Fake News Media Reports non-documented Russian Allegations against Trump – We have Actual Documentation on the Crimes & Corruption of Hillary Clinton

If you are wondering why we will hold President Donald Trump’s feet to the fire regarding an investigation and subsequent prosecution of Hillary Clinton for her crimes, look no further than the hysteria the media and corrupt politicians are engaged in over allegations regarding a questionable “dossier” put out by Trump’s enemies in the Deep State, as well as claims of impropriety over Trump’s advisers meeting with the Russian ambassador, even though the Clinton campaign did the same.  Let me take time to just remind you of actual documentation we have on Hillary Clinton from Wikileaks.  These are the smoking guns that the Trump administration needs to use to bring this woman and her crime family, including Bill and Chelsea, to justice.  Failure to do so only endangers the people of the united States, as well as many people throughout the world.

Keep in mind that Hillary Clinton never actually addressed any of the emails that were leaked that exposed her corruption and crime.  Clinton, the DNC and the media all wanted to deflect from the truth of the revelations and target those who leaked them.

Here we go.

These are just a few of the many crimes that Hillary Clinton has been engaged just over the past several years.  These are not allegations with no evidence.  These are facts that are well documented.  So, why is the media going after Trump over things they cannot prove?  They are state-controlled, useful idiots in the back pockets of corporations who support the New World Order, globalism, and people like Hillary Clinton.

So, spread this around.  Let’s get people educated on the actual crimes committed.  Hillary Clinton is only one of many.  The entire Clinton Crime Family must be brought to justice, along with the criminal usurper Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah, who has well over 1,000 documented crimes, lies and cronyism, and the Democrats and Republicans who enabled these people to commit their crimes.

President Trump, you promised to deal with Clinton.  Fulfill your promise, and enforce the law against her and her accomplices, including your predecessor.

Was FBI Director James Comey Blackmailed by Hillary Clinton regarding the Alleged Wiretapping of Donald Trump?

The Deep State and their puppets in the media are going all out to discredit President Trump’s wiretapping allegations. It’s easy to see why; Obamagate could potentially be the largest political scandal in all our history, and this is only scratching the surface. No matter how hard they try to spin it, however, they can’t erase their own public statements from the record – statements that indicate they knew about the wiretapping months ago!

In the following video, Right Wing News examines the latest evidence linking Hillary Clinton, Harry Reid, Obama’s Department of Injustice, and Loretta Lynch to the now infamous “Obamagate” wiretapping of Trump Tower.

Right Wing News looks at evidence that Hillary Clinton was tipped off about the wiretap from her husband, Bill Clinton, who himself was likely the catalyst of the first wiretapping request after an informal meeting with then Attorney General Loretta Lynch.

It is quite poetic that most of the evidence comes from their very own mouths; perhaps they thought that if it torpedoed Trump’s chances at the presidency, it wouldn’t come back to haunt them? Well, it looks like it has, and as the saying goes “What a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive.”

AllenbWest.com reports:

Some day a thriller of a book will be written about Donald Trump’s election, and the widespread efforts to undermine and delegitimize his presidency. To paraphrase the ancient (Chinese?)curse, we are certainly living in “interesting times.”

It’s safe to say not a single one of you reading this has ever seen anything like this in your lifetime — and we’re all on this ride together. The problem is, it doesn’t look like we can get off either.

Many were disappointed a few months ago when FBI Director James Comey held a press conference to reveal what he’d learned about Hillary Clinton’s private email server and her handling of classified information. As he laid out the various transgressions Clinton had committed, it seemed a slam dunk that he would conclude she should be prosecuted. But then…after all that, he folded.

Now as smoking gun after smoking gun appears regarding the possibility of illegal wire taps and surveillance on members of the Trump team and even the president himself, a new theory is emerging as to why Comey caved. 

Per the Gateway Pundit:

Blackmail is one of the most effective tools to control people in power, especially politicians. Is this why Comey didn’t recommend charges for Hillary Clinton on the email investigation? If Hillary was aware of the FBI wiretapping, she could use that as blackmail against Comey. 

Yesterday, TGP reported that FBI Director Comey asked the Justice Department to publicly reject Trump’s wiretapping claim. Did he order the wiretap?

Don’t forget, then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch met with Bill Clinton on the tarmac of Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport in June of 2016 right around the same time as the first FISA request. Did Bill Clinton mention the wiretapping plan to his lovely wife? Were they all in cahoots?

The Gateway Pundit speculates, If Hillary Clinton had knowledge of Comey’s involvement in the wiretapping, perhaps he let her off the hook to save himself from Clinton blackmail tactics.

We are not only living in interesting times, but very dangerous ones as well. Looks like a tinfoil hat is not going to be protection enough from what we have yet to learn. 

Gateway Pundit Reports:

FBI Director Comey came under heavy fire after he announced that he was re-opening Hillary Clinton’s email investigation just days before the Presidential election. Senate Minority leader, Harry Reid sent him a blistering open letter, accusing the FBI of withholding ‘explosive information’ linking Trump and his advisors to the Russian government.

