, but postponing them is not a good sign. All it does is give additional time for more DOJ shenanigans, which would make ThinkProgress even happier.

Libertarian Weld Compares Trump Deportation of Illegals to Kristallnacht and Anne Frank; Johnson Agrees

According to the Constitution of the united States of America, the legislative powers are invested in Congress – the House of Representatives and the Senate.  One of the enumerated powers of Congress is to establish uniform rules of immigration and naturalization.  So, how can abiding by and enforcing duly legislated, constitutional immigration law be considered similar to Nazi War crimes or the Holocaust?  Former Massachusetts Governor and Libertarian Party candidate for Vice Presidential pick Bill Weld attempts to explain this comparison on CNN.

“I can hear the glass crunching in Kristallnacht in the ghettos of Warsaw and Vienna when I hear [Trump’s plan], honest,” Weld told the New York Times just last week.  Weld is referencing the incident of the “Night of Broken Glass” in 1938 Germany that saw rampant anti-semitism exhibited toward the Jewish populations in Germany, Austria, and Poland.  This is the comparison Weld is making to Donald Trump‘s proposal to deport the illegal alien invaders, who are criminals by virtue of violating federal immigration law.

On Sunday, CNN’s Jake Tapper called out Weld on his comments.  Image the shock when Tapper asked Weld, “Is that a little strong, to talk about the Holocaust?”

Weld responded:

“No, I don’t think so. I served five years on the U.S. Holocaust Commission by appointment of President George W. Bush.  I’m absolutely certain that, as we said in those years, if we don’t remember, we absolutely will forget. And you got to forget a lot of things to think it’s a good idea to round up and deport 11 million people living peaceably, most of them working in America, in the middle of the night.  No, not the United States. China, maybe. Not the United States.”

So, according to Weld, it is not a good idea to hold lawbreakers accountable for their crimes when it involves illegally crossing the United States borders.  As long as these individuals are living peaceably and most are working, these individuals should be allowed to remain in the nation with impunity.  Are other violators of the law going to be given “immunity” from prosecution if they are an American citizen?  What is wrong with holding law violators accountable?

Weld stood by his comments when he stated in an interview on Monday, “It reminds me of Anne Frank hiding in her attic waiting for the Nazi sirens to pass by and evokes the memory — not the memory, I was not alive, but the notion of Kristallnacht.”

Well, Bill, there is a big difference in Anne Frank, Kristallnacht, the Holocaust, and the illegal alien invader issue in the United States.  Anne Frank, as well as other Jews, was a citizen in her own nation targeted for extermination for committing no crime by a government that “conquered” their home nation, but merely being despised by an insane, sadistic German dictator.  The Nazis murdered Jews in cold blood just for existing inside the conquered territory under the iron fist rule of Adolf Hitler.  The immoral, unethical “law” enacted that allowed this to be done was issued by a dictator against legal citizens of the various nations, after stripping their citizenship by decree.

Illegal alien invaders squatting in the United States are not citizens, are not afforded the privileges of citizenship, have violated US immigration law, and should be held accountable according to the law for their crimes.  The immigration law calls for illegal alien invaders to be deported.  End of subject;  end of story.  There is no comparison, Bill.  Moreover, any citizen and/or city, town or municipality who protects illegal alien invader is in violation of the law and should also be held accountable under the law.

According to Breitbart:

The Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson weighed in on Weld’s comments, noting that he would not have referenced the Holocaust, but admitting he did agree with the notion put out by Weld.

“What are we going to do? Are we going to go in these homes and take these people out of their homes? Come on. He made that reference. I don’t make that reference, but it’s crazy. It’s off the charts,” Johnson said in a CNN interview.

Gee Gary, if you don’t make that reference but agree with the insanity spewed by Weld, you might as well go ahead and say it.

As a reminder Gary, law enforcement agencies have been performing “no-knock” raids upon unsuspecting, law-abiding American citizens in the middle of the night in response to issued warrants.  Granted, law enforcement has gotten mixed up and raided the wrong house, thrown an incendiary device into a home injuring a baby when the individual wanted was not even there.   Are we to understand this practice by law enforcement against law-abiding American citizens is tolerable while against lawbreaking criminals, read illegal alien invaders, is not?  Is America to understand that it is acceptable to enforce “some” laws while over-looking others when the laws are constitutional and duly legislated by Congress?

For your information, Mr. Johnson and Mr. Weld, the Constitution is not a Chinese Buffet.  Duly legislated constitutional laws are to be obeyed and upheld, meaning it is the job of the President of the United States to ensure the laws are faithfully executed.  In case you haven’t noticed, America is in the shape she is in because of executive and legislative branches cherry picking the Constitution, refusing to enforce constitutional laws, usurping power and forcing unconstitutional decrees and legislation down the throats of Americans and the States.   Citizens need to reject any candidate who speaks of continuing any decree, action or agenda championed by the largest fraud and usurper to ever hold the office of president – Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Soebarkah.

“Are we going to go in these homes and take these people out of their homes,” you asked.  If needs be, yes, Mr. Johnson.  These individuals are here illegally.  They have broken the law and should be held accountable regardless of the reason they broke the law.  Are you willing to turn a blind eye to the woman who steals food from the grocery store because she is broke and her children are crying from being hungry?  Are you willing to overlook an executive who embezzles from his employer because his wife lost her job and his salary is not enough to cover their bills?  Are you willing to pardon an individual who does not pay their taxes because they follow in the footsteps of many in Congress who do not pay taxes with impunity?  What about a practitioner of Islam who engages in rape and pedophilia because it is a part of Islamic practice?  Does that one get a pass on the law?

You see, Mr. Johnson and Mr. Weld, the very first time one group or groups of individuals receive a “pass” on the law while others are not, the law is then being applied unequally.  Our nation ceases to be a nation where “all men are created equal” and one where bias, prejudice and favoritism indicative of monarchical and dictatorial regimes encroach upon the rights of all citizens.  Allowing illegal alien invaders impunity and amnesty from prosecution and legal action disparages citizens who abide by the law and who would be held accountable for breaking any law – local, State or federal.

There is a reason Justice wears a blindfold and holds a scale, Mr. Johnson and Mr. Weld.  It is so all individuals regardless of status have the law equally applied.  Break the law and one is held accountable based on the law with applicable punishment befitting the crime should one be found guilty.  Illegal alien invaders are no different and are to be held accountable to immigration law when violating it.  Deportation is the punishment befitting the crime of entering our nation illegally.   The federal government should not get a pass on ignoring the law because it failed in its duty to enforce immigration law, letting the numbers of illegal aliens rise to the point it has and now, operate as if this nation has no border when our southern neighbor strictly enforces the border it shares with us.

One doubts you have any chance whatsoever of even being on any ballot.  However, if you were, Americans do not need another individual occupying the White House that looks at law as a “whim.”  Quit trying to garner headlines with inane remarks.  If comments and opinions could gain man the ability to traverse the skies, both of you would be considered “space cadets.

His Dictatorness Giving $2 Million for Summer Program to Help Refugee Students Find Jobs

Our Dictator-in-Chief can’t get enough of slapping American citizens in the face.  If it’s not issuing dictatorial commands for public schools to allow boys to use girls facilities and girls to use boys facilities, it’s declaring immigration laws null and void and making declarations on Obama[no]care.  Bringing in hundreds of thousands of refugees (read illegal alien invaders) is not enough of a slap to citizens and citizens who immigrated and naturalized legally.  Now, Hussein Soetoro has established a new program to help hundreds of “refugee” students to find summer jobs and beyond.

As Breitbart News reports, the weight of the federal government is being used by the usurper in the White House to provide a program to help hundreds of “refugee” students find summer jobs to the tune of $2 million called the Summer Opportunity Project.  According to His Dictatorness, “Access to a job in the summer and beyond can make all the difference to a young person – especially those who don’t have access to many resources and opportunities.”  In total, the program provides $21 million in tax dollars to select cities and communities to help American youth find work for the summer.  However, two million of those funds are being slotted to Utica, New York, for 400 students of its “refugee” community to receive summer work experience and part-time jobs the remainder of the year.  Additionally, these students will receive tutoring in Math and English as part of the “New Americans Career Pathways Project.”

