House Democrats Want ‘Oversight’ On Fox News’ Editorial Decisions

The Democrats are doing all they can to kill off the freedom of speech. Fox News is just a shadow of its former self, but if the Democrats succeed in gaining “oversight” over its editorial decisions, that would be the coup de grace.

The Democrats want a society in which only their point of view can be heard, and only their editorial line can be followed.

In other words, they want the death of a free society.

“House Democrats Want ‘Oversight’ over Fox News’ Editorial Decisions,” by Joel B. Pollak, Breitbart, April 2, 2019:

Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives are demanding to know why Fox News did not publish a story prior to the 2016 election about an alleged affair years before between porn star Stormy Daniels and Donald Trump.

House Committee on Oversight and Reform chair Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD) wrote to former Fox News reporter Diana Falzone last month demanding that she turn over any documents relating to Trump’s alleged extramarital affairs.

An article in the New Yorker last month alleged that Fox News executive Ken LaCorte spiked the story to protect Trump — a claim LaCorte has vehemently denied, saying the story lacked corroborating evidence and that the network was merely practicing responsible journalism, as were other outlets who declined the story.

That article seems to have motivated Cummings’s letter — a letter that not only seeks personal dirt on the president, but seeks information that might be used to review Fox News’ editorial decisions. The committee’s letter suggests that Fox News may have violated campaign finance rules if it tried to help Trump by suppressing the Daniels story.

Falzone has said she will cooperate with the committee, despite an agreement with Fox that prevents her from speaking about the story. In an op-ed at Mediaite, LaCorte says he supports Falzone’s desire to talk about the story publicly, but that he will refuse to cooperate with the committee’s effort to exercise oversight over the free press.

LaCorte writes (original link):

Falzone’s lawyer announced that she would comply with the committee. I won’t.

If House Oversight can launch an investigation based on the ridiculous notion that publishing, or even more bizarrely not publishing, a story can be construed as an in-kind campaign contribution, then no journalist in America is safe from government intimidation. It’s a vast overreach of power, and I won’t have any part of it….

Article posted with permission from Pamela Geller

Minnesota House Votes To Allow Illegal Immigrants To Have Driver’s Licenses – Senate Opposes

Well, just like California, the Minnesota State House voted to advance a bill, an unconstitutional one I might add, that would provide driver’s licenses to immigrants who are in the country illegally.  For those who don’t understand that, it means there are in the country in violation of law, and the Minnesota House just voted to reward those who have knowingly broken the law.

The Minnesota Star Tribune reported:

The Democratic-led Minnesota House voted Friday to give immigrants the ability to get driver’s licenses even if they are in the country illegally, setting the stage for a potential clash with Senate Republicans who argue that the change rewards those who break the law.

The 74-52 vote was a victory for the DFL House majority and Democratic Gov. Tim Walz, who have made it a top priority for this session. But it faces strong opposition in the Republican-controlled Senate, where some conservatives see it as an invitation to illegal immigration and possibly even fraudulent voting.

If the measure were to clear the Minnesota Legislature, still a distant prospect, the state would become the 13th in the nation to provide licenses to residents who cannot prove legal status, fueling the national debate over immigration and access to social benefits.

The Minnesota Voters Alliance and other conservative groups that favor stricter voter ID laws have cast the measure as part of a liberal effort to undermine the integrity of elections, a charge that DFL lawmakers denied. Minnesota has no photo ID requirements at polling stations, and the licenses mandated in the House bill would carry explicit warnings that they can’t be used for voting.

Immigrants, regardless of their status, previously were able to obtain licenses in Minnesota if they could pass the driver’s test and buy insurance. That changed in 2003 amid heightened security measures taken across the nation in response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks. The House bill would restore that right.

Actually, I’m not quite sure where the Star Tribune claims it is a “right” to get a driver’s license.  Rights come from God and if that is the case, why is there a need for a license to exercise such a right?  Me thinks they use a word they do not understand.

What’s even more incredible is that everyone knows exactly where this is going and that is so they can provide an ID when they go to vote illegally in elections.

However, this is being branded as being about safety.  Isn’t that always the claims of tyrants?

“It’s common sense,” said Rep. Samantha Vang, D-Brooklyn Center. “This will allow people to simply open a bank account, to drive safely on the road to their jobs, to their school.”

These people actually believe this will lead to safer roads by giving people driver’s licenses to drive on the road who are here in violation of the law in the first place.  No!  It actually endangers every citizen and non-citizen who are in the state of Minnesota, as well as the rest of the country to where these people might drive.

My perspective is that we want immigrants coming here legally and [to] create a ladder to the middle class,” said Rep. Glenn Gruenhagen, R-Glencoe. “Incentivizing people to come here illegally defeats that purpose.”

This is exactly right.

Muslim Rep. Mohamud Noor, whose family came to the United States after fleeing Somalia, said the bill as a “moral obligation.”

“This is about dignity, it is about respect, it is about inclusion,” Noor said.

Dignity?  Respect?  Inclusion?  For people who are in violation of the law?  So, Mr. Noor wants Minnesotans to respect lawbreakers and dignify them.  Isn’t that what he is saying?  Yep, you better believe it is.

This is a man who fled a country that is dominated by Muslims, seeks refuge in America, only to then turn around and spit on the very laws which allowed him and his family a place of refuge here in the first place.

“Immigrants, whether they are documented or undocumented, are Minnesotans. They are part of the fabric of our communities,” said House Majority Leader Ryan Winkler (D).  “It is time that we helped take away this shadow of not having a driver’s license.”

No, they are not.

“Minnesota shouldn’t be in the business of incentivizing illegal behavior, and by allowing illegal and undocumented immigrants access to driver’s licenses, that’s exactly what our state would be doing,” state Sen. Bill Ingebrigtsen (R) added.

The bill is not expected to clear the Republican-controlled Minnesota Senate.

Newly elected Governor Tim Walz, a Democrat who previously served as a representative in the U.S. House, has not indicated whether he would sign the bill.

Those who voted for the measure should be considered traitors to the people they serve as they are ignoring the violations of law these immigrants are engaged in only to reward them and aid them in being successful in Minnesota while telling the people that they are simply looking out for their well-being, rights and safety.  They are doing none of that.

Article posted with permission from Sons Of Liberty Media

Why Won’t Bernie Sanders Release His Taxes?

No major politician has had a bigger change in his financial status after the last election than Bernie Sanders. And both in 2016 and now, Bernie has been reluctant to release his taxes, and responded to calls to do so with stalling tactics.

He’s played games with financial disclosures before.

Here’s a flashback.

But when federal law required Sanders to reveal, by mid-May, current details of his personal finances, his campaign lawyer asked the Federal Election Commission for a 45-day extension.

Request granted.

On June 30, Sanders’ campaign requested a second 45-day extension, saying the senator had “good cause” to delay because of his “current campaign schedule and officeholder duties.”

Again, regulators approved Sanders’ punt.

Now that Sanders’ second extension has expired, spokesman Michael Briggs confirmed to the Center for Public Integrity that the senator won’t file a presidential campaign personal financial disclosure after all.

Tracking TV ads in the 2016 presidential race

Who is on the air, and where?

“We were told that since the senator no longer is a candidate there was no requirement to file,” Briggs said.

Next year, in 2017, he once again dodged a deadline.

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) has missed the deadline to file his annual financial disclosures with the Senate, a move that continues to delay a complete examination of how his 2016 presidential bid affected his personal wealth.

Sanders’s Senate office missed the annual deadline to file his personal financial disclosure on Monday, instead requesting and receiving a 20-day extension. The Vermont news blog VTDigger first reported the extension.

Now he’s hiding behind ‘starving children’.

Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders sidestepped questions Thursday about when he will release his tax returns, with the Vermont independent hinting he could fulfill his six-week old pledge to make public 10 years of tax returns on April 15 — Tax Day.

Yet, as quickly as Sanders suggested that, he appeared to backtrack and wouldn’t commit that he would release them then.
“Do you know what April 15th is? It’s Tax Day,” Sanders told CNN on Capitol Hill when asked if there was an issue to releasing his taxes. “So, I think we want to make sure we have all of them together and as I said, they will be released soon.”

When asked if that meant he would not necessarily release his tax returns on April 15, Sanders responded, “That’s it. Thank you very much.”

An aide then stepped in front of CNN and said, “he answered your question” and referred CNN to follow up with a Sanders’ spokesperson.

That exchange followed a news conference earlier Thursday on the House passing a Yemen War Powers Resolution earlier. When asked about the tax returns at that news conference, Sanders declined to answer.

“Today let’s worry about the starving children in Yemen,” he said, before departing the room.

Pathetic and despicable. But those are two of Bernie’s middle names.

Why does Bernie Sanders keep playing these games? Considering his wife’s history, and his own with finances, behind all the smoke may be a fire. The Sanders Institute was recently shut down as Bernie prepared to run for office. The FBI chose not to pursue his wife over alleged fraud involving Burlington College. But there may be things still lurking in the paper underbrush.

Article posted with permission from Daniel Greenfield

In Wake Of Synagogue Shooting, Pittsburgh Decides To Make Easy Targets Of Law-Abiding Citizens By Illegally Banning Their Guns

The attack on the Tree of Life synagogue building in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania in October 2018 has given way to the tyrants of the Pennsylvania City Council approving an illegal gun confiscation package, which seeks to disarm citizens and make them soft targets for more criminals who would make easy pray for their crimes.

The public was asked to comment before the vote.

One woman said “It’s not the weapon that’s the problem. It’s the intent of the person handling the weapon that’s the problem.”

However, what someone should have said was that the council had no authority to even consider such legislation since the right to keep and bear arms is just that, a right.  It’s is not something that can be legislated away.

CBS reports:

Pittsburgh City Council took a final vote Monday morning, passing a package of controversial gun laws introduced after last year’s mass shooting at the Tree of Life Synagogue.

Council members voted 6-3 to pass the bills. They now head to Democratic Mayor Bill Peduto for his expected signature.

The legislation will place restrictions on military-style assault weapons like the AR-15 rifle that authorities say was used in the Oct. 27 rampage at Tree of Life Synagogue in Squirrel Hill, which killed 11 people and wounded seven.

It also bans most uses of armor-piercing ammunition and high-capacity magazines, and allows the temporary seizure of guns from people who are determined to be a danger to themselves or others.

Furthermore, the Jewish Telegraphic Agency adds:

The measures also ban ammunition and accessories, such as large capacity magazines, and allow courts to temporarily remove guns from a person deemed to be a public threat. A companion bill passed by the council directs additional funding to city anti-violence programs.

City residents who own guns and accessories outlined in the bills would be grandfathered. Violators of the laws could be fined $1,000, or face up to 90 days in prison, for each offense.

Second Amendment advocates say they will challenge the illegal legislation due to the fact that the city does not have authority to issue such measures.

Time Magazine reports:

Pittsburgh has a home rule charter, which affords the city some independence from the state legislature. But Pennsylvania’s law on the charter says a municipality “shall not enact any ordinance or take any other action dealing with the regulation of the transfer, ownership, transportation or possession of firearms.” The state’s firearms code has an amendment that expressly prohibits municipalities from regulating the “lawful ownership, possession, transfer or transportation of firearms, ammunition or ammunition components.” That inherent tension has set in motion a legal battle over gun rights in Pittsburgh and Pennsylvania more broadly.

Time went on to state something completely unconstitutional.

Pennsylvania’s legislature is the only entity that can change the state law to grant cities and municipalities the right to regulate firearms on their own, according to David Harris, a professor at the University of Pittsburgh’s law school. Right now, Pittsburgh and the courts can battle it out over the specificity of wording in the bills and the state legislation, Harris tells TIME. Because the provision from the city bans the use of certain weapons, one could argue that the state law does not technically stipulate anything about firearms usage. “In order to have this stand up, courts will have to find that the idea of using these items that are now part of the city’s law is different than all the other ways the state prohibited cities from regulating firearms,” Harris says.

Sorry, no, the state legislature has no more authority under the Constitution to infringe on the right to keep and bear arms of law-abiding citizens than the municipality does.  All gun laws are unconstitutional by the very definition outlines in the Second Amendment as a protected right.

The Pittsburgh City Council has become the enemy of the people of Pittsburgh, not it’s representation.

Muslim Rep. Ilhan Omar Working Behind Scenes For Release Of Top Muslim Brotherhood Leader

What Omar does is bad enough, and getting worse all the time, but what is even worse still is the fact that the Democrats have embraced her hatred of America.

They have embraced and internalized it.

It is part of what they are.

The horror of the hate that Omar represents and fosters is very real, but we can be grateful that America is seeing this, hearing this, finally — the true face of the new Nazi party, the party of jihad, the party of treason.

The notoriously hard-left enemedia has hidden the evil of the Democrat party for far too long. Scrub as they might, this is too evil to shroud.

“Ilhan Omar Is Working Behind the Scenes For Release Of Top Terrorist Leader,” Conservative Post, April 3, 2019 (thanks to Mark):

Minnesota Democrat Rep. Ilhan Omar, a noted anti-Semite, is now begging President Donald Trump for his help…

The prisoner she is begging President Trump to help her free is Hoda Abdelmonem, a leader in the terrorist group The Muslim Brotherhood.

“I recently met with @jkbadawy and @thefreedomi to talk about Hoda Abdelmonem, a political prisoner in Egypt,” she said.

“I hope that Trump brings up her case in his meeting with the regime that has imprisoned her. We must work to #FreeHoda,” she said.

Omar was quickly called out on her nonsense by conservative writer Jordan Schachtel who gave it to her straight.

“I just confirmed: Hoda Abdelmonem is a ***senior female leader**** of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. Why is an American congresswoman advocating for an Islamist activist?” he said.

Article posted with permission from Pamela Geller

Beto O’Rourke Funneled $100,000 In Campaign Funds To Family Firm

Whatever the polling numbers may say, Robert Francis ‘Beto’ O’Rourke, Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders are in a tight race to cash in on their political brands. Bobby O’Rourke is still an amateur. But he did manage to pick up $100K in campaign cash.

Democratic presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke paid roughly $110,000 in campaign funds to a web development company while either he or his wife owned it, public records show.

Either O’Rourke or his wife owned Stanton Street — a small web development firm that O’Rourke founded in 1998 — during the vast majority of those payments.

Such payments are legal, so long as the campaign is charged for the actual cost of the services, but ethics watchdogs have criticized the practice as a form of self-dealing.

Which it obviously is.

But still less outrageous than the shenanigans that Mr. and Mrs. Sanders had allegedly gotten up to.

Still it’s bad.

The conflicts of interest and the impropriety are obvious.

O’Rourke didn’t break the law. But these are not the actions of the idealistic outsider that O’Rourke wants to market himself as, but as an old establishment hand who knows every angle for cashing in on his position, his brand and his image.