In Harry Reid’s open letter to Comey he accused Comey of possessing explosive information. He even stated that he’s been asking Comey to release the information to the public…

“In my communications with you and other top officials in the national security community,it has become clear that you possess explosive information about close ties and coordination between Donald Trump, his top advisors, and the Russian government – a foreign interest openly hostile to the United States, which Trump praises at every opportunity,” he said. “I wrote to you months ago calling for this information to be released to the public…and yet, you continue to resist calls to inform the public of this critical information.”

Harry Reid sent this letter to Comey a day before Hillary Clinton sent out a tweet about the wiretap.

The Gateway Pundit also reports:

Hillary Was Tipped Off On Trump Wiretap – Tweeted About it One Week Prior to Election

TGP reported earlier that the first FISA request came right after AG Loretta Lynch met with Bill Clinton on the tarmac at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport in June of 2016.

The second FISA request was submitted in October of 2016 just before the election. Hillary Clinton sent out a tweet on October 31st stating that ‘computer scientists have uncovered a covert server linking the Trump organization to a Russian-based server’.

It appears she was tipped off to the wiretapping prior to the election.

Here is Hillary Clinton’s tweet from October 31st… Computer scientists?… Connect the dots, folks. This was a well coordinated attack on a Presidential candidate. AG Lynch met with Bill Clinton just before the first FISA request.

After they were successful with the second FISA request in October, it appears Bill Clinton passed on the information to his wife to help her win the election. This scandal is about to blow wide open; it’s not going away any time soon. Stay tuned…

It’s becoming increasingly clear that the entire Deep State was aware that Trump was under surveillance. The Deep State was desperately trying to stop Trump and failed at every turn.

(Extraction of Comey letter taken from CBS News)

In the following video, former Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook was a guest on “Fox & Friends” Tuesday discussing what the campaign knew and didn’t know concerning President Donald Trump’s allegations of wiretapping by the Obama administration.

Trump and his Cabinet have denied any contacts with Russia during the campaign, but Mook said the facts in this case paint a different picture.

“Trump aides were caught talking to Russian agents, and those conversations were captured because the intelligence community regularly taps the phone lines of those Russian agents,” Mook said.

In the following video (from the post titled, Attorney General Jeff Sessions Breaks Silence on Russian Issue), prior to blatantly lying about Attorney General Sessions, Senator Coons talks in circles referring to “transcripts that exist” that prove the collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians. 

QUESTION: How can there be transcripts “Senator,” if there was no bugging or wiretapping? Which is it? Do tell…


Article posted with permission from The Last Great Stand.

House Republicans Unveil RINOCare Bill & It’s DOA

Anyone paying attention to the Republicans in Washington knew this was coming.  They promised to repeal the Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare.  That’s where they should stop, with a full repeal.  However, they claim to want to repeal it, but their bill doesn’t even come close to doing that.  Furthermore, they expand their socialistic tendencies in many areas within the bill.  I’m not even going to call it Obamacare Lite.  This is full on RINOCare (Yes, I just coined it).

Read the bill here.

“The American Health Care Act is a plan to drive down costs, encourage competition, and give every American access to quality, affordable health insurance. It protects young adults, patients with pre-existing conditions, and provides a stable transition so that no one has the rug pulled out from under them,” House Speaker Paul Ryan said in a statement.

Understand, before I go further, it is not Washington’s job, nor were they given authority, to protect young adults nor patients with pre-existing conditions.  It is their job to make regular commerce between the states, but that’s not what they are doing in this bill.

Yet, the White House praised the bill.

“Obamacare has proven to be a disaster with fewer options, inferior care, and skyrocketing costs that are crushing small business and families across America,” Spicer said in a statement. “Today marks an important step toward restoring health care choices and affordability back to the American people. President Trump looks forward to working with both Chambers of Congress to repeal and replace Obamacare.”

The legislation would repeal ObamaCare taxes, along with the individual and employer mandates.  Both of those imposed tax penalties for not buying and offering insurance.  The bill would also repeal Obamacare subsidies and replace them with tax credits for consumers.

However, the bill also looks to penalize people up to 30 percent of their premium for leaving gaps in their insurance coverage.

Then there are the tax credits.  By the way, if you don’t understand how the tax system works, it’s there to manipulate you to do things you normally wouldn’t do.  The Washington Post comments on the tax credits.

The bill would replace the premium tax credits and cost-sharing subsidies in the Affordable Care Act with a flat tax credit, based on age. Currently, only people who make between 138 percent and 400 percent of the federal poverty limit are eligible for tax credits that defray their premiums. The size of the credits are pegged to people’s incomes and the cost of a benchmark plan in the marketplace where they’re buying insurance. That helps account for the fact that the average premium can vary widely depending where a person is buying insurance.