First of all, these are illegal alien invaders imported to the united States by Hussein Soetoro, not “new Americans.”   Secondly, the Constitution does not provide any authority to spend any  funds whatsoever for  any type of youth or illegal alien invader assistance of any kind.  Thirdly, there are 400 or more disadvantaged American youth that could be helped with these funds instead of handing it out to illegal alien invaders, if it were constitutional to do so.  Thirdly, these are tax dollars paid by working American citizens and should be under the apportionment of the House, not Hussein Soetoro.

According to Breitbart, this is not the first time Hussein Soetoro has taken it upon himself to do an endeavor such as this.

In 2012, the President’s jobs program helped illegals compete with Americans for scare job opportunities.

Further, by 2014 it was discovered that Obamacare offered U.S. firms a $3,000 incentive to hire illegals over Americans.

Last year, it was discovered that Obama was bringing refugees into every state in the country but refusing to tell state governors where he was placing them all.

Meanwhile, a recent report found that many of these refugees Obama is bringing into the country are racked with diseases, especially tuberculosis.

Obama is not working alone on the refugee program. The United Nations is actually the chief agency helping him bring these refugees into the U.S. under the auspices of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.

Is it any wonder that American citizens are a bit frustrated, angry, and enraged?  Tax dollars collected from American taxpayers are being used frivolously, unconstitutionally and singularly by this usurper traitor in the White House aided and abetted by every single member of the House of Representatives, who constitutionally control the purse.  At a time when jobs are limited, more Americans are out of work than in any other time in history barring the Great Depression, and importation of illegal aliens are perpetrated by our own federal government against the citizenry, this Piece of Slime man occupying the Oval Office doles out taxpayer money from the federal coffers like money grows on trees.

Don’t like it?  Well, it’s because you are a racist, bigoted, xenophobic, Islamophobic, misogynistic, anti-Obama, gun-loving, Bible-toting, Christian, conservative, Trump-loving, wall building, climate change denying isolationist.  That will be the mantra of the multicultural, open border, atheist, pro-Obama, gun-hating, Bible reviling, anti-Christian, liberal, Trump-hating, communist, socialist, climate change advocate liberal when opposition to this pet project of His Dictatorness springs forth.

His Dictatorness joined forces with the anti-American United Nations to bring in these illegal alien invaders that American taxpayers will now be charged with footing the bill for any of his stupid ideas to increase the deficit further – a $20 trillion snafu that this nation nor its people will ever be able to wipe off their backs.  There is no need to ask where Congress is at this point.  They have been “out to lunch” getting their collective frontal lobotomies for the last seven and one-half years.  Each and every one in both chambers know this usurper has joined with the anti-American United Nations.  Yet, not one single individual has lifted one finger with an ingrown nail to do one darned thing against this slug in an Armani suit.

There is nothing wrong with charity or charitable works.  However, the Constitution does not provide for it to be done by government.  Charity and charitable works are to be done by individuals, groups and corporations.  Where are the corporations and business, along with the Chambers of Commerce, in providing a summer work program to the youth of America?  More than likely, the CEOs and stockholders of big corporations are sucking on their proverbial profits content to let the government and His Dictatorness spend taxpayer money.

By now, American citizens should have had enough of this folly.  Our founders certainly would have.   So, what’s wrong with us?

Already Under Crushing Debt, Arizona College Forces Students to “Fund Illegal Immigrants”

Will students at colleges across the country soon be forced to pay for the higher education of illegal immigrants, even as most will already have to struggle for years to repay expensive and burdensome student loans?

That’s what is happening at Prescott College, a private institution in Arizona, and it could become the trend everywhere.

Unbelievably, as good jobs become more and more scarce, the next generation will be forced to support foreign workers who will also serve as competitors in the market place.

via Campus Reform:

 Prescott College in Arizona has decided to charge students a $30 annual fee to finance a scholarship fund for illegal immigrant students.

The fee was originally proposed by students and faculty from the Social Justice and Human Rights program, according to Fox News, and will automatically be added to each student’s $28,000 tuition bill starting next semester unless they take advantage of an opt-out provision.

[…]

Prescott College is a private institution, and does not receive either state or federal funding, but some experts warn that the school may yet face pushback over the new fee and scholarship, even as it seeks to bolster the fund through private donations.

College campuses have become sanctuary grounds for many undocumented immigrants seeking a better life, and liberal academics and students have often been willing to back their interests.

But for the average student legally born in this country and attempting to build a better life, it is a slap in the face from both sides – as mandatory contributions for scholarships to illegals pile onto the extreme levels of debt that education imposes, all while the competition for decent employment becomes stiffer.

“It is beyond absurd that this college is going to force all the students to subsidize the education of a student who is in the country illegally,” added Jessica Vaughn, director of policy studies for the Center for Immigration Studies. “It’s a shame these students and faculty don’t have the same drive to help some of their fellow citizens who can’t afford college and who are forced to compete with illegal workers for job opportunities.”

“At a time when student loan debt is over $1 trillion it is irresponsible for Prescott College to offer this privilege at the expense of other students,” Andrew Kloster, a legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation’s Center for Legal & Judicial Studies, told Fox News. “While the dollar amount seems small per student, the fee does send a message to potential donors to Prescott College that the administration is less concerned with sound financial management than it is with making a political statement.”

Like President Obama, these colleges have put a premium on a protected minority group at the expense of ordinary Americans who have seen their living standards decline significantly with economic decline and globalization.

At what point does the plight of the American aspirant become as a important as a “special” group that has been favored by politically motivated interests on campus, and what does that mean for the quality of “education” at such an institution?

Article reposted with permission from SHTF Plan

The Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1965 Set Us Up For What We Are Witnessing Today

While our government is working to grant amnesty to tens of millions of illegal immigrants, we have to come to accept that the precedent for this was already set as far back as 1965. What many people don’t realize is that immigration laws were dramatically changed in this period by Democrat President Lyndon B. Johnson. In fact, it might be safe to say that a little understood piece of legislation known as the Immigration Act of 1965, later paved the way for the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, which was signed into law by conservative icon Ronald Reagan. This law gave legal status to nearly four million illegal immigrants, and it was signed by one of the most conservative presidents we have ever had. Reagan, according to Charlotte Iserbyt, is also responsible for signing agreements with the Soviet Union concerning education and the merging of the two nations. This is discussed in further detail in my article entitled Deliberately Dumbing Us Down to Affect Social Change

All we hear today is the need for diversity and multiculturalism. We are constantly being bombarded with accusations of racism and intolerance for cultures that are different than ours. As the struggle for human rights and equality raged in the 1960s, it seems that the same ideas of non-discrimination were being applied universally, especially when it came to immigration. Lyndon B. Johnson reformed the nation’s immigration laws to make it a universal “human right” to immigrate to the United States. This is highlighted in a paper entitled The Path to National Suicide. President Johnson claimed that America was not living up to its ideals of liberty and equality by keeping people from certain parts of the world from being able to immigrate here. This is the same argument we hear from the left today concerning the refugees from Syria.

You see, up until 1965, our immigration laws were based on a quota system. What this means is that immigration from certain parts of the world was limited to a number that was equal to the proportion of that population already living in the U.S. This was done for obvious reasons: to protect the cultural integrity of our nation. Today, seeking to preserve American culture is defined as racist and intolerant.   Never mind the fact that we were taking refugees from communist nations around the world that far exceeded any quota. The Asians are a prime example: only 100 per year were allowed from Asian countries; however, we took hundreds of thousands of people seeking refuge from oppressive communist regimes. It was also argued at the time that the law would not have a dramatic effect on millions of people in the U.S. and it would not change the demographic outlook of the nation. It was proposed that only immigrants with families already residing in the U.S. would be the beneficiaries of this law.  The reality of this law, however, has had dire consequences. Since its passage, there has been three times the number of immigrants admitted into the nation as the previous thirty years. This does not include the millions of undocumented, illegal immigrants.

As the quota system was eliminated and immigration was opened up to all corners of the world, many people with little education, employable skill, or desire to assimilate to U.S. laws and culture came into the country. I am not saying that all people who have immigrated here have not contributed to society. I happen to believe anyone of any race or ethnicity can succeed in this nation; however, that doesn’t change the fact that we are being overrun by people with no respect for our laws and values while demanding we bend over backwards in acceptance of their culture.

The point of this article was not to suggest “ who or who not” should be allowed to immigrate to the U.S.; rather, the point is to demonstrate that the issue of amnesty and immigration in general entails a great deal more than many people realize.