Article posted with permission from Daniel Greenfield

More Joe Biden Stories Are Coming Out: “Anybody Who’s Ever Been Around Joe Biden Has Been Touched By Him – Literally”

For years, conservatives have been pointing out Joe Biden’s extremely inappropriate behavior with women and children, but the mainstream media almost entirely ignored it.  But now that some victims on the left are coming forward and speaking out, all of a sudden the mainstream media is all over this story.  Could it be possible that the media has been given the green light to destroy “Creepy Uncle Joe” because someone else is slated to get the Democratic nomination?  No new polls have been released since this scandal went viral, but an average of the previous six polls shows Biden with a solid 7.4 point lead over the rest of the field.  And even though he is not the most charismatic politician in the Democratic field, he is still widely loved by many on the left, and many people believed that he had the best chance of beating President Trump in November 2020.

But not now.  Lucy Flores dealt the first blow, and now more women are coming forward with their own stories.

Christian Science Monitor reporter Linda Feldmann recalls her encounter with Biden very vividly.  She was up in Connecticut on a very hot day to report on a political event, and the thing she remembers most about that day is “Mr. Biden’s sweaty arm”

We were at an outdoor event in Glastonbury, the sun blazing overhead, and I noticed the senators standing around chatting. I walked over and introduced myself. Senator Biden greeted me warmly – and then threw a sweaty arm over my shoulder, and gave me a squeeze. I cringed a little internally; I had never met Mr. Biden before. But I chalked the overly friendly gesture up to his personal style, and maybe a generational difference. I proceeded to interview the senators, but the thing I remember most vividly is Mr. Biden’s sweaty arm.

As Gail Russell Chaddock, a longtime congressional reporter for the Monitor put it, “Anybody who’s ever been around Joe Biden has been touched by him – literally.”

Clearly, Feldmann was not as offended by this encounter as Lucy Flores was, but she did admit that she “cringed a little” when Biden grabbed her.

What former congressional aide Amy Lappos is alleging is much more disturbing.  On Monday, she told the Hartford Courant about the time that Biden inappropriately touched her…

“It wasn’t sexual, but he did grab me by the head,”Amy Lappos told The Courant Monday. “He put his hand around my neck and pulled me in to rub noses with me. When he was pulling me in, I thought he was going to kiss me on the mouth.”

Like so many of Biden’s encounters, it was relatively brief, but Lappos continues to be traumatized by this memory to this day

“I never filed a complaint, to be honest, because he was the vice president. I was a nobody,” Lappos said. “There’s absolutely a line of decency. There’s a line of respect. Crossing that line is not grandfatherly. It’s not cultural. It’s not affection. It’s sexism or misogyny.”

Of course, these new allegations are not exactly shocking to those of us that have been following this story for years.

As Vox has noted, Biden has a very long history of touching women in inappropriate ways…

Biden’s been caught on camera embracing a female reporter from behind and gripping her above her waist, just below her bust. At a swearing-in ceremony for Defense Secretary Ash Carter, Biden put his hands on the shoulders of Stephanie Carter, Carter’s wife, and then leaned in and whispered into her ear. (He’s whispered into many women’s ears.) He’s also touched women’s faces and necks during other photo ops. Once at a swearing-in ceremony for a US senator, he held the upper arm of the senator’s preteen daughter, leaned down and whispered into her ear, as she became visibly uncomfortable. Then he kissed the side of her forehead, a gesture that made the girl flinch.

Biden just kept getting away with it, and so he just kept on doing it.

But now his skeletons are starting to catch up with him.

And Biden has always known that he makes women feel uncomfortable.  Just consider this old quote from well before this current uproar

“I’m a tactile politician,” Biden said March 16 during a speech in Dover, Del. “That gets me in trouble, as well, because I think I can feel and taste what is going on.”

I really can’t understand why some on the left are still choosing to defend the guy.

Just think about it.  If some dude went around touching women inappropriately, sniffing their hair and kissing them without permission, how long would that individual last in your workplace?

In no universe is such behavior acceptable, and this is a point that even CNN’s Jake Tapper is making

Discussing former Nevada lawmaker Lucy Flores’ claim he inappropriately touched and kissed her in 2014 at a campaign rally, Tapper said, “I have to say, if any of the men around this table behaved this way at our places of work, we would get reprimanded, we would get potentially even fired. You are not allowed to touch women inappropriately. Again, it doesn’t matter if your intention is sexual or just friendly — you can’t massage a woman’s shoulders and sniff her hair and kiss the back of her head. That’s not appropriate.”

Someone has just put up a fake Biden campaign site that highlights his inappropriate behavior, and I have to admit that it was the best April Fool’s joke that I saw this year.

His campaign is dead now, and he was receiving a very lukewarm reception from potential donors even before this story broke

Don’t just take my word for it; consider this recent AP headline: “Joe Biden faces a challenge winning over progressives. That challenge is affecting Biden’s fundraising efforts.” According to CNBC, “Skeptical Democratic donors tell Joe Biden they will not raise funds for him at the start of the 2020 campaign.”

Major donors admitted that “they’re not yet convinced he can overtake the younger, more diverse and progressive field, and that they are going to wait to see how he competes in the race.”

If America is ever going to move in a positive direction, we must demand moral behavior from our leaders.

And that includes those on both the left and the right.

Joe Biden’s behavior should disqualify him from running for any political office ever again, and anyone that tries to defend him is choosing to become part of the problem.

Article posted with permission from Michael Snyder

Irrefutable Evidence: 10 Videos That Show Creepy Joe Biden Touching Women Inappropriately

Has the #MeToo movement destroyed Joe Biden’s chances of ever getting to the White House?  In virtually all of the early polls for the race for the Democratic nomination, Biden had been leading.  And most polls have shown him with a sizable lead over Donald Trump in a hypothetical head to head contest.  So there was a very real chance that Joe Biden could have become the next president of the United States, but many believe that his political career has now been brought to an end.  It was anticipated that President Trump and the Republicans would attack Biden relentlessly once he had secured the nomination, but what makes this recent attack so devastating for the Biden campaign is the fact that it is coming from the left.  Joe Biden has been accused of inappropriate touching by a former Democratic nominee for lieutenant governor in Nevada, and the mainstream media is pushing this story really hard.  Could it be possible that someone is trying to push Biden out of the race before it has even really begun?

I would like to share with you what Lucy Flores had to say about Joe Biden in her own words.  But let me warn you that there is one expletive in this quote.  Since this is such an important national story about a man that could potentially become our next president, I decided that it was best to leave this quote unedited

Just before the speeches, we were ushered to the side of the stage where we were lined up by order of introduction. As I was taking deep breaths and preparing myself to make my case to the crowd, I felt two hands on my shoulders. I froze. “Why is the vice-president of the United States touching me?”

I felt him get closer to me from behind. He leaned further in and inhaled my hair. I was mortified. I thought to myself, “I didn’t wash my hair today and the vice-president of the United States is smelling it. And also, what in the actual fuck? Why is the vice-president of the United States smelling my hair?” He proceeded to plant a big slow kiss on the back of my head. My brain couldn’t process what was happening. I was embarrassed. I was shocked. I was confused. There is a Spanish saying, “tragame tierra,” it means, “earth, swallow me whole.” I couldn’t move and I couldn’t say anything. I wanted nothing more than to get Biden away from me. My name was called and I was never happier to get on stage in front of an audience.

During a subsequent interview, Flores stated that she was motivated to come forward when she saw photos and video clips of Joe Biden touching many other women inappropriately on social media

But the #MeToo movement and Biden’s serious consideration of a presidential run changed her mind. Her friends and political allies in Nevada were talking to Biden and his associates about his potential bid this month. And the pictures and video clips of Biden hugging women, caressing their hair and holding on to their shoulders in too-familiar ways began surfacing on social media.

“When I started to see pictures of him behaving in the same way he did with me and with other women, it was very triggering,” she said. “I felt so much empathy for them. I knew what they were going through. I had been in their shoes.

It would be difficult to overstate how damaging this could potentially be to Joe Biden’s campaign.

In the era of the #MeToo movement, even a hint that a male candidate may have been sexually inappropriate with a woman is often enough to completely destroy a political career.

Of course Biden’s people are scrambling to contain the damage, and an “apology” was quickly issued

In a statement to Fox News, Biden spokesman Bill Russo said the former vice president “was pleased to support” Flores’s 2014 campaign “and to speak on her behalf” at the rally.

“Neither then, nor in the years since, did he or the staff with him at the time have an inkling that Ms. Flores had been at any time uncomfortable, nor do they recall what she describes,” the statement said. “But Vice President Biden believes that Ms. Flores has every right to share her own recollection and reflections, and that it is a change for better in our society that she has the opportunity to do so. He respects Ms. Flores as a strong and independent voice in our politics and wishes her only the best.”

That actually doesn’t sound like much of an “apology” to me, and Biden certainly did not acknowledge that he had done anything wrong.

And some of Biden’s supporters are actually suggesting that this was a “politically-motivated” stunt by Flores.  At this point we know that Flores endorsed Bernie Sanders in 2016, and we also know that she has attended events for at least 3 other 2020 candidates

Ms. Flores had a falling out with some in Mr. Sanders’s orbit and left the Our Revolution board. She attended former Representative Beto O’Rourke’s campaign kickoff in El Paso on Saturday, but said she is not supporting any candidate at the moment, though she allowed that she “probably will down the road.”

She also said she had attended an event for Julián Castro and was part of a group that met with Kamala Harris’s campaign manager.

Could it be possible that Flores was encouraged to release this information now by another campaign?

We may never know, but many are speculating that an all-out attempt is being made to get Joe Biden out of this race.  On Twitter, Emerald Robinson suggested that “they’re going for the knockout early”…

Obama is backing Kamala. Joe Biden has been told not to run – he wants to run anyway. So they’re going for the knockout early. Will it stop Joe from running? My guess: yes it will.

We will see what happens, but it is hard to imagine too many on the left rallying to support Joe Biden once people see all the evidence that is out there.

The following are 10 videos that show Creepy Joe Biden touching women inappropriately…

#1 Compilation of Joe Biden being Creepy

#2 Sessions Swats CREEP BIDEN’S Hand Away From Granddaughter

#3 Creepy Joe Biden’s Greatest Hits

#4 Hope And Cringe

#5 CRINGE! Watch as Creepy Joe Biden Makes SICK PEDO Joke About Kindergarten Girl

#6 (Highly Disturbing) Creepy Joe Biden Caught Groping Girls On Camera

#7 Body Language׃ Joe Biden’s insistence on “power” touching

#8 Joe Biden Gets Creepy AGAIN gropes Ashton Carter’s Wife During Swearing Ceremony

#9 Joe Biden is a CREEP!


Article posted with permission from Michael Snyder

Democrat Senator Tim Kaine Introduces Bill To Combat “Undeniable Threat” Of White Supremacy, Ignores Jihad

Another Democrat trying to diminish the glaring Islamic anti-semitism in his own party and also detract from the seriousness and dangers of the highly threatening and vast global jihad.

Tim Kaine asserts that “the rise of white supremacy is an undeniable threat to the safety of our communities,” and “as the threat of violent white supremacy continues to mount, we must do more to ensure law enforcement has the training and resources they need to detect, deter, and investigate these acts of terrorism.”

Kaine is advocating for taxpayer money to go toward a hunt for “white supremacists,” and he uses one incident from 2017 to back up his claims.

Meanwhile, Kaine ignores news such as the story of the five New Mexico Muslims who were recently indicted on terrorism-related offences for allegedly training children “to carry out school massacres.”

The children were living under abusive conditions; the leader of the group is Siraj Ibn Wahhaj, the son of imam Siraj Wahhaj, a former board member of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR).

Siraj Wahhaj once urged the overthrow of the “filthy” U.S. government.

This same man gave an opening prayer at an event at the Democratic National Convention in 2012.

Britain’s Security Service (MI5) has already debunked the “white supremacist” or “far right” threat: it declared that “the number of far-right terror cases the authorities are faced with is ‘absolutely dwarfed’ by the number of cases related to radical Islam.”

That no doubt holds true in the U.S. as well.

“Kaine introduces domestic terrorism bill,” by Nick Shepherd, Bristol Herald Courier, March 28, 2019:

WASHINGTON D.C. — U.S. Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., has introduced a bill that would combat the threat of domestic terrorism.

Kaine and U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Illinois, introduced the legislation on Wednesday. It specifically addresses the growing threat of white supremacists and other violent right-win extremists, according to a news release. The bill is called the Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act.

“The rise of white supremacy is an undeniable threat to the safety of our communities,” Kaine said. “In 2017, violent white supremacists brought their hate to Virginia when they marched through the streets of Charlottesville. As the threat of violent white supremacy continues to mount, we must do more to ensure law enforcement has the training and resources they need to detect, deter, and investigate these acts of terrorism.”

The bill would require the Justice Department, Department of Homeland Security and the FBI to regularly assess the threat posed by domestic terrorism and provide training and resources to assist state, local and tribal law enforcement to address it…..

Article posted with permission from Robert Spencer

Bernie Sanders Doubles Down On Wanting To Eliminate Private Health Insurance

Nobody likes health insurance companies. They’re the worst. Except for government health care. That’s even worse.

Now the bread line candidate is doubling down on his call to kill health care in America and replace it with Cuban medicine.

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who is seeking the Democratic nomination for president in 2020, late Tuesday reiterated his call for the elimination of private health insurance companies and moving to a single-payer, “Medicare for all” system of health care.

“You’re damn right,” Sanders wrote in a tweet in response to a Republican National Committee Research tweet pointing out that he called for eliminating private health insurance during an interview earlier in the day.

In that MSNBC interview, Sanders  said the “current system is incredibly dysfunctional and wasteful” and said universal health care can’t be achieved “unless you get rid of the insurance companies.”

It’s incredibly dysfunctional and wasteful. Because it’s a hybrid private-public system.

Much of it is dysfunctional because of insane government regulations that are driving doctors out of the industry and forcing huge mergers, creating massive beasts that serve as an argument for government health care.

It’s Obama’s Cloward-Pivenization of health care. With the eager cooperation of the big corps that saw short term profits without caring about long term consequences, and assumed that the government would be in business with them in some way, shape or form.

They didn’t foresee an old-line Trotskyist like Bernie getting the nom.

And Bernie would like to replace it with Soviet medicine and breadlines for pills.

“You are not going to be able, in the long run, to have cost-effective, universal health care unless you change the system, unless you get rid of the insurance companies, unless you stand up to the greed of the drug companies and lower prescription drug costs,” he said during an appearance on MSNBC’s “All In With Chris Hayes.”

“That’s the only way that you can provide quality care to all people.”

Unless you eliminate any alternatives.

And then “quality care” will be defined by government metrics. If 33% survive, it’s quality.

Sanders has previously called for the elimination of private health insurance companies.