The new tax credit would gradually peter out for people who make more than $75,000 a year or $150,000 for a couple, but it ignores the fact that care costs more in different geographical regions or that someone who makes $20,000 a year might be more strained in trying to buy an insurance plan with the same amount of financial help as someone who makes $74,000. The graph below shows how a flat tax credit would do little to defray the monthly cost of insurance in markets where health insurance is more expensive.

Additionally, subsidies for insurance companies to help people pay for their insurance that they were mandated to purchase, but couldn’t afford (imagine that under a piece of pretended legislation called the Affordable Care Act), will continue along with other tax credits for four more years!

The bill does some easing to allow insurers the ability to design health coverage, but still maintains 10 categories of health benefits that must be covered.

Again, that is free market.  It is a controlled market.  What if people just want catastrophic insurance?  Sorry, you are just out of luck because government knows better than you and mandates insurance companies must comply with their controls on them.

“From a conservative’s perspective, there are a number of things that need further refinement,” Rep. Mark Sanford (R-SC) said. “This notion of a refundable tax credit is a big deal, Medicaid expansion is a big deal, the Cadillac tax is a big deal.”
“I don’t think it’s ever going to arrive in the Senate. I think it’s dead on arrival in the House,” Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) told CNN.
“This is not the Obamacare repeal bill we’ve been waiting for. It is a missed opportunity and a step in the wrong direction,” Seantor Mike Lee (R-UT) said in a statement.  Lee added that it was “exactly the type of back-room dealing and rushed process that we criticized Democrats for.”
Keep in mind, President Donald Trump told us we would love this bill.  From the word I’m getting, it sounds like people believe they’re are about to get Obamacare 2.0 and they are encouraging Trump to veto the bill, providing it even makes it to his desk.
Vice President Mike Pence called it a “framework” and Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price referred to it as “a work in progress.”
Friends, this is a bad bill from a bunch of people that have shown to be just as much your enemy as the Democrats.  This bill can aptly be named “Ryancare,” or more appropriately, “RINOCare.”


Ben Shapiro Spanks #BlackLivesMatter Supports So Hard, They Have Nothing to Say (Video)

Reporter and commentator Ben Shapiro openly spanked Black Lives Matter supporters on video to the point where they were left without an ability to even utter a word against his argument. Watch as their smiles and laughter disappear as they are outed for the ignorant, insurrection breeding racists that they are.

Following the Baltimore riots, Shapiro appeared along several Black Lives Matter supporters, including Dr. Sheley Secrest, development director of the Seattle Chapter of the NAACP, and Seattle Stranger columnist Charles Mudede, and utterly ripped the mask off the criminal element that is behind the ideology.

First he addressed the rioting of those in the Black community, who destroyed property and threatened lives.

“I’m offended by the uprising of black people breaking into other black people’s stores and looting them,” said Shapiro. “This is a lack of values. People who are destroying private property, destroying cop cars in an uprising against what exactly? Against the black police chief? Against a mostly minority police force? Against the black mayor? Against the black president? Against the black attorney general? Against a city council that nine of 15 are black and all elected Democrats? What is the uprising against? What is it seeking to achieve?”

The obvious answer is that these people were stirred up and wanted to blame racism for their own animal-like behavior. Shapiro is right to question, what did any of the rioting achieve? Nothing, except to burden the tax payers and insurance payers with a heavy burden of replacing what these people destroyed.

When Shapiro was questioned about the ridiculous notion of “income inequality,” he said, “It has nothing to do with race and everything to do with culture.”

Shapiro gave the panelists a moment to laugh, and then he started pushing the facts, some these people do not know how to respond to.

“You explain to me why black kids aren’t graduating high school?” Shapiro thundered. “Explain that one to me. Explain to me why black kids are shooting each other in rates significantly higher than whites are shooting each other? Explain to me why 13 percent of the population is responsible for 50 percent of the murder?[…]Is America more racist now than it was in 1960? And if so, explain to me how that happened?”

However, Mudede decided that it was time to respond, and so he claimed “there has to be racism. I’m talking about human beings. Human beings are most likely going to have racial prejudices.”

“I wanna ask you a question, Charles,” asked Shapiro. “So your default is that when there is no evidence, racism is the deciding factor?”

Of course, Mudede was caught with that question and responded negatively. However, as if Shapiro had not exposed him for what he is, he went further to pull the mask off the ignorant claims of Mudede.

“The idea that you can craft a narrative based on no racism because it just must be somewhere out there in the ether, that doesn’t solve problems for anybody,” said Shapiro. “It creates more problems for people, because now they grow up in a milieu and an environment where they are told that every obstacle they face is from some shadowy, nameless, faceless group who is out to get them simply because of the color of their skin.”

That’s exactly right. This has nothing to do with the color of people’s skin. There are many God fearing Black Americans who are appalled at the kind of criminal activity that the rioters in Baltimore engaged in with the blessing of the mayor, Obama and others. The issue is lawfulness and character. Those who rioted in Baltimore and those who encouraged it are lawless and criminal, period. Well done, Mr. Shapiro!