If you knew what Lyndon Johnson had done before this, you would have to think that this was part of a longer term strategy to secure the votes of minorities for the Democrat party. Many people know that President Johnson, a Democrat, signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964. What they don’t understand is that he voted against it when introduced in 1957 by Republican President Dwight Eisenhower. Lyndon Johnson, at the time, was the senate majority leader and was able to ensure that the senate would vote down Eisenhower’s bill. Given the fact that Blacks and Mexicans have voted primarily Democrat for the past four decades, and the Mexicans are a huge focus for Democrat campaigns, you have to admit that it does seem possible that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Immigration Act of 1965 actually worked hand in hand in securing a permanent voter base for the Democrat Party. As President Obama pushes towards what we fear is an inevitable granting of amnesty to people who are not interested in sharing our ideals, we have to ask ourselves, based on this information, if it wasn’t all part of the plan. If not, it sure turned out to be a beneficial coincidence for the Democrat Party.

Article reposted with permission from Propaganda News

Obama to Illegals – Round Them Up – Send Them Home

The Obama administration actually wants us to believe that the “Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has begun preparing for a series of raids that would target for deportation hundreds of families who have flocked to the United States since the start of last year, according to people familiar with the operation.”

Really – a series of raids? May I take you back to November of 1999? A five year old Cuban boy was found adrift on an inner tube off the coast of Ft. Lauderdale, Florida. He and 12 others had escaped the communist oppression of Cuba to come to America to live with relatives. Everyone but the young lad was killed on the journey, including his mother. His father was left behind.

His name, as some may recall, was (is) Elian Gonzalez. To make a long story short, the commie father wanted his son back. Florida ruled that the relatives should be able to keep him in Miami, but the U.N. and the Clinton administration didn’t agree. The feds asserted their jack-booted authority over the State and on April 22, 2000, in a pre-dawn raid, U.S. federal agents, under the authority of Clinton and Attorney General Janet Reno, stormed the uncle’s house in Miami, guns a-blazing, and forcibly seized Elian Gonzalez from the home.

Witnesses say it was utterly terrifying, as agents pointed their weapons at everyone, including the five year old. It was a media frenzy and the lead story literally everywhere. And this was just one incident—over one kid the Clinton administration did not want to be here. But we are expecting to believe that Obama will dare utilize similar tactics to round up hundreds of families, including little children – which he invited? Fat chance of that!

“Experts say that the violence that was a key factor in driving people to flee Central America last year has surged again, with the homicide rate in El Salvador reaching its highest level in a generation.” So we are also expected to believe that Obama is okay with sending these families back to meet their violent end? I mean – it’s not like these people are conservatives!

If it really is as these “experts” claim, why travel all the way to the United States? Why not go to Belize, where there is no fighting? Why not just get to Mexico, or travel to South America? After all, it is closer and has a similar climate. These are rhetorical questions, of course. The answer is that Obama has put out the welcome mat for them. Recall that his administration informed Central American authorities years ago of his plan to bring in all comers.

And, like the so called “refugees” streaming into Europe, the Central American and Mexican illegal aliens are not just traveling to a country who will welcome them, but also to the promise of easy money – the nation with the greatest welfare benefits. That’s why the Syrian “refugees” are all trying to get to Germany – for the greatest government giveaways.

Still, some appear to be stupid enough to think this will happen for real – that it won’t all be for show. That, or they’ve been told by the Obamites to feign outrage. One such moron (or actor) is Gregory Chen, director of advocacy for the American Immigration Lawyers Association.  He said: “It would be an outrage if the administration subjected Central American families to even more aggressive enforcement tactics.” Even more? Did we miss something?

But not everyone is buying the nonsense. “I’ll believe it when I see it,” said Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies. “If you have photogenic raids on a few dozen illegal families and that’s the end of it, it’s just for show. It’s just a [public relations] thing, enforcement theater.”

Krikorian is correct in his assessment. It will be nothing but theater, if it happens at all.

It wouldn’t surprise me to find out that Obama has already spoken to some federal judge, telling him or her to put a stay on his planned deportation action, so that he may then go to the press and say – “Hey, I tried, but I’m not the king – I’m just the president.” 

Lock Up Your Dogs and Hide Your Preteen Daughters, The Muslim Refugees Are Coming

With hundreds of thousands of so-called Syrian refugees on their way to the US, complements of the Obama Administration, we must realize what this means in terms of American society. Many of these people are not from Syria at all, but from various countries in the Mid-East. Most countries in that part of the world will not take any of them because they fear that ISIS and other terrorist factions are embedded among them. This is an easy assumption, since most of these people are military age men, with very few women and children among them.

What all of them are is Muslim, and they will be bringing their bent and perverted belief system here to the US with them, which means we should prepare ourselves for it.

Basically, we should know that these people will be expecting to live here in the US and continue the traditions they have been used to adhering to where they came from. This will include the ideal of sex and marriage of preteen girls by older men. Thus, our American ideas of pedophilia will have to change, or we will have an already over-populated prison system have to take in many more criminals than they can handle. What this boils down to is that there will be hundreds of thousands of Islamic men in this country who believe it is their right to have sex with and marry preteen girls—and this on top of the belief that each man can have multiple wives.

We will also have to lock up all of our dogs to keep them safe because most of these new Muslim residents will be out to kill as many of them as they can. The dog genocide can already be seen in various parts of Europe where these same refugees have settled.

The US will also begin to experience beheadings as the new choice of crime, since this is a common practice for Islamists.

What most Americans do not realize is that most of these refugees will initially be housed on various military bases where there are already thousands of illegal immigrants from Mexico and Central America still living on the premises. 

Of course, the Federal government will try to accommodate them as much as possible by discouraging the sales of pork at supermarkets and restaurants, while requiring the sale of Halal meat. This is along with the discouragement of alcohol and coffee advertisements and sales because it may offend them.

We will soon see many Christian churches and related religious organizations vandalized and burned, and parishioners attacked because they represent a false belief system and all followers are infidels.

This is what we have to look forward to in the next few months under the Administration’s plan to inundate the US with perhaps a million or more Muslims.   

Four American Presidents Conducted Deportations

Trump is a blowhard. Let’s just admit it. He’s a loud mouth. But that doesn’t mean one can’t still be a Trump supporter. Frankly, if he’s right on the issues, who cares if he’s a blowhard.

Well, he’s not right on all issues. So why is he still so popular? Why does he remain at the top of the heap, despite bashing everyone but his mother? It’s uncivilized, they say.  Yet none of that appears to matter, due to two little words: Illegal Immigration. That’s it.

Although I’m not a Trumpster, I was glad someone finally brought up president Eisenhower and “Operation Wetback,” during the last debate. We “republicans” are supposed to be up on the issues, but I’ll wager 90% in the audience or viewing on TV didn’t know about Eisenhower’s very successful deportation program.

Well, Bill O’Reilly, on behalf of his “folks,” did not take too kindly to Trump invoking the name of Ike. Business Insider writes that the “Eisenhower program has a dark history – including its name, ‘Operation Wetback,’ a derogatory slur.” Of course, they neglect to mention that, in 1950’s parlance, the term “wetback” was more factual than merely derogatory. They also did not care a wit about politically correct speech.

And, according to CNN, “the 1950s-era transfer process resulted in a number of Mexican migrants dying along the way.” They are attempting to make us believe this deportation was the Mexican Trail-of-Tears?

During Tuesday’s Fox Business Network Debate, Trump declared that the Eisenhower program “moved a million and a half illegal immigrants out of this country.”

“That was brutal what they did to those people to kick them back to [Mexico]. The stuff they did was really brutal. It could never happen today,” O’Reilly said to Trump. Bill added that, even if you wanted to, you couldn’t –that “the federal courts would stop you. And they would say each person that President Trump wants to deport has to have due process. So in the year 2050, you would finally get around to it.”

“Bill, they’re here illegally,” Trump insisted.

“Doesn’t matter. The Supreme Court would absolutely rule they all have to have due process because they’re on American soil. You know that,” O’Reilly said.

Okay, first, let’s get to the truth about the actual history of deportation in America.

Four American presidents conducted deportations in our history – Herbert Hoover, Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman, and Dwight Eisenhower. Yes, one of the left’s holy men, FDR, continued Hoover’s deportation program for a period. Why that would be shocking is beyond me, considering his treatment of the Japanese, Germans, and Italians during World War II.