“Yes, it does, because you’re not going to a have a need for private insurance,” he said earlier this month during an interview with NPR when asked if private insurance “goes away” under Medicare for All.

You might have a need. But Bernie has decided that you don’t. That’s how the Left works.

It decides what you need. And then tells you to comply.

Article posted with permission from Daniel Greenfield

Colorado Senate Votes To Pass Unconstitutional Red Flag Bill – Sheriff Vows Not To Comply

Colorado, the state that couldn’t determine whether a woman committed murder when she cut an unborn baby from the abdomen of a pregnant woman due to their pretended abortion “laws,” has now seen their Senate pass a red flag bill, which would authorize law enforcement to  take people’s guns if a court rules them to be a risk to themselves or others, something that violates the Second, Fourth and Fifth Amendments of the US Constitution.

On Thursday, the Senate voted 18-17 in favor of the legislation, House Bill 1177.  No Republican supported the bill and even Senate President Leory Garcia, a Democrat, voted no against the bill.

“I want to continue working with my colleagues to find a Colorado solution,” Garcia said earlier this week in a written statement.

The unlawful bill is expected to be signed by Governor Jared Polis.

The Colorado Sun reported, “The Senate, where Democrats hold a slim 19-16 majority, was where the bill faced its only real challenge.”

That hurdle has now been crossed.

However, there are some constitutional sheriffs who have said that they will not comply with the unconstitutional bill if it is signed by the governor.

“If you pass an unconstitutional law, our oaths as commissioners or myself as the sheriff — we’re going to follow our constitutional oath first,” said Sheriff Steve Reams.

Other sheriffs would rather mental health facilities be funded properly, which I question whether that is the role of government or not.

“It’s time we quit trying to put lipstick on a pig and start funding our mental health facilities, instead of trying to take the rights from our people,” said another sheriff.

The state’s attorney general, Democrat Phil Weiser, said that these men should leave office if they can’t follow a “law” that is unconstitutional.

“If a sheriff cannot follow the law, the sheriff cannot do his or her job,” Weiser said. “The right thing to do for a sheriff who says, ‘I can’t follow the law’ is to resign.”

Yet, Governor Polis is not exactly cozying up to Weiser’s comments.  Instead, he is leaving it up to the discretion of the police.

“Every law enforcement agency has limited resources, and they do have to prioritize what they choose to enforce or not enforce,” said Polis.

That’s a coward’s way out.

What the governor should do is state that the Constitution does not allow any state to engage in authoring red flag laws because they are an attack on the rights of the people.  He won’t do that because he’s playing politics…. with your rights.

I hope these sheriffs come through for their people and don’t kowtow to the pressure of the beast.  Let’s pray God gives them courage.

Muslim Rep. Rashida Tlaib Submits Impeachment Resolution With Support Of One Other Democrat

Muslim and alleged fraudulent representative Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) formally submitted her impeachment resolution on Wednesday with the support of just one other representative, a Democrat who is also Muslim, Al Green (TX).

Green has also tried to advance impeachment of President Donald Trump before and utterly failed.  Tlaib will probably do the same.

CNN reports:

“Just Al Green and I,” Tlaib said, adding that she does not think there will be any others who come forward with their support.
Tlaib has been working behind-the-scenes to get colleagues to put their name on the resolution that directs the House Judiciary Committee to inquire whether President Donald Trump committed impeachable offenses.

Earlier this week she sent a “Dear Colleague” letter to a targeted list of members who in the past had shown an openness to pushing for impeachment and that she thought could be open to signing their name to her resolution.

Asked if she is disappointed that others didn’t sign on, especially those in her freshman class who may have called for impeachment on the campaign trail, she said no.

In a last-minute news conference outside the Capitol, Tlaib brushed aside concerns that she failed to get more than one other Democrat to sign on to her resolution.

“For many of my colleagues, not one told me not to,” she said, explaining she wasn’t discouraged from pursuing her resolution. “And that’s important to know. Not one single person told me not to do this — and I think that speaks volumes, more than whether or not they signed on.”

The text of her letter to colleagues read in part:

We all swore to protect our nation, and that begins with making sure that no one, including the President of the United States, is acting above the law. I urge your support in recommending that the House Committee on Judiciary begin hearings, take depositions, and issue subpoenas to answer this question that is fundamental to the rule of law and the preservation of our democracy.

Clearly, she is suffering from a delusion, just like Adam Schiff.

“For many of my colleagues, not one told me not to,” she said, explaining she wasn’t discouraged from pursuing her resolution. “And that’s important to know. Not one single person told me not to do this — and I think that speaks volumes, more than whether or not they signed on.”

Yeah, it speaks volumes that they are going to let you hang yourself with your own rope.

Even House leadership isn’t considering her plans, which seems questionable at face value, sort of like her legitimacy to be in Congress.

“You can ask her how she’s doing on her resolution,” Pelosi told CNN earlier Wednesday. “That is not an initiative of our House caucus.”

“I’ve made it really clear on impeachment,” Pelosi added. “Everybody can do whatever they want to do but that’s not a place where we are right now. Right now, we are talking about health care, we are talking about climate and building the infrastructure of America in a green way. Just like we promised in the campaign. That is what we are spending our time on.”

Tlaib used vulgarity in a speech back in January in which she stated she was going to “impeach the m***erf**ker,” referring to President Trump.

Shortly after, there were nearly 300,000 people who signed a petition to have her removed from office for fraud, claiming that Tlaib lied about living in the district she ran to represent.

Clearly, this resolution is dead.  It’s a way to make Tlaib feel like she is special and doing something when she’s really doing nothing.

When are we going to see a real investigation into her Islamic terror ties and her alleged election fraud?  Hmmm.  Don’t hold your breath.

Article posted with permission from Sons Of Liberty Media

Pennsylvania’s Islamic Totalitarianism: State Dems Call Christian Prayer “Bigoted” – Applaud Qur’an Reading At State House Session

“State Rep. Jason Dawkins, another Muslim lawmaker, opened the session Tuesday by reading from the Quran, prompting applause in the chamber.”

The favored religion on the Left is one that has moved some of its adherents to wage war against the West for 1,400 years, as The History of Jihad illustrates in detail. Is it just coincidence that the Left seems to oppose every counterterror and national security measure, and always to denigrate Judeo-Christian tradition while exalting Islam?

An update on this story. “Pennsylvania state Dems slam Republican’s prayer as ‘offensive,’ bigoted,” by Lukas Mikelionis, Fox News, March 27, 2019:

Pennsylvania state Democrats branded as “offensive” a Republican’s decision Monday to open a voting session with a prayer and a thank-you to President Trump for supporting Israel, with some Dems claiming to be “horrified” by the remarks and accusing the female lawmaker of Islamophobia.

State Rep. Stephanie Borowicz, a Republican and associate pastor’s wife who was elected to the state House in November, was accused of bigotry after she invoked the name of Jesus at least 13 times just before the Legislature swore in its first Muslim woman at the Statehouse in Harrisburg.

“God forgive us — Jesus — we’ve lost sight of you, we’ve forgotten you, God, in our country, and we’re asking you to forgive us,” Borowicz said added. She then praised President Trump for his support of Israel.

“I claim all these things in the powerful, mighty name of Jesus, the one who, at the name of Jesus, every knee will bow, and every tongue will confess, Jesus, that you are Lord, in Jesus’ name,” Borowicz said.

Democrats slammed her for the prayer. Rep. Movita Johnson-Harrell, the Muslim lawmaker who was sworn in at the Statehouse, accused Borowicz of using her religion against her….

State Rep. Jason Dawkins, another Muslim lawmaker, opened the session Tuesday by reading from the Quran, prompting applause in the chamber.

Article posted with permission from Robert Spencer

Corrupt Clinton Governor Under Recent Fed Investigation May Run In 2020

Is it too early to tout a McAuliffe-Abrams ticket?

Everybody and their cousin is jumping into the 2020 race. It doesn’t matter if you’ve barely held public office or have had more corruption scandals than brain cells.

Come on down, Terry.

First on CNN: Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe under federal investigation for campaign contributions

Virginia Democratic Gov. Terry McAuliffe is the subject of an ongoing investigation by the FBI and prosecutors from the Justice Department’s public integrity unit, U.S. officials briefed on the probe say.

That was in 2016. Now on CNN, three years later.

Terry McAuliffe is moving closer to a 2020 presidential run, Democrats close to the former Virginia governor tell CNN.

McAuliffe has been telling Democratic allies that he is leaning toward jumping into the Democratic presidential race next month, according to three people who have spoken to him. The former governor has long said he would make a decision by the end of March, with a potential announcement later in April.

McAuliffe has been flirting with the ideal for a while. Under the Clintons, he was really close to the center of power. And its financial rewards. He racked up a legion of Clinton scandals, impressive even by Clintonworld scandals, which, considering McCabe, keep on coming even now and the Clinton email investigation.

Here’s a summary from that notorious right-wing publication, Mother Jones, of his past.

 He cooked up the idea of essentially renting out the Lincoln bedroom during the Clinton administration as a fundraising vehicle, and he smashed all previous presidential fundraising records in the process. When McAuliffe was the Dems’ top fundraiser, a campaign finance scandal besieged the Clinton White House. Coincidence? No.

Or the New York Times.

A 2011 New York Times editorial chastised McAuliffe as “a walking symbol of the wretched excess of the Clinton years.”[36]

During the 1996 election, Martin Davis, a Democratic fund-raising operative, who later pleaded guilty to fraud in relation to their dealings, implicated McAuliffe in an illegal contribution swap scheme

In 1999, the New York Times wrote that McAuliffe “transformed the art of raising money for public figures into the art of raising money for himself, leveraging a personal fortune from his political fund-raising contacts.”

In 2013, the Washington Post reported that McAuliffe used his political connections to generate big profits for himself while many of his the businesses he invested in failed.

Clearly, the 2020 candidate that the Dems deserve.

Article posted with permission from Daniel Greenfield

Rand Paul Wants Obama Officials INVESTIGATED For Inventing ‘Russian Conspiracy’ Hoax

Most Americans have heard by now that the inquiry of special investigator Robert Mueller into the Trump campaign’s ties with Russia during the 2016 presidential election was a giant failure.  While leftists and the media lost their collective minds thanks to a narrative they invented, Rand Paul suggested Obama officials should take a turn in the hot seat.

Senator Rand Paul has called on the Justice Department to investigate the Obama aides who forced the false claims into the minds of the public using propaganda and brainwashing tactics. According to The Washington Examiner, Paul used Twitter to call for an investigation of those responsible to the “Russian conspiracy hoax” perpetrated on the American people.

Others have called for a probe into Hillary Clinton’s campaign and Barack Obama’s administration for alleged attempts to spy on president Donald Trump during the 2016 election. Trump campaign pollster John McLaughlin believes it is past time to get it started too. “I’m very concerned that it’s becoming more clear that the Obama administration was able to obtain a FISA warrant to spy on our campaign based on phony opposition research from the Clinton campaign. Having federal law enforcement spy on a presidential campaign based on phony campaign research is really distressing and the true untold story,” he said.

“In retrospect, we now know this is one of the worst transitions in American history,” former Bush White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer told The Washington Times. “On the surface, they played nicely and said nice things. But below the surface, it is clear several people in the Obama administration were doing everything they could to leave time bombs behind that would detonate all around Donald Trump and his administration.” 

The bigger picture is that had this gone sourer than it already has, the Obama administration could have ignited a war with Russia.

Before the tears of the saddened liberals dried after Donald Trump beat Hillary Clinton to become the 45th president, Obama was at it with his “pen and phone,” determined to destroy any chance Trump had at being a success. Obama, who was upset that Hillary Clinton would watch Donald Trump inaugurated as president, decided to shift blame to Russia. He authorized a covert cyber operation to deploy “implants” in Russian networks that could be triggered remotely in retaliation to any future cyber aggression by Moscow, TheWashington Post reported Friday.

The implants, developed by the NSAare designed to hit Russian networks deemed “important to the adversary and that would cause them pain and discomfort if they were disrupted,” a former U.S. official told The Washington Post. Note the use of the word “adversary,” almost as if Obama’s goal was to begin a war with Russia. And to make matters worse, “U.S. intelligence agencies do not need further approval from (President) Trump, and officials said that he would have to issue a countermanding order to stop it,” the Post reported“The officials said that they have seen no indication that Trump has done so.” –SHTFPlan, June 2017

This conspiracy likely goes much deeper than anyone will ever be allowed to know.

Article posted with permission from Mac Slavo

GOP Rep. Matt Gaetz Embraces Climate Change – Proposes Alternative To AOC Green New Deal

We’ve all heard the expressions;  “Never wake a sleeping baby”;  “Let sleeping dogs lie”;  and, “Leave well enough alone”.  It’s good advice;  however, politicians don’t understand these simple, yet wise, statements.  When it comes to policy and lawmaking, Republicans try to “outdo” Democrats and vice versa.  Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Democrat freshman Congressman from New York, introduced the “Green New Deal” that outlined converting the united States to renewable energy sources, ditching fossil fuels entirely, and severely crippling the nation’s economy because we only have 12 years to “save the world” from the hoax of “climate change.”  Not to be outdone, Republican Florida Congressman Matt Gaetz has developed his own resolution called the “Green Real Deal”.

The Daily Caller reported:

GOP Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz is preparing to introduce a “Green Real Deal” resolution to contrast with Democratic New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s Green New Deal, according to Politico.

Ocasio-Cortez unveiled her resolution on Feb. 7 and immediately faced criticism for its scope and potential cost, which reached toward tens of trillions of dollars. 

A draft of Gaetz’s resolutionobtained by Politico, recognizes risks to the U.S. from climate change, citing Department of Defense reports that identify certain military assets and bases as at risk to rising sea levels and increasing severe weather events, such as hurricanes.

“Climate change creates new risks and exacerbates existing vulnerabilities in communities across the United States, presenting growing challenges to human health and safety, quality of life, and the rate of economic growth,” the draft says.

Energy lobbyists have seemingly received copies of Gaetz’s resolution are beginning to line up behind it in support.

“Congressman Gaetz deserves to be applauded for taking the lead in crafting a bold resolution that identifies actionable climate solutions that will benefit America’s economy, environment, and national security,” Heather Reams, executive director of Citizens for Responsible Energy Solutions, said in a statement.

Gaetz’s resolution pushes market-driven innovation and competition from companies developing green energy technology. It does not set any emission reduction goals.

The draft pledges “to reduce and modernize regulations so that clean energy technologies can be deployed, and compete.”

The united States has enough real problems to solve.  Yet, there are members of Congress expending energy to develop legislation, unconstitutional legislation at that, directed at the contrived climate change hoax.  With all the information available to disprove Al Gore’s “Church of Climate Change”, it appears no one in Congress is interested.