If that was not enough Shapiro for you on the subject, check out this short clip in which he claims “The Black Lives Matter movement doesn’t believe black lives matter.”

US Prisons Nothing More Than Criminal Universities and Crime Corporations

The United States leads the world in the number of people incarcerated in state and Federal prison. With a current inmate population around the size of the entire Houston geographical area, we now basically have a criminal community existing within regular society. 

Within the confines of these prisons, most gang members, drug dealers, and other crime bosses continue to run their crime businesses from prison. With visitations from key people related to their illicit business coming and going all the time, most incarcerated bosses find it as easy to run their professions from the inside the same as when they were free. Thus, what we really have is a broken prison system which has become nothing more than a business center for continuing crime on the streets as well as actual universities for teaching crime to other inmates who are either forced into it by the color of their skin or learn it by virtue of simply being there.

A fine example of a broken prison system is California’s Pelican Bay State Prison, located a few miles north of Crescent City on Lake Earl Dr. This facility is notorious for housing the very worst criminals in the entire state. As usual with any Federal and state prison, the inmate population at PB exceeds the capacity.

Since Crescent City is so far away from where most of PB’s inmates originate, the city has had little population growth associated with the prison. However, the city has had an increase in crime rates. Most PB visitors who are associated with the various criminal businesses run by the inmates via outside visits come and go without incident, only concerned with the criminal business transactions and advice they originally came there for in the first place.

In every respect, it doesn’t make sense to imprison these inmates if they are going to continue to run their illegal businesses from the inside. The only real remedy to prevent them from still being able to keep their criminal endeavors going is to prevent them from having any visitors at all and to cut off their mail correspondence, as well. It is a full time job for many guards to simply sift through thousands of letters and cards on a daily basis, looking for code and drugs as well. With a total separation between inmates and all outside individuals during the entire duration of their sentence, the incarcerated criminals would be just that, not simply criminal business executives running their operations from inside their respective prisons.

Another possible remedy to the problem of inmates keeping their crime businesses running by visitations would be an exchange program, not necessarily between states, but perhaps between agreeing countries. This would definitely put a crimp in a prisoner’s ability to communicate business transactions for their outside criminal endeavors.

The bottom line is, as long as inmates have the ability to transact business from inside their prisons, we are simply paying for these crime bosses to have a place to stay, free medical, and food for X amount of time while continuing their business as usual.

In today’s prison system, the idea of rehabilitation is out the proverbial window and has been for decades. Now, when someone is sent to prison, it is to do time and to continue to do business as usual.

Today’s politically correct idealism in the US simply doesn’t exist behind prison walls. Here, rampant racism exists at all times and is taught to most inmates who want to survive their sentence. Some institutions purposely separate races.

Today’s Criminal Justice system is entirely broken, from the arrest and conviction of drug users (who should be sent to drug rehabilitation rather than prison) to imprisoning criminals only to allow them to do business as usual from the confines of their particular prison.

Being sentenced to death is a joke in most states, such as California, for example, where death row inmates are simply placed in private cells and wait for their sentence to be carried out until they die a natural death from the duration of time spent.

The current prison system in the US has to change with the times. For far too long, we have been allowing prisoners visitations and communication with the outside and have been putting people in prison who do not belong there. The system also is a breeding ground for creating more criminals, rather than rehabilitating those they have. For all intents and purposes, prisons in the US are nothing more than criminal universities and US Crime Corporations.

Eagles of Death Metal Singer Changes Position on Gun Control Following Paris Jihad

It was during an Eagles of Death Metal concert that and Islamic jihad attack erupted in Paris in November 2014. At that time, lead singer Jesse Hughes was all for gun control. However, after that night, he began to rethink his position.

In an emotional interview, Hughes cried as he recalled the attack that left 89 dead at the concert hall.

In speaking about gun control, Hughes said, “Did your French gun control stop a single person from dying at the Bataclan?”

“And if anyone can answer ‘yes’,” he added, “I’d like to hear it, because I don’t think so. I think the only thing that stopped it was some of the bravest men I’ve ever seen in my life, charging head first into the face of death with their firearms.”

Hughes had previously held to an anti-gun position, but following that night, he claims that the experience changed his position.

I’m glad that Mr. Hughes has changed his position. I’m not happy that it took an experience like this to do it.

This is only one of many stories that could be told of people who have had their minds changed when the reality that we live in a dangerous world rudely awakens them.

We saw sheriffs and police chiefs, even some who enforce unconstitutional gun laws, across our own nation begin to call for armed citizens to take out those who seek to commit mass murder.

This is going on in other countries, as well.

Guns in the News reports:

Even in Israel, Public Security Minister, Gilad Erdan, conceded on Monday that “… citizens, skilled in the use of guns, are needed… in the fight against terrorism.”

HE CONTINUED, “There is no way to stop every terrorist attack, because terrorists do not need an explosives laboratory… a knife is enough for them.”