Beginning in 1931, under the auspices of trying to preserve jobs for American citizens during the Depression, the government began a series of “repatriation” programs. They called it repatriation because it was being done at the local level and by local authorities, and it was determined that only the feds could “deport.” Both the Hoover and Roosevelt administrations were perfectly content to let the local authorities do the heavy lifting of deportation.

What does that mean? Well, it means that, to a progressive, the law is relevant only to their desired position. Hoover and Roosevelt’s position was that, due to their bad policies, there weren’t nearly enough jobs for Americans, so to heck with what the law concerning immigration and deportation was – if it were easier to allow local authorities to round up the Mexicans, well, that was good enough. It didn’t matter what the “law” actually said. Hoover’s goal was to have local authorities “repatriate” 500,000 foreigners.

Harry Truman was much more successful. In 1950, he wrote: “These people are coming to our country in phenomenal numbers – and at an increasing rate. Everyone suffers from the presence of these illegal immigrants in the community.” His reasoning was a lack of post-war jobs.

Under Truman, approximately 3.3 million Illegals were deported. Yet, looking closer at the numbers, you’ll find that only about 130,000 were removed by the government, and the other 3.2 million self-deported. Yes, when the illegals figured out old Harry “The Buck Stops Here” Truman was serious, they packed up and left on their own. His “deportation force” only had to deport about 4% of all who left. See how this works?

And it worked again under Eisenhower.

In all, from when Hoover began in 1931 to the end of Ike’s term in 1959, about 5-1/2 million Illegal aliens left this country, but fewer than 500,000 (or less than 10%) had to be “rounded up” and removed.

When people understand that a president is serious about deportation, the Illegals, as they’ve always done in the past, will once again respond in kind.

And as far as the “court battles,” a President Trump will just declare that deportations are a matter of national security and trump the courts. Pardon the pun.

Legal Immigration Is an Honor Denied

Millions and millions of legal aliens past and present must feel pretty betrayed and foolish that they have followed the law, spent endless hours filling out paperwork, paid expensive fees, waited and waited, traveled to immigration offices sometimes in faraway places at great cost to them, subjected themselves to interrogations, fingerprinting, medical tests to prove that they were healthy, undergoing financial cross-examination to make sure they would not become a burden to American society, in order to legally immigrate to the United States as resident aliens.

They want a chance at the American dream. But this American dream has been destroyed by the lawlessness that permits illegal aliens to break our laws and demand citizenship and rights that previously were reserved for law-abiding people either born in this country or naturalized, people who wanted to make America better through their contributions once they were given the opportunity to live in a formerly free country.

Now we reward law breakers, no questions asked, with every possible financial incentives an American citizen has and they are not satisfied. They demand American citizenship, free health care, birth certificates even though most were not born in this country, and they demand their own Bill of Rights. This document was just released by United We Stay, a group comprised of illegal aliens, first generation Americans, and liberal human rights activists. In addition to their 10-point demands, they object to the term “illegal” and “alien” because they are “dehumanizing.”

At the same time, illegal alien groups had no hesitation releasing a vile video with very young children using profane language and gestures that cannot be played on screen without blocking the profanity, a message addressed to presidential candidate Donald Trump and to any law-abiding American who supports him. A majority of Americans reject criminality and such behavior unbecoming of adults but especially young children.

If this group was looking for sympathy and acceptance from Americans, this ill-conceived video certainly back-fired. Americans were outraged and disgusted that young children could be used in such a repulsive way by their own parents and other adults.

We are not racists or bigoted because we like the rule of law. You disrespected our country and broke our laws when you decided to sneak across the southern border without proper papers and authorizations.

Americans don’t want to raise their children around your children if these are the values, the vile language, and despicable behaviors that you teach your young children – no respect for the rule of law, for authority, and for the potentially future president of the United States. This video shows in glaring detail your mal-educated youth in action.

We don’t care that you “work hard” and that you do jobs that “Americans won’t do.” Americans and legal immigrants work hard too and pay heavy taxes so that you can have your anchor babies in the United States at taxpayer expense and free emergency healthcare in any hospital in the U.S. Anchor baby is not an offensive term, it is how you anchor yourselves by blood lines to eventual legal residence in the U.S.

Americans in whose faces you spit, whose flags you burn, whom you mock with obscene gestures and call lewd names are paying for your EBT cards, your WIC benefits, your child’s Medicaid, your housing, your food, your unearned income tax credits, your children’s free education, your ESL lessons, school lunch meals for your kids, housing, furniture, and other benefits that poor Americans may or may not receive. You demand your “entitlements” you did not pay a dime into simply because you are human beings. It is not our obligation to take care of you, we must first take care of our elderly and needy citizens.

After the publication of this video and the recent wave of crimes committed by illegal aliens, more Americans realize that presidential candidate Donald Trump, heavily vilified by the main stream media and by progressive groups, was right. A certain segment of the illegal immigrant population are criminals, rapists, and bring in drugs as mules when they don’t have the fee to pay the coyote to guide them across the border illegally in the dead of night.

Unlike illegal aliens already in the U.S., flaunting, demonstrating, and financially benefiting from their illegal status, over four million legal immigrants are quietly awaiting the dispensation of their immigration status application, following the law and waiting patiently in their countries, unable nor willing to jump the border, with no desire to transform America into the third world socialist dictatorship they hope to escape.

Should illegal aliens not get to the back of the line?

Illegal Aliens Attend Elite Universities

U.S. News & World Report’s has released their annual college acceptance list. It has ranked some 1257 colleges and universities with their average acceptance rates ranging from 100% acceptance all the way down to 5%.

Obviously, 100% acceptance means that if you apply, you’re getting in. I assume all you have to do is pay and you’re in. These include the Academy of Art University in San Francisco, City University of Seattle and College of Staten Island, and many others.

On the flip side, some of the more elite colleges and universities make it darn near impossible to be accepted.

One would assume (and be right) that Ivy League Universities would be the pickiest, yet, there are others on the top 10 most difficult list, such as the Naval Academy, College of the Ozarks (which accepts only 8.3% of applicants), and Alice Lloyd College in Kentucky. The rest are pretty much who you would expect–Harvard, Yale, Brown, Princeton, and Columbia. However, the most difficult is University is Stanford, which is considered the Harvard of the West and accepts only 5.1% of all who apply.

One must, therefore, assume that the applicants who are accepted must be exceptional. They must have something that the other 95% don’t. You would also assume that those who do apply consider themselves exceptional and, therefore, if they are denied, the blow would be quite upsetting—even crushing, to some.

I wonder just how those denied applicants would feel if they knew their coveted slot was taken by an illegal immigrant. Stanford, like these other elite universities, has a very limited number of slots to fill each school year, so “When an undocumented student is allowed into a college, ‘there is another kid who wasn’t admitted because we admitted the illegal alien,’ says Ira Mehlman, spokesman of the Federation for American Immigration Reform.”

To add insult to injury, the illegal immigrant not only takes the coveted slot from a citizen, but also is awarded financial aid, grant, and scholarship money. Stanford attempts to keep this on the downlow by not officially publicizing its acceptance of illegal immigrants. Harvard, Yale, and Columbia have the same hush-hush policy. I wonder why that is? Could it be that they don’t want to upset those exceptional applicants who are citizens and have been passed over in favor of illegals? You bet your a** that’s the reason.

Karen Cooper, director of [Stanford] financial aid, emphasized that there are no restrictions on using University funds to meet the financial need of applicants – including those who are undocumented.”

She added that, “We do provide support to the undocumented students, and we hope that they could have as normal and integrated a student experience as all of our students.” Well, isn’t that nice. I’m sure the exceptional student who has worked his or her whole life to attend Stanford feels so much better that the illegal immigrant who stole their spot will have a “normal and integrated student experience” at his or her expense.

But things are not as rosy for the “undocumented” student as one would think. Things like internships or counseling resources, available to citizens, may be limited for the “undocumented.”

One illegal immigrant, Fermin Mendoza, attending Stanford, said, “When you’re an undocumented person at Stanford, when you’re an undocumented person at any institution, you can’t do all those things.” 

I guess we’re supposed to feel bad for this student. Well, I’m sorry, but I don’t. They or their families have come here illegally—have been afforded virtually every benefit of citizenship—have been accepted into one of the world’s elite universities—and have done so at the expense of some otherwise exceptional citizen, who may now not be able to live out his or her dream of attending their chosen college. All because someone or some family broke the law and sneaked into our country.