In 2015 article “Scientists Falsifying Data to Pander Global Warming“, the hoax of climate change, perpetrated by scientists and the United Nations, was documented.  The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) admitted their computers “exaggerated” the intensity of climate change in 2013.   The same year, scientists ridiculed the IPCC’s report as over-confident and suggested the IPCC be “put down”.   Again, in 2017, the IPCC’s climate models were found to be “totally wrong”.  Moreover, none of the IPCC climate models meet the standard of the Scientific Method, a standard for scientists to verify hypotheses and theories.

So, why are members of Congress peddling the “Green New Deal” and the “Green Real Deal”?  They belong to the climate change church of Al Gore.  Gaetz tweeted on March 12, 2019, “Climate change is real.  Humans contribute.”

Climate change is real. Humans contribute.

— Matt Gaetz (@mattgaetz) March 12, 2019

In all the research and resources available, there is no actual scientific proof that humans contribute to “climate change” nor that “climate change” is even real.  Abundant proof is available that debunks the UN IPCC claim of climate change and proof humans do not contribute since climate change is a hoax for worldwide redistribution of wealth.

They admit large parts of the world were as warm as they are now for decades at a time between 950 and 1250 AD – centuries before the Industrial Revolution, and when the population and CO2 levels were both much lower.

In 2010, the IPCC admitted climate policy had little to do with environmental protection;  it was about redistribution of wealth on a global scale.  Again, in 2013, the UN IPCC admitted climate change policy was not about the environment;  however, prominent individuals in the US and Canada supported implementing climate change initiatives even if climate change theory was wrong.

Former U.S. Senator Timothy Wirth (D-CO), then representing the Clinton-Gore administration as U.S Undersecretary of State for global issues, addressing the same Rio Climate Summit audience, agreed: “We have got to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic policy and environmental policy.” (Wirth now heads the UN Foundation which lobbies for hundreds of billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars to help underdeveloped countries fight climate change.)

Also speaking at the Rio conference, Deputy Assistant of State Richard Benedick, who then headed the policy divisions of the U.S. State Department said: “A global warming treaty [Kyoto] must be implemented even if there is no scientific evidence to back the [enhanced] greenhouse effect.”

In 1988, former Canadian Minister of the Environment Christine Stewart  told editors and reporters of the Calgary Herald: “No matter if the science of global warming is all phony…climate change [provides] the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world.”

In 1996, former Soviet Union President Mikhail Gorbachev emphasized the importance of using climate alarmism to advance socialist Marxist objectives: “The threat of environmental crisis will be the international disaster key to unlock the New World Order.”

Speaking at the 2000 UN Conference on Climate Change in the Hague, former President Jacques Chirac of France explained why the IPCC’s climate initiative supported a key Western European Kyoto Protocol objective: “For the first time, humanity is instituting a genuine instrument of global governance, one that should find a place within the World Environmental Organization which France and the European Union would like to see established.”

It doesn’t take an expert on climate or an expert on government to understand the motive of politicians to embrace the hoax of climate change when enough research and information is available to debunk climate change and man’s contribution to it.  It’s called fleecing the public of more money for their unconstitutional and frivolous spending.

According to The Daily Caller:

In contrast to the Green New Deal, the draft Green Real Deal resolution takes a positive view on nuclear energy. Ocasio-Cortez’s resolution did not mention the energy sector, causing some controversy among pro-nuclear energy experts.

Gaetz’s legislation takes a wide-ranging approach to cutting emissions through investing in fossil fuel carbon capture technology, new and updated nuclear and hydropower placements, making the power grid more efficient and granting energy companies improved access to public lands.

The resolution pledges to “empower individuals, states, and the marketplace” to develop and disseminate new technology that will cut the United States’ carbon emissions.

Whoever came up with the lie that nuclear energy production is “clean energy”?  Politicians and environmentalists alike fail to account for the radioactive waste generated that takes hundreds or thousands of years to dissipate nor where that waste is to be stored.  Moreover, one mistake by an individual at a nuclear power plant results in an accident like Three Mile Island or Chernobyl or Fukushima.  Chernobyl has already had one sarcophagus replaced and in about 20 or so years, will need another replacement – that will continue until the waste is spent.  There is no humanly way possible to clean up Fukushima, which continues to “pollute” the globe with radiation and radioactive waste and will for years to come.

How many people would be thrilled to have a nuclear energy power plant in their town or backyard?  Not many.

While politicians should be versed in the issues, it is painfully obvious they care not to read all the research;  and, neither does their staff.  No one read the Obamacare legislation before it was passed, proving they care little about inflicting disastrous legislation upon the public.  Money talks and those who can grease the palms of politicians get their agenda promoted and legislation passed related to that agenda regardless of constitutionality or adverse effect upon the people.

Another thing that appears to be occurring is some type of tit-for-tat contest between Democrats and Republicans to see who can out “socialism” the other, the people be damned.  Just as Republicans refused to repeal Obamacare, choosing to replace it with their version of government controlled health care insurance, the same is happening with the “Green New Deal”.   This proves that both parties are complicit with a socialist agenda, ignore the Constitution, and fail in properly representing the people.  Our “representatives” in the House and members of the Senate are operating as though the people work for them instead of the other way around.

These elected officials are not making decisions based on the scientific evidence that climate change is a hoax or even considering the data as inconclusive.  Instead, they embrace the UN IPCC “junk” science to rob citizens of more of their money for their own purposes, which aligns with the globalist agenda of one world government and wealth redistribution.  The willingness of both chambers of Congress to develop and possibly pass legislation based on partial information, inconclusive information or false information is negligent, irresponsible, incompetent, ignorant, self-serving and aggrandizing.

It demonstrates that both chambers of Congress consist of a majority who are anti-constitutionalists hell-bent on shafting the people.  Republicans may not go along with AOC’s ridiculous plan, but they will their own waiting in the wings should the “Green New Deal” fail to launch.  With either plan, the people lose while the politicians win.  It further cements the idea that every State should have recall procedures against Representatives and Senators who fail or refuse to adhere to their oath of office, the Constitution, and support any ideology anathema to the founding of the united States.

Georgia: Democrat Reps. Propose Bill to Require Men to Report Every Release of Sperm to Police

Atlanta, GA — In what serves as a perfect example of the mockery the political system in America has become, five Democratic representatives from Georgia have proposed a bill which would require men to report “certain events” of a sexual nature to law enforcement. The bill would require men to call the police to report the release of sperm.

According to the House website, HB 604 was introduced by Reps. Park Cannon (D-Atlanta), Renitta Shannon (D-Decatur), Donna McLeod (D-Lawrenceville), Sandra Scott (D-Rex) and Kendrick March 11. It does not appear to have been assigned to a House committee at this time.

It reads as follows:

To amend Chapter 1 of Title 35 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, relating to general provisions relative to law enforcement officers and agencies, so as to require certain males to report certain events to law enforcement; to provide for related matters; to repeal conflicting laws; and for other purposes.



Chapter 1 of Title 35 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated, relating to general provisions relative to law enforcement officers and agencies, is amended by adding a new Code section to read as follows:9″35-1-23. Any male 55 years of age or older shall immediately report to the county sheriff or local law enforcement agency when such male releases sperm from his testicles.”


All laws and parts of laws in conflict with this Act are repealed.

Kendrick has been in the media lately after she called for a “testicular bill of rights” legislative package that would regulate the bodies of men. The legislation, which was proposed in response to an abortion bill that just passed the House, would:

  • Require a man to get permission from their sex partner before they are able to obtain a prescription for Viagra or any other erectile dysfunction medication
  • Ban vasectomy procedures in Georgia, with punitive measures that are listed in HB 481
  • Make it an “aggravated assault” crime for men to have sex without a condom
  • Require DNA testing when a woman is 6 weeks and 1 day to determine the father of the child who will “IMMEDIATELY” start paying child support
  • Require a 24 hour “waiting period” for men to purchase any porn or sex toys in Georgia

Despite the supreme court clearly stating that states cannot ban abortion before the point of viability—23 to 25 weeks—the Georgia House voted earlier this month to do exactly that. Dubbed the “heartbeat bill,” the controversial and arguably unconstitutional legislation passed by a vote of 93-73 and will ban abortions once a heartbeat is detected.

The reason this is so controversial is that a heartbeat can be detected at close to 6 weeks—a period during which most women may not even know they are pregnant.

When asked by Rolling Stone if she was seriously considering following through with this legislation that would require men to report semen releases, Kendrick noted that she was “dead serious.”

Kendrick admitted that her bill would likely not pass, but she says the point of it is to “bring awareness to the fact that if you’re going to legislate our bodies, then we have every right to propose legislation to regulate yours.”

Women have every right to do with their bodies what they see fit and transgressions against women that seek to limit their ability to do so are certainly a problem. But attempting to fix that problem by punishing all men—many of whom likely support a woman’s right to choose—is as asinine as it is childish.

Now, Georgia taxpayers are financing a tit for tat situation that resembles a fight on a kindergarten playground more so than a political process.

Article posted with permission from Matt Agorist

Ilhan Omar Holding Secret Fundraisers With Hamas-Linked CAIR & Terror-Linked Muslim Charity

The Democrats won’t say a word about this. They have already learned that nothing negative whatsoever can be said about Omar, on pain of charges of “Islamophobia.” And support for Hamas-linked CAIR is mainstream among the Democrats.

They routinely appear at CAIR events and have no apparent interest in what the group is all about.

CAIR is an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas terror funding case — so named by the Justice Department.

CAIR officials have repeatedly refused to denounce Hamas and Hizballah as terrorist groups.

Several former CAIR officials have been convicted of various crimes related to jihad terror.

CAIR’s cofounder and longtime Board chairman (Omar Ahmad), as well as its chief spokesman (Ibrahim Hooper), have made Islamic supremacist statements about how Islamic law should be imposed in the U.S. (Ahmad denies this, but the original reporter stands by her story.)

CAIR chapters frequently distribute pamphlets telling Muslims not to cooperate with law enforcement.

CAIR has opposed virtually every anti-terror measure that has been proposed or implemented and has been declared a terror organization by the United Arab Emirates.

CAIR’s Hussam Ayloush in 2017 called for the overthrow of the U.S. government.

CAIR’s national outreach manager is an open supporter of Hamas.

“Omar Holding Secret Fundraisers With Islamic Groups Tied to Terror,” by Adam Kredo, Washington Free Beacon, March 22, 2019:

Democratic freshman Rep. Ilhan Omar (D., Minn.) has been holding a series of secret fundraisers with groups that have been tied to the support of terrorism, appearances that have been closed to the press and hidden from public view.

The content of these speeches, given to predominately Muslim audiences, remains unknown, prompting some of Omar’s critics to express concern about the type of rhetoric she is using before these paying audiences, particularly in light of the lawmaker’s repeated use of anti-Semitic tropes in public.

Omar recently spoke in Florida at a private event hosted by Islamic Relief, a charity organization long said to have deep ties to groups that advocate terrorism against Israel. Over the weekend, she will appear at another private event in California that is hosted by CAIR-CA PAC, a political action committee affiliated with the Council on American Islamic Relations, or CAIR a group that was named as an unindicted co-conspirator in a massive terror-funding incident.

Omar’s appearance at these closed-door forums is raising eyebrows in the pro-Israel world due to her repeated and unapologetic public use of anti-Semitic stereotypes accusing Jewish people of controlling foreign policy and politics. With Omar’s popularity skyrocketing on the anti-Israel left, it appears her rhetoric is translating into fundraising prowess.

It remains unclear what Omar has told these audiences in her private talks. Washington Free Beacon attempts to obtain video of past events were unsuccessful, and multiple local news and television outlets in the Tampa, Fla., area, where Omar spoke to Islamic Relief last month, confirmed they were unable to gain access to the closed door event.

Islamic Relief has come under congressional investigation for what lawmakers have described as its efforts to provide assistance to terrorist group such as Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood. The charity has been banned by some countries as a result of these ties.

In 2017, Congress sought to ban taxpayer funds from reaching the charity due to these terror links.

A representative from Islamic Relief declined to provide the Free Beacon with any material related to Omar’s appearance.

“The event was closed to the media. No materials are available,” the official said.

On Sunday, Omar will hold another meet and greet in Irvine, Calif., for CAIR-CA PAC. Those wishing to hear Omar speak are being asked to donate anywhere from $50 to $250 dollars, according to a flyer for the event.

The CAIR event also appears closed to the press. Free Beacon attempts to contact the organizer and obtain access were unsuccessful. Requests for comment on the nature of the speeches sent to Omar’s congressional office also were not returned.

CAIR, a Muslim advocacy group known for its anti-Israel positions, was named by the U.S. government as part of a large network of groups known to be supporting Hamas….

Article posted with permission from Robert Spencer

NJ Governor Signs “Rain Tax” Bill; Residents Can Now BE TAXED When It Rains On Their Property

In what is one of the most corrupt and vile things to have ever happened to the American political system, residents of New Jersey will now be taxed when something 100% out of their control happens. New Jersey’s governor Phil Murphy signed 19 bills into law on Monday, one of which, was the so-called “rain tax.”

Unfortunately, there were supporters of this tyrannical and wholly dictatorial law. Dubbed S-1073, supporters call it “flood defense,” and say it will serve as a long-needed tool to manage flooding and dirty runoff from rainwater.  So there are actually human beings on earth who want others and themselves stolen from because it rains.  There is nothing more disturbing that the current political path the United States is currently one.  It’s downright horrifying, actually.

Government is downright evil and shameless when it comes to taxation. These pillagers of the public just sit around all day thinking and dreaming of events and things to tax. – Judy Morris Report

“Most importantly, it gives communities a way to access new resources in a fair and equitable manner, and invest in related benefits such as additional green space. We urge the governor to sign it,” said New Jersey Future’s Chris Sturm, who serves as the advocacy group’s managing director for policy and water, according to a report by Patch.

Some have criticized the bill (albeit, now enough) saying that it would impose taxes “based on the weather” which is an unfair system of stealing the money of others. Obviously, if you have any heart at all.  It also gives the government much more power and more authority to steal more money by expanding what’s already an overly unfair burden (all taxation is “unfair”) on New Jersey residents who were saddled with several new taxes in 2019.

Assemblyman Christopher DePhillips has said the “rain-tax” bill permits local communities to tax “based on the weather,” and allows unlimited bonding and debt to be placed on the backs of property taxpayers. Not that bonding and debt aren’t already on the backs of the taxpayer, it is, but now New Jersey gets to carry the financial burden when it rains.  “The last thing this state needs is more debt and another runaway tax. Especially one that taxes the weather” said DePhillips.