The inescapable conclusion is that modern politicians, here and there, will continue to spend most of their time worrying only about themselves, as all of Western Civilization cluelessly spirals into the dustbin of history. In the interim, the rest of us, dismissing what they say, need to take firm control of our own lives, providing our own protection, and steadfastly managing our own destinies, never waiting around for someone else, some mythical governmental agency, that “really cares” to “solve our problems.”

Expecting to be “protected” from evils and dangers that lurk everywhere has always been naive and foolish.

Today, it is suicidal!

Indeed it is! Still, there are those in our own country who would seek to have us disarmed before our enemies while they leave the door wide open for our enemies to enter. It’s treasonous and it’s dangerous. Now, what will we do about it my fellow Americans?

Polish Magazine NAILS It with Cover Showing European Woman Being Sexually Attacked by ‘Migrants’

The cover is causing “outrage?” It’s just as Orwell said: “The further a society drifts from truth the more it will hate those who speak it.”

Note the UK publication’s use of the word “white.” It’s not race. It’s religion. She’s non-Muslim.

“Polish magazine causes outrage with cover showing white woman being sexually attacked by ‘migrants’” The Independent, February 17, 2016:

The right-wing Polish weekly magazine wSieci (The Network) has caused outrage with its latest front cover.

The publication features the image of a white woman, draped with the European Union flag, screaming as she is being groped and assaulted by dark skinned male arms.

Twitter users have compared the images with fascist propaganda in Nazi Germany and Mussolini’s Italy, which used images of women being attacked by Jewish and North African men.

The image is a reference to the sexual assaults that have been claimed to have been perpetrated by migrant and refugee men against European women.

The 1,000 reports of theft, sexual assault and rape of women at Cologne’s central train station on New Year’s Eve led to calls for stronger immigration controls.

Recent news has revealed that only three of the 58 suspects arrested in connection with the attack were refugees from Iraq or Syria.

The magazine headline reads “Islamic Rape Of Europe”.

Reposted with permission from PamelaGeller.com

Pamela Geller’s commitment to freedom from jihad and Shariah shines forth in her books

Bill Clinton Mistress Fears Assassination for Claims that Bill Cross-Dressed & Hillary is a Lesbian

“There is a vengeful, spiteful ugliness that some women have for other women. Hillary is just one of those women.” – Sally Miller, former Bill Clinton mistress

In what can only be described as a bombshell interview, one of Bill Clinton’s former lovers, Sally Miller, gives the world a peek into the sex lives of the America’s most famous liberal couple.

Sally Miller had a raucous three-month affair with Bill Clinton years before he became the 42nd President of the United States, and that relationship has her fearing for her life today. In fact, Miller is so fearful of retribution from the Clinton family that she sleeps with a loaded weapon within arms reach. She claims that since news of her upcoming memoir broke she has fallen victim to stalking and late night anonymous phone calls. Miller worries that the Clintons may look to silence her through violence and has gone so far as to tell people that if she dies suddenly… it was the Clinton family who had her killed!

Some of the interesting notes from Miller’s upcoming tell-all:

  • Bill Clinton once wore her frilly black nightgown and danced around her room while playing his saxophone.
  • “Let’s just get down to the facts. Firstly, Bill didn’t mind telling me that Hillary doesn’t like sex. I take him at his word and he told me she liked females more than men. She was the child of a more progressive community. She was exposed to all the liberals, she was a flower child. Hillary does drugs too, that’s the only time that she would entertain the idea – again, this is what Bill told me.”
  • He would sometimes unwind by smoking a marijuana cigarette. Miller claims that she saw Clinton produce a pouch of white powder on several occasions and snort lines off her coffee table. “I don’t do drugs and I don’t smoke. But if you come into my house and say ‘gosh I’ve had a bad day’ I wouldn’t know how to stop you… Do I make it a point to have affairs with married men, no. But most everyone in Arkansas assumed that their marriage was a business arrangement. Bill never sounded like he was in love or locked into a loyal arrangement.”

While the details may sound shocking, they fit the historic pattern of Clintonian behavior. Also, while I have no doubt that some will question the veracity of Miller’s story, I would argue that the Clinton’s sordid past must be taken into account. Bill Clinton has been caught in numerous affairs, he’s been accused by a handful of women of sexual assault, and several common threads run through all of the accounts. First, the manner in which the women engaged in relations with Clinton and secondly, their fear of Hillary Clinton.

Sally Miller’s story is simply another chapter in the disgusting book that is the life of the Clinton family.

war on women Clinton

Article reposted with permission from Eagle Rising.

Nevada Federal Grand Jury Indicts Cliven Bundy and Four Others for Leading 2014 Standoff

A federal grand jury has indicted Cliven Bundy and four others for leading a 2014 standoff with unconstitutional federal agencies at the Bundy Ranch.