We’re supposed to feel bad for an illegal immigrant who gets to attend Stanford or Harvard or Yale or Princeton, probably on a full scholarship, and instead of thanking God every day for his good fortune, he complains that he may not be able to take advantage of all the services offered to those who actually deserve those benefits.

That’s gratitude for ya!

Engineered Migration and Demographic Suicide

As the engineered tide of illegal immigrants is flooding Europe and North America, small countries are overwhelmed and have made inefficient and weak attempts to stem this deluge and to close the Schengen zone borders.

Griff Witte wrote on November 3, 2015, on the front page of the Washington Post, “As migrant tide reaches a new high, pressure builds for Europe to seal its borders.” As they are “tempted to close the doors” of the “cherished continent open borders for good,” the big white elephant in the room questions are, why would westerners destroy their nations on purpose by allowing in jihadists disguised as “refugees,” and, why is it necessary to bring in unskilled and often illiterate labor from third world nations?

As Michael Savage wrote so aptly in his recent book, with Government Zero you have “zero borders, zero language, and zero culture,” you have a nation in shambles.

I wrote about western demographic suicide long time ago in my book, Liberty on Life Support, but it bears repeating that a senescent Europe is not having enough babies to replace its dying population.

Author George Weigel described how Europe is committing “demographic suicide” by failing to “create the human future in the most elemental sense, by creating a next generation.”

Most western European nations produce less than the necessary replacement value of 2.1 children per family for many reasons: birth control, abortion, unproductive and unemployed young people who live longer in their parents’ homes, pursuing careers, exploring and following immoral and perverted lifestyles, making selfish choices, and occupations that do not require a large family to support the farm. The solution has been to import immigrants to fill the demographic and no-skill employment needs.

The historian Neagu Djuvara found fault with the lack of ideals, morality and blatant debauchery among civilized society, especially young people. Europeans and Americans alike lack ambitions, he said, and have stopped having children. The West has thus created a vacuum which third world counties are more than happy to fill with their fertility rate of 8.1 children per family.

Legal and illegal immigration has been facilitated by generous welfare programs in nations like Sweden, Finland, Norway, U.K., France, Belgium, and Denmark. Ghettoes were formed, countries within a country, where immigrants rejected integration, producing sub-cultures that clashed with western civilization in every way.

Refusing to learn the language, the immigrants promised the destruction of the very country they occupied. As they received welfare and free housing, they vowed to remake Europe into a new world order Caliphate.

Bruce Bawer aptly named his book, “While Europe Slept,” describing the Muslim takeover of many European countries as inevitable and enabled by appeasement, self-censorship disguised as political correctness and hate speech, apologies, and across the board accusations of “Islamophobia.”

The “guest workers,” “refugees,” “asylum seekers,” or “family reunification” claimants deliberately destroyed their papers in route to the country of destination, knowing that they would evade detection if they were terrorists. They came from very poor, remote villages, and were highly hostile to Western values and history, and are not likely to accept them.

They are very dishonest, corrupt, and adept at taking advantage of the generous welfare system: unemployment, public assistance, relief payments, child payments, disability, cash support, and rent allowance. Welfare is based on the honor system in some Nordic countries, but Islamic law gives them advice to abuse the infidels’ system, “to cheat and lie to the countries that harbor them.” The monetary benefits are considered “jizya,” a tribute that infidels in Muslim-controlled countries must pay in order to stay alive.

In line with this administration’s plans, young “refugees” are being settled around the country in small and conservative communities who have no idea how to deal with them, where they came from, and who they are. These young men of military age who hate western civilization and our way of life, are supposed to fill the vacuum and replace childless Americans.

People in the U.S. have various opinions why Americans are not having enough babies and why men and women in the civilized world are afraid of marriage and commitment. Dr. Savage dedicated part of one show to this very question.

The opinion of middle-aged men and women are varied:

  • Culture has changed, one no longer needs kids to care for their parents in old age, and women work on careers full-time, leaving less time and resources for raising children
  • People are more selfish and are looking for that perfect wife from Hollywood, genetically perfect, plastically beautiful, smart, famous, and petite
  • Because men don’t commit to marriage, young women are pushing around strollers with dogs and cats
  • Young people play the field, can have sex every day with a different person, pornography is available everywhere, or they already live together without commitment
  • Birth control and abortions are readily available and cheap when compared to raising a child
  • Public schools and environmentalism have brainwashed students that there are already too many humans on the planet and are negatively affecting the health of Mother Earth
  • Out of wedlock kids are raised by welfare government-daddy
  • Morals have decayed and families have broken down by high rates of divorce and by government laws redefining marriage
  • The young have been raised to become the selfish “me and only me” generation
  • Economics dictated that children were an asset in agrarian societies but they are a liability in an industrial society; they live longer and without shame with their parents because they are looking for the perfect dream job
  • Young generation have such high and entitled opinion of themselves, they want high salaries right away, no effort involved, they are a gift to the world, and become depressed when reality hits
  • Helicopters parents have raised them with a false sense of self, they were told they were special and received trophies for participation, with no understanding of failing and starting over
  • If you did not marry someone in the village, you were a failure and had no one to care for you in old age; now you have mobility and accepted immorality, divorce is no longer shameful or a sin; you can tap into the whole world with the Internet, you bring a person from the other side of the world to marry; you are never satisfied and ads confuse you constantly thus exacerbating your narcissism
  • Television and Hollywood created a false sense of yourself, you are waiting for Mr. or Mrs. Perfect because you have plenty of time and there is always something better out there; you want to be in the one percenters without effort or education, just overnight success
  • Ads projected the white father as the bumbling idiot and Hollywood portrays stupid parents who have to defray to the wisdom of their children, of their little brats who know better than they do
  • Women’s liberation and women working outside of home have destroyed the family unit, there is no more social pressure to get married while men are looking for “bad girls” because that is how the media portrays the beautiful and the desirable

The opinion of young males and females:

  • Women’s liberation is to blame – once women decided to educate themselves, men felt less of an obligation to get married and take care of them
  • Millennials put off being adults because their parents coddle them and allow them to live in their homes indefinitely
  • People live longer thus they can delay maturity and marriage
  • Women and men with morals and religious beliefs are hard to find
  • If women show themselves more independent, men feel less obligated to provide
  • Children are more expensive and the economy is bad
  • Women are sexual objects and men do not respect them
  • The Internet facilitates pornography – men don’t feel the need to be monogamous
  • Definition of marriage has changed, marriage is no longer a religious covenant, it is a social contract and the law says you can now marry anyone and eventually anything
  • Divorce, alimony, and child support are expensive
  • Forced marriages don’t exist anymore because having kids out of wedlock is no longer shameful or scorned by society or by religion
  • Cheating is so prevalent that both men and women want to make sure they marry the right person in order to avoid an expensive and painful divorce
  • For Europeans, housing is so expensive, many potential couples cannot afford married housing or the wait list is so long that they delay marriage and live with their parents

Michael Savage asked pointedly why young men are terrified of the responsibility to have children, why would they allow family lines to die out with them, why commit cultural suicide while taking care of millions of illegal aliens’ children via tax-driven welfare. It is certainly difficult to find moral values in a bar, in a predominantly drinking and partying culture.

Men are afraid of commitment and cite economics as an important reason. But, was it ever inexpensive or easy to have children? “People had babies during the Black Plague and even in concentration camps during the Nazi regime,” Savage said. Non-western cultures have no problem having lots of babies.

Is the culprit the “chickification” of men driven by the feminist “man-hating movement” that ridicules and infantilizes men, especially white males, and the lack of teaching manhood and responsibility? Is it rap music that glorifies violence against women and utter disrespect for life?

Is it the “hardening of women,” the tough females, who intimidate, scare, and drive off many men? Is it the government daddy that created generations of irresponsible young men who reproduce and abandon their offspring and the responsibility to raise and teach the child they created?

While young men and women keep searching for the perfect mate that does not exist, how is it, asked Savage that arranged marriages work well in other cultures that have no problem with fertility? Why do some women lie to have control of their exes, holding their children hostage to this manipulation?

Will the massive engineered migration from third world countries, the demographic suicide of the west, the overall degradation of western society, and the mental disorder of liberalism eventually doom western civilization?