The so-called soft socialism of western nations is just an illusion. Western nations are bankrupt, their economies are disintegrating before their very eyes and the promises of lifetime pensions, welfare and healthcare are nothing more than propaganda lies that voters willingly drink. In the end, they will have nothing and be much worse off. Such is the fate of a person who votes for the police powers of the state to steal from another to give them what they want but never earned. –Judy Morris Report

Article posted with permission from Mac Slavo

Pubescent Voting Bloc: Nancy Pelosi, ‘We’re Collecting Thoughts About’ Lowering The Voting Age

Editor’s Note:  Meanwhile, these same people don’t want you to have a gun of any kind at this age, won’t let you join the military, don’t want you to drink a beer, smoke a cigar… and on top of that, they make excuses for people like Beto O’Rourke for stupid, criminal things he did at this age.  These people are looking to control the younger generation, and you can bet they are going to do it if someone doesn’t stop them.  That someone is the American people.

The infantilization of millennials is a hallmark of the Democrat party. President Obama went so far as to keep “children” on their parents’ healthcare until the ripe old age of 26. But mob rule needs morons and the party of treason can rely on the enemedia to advance their totalitarian agenda.

American schools have been taken over by the left. Therefore, it makes sense that the radical Democrats would want America’s young people to vote, while they are being indoctrinated by activist educators.

Lowering the voting age, open borders, and abolishing the Electoral College means permanent political power for the Democrat Party, and the end of America as we know it.

The Republicans must not just win in 2020: they must rout.

“Nancy Pelosi: ‘We’re Collecting Thoughts About’ Lowering The Voting Age,’ by Kerry Picket, The Daily Caller, March 19, 2019:

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi explained to reporters Monday what kind of steps she may consider to lower the federal voting age to 16 years old at a press conference in Ferguson, Missouri.

“We’re obviously collecting thoughts about it. Just because someone has a good idea — any of us — doesn’t mean it’s going to the Floor next,” Pelosi said. “It means you go through the process. You build consensus. You build a crescendo. That’s another club I’m starting: the crescendo club.”

She added, “You have an idea? Let’s see how many people you can convince. Let’s see what the other views are that we can enhance this.”

Pelosi, at her weekly presser last Thursday, told The Daily Caller she always supported lowering the voting age. The Democrat-proposed legislation, known as the “For The People Act” (H.R.1), included a debate over a failed amendment intended to lower the voting age to 16 years of age. The amendment was defeated 126-305, but H.R.1 passed.

Article posted with permission from Pamela Geller

“Fauxahontas” Elizabeth Warren “White Nationalism” Poses Same Threat As “ISIS & Al-Qaeda Terrorism”

OK, seriously?  Not only can we take this woman’s mental capacity to serve in the US Senate seriously nor her claims to be Native American, even to the point that she forgot using that claim to get into college while hypocritically blasting others for bribing their kid’s ways into colleges, but now we are hearing from Senator “Fauxahontas” Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) that “white nationalism” poses the same threat as “ISIS and al-Qaeda terrorism.”

Here is a woman who has already had to apologize for making ethnic-related claims regarding her non-Native American status, but like most Socialists, Leftists and Communists, there is nothing like dividing people based on how their Creator made them.

While I don’t deny that there have been those who felt superior due to skin color or ethnic origin, that is not necessarily the case in the US.

Islamic jihad, however, is a great threat and the numbers don’t lie, not only in the US, but around the world.

So, just like the good little Democrat exploiter, who never wants a crisis to go to waste, Warren interjected her stupidity into political commentary surrounding the New Zealand massacre.

Breitbart reports:

During a campaign stop in Memphis, TN, 2020 presidential hopeful Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) commented on white nationalism following the terror attack in two New Zealand mosques that left 50 people dead.

Warren compared white nationalism to ISIS and Al-Qaeda, saying all three “pose a threat” to the United States.

“It’s going to take acknowledging what a terrible problem white nationalism is and how it is a threat to the safety and security of the United States,” Warren said Sunday. “In the same way that ISIS and Al-Qaeda terrorism pose a threat to the U.S., so does the rise of white nationalism.”….

Clearly, this is more of a shot at President Donald Trump than it is anything with any level of substance.  Warren doesn’t know her you know what from a hole in the ground.

However, don’t blame Warren.  It’s the people in Massachusetts that put this illiterate, unconstitutional, mental midget and criminal into office.

Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media

State Senate Passes Bombshell Law Promising to Disobey ALL Federal Gun Control Laws

Missouri — As politicians and anti-gun rights activists continuously chant, “we don’t want to take your guns,” behind the scenes — in only a year — politicians have been working overtime to limit your right to bear arms. These laws are all a reaction to the tragic shooting in Parkland, Florida last year and, like most politicians always do, they are not letting this tragedy go to waste. Luckily, however, states like Missouri are moving to protect their residents from laws like these by passing legislation to ban gun control laws.

As the Sentinel reports, Missouri may have just made the most monumental step towards freedom and individual liberty since the signing of the Bill of Rights. In a 23-10 vote by Missouri’s state senate, the state passed a bill that would nullify ALL Federal gun laws and regulations, and make enforcement of those laws by federal officers within the State of Missouri a criminal offense.

Like it’s predecessor, SB613, Bill SB367 and it’s companion, House Bill HB786, would prevent all state agencies and their employees from enforcing any federal law that infringes the Second Amendment in any way, including gun registrations, fees, fines, licenses and bans. Originally authored in 2014, a former version of the bill was also passed, but vetoed by then Missouri Governor Jay Nixon.

The pro-2nd Amendment legislation leaves no room for error and blatantly refuses to abide by “all federal acts” which set out to stifle an individual’s ability to defend themselves.

“All federal acts, laws, executive orders, administrative orders, court orders, rules, and regulations, whether past, present, or future, which infringe on the people’s right to keep and bear arms as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the United States I and Section 23 of the Missouri Constitution shall be invalid in this state, shall not be recognized by this state, shall be specifically rejected by this state, and shall be considered null and void and of no effect in this state.”

According to the Sentinel, cops were not very happy with the passage of this bill as Missouri law enforcement officials raked in $34,462,153 in forfeitures from 2001 to 2008, according to a report by the Institute of Justice.

The bill is so pro-gun that even the NRA opposed it and attempted to insert language that would require gun owners to report a stolen firearm to police no more than 72 hours after the discovery of the theft, or face a $1,000 fine and a misdemeanor charge. However, they were unsuccessful and the bill is now moving to the House.

The reason bills like this are so necessary is because laws across the country are being passed en masse to limit your right to self-defense. Since the tragic shooting in Florida in February 2018, the Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence has recorded a whopping 55 new gun control measures in 26 states—in just the first six months of the year.

Some of these laws being passed are ‘Red Flag’ laws which are used to disarm individuals who are reported as a threat by a family member or friend. Many believe that these red flag laws are dangerous as they can prompt police action with little to no due process.

As a recent report out of FOX32, points out, nine states have passed laws over the past year allowing police or household members to seek court orders requiring people deemed threatening to temporarily surrender their guns, bringing the total to 14. Several more are likely to follow in the months ahead.

To show how willing these states are to use these laws, an unprecedented 1,700 orders to seize guns were issued in 2018, likely resulting in the confiscation of thousands of guns. What’s more, is the fact that this number is likely far greater because there is no requirement to report these numbers and this data doesn’t include California who has recently implemented some of the most draconian gun laws in the country.

To those who may be in favor of such laws, consider the following: There is no way to stop an estranged spouse from calling police repeatedly and telling them their ex is threatening to cause harm to others.

Anyone, any time, now has the ability to claim someone else is a threat and have police take their guns. One does not need to delve into the multiple ‘what if’ scenarios to see what sort of ominous implications arise from such a practice. Luckily, some states have put in checks that require further investigation before police go in to take someone’s guns.

Although it is not perfect, an example of one of these red flag laws with a system of checks is in Illinois. Gov. Bruce Rauner signed laws last year authorizing judges to take weapons away from people facing problems that make them dangerous to themselves or others. However, the person making the claim has 14 days to produce “clear and convincing” evidence that the person in question is potentially dangerous and should have weapons taken from him or her for up to six months.

Although the ostensible intention of these recently passed laws is to stop a future tragedy, it is important to point out that there were already laws on the books that should’ve stopped Nikolas Cruz from ever getting a gun. But none of them worked.

Citing Cruz as the reason for advocating the erosion of the 2nd Amendment, the anti-gun activists are claiming he should’ve had his guns taken which would have prevented the tragedy. Sadly, however, they are ignoring the fact that he was accused of multiple feloniesand should’ve never been able to purchase a gun in the first place—but law enforcement failed to act on any of it.

Also, in California, as TFTP reported in January, taking someone’s guns away does not prevent that person from illegally obtaining another firearm and using it to commit murder.

In January, a tragedy unfolded in California as a deranged gunman, Kevin Douglas Limbaugh, walked up on an innocent woman, officer Natalie Corona, pulled out his guns and began shooting her repeatedly until she died. Limbaugh then fired several more shots at others before turning the gun on himself and taking his own life.

Limbaugh obtained the gun illegally because police had already taken his legal ones.

According to police, Limbaugh’s guns were confiscated last year likely related to the red flag law. In September, Limbaugh was charged with a felony count of battery with serious bodily injury. That charge stemmed from Limbaugh punching a co-worker, Gilbert Duane McCreath, while the two worked at the casino the night of Sept. 20, according to the Sacramento Bee.

After the charges, Limbaugh was given a high-risk assessment that determined the chance of him re-offending was low, but he was still ordered to turn in his registered weapons to police, the only one being a Bushmaster AR-15. On November 9, Limbaugh turned in the weapon.

Sadly, the laws designed to keep the guns out of the hands of bad people failed, and an innocent young woman was murdered.

The reactionary nature of disarming Americans because deranged psychopaths kill people is dangerous and only serves to keep the guns out of the hands of law abiding citizens as the above two cases illustrate. Moreover, deranged psychopaths don’t even need guns to cause mass death.

According to a 2015 study, even if all guns were removed from America, in a ten year period, 355 people still would’ve been murdered in mass killings. 

From 2006 to 2015, 140 people were murdered by arsonists in mass fires, 104 were stabbed in mass stabbings, and 92 people were beaten to death in mass killings. To reiterate, these are deaths in which four or more people were killed.

“People sufficiently enraged to commit such crimes may also be motivated to find other ways,” criminologist James Alan Fox of Northeastern University points out.

Luckily, Missouri politicians seem to grasp the notion that the only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun, is a good guy with a gun. Now, if they could stop raiding cancer patients in the hospital for treating their illnesses with a plant, that would be another giant step forward.

Article posted with permission from The Free Thought Project

Democrats Use Nazi Policy To Get Registration, Then Confiscation, Of Your Guns

Happiness is a warm gun, sang the Beatles, but Democrats are singing registration, then confiscation, of your guns. A “Firearm Registration” bill was introduced in the Pennsylvania Legislature on March 8, 2019.

Safety is the mantra of anti-gun activists, but their claim of control is a means to their goal of a gun-free society. This progressive policy can be implemented only by compliant citizens. But political opponents, the “deniers,” must be eliminated by social shaming or civil and criminal penalties. There are historical lessons of totalitarian governments, which rule because citizens have been deprived of weapons.

The Nazi policy

In Nazi Firearms Law and the Disarming of the German Jews, page 537, Stephen P. Halbrook observed:

“The record establishes that a well-meaning liberal republic would enact a gun control act that would later be highly useful to a dictatorship. That dictatorship could then consolidate its power by massive search and seizure operations against political opponents, under the hysterical ruse that such persons were ‘Communist’ firearm owners.”

“It could enact its own new firearms law, disarming anyone the police deemed ‘dangerous’ and exempting members of the party that controlled the state. It could exploit a tragic shooting of a government official to launch a [sic] pogrom, under the guise that Jewish firearm owners were dangerous and must be disarmed.”

“This dictatorship could, generally, disarm the people of the nation it governed and then disarm those of every nation it conquered.”

The USA’s fundamental rights

“A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” The Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

“In the 2008 case District of Columbia v. Heller, the Supreme Court held that the ‘Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home.’” Reported by the Legal Information Institute of the Cornell Law School.

“The above experiences influenced perceptions of fundamental rights in both the United States and Germany,” Halbrook explained: “Before entering the war, America reacted to the events in Europe in a characteristic manner. Seeing the Nazi threat and its policies, Congress passed the Property Requisition Act of 1941 authorizing the President to requisition certain property for defense, but prohibiting any construction of the act to ‘require the registration of any firearms possessed by any individual for his personal protection or sport’ or ‘to impair or infringe in any manner the right of any individual to keep and bear arms.’” Nazi Firearms Law, pp. 536-37.

“Remember that registration of firearms is only the first step,” stated the Requisition Act’s sponsor, Rep. Paul Kilday (D-TX). “It will be followed by other infringements of the right to keep and bear arms until finally the right is gone.” Nazi Firearms Law, p. 537, fn. 289.


A secret Nazi Gestapo Order (1941) is compared to Pennsylvania’s Firearm Registration bill (2019) in this side-by-side chart. Pennsylvania’s bill has more requirements than the Nazi’s order. In Pennsylvania, if the bill becomes law, a gun owner will be required to provide more information than a person who registers to vote.

For the right of self-defense, a person would be required annually to self-report ownership of each gun and describe it in detail. A certificate or renewal is not guaranteed because the State Police could deny the application. Partisan bureaucrats may not appreciate an applicant’s conservative politics: Allegiance to the Bill of Rights and limited government. Far-fetched? Just ask Tea Party organizations who were delayed or denied non-profit status by Obama’s IRS.

The State Police’s database could be released for official or nefarious purposes: The Pennsylvania Legislature under the guise of oversight. Freedom of Information requests by liberal media and advocacy groups.

Anti-gun zealots could dox persons who own guns. New York’s concealed weapon permit holders were posted via a map on the internet. There was proposed a multi-state map. Liberal news agencies and the social media mob have harassed law-abiding, private citizens. Identification of gun owners is not likely to deter criminals, who may have a shopping list for gun collections.

An enemy could learn that you own a gun. A related “red flag” law may be used for a fraudulent claim against you. The police will confiscate your gun pending a court hearing. Meanwhile, an enemy has an opportunity to cause injury or murder of you.

Law-abiding citizens’ registration of guns will not prevent criminals from obtaining unregistered guns. No lives will be saved. Note the bill’s absence of “whereas” clauses of findings of facts to support unidentified benefits. Also, the absence of redeeming press releases of the bill being introduced by Democrats: Angel CruzMary Jo Daley, and Mary Louise Isaacson; and Democrat co-sponsors: Joseph C. HohensteinJoanna E. McClinton, and Benjamin V. Sanchez. The bill failed in 2009-102011-122013-142015-16, and 2017-18.

This proposed law could be enforced only if the government is aware that you own a gun. Will the police conduct a search for guns, literally door to door?

If you are forced to use a gun for self-defense, but fail to comply with registration, could your defense effectively be an infringement of the Fifth Amendment?