Bundy, along with his sons Ammon and Ryan, Ryan Payne and Pete Santilli are facing charges of conspiracy to commit an offense against the United States, conspiracy to impede or injure a federal officer, using and carrying a firearm in relation to a crime of violence, assault on a federal officer, threatening a federal law enforcement officer, obstruction of the due administration of justice, interference with interstate commerce by extortion, and interstate travel in aid of extortion.

According to a press release by the Justice Department (pause for laughter):

Cliven D. Bundy, 69, of Bunkerville, Nev., Ryan C. Bundy, 43, of Mesquite, Nev., Ammon E. Bundy, 40, of Emmet, Idaho, Ryan W. Payne, 32, of Anaconda, Mont., and Peter T. Santilli, Jr., 50, of Cincinnati, Ohio, are charged with one count of conspiracy to commit an offense against the United States, one count of conspiracy to impede or injure a federal officer, four counts of using and carrying a firearm in relation to a crime of violence, two counts of assault on a federal officer, two counts of threatening a federal law enforcement officer, three counts of obstruction of the due administration of justice, two counts of interference with interstate commerce by extortion, and one count of interstate travel in aid of extortion.  The indictment also alleges five counts of criminal forfeiture which upon conviction would require forfeiture of property derived from the proceeds of the crimes totaling at least $3 million, as well as the firearms and ammunition possessed and used on April 12, 2014.

Here is exactly why Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah brought in constitution-violating, asset forfeiture criminal and terrorist-tied Loretta Lynch as his Attorney General. Please don’t forget the Democrat and Republican senators who helped confirm her because they are just as complicit. No crime of violence occurred at Bundy Ranch, except for the crimes of federal agencies who destroyed the property of Cliven Bundy and his family. There were attempts to corral people into “First Amendment Zones,” which is unlawful and tazing individuals who were exercising their free speech, but there was no violence committed by the Bundys or the protesters.

“The rule of law has been reaffirmed with these charges,” said U.S. Attorney Bogden. “Persons who use force and violence against federal law enforcement officers who are enforcing court orders, and nearly causing catastrophic loss of life or injury to others, will be brought to justice.” 

Who used force? Who used violence? Did the court order demand that cattle be slaughtered? Did the court order that snipers be put into place and an army of hundreds of armed federal agents surround American citizens? Again, who was using force? Who committed acts of violence? Was it not the DC government acting in violation of the Constitution’s requirement regarding ownership and control of land? I think it was.

According to the DOJ release, the maximum penalties for the charges issued are:

Conspiracy to Commit an Offense Against the U.S. – 5 years, $250,000 fine

Conspiracy to Impede and Injure a Federal Law Enforcement Officer – 6 years, $250,000 fine

Assault on a Federal Law Enforcement Officer – 20 years, $250,000 fine

Threatening a Federal Law Enforcement Officer – 10 years, $250,000 fine

Use and Carry of a Firearm in Relation to a Crime of Violence – 5 years minimum and consecutive

Obstruction of the Due Administration of Justice – 10 years, $250,000 fine

Interference with Interstate Commerce by Extortion – 20 years, $250,000 fine

Interstate Travel in Aid of Extortion – 20 years, $250,000 fine

“This indictment sends a resounding message to those who wish to participate in violent acts that our resolve to pursue them and enforce the law remains unwavering,” said Special Agent in Charge Bucheit.

No, the indictment sends a message that DC is engaged in a tyrannical overthrow of the Constitution and will put men in jail on trumped up charges when all they were doing was seeking to expose the criminals and uphold the Constitution.

“Today marks a tremendous step toward ending more than 20 years of law breaking,” said Bureau of Land Management Director Neil Kornze. “The nation’s public lands belong to all Americans.”

Twenty years of lawbreaking? Mr. Kornze, law breaking continues under the current administration just as it has for well over 150 years in this country. When will you be prosecuting your own DOJ, whose Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms has criminally engaged in the trafficking of thousands of weapons across the Mexican border and into the hands of Mexican cartels, which resulted in the deaths of two federal agents, hundreds of Mexicans and who knows how many others?

No, my friends, this is not about bringing law breaking to an end. It’s about those engaged in crime at the DC level attempting to silence those who are exposing their crimes.

At least one federal judge understood the law breaking of the Bureau of Land Management and in his opinion of United States v. Estate of Hage, U.S. District Court Judge Robert C. Jones revealed the criminal actions of the BLM against Nevada rancher E. Wayne Hage. Judge Jones held “government officials” in contempt and referred the issued to Eric Holder’s office. We all know what happened… nothing.

Kit Daniels reported:

For over 20 years, the Bureau of Land Management engaged in a “literal, intentional conspiracy” against Nevada ranchers to force them out of business, according to a federal judge whose court opinion exposes the BLM’s true intent against rancher Cliven Bundy.

BLM agents who impounded Cliven Bundy’s cattle.