Democrats Introduce Bill to Provide Obamacare to Illegal Immigrants

Ugh. Democrats in Congress are pushing hard to pass a bill that would give Obamacare healthcare coverage to illegal immigrants. Yep, they want to force Americans to pay for healthcare coverage for people who break into our country illegally. As if we weren’t already providing enough incentive for illegals to sneak in, offering free healthcare would simply instigate a whole new flood of immigration from all over Latin America.

Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-IL) introduced the bill to Congress in the hopes of changing current law, which explicitly forbids illegals from being insured through Obamacare. (Though it does not forbid them from being insured – just from receiving benefits under Obamacare.) Gutierrez hopes to changed that:

“It gives them access to the healthcare exchanges in Obamacare under the ordinary rules of residency in the states in which they live and makes them eligible for subsidies if and when they file taxes — just like the rest of us,” Gutierrez said when introducing his bill in Congress.

Thankfully, the fact that Republicans hold strong majorities in both the House and the Senate should mean that this bill has no chance of becoming law anytime soon, but it does give us insight into the liberal battlefield over illegal immigration.

What I find ironic with the entire effort is that over the last several months, the establishment of both parties has been stumped about how it is that Donald Trump can be so popular… but then they do something like this. Hey Establishment! Wake up! This is why Donald Trump is still so very popular! America doesn’t like illegal immigration, so stop creating and supporting policies that encourage illegal immigration!

Also, while we can be fairly sure that this bill won’t pass anytime soon, we really can’t be sure because the GOP establishment has been infatuated with helping Democrats pass immigration reform for the last couple of years. Politicians like Paul Ryan (R-WI), John Boehner (R-OH), John McCain (R-AZ) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC) are hell-bent on passing immigration reform (any kind of reform) that they might willingly allow something like this to happen if it meant getting Democrats on board with their next plan. It’s truly maddening.

This is where the Democrat Party is leading the GOP (and the rest of us), folks. Prepare to keep hearing about bills like this over the next few months and years, and unless we elect more conservatives… we may soon see some of these terrible “reforms” come to pass.

Source

Illegal Immigrants Appointed to City Government in California: “We’re Sending the Wrong Message”

The Los Angeles suburb Huntington Park made history, as the first city in the United States to official appoint undocumented, illegal immigrants as city officials.

Some locals are infuriated after a city councilman made the announcement, sounding a sharp cry of opposition, but even so, the point of no return has been crossed — illegal immigrants are becoming an official part of the government.

CBS Los Angeles reported:

Councilman Jhonny Pineda announced at Monday night’s city council meeting the appointment of two undocumented immigrants as commissioners…

“You are out of order!” one woman in the crowd yelled at the council members during the meeting.

Some critics say Pineda, who joined the council in March, specifically picked Medina and Zatarain because they worked on his campaign. Others say they don’t believe undocumented immigrants should serve the government this way.

“We’re sending the wrong message: you can be illegal and you can come and work for the city,” a woman told Finnstrom.

[…]

Frank Medina will join the health and education commission and Julian Zatarain will be working with the parks and recreation commission.

[Pineda] promised voters on the campaign trail he’d create opportunities for the city’s sizable undocumented immigrant demographic.

Officials defending the decision say that the appointees will be unpaid, in accordance with federal law, and will have no say over policy.

Nonetheless… the appointments are another milestone in what many see as the undoing of the United States, and respect for its Constitution and laws.

The move is indeed historic — a snapshot of a larger fall of the empire, with barbarians officially in the gate, with hoards and gangs within government and in the populace more powerful than institutions it is in the midst of sacking. The nation seems to be in a period of dissolution, where racial and ethnic enclaves are breaking off into fragmented areas.

Putting citizens with a shaky legal status in an official position of authority in a local government is a bold move beyond even amnesty for undocumented workers with controversial status in an economically challenged and politically divided country.

Many in the Huntington Park community have vowed to challenge the legality of the appointments, but City Councilman Jhonny Pineda claims he ran it by city lawyers, and feels confident that appointments will stand, and the broader community served by including a sector not generally recognized by the political process.

Just imagine what millions of now-documented immigrants, granted amnesty and a path to citizenship, can do with a massive voting bloc big enough to swing both local and national elections.

Just imagine how big this change will be, and how much more dangerous promises it could bring through big government programs.

Source

USCIS Declares Citizenship Is Means to Combat Terrorism at Home

The growing threat of rampant terrorism here in the US concerns many Americans as Obama “imports” unvetted Muslims from the Middle East and unidentified, undocumented illegal aliens invade the nation through our porous southern border. While Obama and his administration declare patriotic Americans “terrorists,” the identification of real threats remains undone. So, how does our nation thwart the threat of terrorism inside our borders? According to top immigration agency, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), the way to “blunt homegrown terrorism” is by offering illegal alien invaders citizenship. At least, that is the plan sold to a Senate subcommittee.

In records obtained by the Daily Caller News Foundation, the agency declared to the Immigration and the National Interest Subcommittee, “In furtherance of DHS’s mission to safeguard the homeland, [United States Citizenship and Immigration Services] is committed to fostering integration and community cohesion.”

To understand their position, one has to understand their terminology. When DHS talks about “fostering integration,” their meaning is dumping thousands of unvetted, undocumented illegal alien invaders into our cities and towns without our direct knowledge or concern of the economic, social or political impact. Anytime the words “community cohesion” are used, the DHS, as well as this administration, intends for Americans to alter their community to “fit” the illegal aliens instead of illegal aliens melding into our community, accepting our way of life. Any US citizens not “on board” with rampant illegal immigration and the importing of unvetted Muslims is dubbed “racist,” “isolationist,” “bigot,” “Islamophobe,” and “heartless.”

USCIS engages and supports partners to welcome immigrants, promote English language learning and education on the rights and responsibilities of citizenship, and encourage US citizenship.

The key takeaway here is the word “immigrant.” No longer is there a distinction between “illegal” and “legal” immigrants — the government classifies them all as immigrants. In this way, US citizens who oppose illegal alien invasion can appear to be against immigration in totality. In truth, Americans have welcomed and continue to welcome immigrants who have come to this country legally to assimilate into our culture. Patriotic Americans understand that rampant illegal immigration threatens our sovereignty, economy, society, and culture. Moreover, Muslim immigration threatens to destroy our constitutional government through “stealth” by attempting to implement their theocracy within our borders while wreaking havoc by participating in jihad on American soil.

And, how is the promotion of English language learning working out for USCIS? Go into any Social Security Administration office and look at the placards and posters on the wall in over 100 languages. Call up any business’s customer service and instructions tell callers to “press ‘1’ for English.” The government doesn’t even know the Constitution, and if they do, trample it daily. Yet, the government instructs these illegal aliens on “rights and responsibilities of citizenship.” More likely, the agencies instruct these invaders to access entitlement programs to bankrupt the system while encouraging these invaders to inflict harm on communities. It would follow along with Obama’s agenda to destroy the nation.

The overall favorite here is “encourages US citizenship.” With legal immigration, most individuals entering the country plan, for the most part, to attain US citizenship because they desire to assimilate into a nation based on upholding individual God-given rights. Granted, some overstay Visas and remain in the country, becoming “illegal.” Apparently, the government realizes that many of these illegal invaders have no intention of being citizens, hence the “encouragement” to apply. The analogy boils down to something my grandmother used to say — “why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free.” Illegal aliens have no desire to attain US citizenship when they can readily access programs reserved for citizens without being citizens. If they desired US citizenship, these invaders would have entered legally. Our government actually encourages and rewards illegal alien invaders by allowing these criminals access to programs normally available to citizens only.

The subcommittee had pointed to the arrest of Six Somali men on terror-related charges in Minnesota — where a large population of Somali refugees were settled — as evidence of the threat and then asked whether USCIS can guarantee other communities won’t face similar threats from the thousands of Syrian war refugees that have been settled stateside.

Referring to its efforts to promote citizenship, officials from USCIS made an appeal to nationalism: “These efforts emphasize the role that shared citizenship rights and responsibilities play to unify all Americans.”

Seriously? A Senate subcommittee asked an Obama sycophantic agency that announced it would follow unilateral decree instead of constitutionally authorized legislation on immigration if they can “guarantee other communities won’t face similar threats….” Now we know how the candy company came up with the name “Airheads” for their product. On top of this, the article refers to these illegal aliens as “war refugees.” Par for the course since the Obama administration made plans to grant “Central American minors related to illegal immigrants in the US refugee or parole status, and fly them into the country” earlier this year.