Fail to register a gun, then risk a criminal penalty of 90 days in jail. The government likely will confiscate your gun; You likely will not be eligible to possess another gun; and you likely will be limited to lesser forms of self-defense.

Gun registries will lead to gun confiscation, as illustrated by AustraliaCanada, and Germany; as well as the United States: CaliforniaIllinois, and the heart of liberalism: New York City.

National gun confiscation has been proposed by liberals including Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA; 2018); the NAACP (2018); and Hillary Clinton, presidential candidate (2016).

Admit it, liberals, you really do want a total ban on firearms.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, suggested that a Democrat President could declare gun violence as a national emergency.


Have we not learned the lesson of the Nazi policy to disarm, and then control, its citizens? Nazi gun laws facilitated the murder of political enemies, specifically the Holocaust of more than six million Jews.

What part of the Second Amendment’s independent status, “shall not be infringed,” did these legislators, some attorneys, not understand? The U.S. Constitution trumps a state statute. A first-year law student learns this principle.

Liberals ignore constitutional law in favor of an agenda of a gun-free society. Liberals use safety as subterfuge for registration leading to confiscation of guns.

I appreciate our Founding Fathers’ wisdom that the Second Amendment is a guard against tyranny, whether the enemy is foreign or domestic.

Since self-defense is a God-given right, I believe in the Doctrine of the Lesser Magistrates: Should gun registration become law by an act of either a state or federal government, I will not comply. Such a law would classify this patriot as a criminal.

Read relevant documents:

Law Comparison

Pennsylvania HB768: Firearm Registration Act

Pennsylvania Summary Offenses

Nazi Firearms Laws

Nazi Gestapo Order

Posted with permission from Pamela Geller

Gerald Lostutter is a Florida licensed attorney, college professor, journalist, and patriot life member (endowment level) of the National Rifle Association. This article does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should consult a licensed attorney for advice.

Media Coverage Of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Has Led To Her Tanking Poll Numbers – Leads To Epic Meltdown

While Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is certainly not the sharpest knife in the drawer, you have to give her credit that she knows how to get media attention, but sadly for her, that media attention has backfired, exposing the reality of what an absolute, illogical person she is with a totalitarian bent.  Polling numbers demonstrate the media’s coverage of AOC has caused her poll number to tank since last summer.

Gallup put out the numbers on Friday.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Two months into her new job on Capitol Hill, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has become a much more recognizable figure to Americans. Half of U.S. adults were unfamiliar with or had no opinion of her in September after her seismic primary win over the summer, but that figure has shrunk to 29% today. But the increased visibility has not improved her overall standing with Americans. Whereas the public had mixed views of Ocasio-Cortez in September, her image now tilts slightly negative, with 31% viewing her favorably and 41% unfavorably.

Since September, the congresswoman’s unfavorable rating has climbed 15 percentage points while her favorable rating is up by seven points. The latest data are from a Gallup poll conducted Feb. 12-28.

Ocasio-Cortez has garnered outsized media attention for a single member of the House of Representatives since last year when she defeated a 10-term incumbent in the primary. Young and social media-savvy, the congresswoman has used her new platform to advocate for progressive ideas and sponsor the New Green Deal, an ambitious proposal to combat climate change.

The trajectory of Ocasio-Cortez’s image has some similarities to that of former House Speaker Newt Gingrich. Though Gingrich was no newcomer to Congress, he only gained national prominence after leading the Republican takeover of Congress in 1994. Like Ocasio-Cortez, he quickly became a household name with more viewing him unfavorably than favorably within a few months of assuming the House speakership in 1995.

Underscoring how far she has come so quickly, Ocasio-Cortez’s ratings are currently similar to Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, whose favorable, unfavorable and no opinion ratings from December are nearly identical to the congresswoman’s latest figures. Schumer has served in Congress since 1981, first in the House of Representatives, and since 1999 in the Senate.

So, what caused AOC to go into meltdown mode over these numbers?  Well, again, it’s her inability to think, reason or understand reality.

Breitbart wrote an article on the poll numbers.

While there’s no question all this media coverage has given Ocasio-Crazy a national profile in an unprecedented amount of time, there is also no question that national profile is a mostly negative one.

According to Gallup, of those who do know Ocasio-Crazy, a meager 31 percent view her favorably, while a plurality of 41 percent view her unfavorably. That puts her 10 points underwater with the American public.

When this poll was first taken in September, Ocasio-Crazy was only two points underwater. Back then, her favorable rating sat at 24 percent while her unfavorable rating was just two points higher at 26 percent.

Over the last five or so months, her favorability rating has increased only seven points (24 to 31 percent) while her unfavorable rating leaped a whopping 15 points (26 percent to 41 percent).

What is most revealing about these numbers is what it says about the eunuchs in the establishment media. The glowing wall-to-wall coverage Ocasio-Crazy has enjoyed backfired bigtime.

And so, once again, we see compelling proof the establishment media no longer have the power or the moral authority to move public opinion their way. In fact, in the case of Ocasio-Crazy, public opinion moved in the opposite direction the media intended.

So, the genius who believes the world will end in 12 years shot back claiming, “If you want to know what subconscious bias looks like,” she screeched, “it’s a headline saying ‘AOC is underwater with every group EXCEPT women, nonwhites, and 18-34 year olds.’

“So older, conservative white men are considered “everyone” and everyone else is discounted as an exception,” she added.

Uh, what?

Still, she got 129,000 likes for that gibberish of misunderstanding.

It got worse.

“The reason people know more [about me] is bc Fox News has turned into “AOC TMZ” (no offense to TMZ), so awareness is growing w/ GOPers,” she tweeted in a follow-up.

Yes, we can’t be scared by that because the world ending in less than 12 years is far scarier.

The point is she fails to see that her favorability didn’t just tank with “old white men.”  She tanked across the board:  seven points with independents, three points with women, seven points with young people age 18-34 and eight points with ages 35-54.

There is a saying that it’s better people think you are a fool that open your mouth and remove all doubt.  As long as the media puts the microphone in front of this puppet, she is going to keep demonstrates how foolish she really is, both economically/politically and theologically.

The GOP just needs to keep letting her talk.  She’s committing suicide in front of everyone.

Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Mocks God: “What Good Are Your Thoughts & Prayers When They Don’t Even Keep The Pews Safe”

49 people were just ruthlessly gunned down at two mosques in the city of Christchurch, New Zealand and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is using it as an opportunity to mock God.  As you will see below, in response to the mass shootings she posed this question on Twitter: “What good are your thoughts & prayers when they don’t even keep the pews safe?”  Conservatives were obviously her intended target, but her statement implies that either God won’t listen to our prayers and stop these terror attacks or that He simply can’t do it because He lacks the power to do so.  Either way, her statement is a direct attack on God and believers all across America are deeply, deeply offended by her statement.

What just happened in New Zealand is yet another example that demonstrates that the thin veneer of civilization that we all take for granted on a daily basis is rapidly disappearing.  Shooter Brenton Tarrant is a horribly deranged man who decided that he would gain worldwide fame by shooting a whole bunch of innocent people in cold blood.  And it turns out that he wasn’t even from New Zealand

A 28-year-old Australian man who was charged with murder was remanded without plea until his next appearance in court on April 5, while two others remain in police custody. NBC’s Australian subsidiary, Channel 7, say police sources have named one of the suspects as Brenton Tarrant.

The charged individual “traveled sporadically to New Zealand and stayed for varied amount of time,” but was not a resident of Christchurch, Ardern said in a statement.

In this day and age, this sort of thing can literally happen anywhere.  No community is truly “safe”, and we all need to understand that our world has fundamentally changed.

When a great tragedy like this happens, it is not time to jump on social media and try to use it to score political points.

Unfortunately, that is precisely what Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and others on the left have been doing.  Here is her full statement about “thoughts & prayers” in context

At 1st I thought of saying, “Imagine being told your house of faith isn’t safe anymore.”

But I couldn’t say “imagine.”

Because of Charleston.
Sutherland Springs.

What good are your thoughts & prayers when they don’t even keep the pews safe?

If she had simply mocked gun owners, conservatives or her political opponents, that would have been bad enough.

But she didn’t stop there.

She mocked almighty God by implying that our thoughts and prayers are worthless.

There is no room in Congress for someone that would make such a statement, and I am calling on Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to immediately resign.

Others on the left are relentlessly pointing their fingers at conservatives in the aftermath of this attack, but Brenton Tarrant was not a conservative.  In fact, he made this explicitly clear in the manifesto that he left behind

The terrorist gunman who killed 49 Muslims at a mosque in New Zealand said in his own manifesto that he wanted “no part of” conservatism, describing himself as an “eco-fascist” and expressing admiration for Communist China.

Answering the question “Were/are you a conservative?”, Brenton Tarrant wrote, “No, conservatism is corporatism in disguise, “I want no part of it.”

But you aren’t hearing that on the mainstream news, are you?

In his manifesto, Tarrant also expressed disdain for Donald Trump, and he openly admitted that the “nation with the closest political and social values to my own is the People’s Republic of China.”

That would make him a far left communist more than anything else.  But the mainstream media just keeps using terms such as “right wing extremist” to describe him.

Tarrant also made it abundantly clear in his manifesto that he wants to see “a civil war in the United States”

At three points in his manifesto, the shooter also states his intention to spark a civil war in the United States by triggering crackdowns on the Second Amendment. In his laundry list of motivations, the shooter spends the most amount of time discussing this goal, which he believes will ultimately lead to a “fracturing” of the U.S. along “cultural and racial lines.”

As he describes it, his attack will “Create conflict between the two ideologies within the United States on the ownership of firearms in order to further the social, cultural, political, and racial divide within the United States.”

Without a doubt, our nation is more divided today than we have ever seen in modern American history, and the stage is set for the mass societal chaos that I depicted in “The Beginning Of The End”.  I am stunned by all of the anger, frustration and hatred that I see throughout our society, and it is getting worse with each passing day.

If we don’t learn how to love one another, we simply are not going to make it as a society.

Loving others does not mean that you always have to agree with them.  We must always contend for the truth, but at the same time, we have got to find a way to love those that are opposed to us.

Hatred never leads anywhere good, and Tarrant is a perfect example of that fact.  Sadly, our world is filled with more hate than ever before, and that is going to have very serious consequences for all of us.

Article posted with permission from Michael Snyder

Self-Proclaimed Pro-Life Republicans Blast Democrats For Opposing Bill To Protect Babies Who Survive Attempted Murder

Democrats, liberals, progressives, LGBTQxyz individuals, socialists, Marxists, fascists, and communists, it’s time to stand up and represent.  Many of your party members in Congress refuse to protect the lives of innocent babies who are murdered in the womb and the lives of innocent babies born who survived the attempted murder on their life.  Stand up and represent your support for infanticide and murdering babies in the womb.  It’s very simple really;  either you are against murder (anti-murder) or you are for murder (pro-murder).  There are no shades of gray;  no special circumstances under which one can justify murder;  or, no justification for the killing of another human being who has committed no offense against the people or the nation.

WND reported:

A group of pro-life Republicans in the House gathered Wednesday to ask the question: Why are Democrats fighting so hard to stop born infants from getting medical care?

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R., Calif.), Whip Steve Scalise (R., La.), and Republican Conference Chairwoman Liz Cheney (R., Wyo.), and others lambasted Democrats for blocking legislation requiring doctors to treat babies born after failed abortions. The Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act would legally cover infants who are still alive after botched abortions with “the same claim to the protection of the law that would arise for any newborn, or for any person who comes to a hospital, clinic, or other facility for screening and treatment or otherwise becomes a patient within its care.”

With the words “end infanticide” emblazoned on the lectern at which they spoke, the GOP members of Congress emphasized their pro-life principles but also asked why even pro-choice Democrats would tolerate the killing of infants outside the womb.

The answer is simple – pro-choice is pro-murder.  If one is willing to murder an innocent human being, in this case a baby in the womb, one is certainly willing to murder a baby after birth or surviving the attempt on its life in the womb.  But, self-proclaimed “pro-life” Republicans are willing to “tolerate” the murder of babies in the womb.  Therefore, no Republican claiming to be “pro-life” can expect their Democrat counterparts clinging to “pro-choice” to back down on their promotion of baby murder post-birth when the socialist/communist doctrine devalues human life and uses violence and force, including murder, to promote their ideology.

WND continued:

“There are some issues you really can’t believe you have to have debated, and this is one of those issues,” Cheney said.

Specifically, Scalise implored Democrats to sign the discharge petition to bring the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act out of committee and onto the floor of the House.

“I’m calling on every member of Congress to sign the discharge petition,” Scalise said. “Let’s have a debate.”

The bill has gone down more than a dozen times in the House and Senate. The bill’s Senate sponsor, Ben Sasse (R., Neb.), said he was surprised it was blocked by a filibuster since nothing in its language restricts abortion, but that hasn’t stopped abortion-rights groups from denouncing it in strident terms. House members echoed Sasse’s point that this bill only serves to protect babies that have been born, repeatedly asking why Democrats have blocked it a total of 17 times.[Emphasis mine.]

“Seventeen times we’ve asked,” said Indiana’s Rep. Jackie Walorski (R.). “I cannot fathom, to our Democratic leadership, what are you afraid of?”

“It’s unbelievable,” Cheney said. “The Democrats are fighting for infanticide.”

Cheney is correct – Democrats are fighting for infanticide.  However, Republicans are operating as hypocritical as Democrats.  One cannot claim to be “pro-life” and support “pro-choice” – the murder of babies in the womb.   Murder is murder;  there is no reclassification of the definition just because another human being is in the womb.  If you are Republican and support the Republican position, stand up and represent.  Be proud of your affiliation.

But, Democrats continue to refer to women deciding to murder their unborn children through “murder-for-hire” scenarios as “women’s choice.”  The baby has two parents.  Why is the rights of the father not considered?  A baby is not an appendix, a liver or body part of its mother.  It is a separate human being, with different DNA than its mother, with all the inherent God-given individual unalienable rights as those already born, and the mother is the vessel/caretaker through which that individual human being is nurtured to development to survive without its vessel.

Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA) slammed Republicans and the bill as being against “women’s rights” and “anti-doctor, anti-family, and anti-woman.”  According to Murray, as reported by WND, a law already exists that protects babies in these cases (those who survive the murder procedure known as abortion);  but, the bill does not contain any criminal penalties for doctors nor provision for the surviving baby to receive medical care.

How is protecting an innocent baby’s life “anti-doctor, anti-woman, or anti-family”?

“Kristyn Brandi, a board member of Physicians for Reproductive Health, said the Republican bill ‘is a stark departure from the 2002 law as it singles out abortion and applies strict new requirements on abortion providers only, with the intent to malign and threaten abortion providers.'”