“Based upon E. Wayne Hage’s declaration that he refused to waive his rights — a declaration that did not purport to change the substance of the grazing permit renewal for which he was applying, and which had no plausible legal effect other than to superfluously assert non-waiver of rights — the Government denied him a renewal grazing permit based upon its frankly nonsensical position that such an assertion of rights meant that the application had not been properly completed,” Judge Jones wrote. “After the BLM denied his renewal grazing permit for this reason by letter, the Hages indicated that they would take the issue to court, and they sued the Government in the CFC [Court of Federal Claims.]”

And at that point, Jones explained, the BLM refused to consider any further applications from Hage.

“The entire chain of events is the result of the Government’s arbitrary denial of E. Wayne Hage’s renewal permit for 1993–2003, and the effects of this due process violation are continuing,” he stated.

“This behavior shocks the conscience of the Court and provides a sufficient basis for a finding of irreparable harm to support the injunction described at the end of this Order,”

It’s shocking because these men should have been upholding the law, but instead, turned against the American people and acted in a criminal fashion.

Read the indictment below:

Federal indictment against Cliven Bundy and others

Scalia’s Family Requests Public Accept Death from Natural Causes Despite Disturbing Questions about Procedure

My previous article, titled “A Nurse’s Perspective: Justice Scalia’s Death in Texas is the 21st Century Version of the Assassination of JFK,” explored some rhetorical questions that may never be answered due to the procedures followed by those on the scene. Some posting comments questioned the comparison of Justice Scalia’s death to the assassination of JFK. Just as there are questions that remained unanswered about skipped procedures, procedures ignored or procedures altered with JFK, there are questionable procedures occurring in the aftermath of the Supreme Court justice’s death. Justice Scalia may or may not have died due to natural causes. The point is the very nature of what occurred post death of Justice Scalia does not conform to a reasonable and prudent norm that most individuals and professionals expect.

In light of the events and according to expected standards, an autopsy could be considered part of the investigation by law, subject to family approval or not. However, the family requested no autopsy be performed. Eugene Scalia, 52 year-old son of Justice Scalia, explained on The Laura Ingraham Show the family’s reason.

Scalia, a lawyer, stated in the radio show, “Our family has no doubt that he was taken from us by natural causes. We accept that. We’re praying for him. We ask others to accept that and pray for him.”

With that statement, the younger Scalia acknowledged his understanding of why people might have a difficult time accepting the passing of his father.

According to Western Journalism:

My father, he was like a force of nature,” he said. “He seemed sort of a permanent institution. But he’d have been the first to tell you — the first — that, you know, we’re from dust, we return to dust. Your life can be taken from you at any instant. He was a month shy of 80 years old. He led this incredibly full and active life. But I knew, and he knew, that he was in a place in life where he could be taken from this world at any time, and that’s what happened last week.”

Scalia is one of nine children the late justice had with his wife of fifty-five years, Maureen. “Everybody loses their dad at some point,” the oldest son observed. “And I feel blessed that it’s not just the family who feels that he was great, but that there are millions of people who feel that and so many, like you, who are honoring it.”

Eugene told Laura Ingraham that his mother is a strong woman who is holding up well. “I don’t know that the Lord could design a better support network,” he said. That includes “a built-in priest,” the justice’s son, Paul.

The funeral for Justice Scalia will be held at 11 am on Saturday, February 20, 2016, at the Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception in Washington, DC. Justice Scalia will lie in repose on Friday at the Supreme Court where the public may pay their respects.

The family of Justice Scalia has no doubt he died from natural causes and asks everyone to respect their acceptance. While I believe many in America respects the family’s wishes, it still does not quell the questions that many have regarding possible “procedural” missteps. If it were my family member, who died under the exact same circumstances, I would question the individuals’ credentials on the scene who determined resuscitation efforts were futile, Texas Statutes and the undocumented allowance of judges determining death, and why no one on the scene initiated the emergency response system commonly done by reasonably prudent individuals. One should ask one’s self, “If it were me who found Justice Scalia under the circumstances, would I activate the EMS and initiate resuscitation measures or not?” Then, turn around and ask, “If it were me who found anyone under these circumstances, would I activate the EMS and initiate resuscitation measures or not?” Go one-step further and ask, “If it were me or my family member, what would I expect individuals on the scene to do?”

In answering these questions, it provides a point of reference to what a reasonable person would do. It would be reasonable and prudent to activate EMS and initiate resuscitation measures until EMS arrived. In some areas, when EMS is activated, a sheriff or police officer subsequently arrives on the scene.

Additionally, most States have what is known as “Good Samaritan Laws” to protect non-medical professionals when rendering aid to individuals in an emergency.

Evidently, in Texas, one does not activate EMS in this circumstance. Neither would EMS be activated when distance is an issue. It seems it is reasonable and prudent for an individual without medical training to determine if one is dead or not, determine whether emergency medical services are required, and a judge can pronounce one dead without any examination, no medical training, being on the scene, and based on someone else’s findings who is not medically trained.