These “airheads” want a government agency to state whether it can guarantee that other communities won’t face a similar threat to those in the town in Minnesota. A third grader could tell you no government agency can guarantee that when they don’t know who’s here, where they are or exactly their country of origin. It would validate that Congress is “dumber” than a third grader if they weren’t actively complicit with the Obama agenda. Truly, both chambers are not filled with “airheads” but with treasonous criminals.

Why aren’t Muslim “refugees” going to a Muslim country near to where they originated? Why is this nation importing Muslims instead of persecuted Christians? Syria is full of ISIS; and Somalia, a country lacking any type of government, is home of lawless pirates and other criminals. Why is this government illegally importing individuals from Central American countries whose governments are being overtaken by drug cartels? Simple. The Obama administration is in the business of importing terrorists and criminals to wreak havoc in this nation to destroy it while Congress complies like “good little dictator followers.”

Of course, the United Nations developed a plan to handle “refugees” for all participant nations. However, the UN cares not for any country’s right to sovereignty or direction of immigration and works actively to destroy the sovereignty of nations through its “policies” while inching power to an all-world governmental agency. The UN has the perfect opportunity to help tear down this nation, considering what currently occupies the Oval Office. Their plan is Obama’s plan, and vice versa.

No one in the Obama administration or Congress is truly concerned about the effect the rampant illegal alien invasion causes American communities. It doesn’t affect them, plus, they are complicit in supporting the agendas. Government agencies settle (more like dump) illegal aliens into average, mainstream American cities and towns, not the gated, prestigious, wealthy neighborhoods occupied by Congress, administration officials, Obama, or department heads. Subcommittee members ask “fluff” questions that get convoluted answers or no real answer at all. In their minds, they hear “no problem,” which is then pandered to the public. They quash any opposition to their fantasy quickly through backlash by the “state-controlled” lamestream enemedia and liberal bobble heads. All the while, these traitorous charlatans shield themselves from the effects of their lawlessness.

The only thing that matters in Washington, District of Corruption, is the agenda. That is all there is — the agenda. Whatever will promote and advance the agenda moves forward as planned. No one in government has an excuse for what they are actively doing to this nation. All are guilty as charged. They use issues like the Confederate Battle Flag and Cecil the Lion to divert the attention of Americans away from their lawlessness. It won’t get any better. In the coming months, it will get worse. Americans need to choose now on which side they stand, if they haven’t already.

Obama’s Executive Order Means Amnesty for 80 Percent of Illegals

With a court-ordered hold on Obama’s order, we do not have to worry about many of the illegal aliens being given a free pass.  But, we do have to worry if this hold is somehow overturned.  There is a study that shows that the president’s executive order covers more people than he had represented in his November announcement.

The Washington Times reports: 

President Obama’s executive actions on immigration shield more than 80 percent of the estimated 11 million illegal immigrants in the country from any danger of being deported, a top immigration think tank reported Thursday.

We should not be shocked at this stage that the president is a liar.  That he has misled or sought to mislead the people he works for.  This is a normal thing for Obama.  He thinks that he knows better than the people.  But, he went one step further.

The Times continued:

As part of his November amnesty Mr. Obama announced a program to proactively grant a temporary deportation amnesty to as many as 5 million illegal immigrants. But he also directed immigration agents not to bother deporting millions of others, even though they weren’t eligible for the official amnesty, which grants work permits and other benefits.

What this means is that the president had told the public one thing and had told law enforcement another.  What this means is that the president of the United States advised—no, ordered law enforcement not to enforce the law.  Obama wanted the people in charge of enforcing the law to ignore, essentially, his own orders.

Follow me on this.  Obama told the American people that only 4 of the 11 million Illegals would be affected by his executive order.

U.S. News and World Reports said:

Last night, President Barack Obama unveiled a broad plan for the nation’s immigration challenges, to be enacted by executive order. By all accounts, the president’s plan would affect nearly 4 million undocumented individuals in this country.

So, then, this is less than half of those currently here illegally.  But, what the president did not say was that over half of the remaining number was not going to be dealt with because they were not going to face enforcement.  The president had no intention of seeing those not meeting the eligibility for amnesty being deported.

The Times reports:

The directions to immigration agents were deemed enforcement “priorities” and instructed agents not to bother arresting or deporting anyone who didn’t meet the top priority levels.

“Implementation of the new enforcement priorities is likely to affect about 9.6 million people,” MPI’s Marc Rosenblum, author of the new study, said.

The president is meeting none of the requirements he set on his own policy and continues to allow illegals to snub their nose at our laws.

Source

Caught On Camera: Illegals Smuggle Drugs into Laredo before Trump Visit

As Donald Trump prepared to arrive in Laredo for a tour of the US border, Infowars captured astounding footage which shows illegals sneaking across the Rio Grande River before they frantically throw huge bags of drugs into a vehicle and swim back to Mexico.


 

Infowars reporters Joe Biggs and Josh Owens traveled to Laredo to cover Trump’s highly publicized visit. While recording footage of the Rio Grande River, which forms part of the Mexico–US border, Owens spotted illegals crossing the water in the distance on rafts and began to film.

The clip then shows an individual holding open the trunk of a red Ford Explorer before four illegals frantically run up carrying huge packs of what are almost certainly drugs before quickly throwing them into the vehicle and fleeing back towards Mexico.

The vehicle then drives into America as one of the smugglers glances back towards Biggs and Owens.

Biggs and Owens immediately had to go into hiding and remove the license plates on their vehicle because they were spotted by the cartel during filming.

The footage validates Trump’s assertion, for which he has been vilified for weeks: that illegal immigrants are bringing drugs into the United States.

“When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best,” Trump said during his announcement that he would run for president. “They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.”

Trump was invited to visit the border by the National Border Patrol Council and will arrive in Laredo later today, although the participation of Border Patrol agents was subsequently canceled after the national AFL-CIO-controlled union intervened.

Mexican drug cartels make up to $29 billion annually from U.S. drug sales, with 90% of the cocaine that enters America transiting through Mexico. The majority of marijuana and methamphetamines that are sold in the U.S. also come from Mexico.

The footage illustrates the porous nature of the US border and how easy it would be for ISIS terrorists – who reportedly have set up training bases nearby, to bring militants, weapons and explosives into America.

Source

10 Horribly Violent Crimes That Were Committed By Illegal Immigrants

Yes, illegal immigrants are responsible for lots of crime in this country. In recent years, nearly 1000 illegal immigrants have been convicted of committing sex crimes against children in the state of Texas alone. And as you will read about below, illegal immigrants have a murder rate that is 3 to 10 times higher than the general population. So anyone that suggests that illegal immigrants don’t commit more crime than the rest of us is simply lying to you. Unfortunately, even though we could prevent thousands upon thousands of violent crimes by securing our borders, the Obama administration refuses to do so and it has become very politically incorrect to even talk about this. Every single day, American citizens are being murdered and raped by people that should not be in this country and yet nobody is supposed to address this issue. No wonder our nation is in the process of self-destructing. The following are 10 horribly violent crimes that were committed by illegal immigrants…

#1 An illegal immigrant that had been deported five times recently gunned down a young woman that was taking a walk with her father on a pier in San Francisco

Kate Steinle was walking on a busy pier in San Francisco with her father when there was a single popping sound in the air.

She fell to the ground, struck by a bullet, the victim of what police say appears to be a random killing.

The man accused of firing the deadly shot — 45-year-old Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez — is an undocumented immigrant, a repeat felon who has been deported five times to Mexico, according to immigration officials.

#2 An illegal immigrant has just been arrested for abducting a 13-year-old Florida girl and repeatedly raping her

On Thursday, Michigan police arrested a Mexican illegal alien, 23-year-old Aurelio Hernandez-Gomez, after finding him with a 13-year-old Florida girl who had last been seen two days before her ordeal.

Cops acted on a tip that led them to a Hartford home where Hernandez-Gomez hid the girl while assaulting her.

#3 Earlier this year, an illegal immigrant in Alabama was arrested and charged with sodomizing a 10-year-old girl

An illegal immigrant was arrested Monday in Alabama after sexually assaulting a young girl.

According to reports, Ramiro Ajualip, a 27-year-old who entered the country illegally, was accused earlier this week of raping a 10-year-old girl on Feb. 27 while he was living with the child’s family.