This back and forth, “tit-for-tat” embarrassing arguing among politicians comes from attempting to justify murder based upon age/condition of being born, unless you are a Democrat.  In the case of Democrats following the lead of New York’s Andrew Cuomo, Virginia’s Ralph Northam, and Kathy Tran, it is acceptable to murder babies after being born if the mother decides she wants to kill her baby.  Although Tran walked back her comments to declare that murdering a baby when a woman is giving birth is infanticide, Washington Democrats refuse to walk back their support for infanticide.

Rep. Ben Cline (R-VA) partially gets it when he said, “There’s an important person being left out of that discussion, and that’s the baby.”

The baby, being an individual human being, is denied all the rights bestowed upon him/her by God by the mother, the doctor, and the government, most importantly the right to life;  but, the baby is being denied due process before being murdered just for existing and because the mother doesn’t want the child.  Who is to uphold the rights of the baby through representation?  Who stands up to protect those who cannot protect themselves?

All of this skirting around the issue would be avoided if murder wasn’t being politicized.  Life begins at conception and life has intrinsic value.  And, murder is murder regardless of age or status of birth.  It’s that simple.  But, “party politics” has taken this issue to the extreme and bizarre.  Republicans cannot have it both ways – claim to be “pro-life” while still supporting the murder of babies in the womb at any stage.  And, Democrats cannot survive supporting the murder of babies in the womb and after birth.  This is why no one should be loyal to any party because both are hypocritical, lawless and criminal when it comes to protecting the most innocent among the citizens.  The loyalty should be God first and His commandments, then, the founding documents of this republic.

So, it boils down to this one question, “are you pro-murder or anti-murder?”  There are no “ifs, ands, buts or qualifiers.”  The qualifiers are what these politicians are trying to work around to justify the unjustifiable.  If, after this, you can still support a party, stand up, Democrats, and represent;  the same for you Republicans.  If you can’t support either party because of this, you are now free from group-think and realize that both parties are corrupt, criminal and undeserving of your support.

American citizens should be able to reject the party system based on this one issue.  When politicians in both parties debate at what point it is acceptable to commit murder, there is a big problem with the morality of this nation reflected in these political hacks.  Today, it’s innocent babies.  Tomorrow, it could be any demographic group whom these political hacks decide is expendable.

There is only one position and that is murder is wrong, immoral, and illegal, regardless of age.

Trump: Ryan Blocked Subpoenas Of Democrats Who Should Have Been Investigated

Well, what can I say?  I tried to tell conservatives back in 2012 that Paul Ryan and Mitt Romney were not conservatives nor constitutionalists.  No one would listen.  I even got death threats from some of these people.  I’ll bet they’ve been singing a different tune now that these men have been opening their mouths and for Paul Ryan, running the show the past couple of years.  Now, President Donald Trump has declared that some of the reason corrupt, criminal Democrats weren’t subpoenaed by Congress was because Ryan blocked the subpoenas.

In an exclusive interview with Breitbart, Trump said that Ryan blocked issuance of subpoenas for Democrats he believes should be investigated.  However, now that Republicans are no longer in charge of the House, Trump claims that some of those people may have gotten away with that which they needed to be investigated.

Breitbart reports:

Trump said that House Freedom Caucus Chairman Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC) and his predecessor and fellow conservative Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) wanted to be tougher with the left, but that Ryan would not let them.

“Paul Ryan wouldn’t give the right to have any subpoenas,” Trump told Breitbart News. “Okay? Now in all fairness, Meadows and Jordan and all these guys, they wanted to go tougher, but they weren’t allowed to by leadership.”

Trump’s comments came in a wider part of the conversation about how the left is more “vicious” than the right—and that the left in American politics plays “cuter and tougher.”

“So here’s the thing—it’s so terrible what’s happening,” Trump said when asked by Breitbart News Washington Political Editor Matthew Boyle about how the left is fighting hard. “You know, the left plays a tougher game, it’s very funny. I actually think that the people on the right are tougher, but they don’t play it tougher. Okay? I can tell you I have the support of the police, the support of the military, the support of the Bikers for Trump – I have the tough people, but they don’t play it tough — until they go to a certain point, and then it would be very bad, very bad. But the left plays it cuter and tougher. Like with all the nonsense that they do in Congress … with all this invest[igations]—that’s all they want to do is –you know, they do things that are nasty. Republicans never played this.”

OK, that’s great that President Trump sees this and is speaking out on it.  However, whose hands does this fall into to investigate and bring justice in the matter, according to our Constitution?  That’s right, the president.

So, I believe exactly what President Trump is saying, just like I believe what he said about crooked Hillary and believing she is “guilty as Hell,” but the question I have is, Mr. President, why are you not fulfilling your promise to deal with Hillary Clinton and throw in the rest of the lot of these people you believe should have been subpoenaed?  Why are you merely talking about it and pointing the finger at Ryan, and rightly so, but not fulfilling your oath

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” –Article II, Section I, Clause 8, US Constitution

It is the President’s constitutional duty “to take care that the Laws be faithfully executed” (Article II, Section 3).

Paul Ryan talks like he’s a conservative, but when it comes to actually “doing” conservative, well, that’s another story.  While I’m glad Trump pointed out Ryans’ failures, largely because he’s a coward and a controlled man, that is no excuse for President Trump to right the wrongs done by Ryan.

Let’s see some of those subpoenas, Mr. President.  I’ll back you on them!

Senate Votes To Block Trump’s Emergency Declaration To Fund Southern Wall – Trump Vows Veto

On Thursday, the US Senate voted 59-41 in favor of blocking President Donald Trump’s declaration of funding the southern border wall as a national emergency.  However, Trump voiced his opposition in a one word tweet, “Veto.”

The border wall has been a campaign promise, despite the fact that Congress has not allocated funds for it per the Constitution, and despite the fact that the federal government does not own the land on which the border wall would be built, again, per the Consitution.

However, that did not stop Senate Democrats and some Republicans from voting against what is clearly an unconstitutional declaration of a “national emergency” by the president to build the wall.

Still, Trump responded with a single word tweet, “Veto!”

Trump promised the veto ahead of the vote.

“A big National Emergency vote today by The United States Senate on Border Security & the Wall (which is already under major construction). I am prepared to veto, if necessary. The Southern Border is a National Security and Humanitarian Nightmare, but it can be easily fixed!” he tweeted on Thursday.

Trump, being confident that the Senate does not have the votes to overturn his veto claimed the vote was a “border security vote.”

But the question is whether or not his actions are constitutional.

FT reports:

The vote on Thursday pit Mr Trump against some of the most prominent members of his own party and will force him to issue the first veto of his presidency if he wants to proceed with taking money from other federal agencies to fund wall construction.

In addition to some Senate Republicans who have bucked Mr Trump in the past like Maine’s Susan Collins and Alaska’s Lisa Murkowski, Thursday’s 59 to 41 vote saw a wider array of party stalwarts turn against the president, including Utah’s Mitt Romney.

In total, 12 Republicans voted for the measure, including Mike Lee, Marco Rubio, Rand Paul and Lamar Alexander.

Frankly, if Mike Lee is voting against you, you are probably on really bad constitutional grounds, and I agree with those that opposed Trump on his declaration of a national emergency and trying to go around the Constitution regarding money for a wall.

The following Republicans joined Democrats to vote against Trump’s national emergency declaration and allocation of funds to build a wall on our southern border.

  • Lamar Alexander (Tenn.)
  • Roy Blunt (Mo.)
  • Susan Collins (Me.)
  • Mike Lee (Utah)
  • Jerry Moran (Kan.)
  • Lisa Murkowski (Alaska)
  • Rand Paul (Ky.)
  • Rob Portman (Ohio)
  • Mitt Romney (Utah)
  • Marco Rubio (Fla.)
  • Patrick J. Toomey (Pa.)
  • Roger Wicker (Miss.)

While I don’t care for many who are clearly RINOs in the pack, you can’t help but recognize people like Rand Paul and Mike Lee who have taken unpopular stands when it comes to the Constitution.

I’ll remind people who might claim I’m “anti-Trump” or whatever, this is a vote about what is constitutional, not whether one bows to a political idol.

When asked whether there would be consequences for Republicans who went after him for opposing him on his usurpation, Trump would not respond, but a White House spokesperson did say that he would not forget senators who opposed him that might ask him to attend their fundraisers or help them in any way.

So be it.  The law is the law, and there is no authorization in our Constitution for the president to engage in this.  If President Trump wanted to follow the Constitution, he should eliminate every single welfare benefit to any and all non-citizens.  In fact, if he was constitutional, he would eliminate every welfare benefit even to American citizens, but as you can see, no matter the party in the White House, it’s the people, the Constitution and our rights and money that is lost.

As even talk show host Rush Limbaugh declared on Thursday:

“Talks within the GOP conference to avoid an embarrassing rebuke for Trump collapsed Wednesday, and Sen. Mike Lee (Utah) joined four fellow Republican senators who have already said they will back the measure.”

Folks, it isn’t a big deal in the big scheme. You know why? Because they don’t have enough votes to override Trump’s upcoming veto of this. I saw Romney on TV, Romney was talking, “I am really worried that passing this will give future Democrat presidents an opportunity to behave outside the Constitution, and I say we’re –” you ever heard of Barack Obama? And the Republicans didn’t do anything to stop him when he did it.

You know, presidents are gonna take power any time they can get it. And if nobody’s gonna stand up to ’em like nobody stood up to Obama, then they’re gonna get away with it. The battle for power between the executive branch and the legislative is legion. It’s designed in the Constitution, separation of powers. We are supposed be distracted by this argument over power.

The founders of this country didn’t want this government passing laws every day. The more they could be tied up arguing with each other over who’s got the power to do this, the better. The real problem in our country is not that. The real problem in our country is how much power Congress has willingly given away to bureaucratic agencies in the executive branch, the quote, unquote bureaucracy or the administrative state.

And I’ll tell you the real irony about that is the president is in charge of the administrative state. The president is in charge of all of those bureaucratic agencies, but he’s got no control over ’em. They’re out of control. Congress has ceded so much power to regulatory agencies — the FDA, the EPA. I don’t need to waste time going through this again.

But the bottom is this is a bunch of Republicans who are taking positions here that they can campaign for reelection on, knowing full well the president’s gonna get his national declaration of emergency. You know why? ‘Cause they don’t have enough votes to override. He’s gonna veto this, and they can’t override the veto. So he’s gonna end up with his declaration of national emergency.

But you’re gonna have these Republican senators who are gonna be able to go back and campaign, “I voted against the expansion of presidential powers. I voted against presidents being able to violate the Constitution. You should reelect me because I –” that’s what they’re doing. Now, the media is portraying it as a rebuke of President Trump. And, look, there may be some of that.

OK, great, then Limbaugh goes on to try and make it political, which I grant some people will make it, but he made the case right there:  Congress has unconstitutionally given power to the president that he constitutionally does not possess.

So, what is wrong with anyone that opposes him, regardless of their motives?  I’ll tell you, a two-party system that gets you arguing over your party’s side rather than what the law that was written to protect the people, actually says.

Elizabeth Warren Says She Has “Zero” Sympathy For Parents Involved In College Cheating Scandal (After She Also Cheated To Get Into College)

Senator Elizabeth Warren, who recently took a DNA test to “prove” her Native American ancestry following attacks by President Trump, says she has “zero” sympathy when it comes to the celebrity parents involved in bribing administration and testing officials in an effort to get their children into top universities.

What’s most notable about Warren’s zero sympathy claim about cheating to get ahead is that her DNA test revealed she was about 1/1024th Native American, which is lower Native American ancestry than most Americans.

Warren reportedly benefited from her claims of ancestry to get ahead at Harvard and even identified herself as a “Native American” on a Texas Bar registration form.

As Dan Bongino points out, Warren appears to completely lack any sself-awarenesswith respect to her quick response when asked about the college cheating scandal:

Article posted with permission from Mac Slavo

Democrats’ New Campaign ‘Reforms’ Are A War On Free Speech

This is no surprise. The left has always been against the freedom of speech. Leftists cannot defeat their foes in discussion and debate, and so they move to shut them down by force. Look at what the social media giants are doing. Every one of them is owned and operated by Leftists who are working systematically to silence my colleagues and me and everyone else who dares to oppose the Leftist agenda and support President Trump. HR 1 is an attempt to circumvent and destroy the First Amendment, and codify speech restrictions. This has been a long time coming, but if it becomes law, America is finished as a free society.

“Democrats’ new campaign ‘reforms’ are a war on free speech,” by Rich Lowry, New York Post, March 11, 2019:

The same Democrats who can’t abide President Trump’s alleged offenses against the First Amendment passed, as their first priority, a speech-restricting bill opposed by the American Civil Liberties Union.

Trump shouldn’t call the media the ­“enemy of the people” or inveigh against Jeff Bezos for owning The Washington Post, but Nancy Pelosi’s HR 1, enacted in the House last week, is the true affront to the Constitution.

The wide-ranging legislation purports to reform campaign finance with a series of vague, sweeping measures that will act to chill speech when they don’t actively regulate or squelch it. HR 1 is called the For the People Act but would be more aptly titled The Be Careful What You Say, It Might Be Illegal Act.

Progressives can’t abide the notion that people in this country get together to spend money on advocacy outside the purview of the government — in other words, freely promote their favored causes as ­befits a free people living in a free country.

HR 1 cracks the whip. As the Institute for Free Speech points out, the current campaign-finance rules limit expenditures that expressly advocate for the election or defeat of a candidate or refer to a candidate in public advertising shortly before an election. The idea is to have clear rules, so groups can promote their views without fear of running afoul of federal regulations.

HR 1 blows up this regime. It seeks to regulate any speech at any time that “promotes or supports the candidate, or ­attacks or opposes an opponent of the candidate,” a fuzzy standard that could catch up all manner of non-electoral messages — for example, “Trump’s tariffs are a mistake,” or “Support Trump’s Wall.”

HR 1 also widens the definition of coordination between a group and a candidate to encompass almost any communication. It’d still be permissible to discuss a candidate’s position on an issue, so long as there is no talk “regarding the candidate’s or committee’s campaign advertising, message, strategy, policy, polling, allocation of resources, fundraising or other campaign activities.”

Even if a group doesn’t coordinate with a candidate under this loose standard, it could still be deemed to have coordinated if it were founded by someone who goes on to become a candidate; relies on the professional services of someone who also did work for a candidate; or is run by someone who had conversations about a campaign with the relative of a candidate.

On top of all this, HR 1 goes after the privacy of ­donors to advocacy organizations. It mandates the disclosure of the names and addresses of ­donors giving more than $10,000 to groups that engage in “campaign-related disbursements.” Given our toxic political environment, this would potentially subject the donors to harassment and abuse, and they might not even be aware of or support the communications in question….

Article posted with permission from Pamela Geller

Trump Promotes ‘Jexodus’

Prominent Democrat Jews such as Alan Dershowitz continue to deny that the Democrat Party is anti-Semitic. Jews such as Dershowitz are either delusional or dishonest. No one who is objective could say that the Democrat Party is not anti-Semitic, given what we have seen from the party in the last 10 years. The evidence is overwhelming, and it is time for Jews to flee.