Ajualip was charged with first-degree rape and first-degree sodomy, which are both Class A felonies in Alabama and carry with them sentences ranging from 10 years to life in prison with parole a possibility if convicted, according to a local report.

#4 While taking refuge in the “sanctuary city” of Philadelphia, one illegal alien decided that it would be a good idea to attack and rape a 26-year-old doctor as she walked home from work

Living and working in sanctuary, Mr. Garcia last month, according to police, approached a 26-year-old Philadelphia doctor who was walking to her home in the city’s fashionable Rittenhouse Square neighborhood after a night out with friends. He is accused of forcing the woman into her apartment and raping her repeatedly.

Police said Mr. Garcia then stole the victim’s cellphone and rode away on his bicycle. In perhaps not the smartest of moves, Mr. Garcia kept the victim’s smartphone in his possession. Police said they found him, in part, by calling the phone and locating its signal.

#5 In Arizona, an illegal immigrant that had been deported six times has just been charged with a hit-and-run. It turns out that the vehicle that he hit contained a young mother and her two very young children

A six-time-deported illegal immigrant is charged in the felony hit-and-run of an Arizona mother and her two young children. The man allegedly admitted to being high on marijuana while causing the severe lacerations to a five-year-old boy. The five-year-old and a two-year-old were both taken to an area hospital.

#6 In Porterville, California a drunk illegal immigrant plowed through a fence and killed a 3-year-old girl that was standing in line for ice cream

An illegal immigrant driving drunk and without a license crashed through a fence Sunday, hitting and killing a 3-year-old girl as she was waiting in line for ice cream in Porterville, California.

Adolf Balbuena, 18, mowed down the toddler, Angeles Moreno, as she and several others, including an 8-year-old boy, were waiting line at an ice cream truck.

After hitting Moreno, Balbuena backed up and drove away. He was arrested at his home around an hour later, the Fresno Bee reported.

#7 Down in Laredo, Texas an illegal immigrant that had been deported four times confessed to murdering his wife with a hammer

Breitbart Texas has exclusively confirmed that a man who confessed to murdering his wife with a hammer in Laredo, Texas is a four-time deported illegal immigrant who would not have been in the U.S. had he not been able to illegally cross back into the country multiple times from Mexico after his deportations. In addition, the Laredo Police Department continuously encountered the man in violent episodes with his wife, yet did not notify Border Patrol, according to federal agents who spoke with Breitbart Texas on the condition of anonymity.

#8 In DeLand, Florida a 27-year-old Mexican immigrant that is here illegally has been charged with raping a woman that cannot hear or speak

A 27-year-old Mexican man is locked up after police charge him with raping a woman who cannot hear or speak.

Juan Corona-Martinez (picture courtesy Volusia County Jail) of Becca Lane in DeLand is held on $50,000 bond following his arrest on Friday.

The DeLand Police Department says they were called out to Florida Hospital DeLand on November 19th when a 37-year-old woman told a friend she had been raped by Corona-Martinez.

#9 Earlier this year, a 29-year-old illegal immigrant killed a convenience store clerk in Phoenix over two packs of cigarettes

Apolinar Altamirano, 29, an unauthorized Mexican illegal alien DREAMer, has been arrested for the January 22, 2015 first-degree murder of Phoenix Quick Trip store clerk Grant Ronnebeck, 21.

Altamirano is accused of shooting Ronnebeck and stealing two packs of cigarettes after the clerk demanded payment before giving Altamirano any cigarettes.

The murder was recorded on the store’s security camera and police captured Altamirano after a high speed chase in Phoenix.

Altamirano had previous run-ins with local police and Immigration and Customs Enforcement. In 2012, he pleaded guilty to facilitation to commit burglary and got probation but was placed in deportation proceedings.

Before the murder of Ronnebeck, Altamirano was released on a $10,000 bond in 2013 from ICE custody despite the defendant’s own claims of ties to the Mexican Mafia.

#10 Not too long ago, three members of the MS-13 street gang forced a 16-year-old New York girl into the woods and took turns brutally raping her

Three MS-13 street-gang members from El Salvador are being held without bail on charges they forced a 16-year-old New York girl into the woods near a golf course, and two of them raped her while the third kept watch.

“This is one of the most brutal, heinous crimes that I have seen in a long, long time,” Suffolk County District Attorney Thomas Spota said at a news conference, according to New York’s WNBC-TV. “This poor young woman is so lucky that, quite frankly, that she is alive. These are vicious young men, vicious young men, and what they did to her was absolutely terrible.”

Spota, who said the attack was “barbaric,” identified the suspects as 17-year-old Jose Cornejo, 18-year-old Bryan Larios and 17-year-old Joel Escobar. All three of the MS-13 gang members, who are from El Salvador, were arrested May 29 just hours after the attack. They are being charged as adults.

According to Democrats (and some Republicans), we should not be too concerned about crimes such as these because the general population commits crimes at about the same rate.

But when they tell you that, they are flat out lying to you. The following numbers come from a recent American Thinker article

Let’s take homicide as an example. The GAO estimates “criminal aliens” were arrested, convicted and incarcerated for 25,064 homicides. If non-citizens committed them over seven years, the annual rate would be 14.2 per 100,000 non-citizens. If illegal aliens committed them over four years, the annual rate would be 58.0 per 100,000 illegal aliens. Either way you compute, those are high rates.

By comparison, the FBI reports the murder rates for the entire U.S. from 2003 through 2009 varied from 5.0 to 5.8 per 100,000 inhabitants for an average rate of 5.5. To be clear, 5.5 is much lower than either 14.2 or 58.0.

Or look at the total number of homicides in those years. Per the FBI, there were 67,642 murders in the U.S. from 2005 through 2008, and 115,717 from 2003 through 2009. Per the GAO, criminal aliens committed 25,064 of them. That means they committed 22% to 37% of all murders in the U.S., while being only 3.52% to 8.25% of the population.

Conclusion: criminal and illegal aliens commit murder at much higher rates than all inhabitants of the U.S. – at least 3 to 10 times higher.

We desperately need to secure our borders, but most of our politicians are against doing that because they believe that it would be bad for them politically.

So hardcore criminals, drug runners, gang members and sex offenders are going to continue to pour into this country. And what makes things even more infuriating is that there are hundreds of “sanctuary cities” that have rolled out the red carpet for them. If you can believe it, many of these sanctuary cities actually have a practice of releasing illegal immigrants with criminal records back into our communities rather than turn them over to the feds…

Some 276 “sanctuary cities,” nearly 50 percent more than previously revealed, released over 8,000 illegal immigrants with criminal records or facing charges free despite federal requests that they be turned over to Immigration and Customs Enforcement for deportation, according to an explosive new report.

The Center for Immigration Studies, revealing new numbers it received under the Freedom of Information Act, said that those releases from cities that ignored federal demands came over just eight months and are just part of an even larger release of 17,000 illegals with criminal records.

And of course the Obama administration has been releasing violent criminals back into our communities as well. This is a huge scandal that hardly anyone is talking about. In a previous article, I discussed how the Obama administration released more than 36,000 convicted criminals back on to our streets in one recent year alone

Why has Barack Obama been releasing thousands of illegal immigrants that have been convicted of crimes back on to the streets of our cities? According to U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley, more than 36,000 were released from custody in Fiscal Year 2013 alone. These individuals were actually convicted of committing crimes, and many of them went on to commit new crimes once they were released by Immigration and Customs Enforcement. In fact, Senator Grassley says that 121 of the criminals that were released during Fiscal Year 2013 were subsequently charged with committing murder. That means that more than 100 American citizens are now dead because of Obama’s foolish policies. Why is Obama doing this? He knows that one out of every five illegal immigrants has a criminal record, and he knows that many of these convicted criminals that he is releasing will go on to commit new crimes. What possible justification could Obama have for doing this to our communities?

If we do not secure our borders and we continue to release convicted criminals back into our communities instead of deporting them, a lot more innocent people are going to get raped and murdered.

The families of those that have already been murdered can never get their loved ones back.

Those that have been brutally raped can never erase what has been done to them.

But we could prevent many future violent crimes if we were just willing to take some common sense measures to protect our citizens.

So why won’t our politicians do something?

Please feel free to share what you think by posting a comment below…

Source

Take a look at the future of America: The Beginning of the End and then prepare.