Alan Dershowitz believes that prominent Jews like him could help marginalize the Jihad (hard-left) caucus of Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and others, if they were to stay in the party. Dershowitz is dreaming. That may have been true 10 years ago, but it is certainly not true now. On the contrary, it is the Jewish centrists such as Dershowitz who are being marginalized.

The only option for Jews is to stop supporting the Democrat Party with votes and donations. No Jew with a brain or with dignity should support the neo-Nazi Democrat Party in any way. Wealthy Zionist Jews such as Sheldon Adelson should financially contribute to the Jexodus organization, so that it has a greater chance of being successful.

“Trump promotes ‘Jexodus’ after ‘Fox & Friends’ segment,” by John Bowden, The Hill, March 12, 2019:

President Trumpappeared to promote a movement encouraging Jewish voters to leave the Democratic Party on Tuesday over remarks made by Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar (D)

Following a “Fox & Friends” interview with “Jexodus” activist Elizabeth Pipko, the president quoted Pipko in a tweet, writing that the Democratic Party doesn’t “care” about Jewish people in America.

“Jewish people are leaving the Democratic Party,” Trump tweeted, quoting the conservative activist. “We saw a lot of anti Israel policies start under the Obama Administration, and it got worsts & worse. There is anti-Semitism in the Democratic Party. They don’t care about Israel or the Jewish people.”

The website for Jexodus describes the movement as a group of Jewish voters tired of “bondage to leftist politics” and “hypocrisy, anti-Americanism, and anti-Semitism of the rising far-left.”

Article posted with permission from Pamela Geller

Pelosi Admits Democrats Have Nothing Impeachable On Trump

OK, so we know House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) has not really supported impeachment like some of her Democrat colleagues have.  So, this is not really anything new for people paying attention, but the fact that she claims that Democrats don’t have anything “compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan” to impeach President Donald Trump on is quite telling.

Of course, Pelosi is attempting to stave off some of the more unhinged Democrats such as Rashida Tlaib (D-MI), Ilhan Omar (D-MN) and Maxine Waters (D-CA).

Pelosi knows there is nothing coming in the Mueller report that people will actually get behind to impeach President Trump, and rightfully so. She also knows it will be bad politically for Democrats, adding that it would be “divisive to the country.”

Isn’t like these people haven’t been trying to divide us anyway, along with their friends in the corporate media.

Despite her claims, don’t look for her to stop rabid committee chairmen Jerrold Nadler or Adam Schiff. They simply refuse to accept the fact that there is no evidence for the witch hunt that has gone on for over two years now.

CNN will be right along with them too, as they can’t accept the truth either. They have told so many lies that they can no longer distinguish truth from lies.

The fact is that if our representatives actually followed the Constitution, there would be some things they could impeach President Trump over, but if they actually followed it, they would be implicating themselves to the same kind of impeachment, and they certainly aren’t going to do that, are they?

So, this has been nothing more than another episode, a long and expensive one at that, of WWE, but you can bet it will all be fodder come 2020 in that election cycle.

Muslim Rep. Ilhan Omar on Trump & Obama: “One Is Human, The Other Is Not”

While there are plenty of emails I get in my inbox stating that people are happy to see someone finally calling out the Israeli lobbyists, and I don’t mind that, I have a greater concern about Rep. Ilhan Omar’s (D-MN) agenda, underlying ideology and criminal history in why she is engaging in what she is.  She is clearly anti-American and basically states that she is not here to assimilate but rather we are to accommodate her and Somalis like her.  Still, in a recent comment, Omar claimed the usurper, Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah, is somehow “human,” while President Donald Trump is not.

In a short exchange with Fox News, while on Capitol Hill on Monday, Omar claimed that Obama and President Trump aren’t even comparable despite the fact that she tried to compare them previously, and rightfully so on the subject she was addressing.

However, at that time, she quickly walked that back, claiming that she was a fan of Obama.  Of course, she is!

“Do you think President Obama is the same as President Trump?” asked Fox News reporter Guerin Hays.

“Absolutely not, that is silly to even think and equate the two,” responded the Islamic terror-tied congresswoman. “One is human, the other is not.”

Here’s the video.

She quickly escaped into an elevator, just like Mad Maxine Waters (D-CA).

However, notice her snide attitude in responding, which should give anyone reason to question what this woman is up to.  Fine, you like that she pointed out Israeli lobbyists.  I actually like that too.  This is America, not Israel, not a Muslim country, and Asian country, an African country nor a European country.  I’d just as soon all lobbyists for all those countries not have meetings with our representatives.  We see often what happens when those people begin to engage our representatives.  We have diplomats for those sort of things.

However, ask yourself, do you really think her comments are 1) appropriate for a representative and 2) made with any merit?  Really?  Both men have engaged in unlawful droning and unconstitutional activity.  One usurped the Oval Office while the other gained it lawfully.  One vocally championed the murder of the unborn and the born while another vocally opposed it, even though he continued to fund it with more than a billion dollars of your money just like the usurper.

However, the questioning came in response to Omar’s claims that Obama was just another pretty face who got away with murder.  She immediately attempted to walkback those comments, even deleting a tweet claiming that Politico reporters somehow distorted her words, which they did not.

Yet, the people have yet to impeach this woman.  Why?

She’s obviously been involved in immigration fraud and engaged in incest, as well as bigamyShe has stood alongside Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison and encouraged the violation of voting laws, while at the same time using Islamic terror recruitment terms, being completely anti-US Constitution, and claiming it is “silly” to say that the foundations of our country and culture are Christian.

Omar, like many other freshmen and establishment representatives, is a stain on the US Congress.  It’s time those stains were removed.

Article posted with permission from Sons Of Liberty Media

2018 Gubernatorial Loser: 2020 Presidential Bid Is On The Table

The one thing that the 2020 field needs is more Democrats making hopeless runs for a nomination they can’t win in the hopes of either getting a Veep spot or higher speaking fees.. And the clown car is being chased by even bigger clowns. Like Stacey Abrams.

You may remember Stacey from her defeat in 2018. But these days just coming in second in a Senate race qualifies you to run for the White House.

So that person who gives literacy a run for its money, tweeted this.

“In #LeadFromTheOutside, I explore how to be intentional about plans, but flexible enough to adapt. 20 years ago, I never thought I’d be ready to run for POTUS before 2028. But life comes at you fast – as I shared in Q&A w @Yamiche at @sxsw. Now 2020 is definitely on the table…”

If anyone can translate this sentence into English, I would appreciate it.

Life comes at Stacey fast. Speeding into her brain is the revelation that no one will remember her name in 2022, let alone 2028, so if she’s going to cash in on her 15 minutes, it better be now.

2020 is on the table. So is Stacey.

Because what 2020 really needs is a candidate who looks like she wandered off the street, isn’t sure where she is, but wants to echo Bernie Sanders while barely understanding how her intentional flexibility comes at you fast when she’s definitely on the table.

Article posted with permission from Daniel Greenfield

The Final Countdown In The Push For Birth To Grave “Education”

Anti Fed Ed Warriors, you’ve heard me say for a long time that the LAST chain in the birth to grave education alignment is the HEA (Higher Education Act) as it is re-authorized. Since ESSA (Every Student Succeeds Act) embedded the HEA (along with WIOA, Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act) within its 391 final law version, we learned the goal all along is what you see below:

So, Warriors, the million dollar question is, what will the new version of HEA’s goal be?

We know the “every” in ESSA means ALL children in PreK-12th grade (no matter what choice) to be aligned to post-secondary ‘readiness’ standards. Those ‘standards’ aren’t educational ones, but those workforce standards created and credentialed BY industries found in WIOA(Which is WHY both WIOA and HEA were tied to ESSA’s mandates)

If we were to illustrate the WIOA/ESSA/HEA consortium, I think this is what we’d see:
Human capital concept in tag cloud

Notice there are no faces, no personalities, only workers.

The CCSS Machine has taken the old saying ‘All work and no play makes Johnny a dull boy’ and applied it liberally throughout all the Machine touches! It is doing everything it can to make Johnny and Suzy as dull as possible.

What does Common Core show up in higher education? CTE (Career Tech Education)STEM and STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, (the Arts), and, Math), Apprenticeships/Internships, dual enrollment/concurrent enrollment, continuing education, reskilling, community colleges, public and private universities, trade schools, on-line or hybrid college programs, CCR (College/Career Readiness)CP (Career Pathways)CC (Career Clusters or Career Chunks)CT (Career Tracks)AP and IB courses/classes, adult charter schools, and any assessment related to all of these.

Why? Because the HEA/WIOA alignment begins well before adulthood!

Previous HEA (Higher Education Act) Updates:

1) The last time HEA was re-authorized was 2008. It’s been renewed (meaning funding streams) have been updated in 2016. Usually, the re-authorizations of federal education happen in a one-two type of punch in the gut. However, the ESSA was passed in Dec. 2015.  Congress did try to pass legislation for HEA in the 115th Session, but the bills died.

2) In 2014, I showed you the actual Adult Common Core State Standards. These were used in HEA institutions and K-12th education across America. If you didn’t know it, I showed you how Perkins funding (supposedly funds higher education) is actually based on your State’s 5-17 year old population.

3) In 2015, how College Promise was a cog of the CCSS MachineP3s (Public Private Partnerships) are a huge part of the intended ‘success’. You also got a look at how those higher education degrees were being ‘profiled’ (data tracked) in 2015.

4) In 2016, before HEA was ‘renewed’, I showed you how a University of PA symposium gave a bird’s eye view of the CCSS Machine’s plans for HEA ‘improvements’. When the renewal funds were announced, I showed you how this would impact our students of all ages.

5) In 2017, you got to read and learn about how ‘free college’ for all was the way America can ‘get smarter’ without a massive debt load (aka higher taxes) & how ‘all education’ is considered CTE (Rep. Virginia Foxx’s infamous quote is in full color)

6) Last year, 2018, I used the higher education true cost for NC taxpayers to show you have federal ‘aid’ has hurt ALL our States. As we know, if it’s in one State, it’s in all the others! In August 2018, I gave “Wormy” Awards to the HEA, along with several other laws and CCSS Machine member groups.

So, why show you previous updates? Because all of what hasn’t passed into HEA before NOW, will be thrown in the newest version of HEA! It will be another ‘kitchen sink’ bill!

**Special Note: Sen. Lamar Alexander retires when the 116th Session of Congress is dismissed. (Meaning Jan. 2021) The ‘new’ HEA is rumored to be his last ‘gift’ to Americans.

Top Priorities for HEA:

To access the articles cited above, you’ll find the National group, CTE Watch’s information here. Rep. Scott’s, here and here; Sen. Alexander’s, here.

In 2014, the Inclusive Higher Education Committee wrote a letter to the Senate HELP Committee addressing how the HEA needed to make sure it provided for those with special needs, especially in relation to  WIOA. I’ve reported on this before, but be sure to look for what ‘new’ agenda items will be embedded in the updated HEA.

In a 2014 letter to Senator Alexander from the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, the need for tougher action in HEA towards accrediting groups not interfering with diversity policies.
*Be sure to watch for this, as accrediting processes via ESSA, WIOA, and HEA have seen changes which aren’t good.

In 2015, The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights published a financial report which included higher education. On pages 4 and 5 you’ll find all the references to the HEA. The group was studying if low-income students, students using TRIO and GEAR UP, and under-served students, could not only afford college, but survive economically.

*No doubt the newer HEA will have something about this included.

From 2018, the National Association for College Admission Counseling (NACAC)urged the entire Senate HELP Committee with this quote about the HEA: “NACAC urges theCommittee to continue this aspiration (expanding opportunity & access to higher education in America) through this re-authorization as our nation and economy have benefited from the federal government’s investment in higher education.”  The NACAC also wants to support GEAR UP and TRIO, while seeing DREAM Act legislation embedded for undocumented students.

*As if the tax burdens on Americans isn’t enough, paying for anyone’s free college is a mistake. What will we see of this in the newest HEA?

From late 2018, this Forbes article shows us, Anti Fed Ed Warriors, some ‘ammo’:


Forbes, from this year (2019) gave 4 predictions about the HEA. One of them was ‘income sharing’

When Nancy Pelosi was Speaker of the House in 2015, she had this to say at the beginning of her statement on the 50th anniversary of HEA. Now that she’s Speaker again, what will we hear?


Related resources:
1) Sen. Alexander was the sponsor for the SUPPORT Patients and Communities Act. It’s main focus was on the opioid crisis. We know drugs are used in schools via mental health programs and services, which this law increased at a federal level. This will tie to the Be BEST White House initiative, where SEL (Social Emotional Learning) is a kingpin from the CCSS Machine.

2) Harvard University (a huge CCSS Machine member) named Sen. Alexander as a Fellow in the Harvard Kennedy School’s Institute of Politics, Class of 1971.

3) According to the Tennessean, Sen. Alexander will spend his last years in Congress focused on two agenda items: health care costs and higher education.

4) In the Rep. Scott information link above, you’ll find he wants to review ESSA as a top priority in the House’s Committee on Education and LaborHe’s wanting to increase the inflexibility exercised over the States.

5) My February 2019 look at the HEA amendment Bills from Congress.


In my next article, I’ll be diving into an NC based group which influences higher education across the nation. Are there ties to the HEA? Most definitely. Ties to the CCSS Machine, more than likely.

Warriors, we must fight the Big Four AND the CCSS Machine when it comes to the HEA.


Article posted with permission from Lynne Taylor

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: People Should Be “Excited” To Be “Automated Out Of Work”

Somewhere out there is a bot that can replace Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez. It needn’t be very bright. It doesn’t have to be any smarter than the bots that post, “How you can make a trillion dollars working from home” in the comments.

And that would still make it too intelligence. But once we replace Cortez with a bot, we’ll see how excited she is.

New York congressional representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez believes that people should welcome robots taking their jobs — but not the economic system that can make it financially devastating. During a talk at SXSW, an audience member asked Ocasio-Cortez about the threat of automated labor. “We should not be haunted by the specter of being automated out of work,” she said in response. “We should be excited by that. But the reason we’re not excited by it is because we live in a society where if you don’t have a job, you are left to die. And that is, at its core, our problem.”

A huge chunk of the Dem base in New York doesn’t have a job. They’re doing just fine sponging off those who do.

But Cortez has no original ideas. Ever. This is the same old, “Let’s build a lot of robots that will make everyone free stuff, nationalize the robots and then everyone can focus on their art projects”.

The brilliant is about a century old. And the only problems with it are economics, politics and human nature.

But hopefully, Cortez will be very excited to be replaced by a bot that will tweet selfies, pick fights on Twitter and post random socialism quotes.

Article posted with permission from Daniel Greenfield