Being this appears to be the case, it might be reasonable and prudent for one to avoid Texas and the Cibolo Creek Ranch if one has health issues, just in case; or, the State of Texas should re-evaluate its statutes on these types of situations.

Since Justice Scalia’s family has asked the public to accept the Justice died from natural causes, it is upon the individuals comprising the public to determine whether or not that request can be honored. Accepting that Justice Scalia died from natural causes does not negate asking questions regarding the procedures followed or events occurring at the Cibolo Creek Ranch in the State of Texas after the Justice’s death. Those procedures affect every resident of Texas and all individuals visiting the State. For me, it will remain an unknown as to the cause and manner of death due to questionable procedures and actions occurring after finding Justice Scalia.

Ted Nugent Labeled as “Anti-Semitic” for exposing Jews Attacking Second Amendment – Becomes Member of Jewish Second Amendment Supporters

Rockstar Ted Nugent was recently blasted after he posted a picture that exposed several Jewish political leaders who are attacking the Second Amendment, but the irony is that he has just been made a member of The Zelman Partisans, a group of Second Amendment supporting Jews.

David Codrea reports:

Practically everyone, including conservative and gun rights groups, reacted with understandable outrage to rocker and RKBA diehard Ted Nugent’s Facebook post of a graphic featuring Jewish anti-gun politicians with Israeli flags.

While quick to distance themselves from a celebrity they’d have happily claimed as an ally the day before his ill-conceived post, none of his detractors even attempted to contact him afterward to ask if accusations of anti-Semitism were true.

Wanting to understand what he was thinking and how he managed to make himself a media target for charges of anti-Semitism, Nicki Kenyon of The Zelman Partisans spoke with Nugent, and found her group was alone in asking him what happened. Additionally, Nugent took TZP up on an offer it made a week earlier and ended up joining the group.

The recently-formed organization is comprised of former members of Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership, who split off in disagreement following JPFO’s acquisition by the Second Amendment Foundation. Naming themselves in honor of JPFO’s founder, the late Aaron Zelman, TZP activists who knew and worked closely with Zelman consider themselves more in keeping with his fiercely uncompromising nature, and believe their approach to be truer to the legacy their friend, colleague and mentor would have wanted.

Here’s what Nugent posted:

“Know these punks,” he wrote. “They hate freedom, they hate good over evil, they would deny us the basic human right to self defense & to KEEP & BEAR ARMS while many of them have tax paid hired ARMED security! Know them well. Tell every1 you know how evil they are. Let us raise maximum hell to shut them down!”

Now, there is nothing anti-semitic in this post, yet even people like Debbie Schlussel should know better, but instead of being angry that these people are attacking the American people, she went on a tirade against Nugent!

“Ted: As a religious Jew who testified with you in the Michigan Senate for relaxing gun laws and strengthening the 2nd Amendment, I’m absolutely disgusted but not at all surprised that you are showing what I always suspected: that you are a Jew-hater and a piece of crap,” she wrote, which garnered over 2,000 likes. “Ted Nugent Endorses Jews, then Announces He Hates Jews. Also, I’m sickened you invoke the slogan of Jewish Holocaust survivors, “Never Again” in mockery. Go to hell, a**hole!”

Frankly, Debbie, you need a thicker skin and quit making stupid comments like this one. Nowhere did Nugent claim “the Jews are out to get you.” Sure, these are just a few that would be among the Communists in Russia and the Nazis in Germany who would sell out their own people. I don’t think there is any question about that. However, Nugent would then follow up with this post without comment.

Exactly! Of course, Debbie Schlussel was nowhere to be found in the comment section. Why? Because her hypocrisy had been exposed.

“Can I say oy vey?” Kenyon quoted Nugent as saying in a phone conversation. “I sincerely apologize for my irresponsible re-posting of such a nasty and offensive meme. In my rush between songwriting jams and musical recording frenzy, all I saw was the images of people dedicated to disarm us, I made no connection whatsoever to any religious affiliation. Everyone knows deep down that at 67 years of age I didn’t suddenly become anti-Semitic. That’s patently ridiculous, and those who rushed to such a mistaken condemning judgement should re-examine the system by which such equally irresponsible knee-jerk judgments are made.”

In any case, I say good for Nicki doing the interview with Nugent to explain what was meant in the post. Frankly, I didn’t need the explanation. A Jew, Muslim, Christian, or any other religious or ethnic persons that seeks to disarm us should be exposed without prejudice. I was glad to see Nugent did what he did and I’m glad to see there are still some Jews who remember the lesson learned by their forefathers in Germany.

Police Say another Young Doctor’s Untimely Death is “Suspicious” – 2nd Death in 2 Weeks at Spokane VA

Dr. John Marshall, acting chief of surgery at Mann-Grandstaff VA Medical Center in Spokane, went missing after going on an early morning run near the Spokane River. At that end of January, Marshall’s body was found in the Spokane River. His death, which police have labeled as “suspicious,” comes in a long line of mysterious deaths of doctors over the past year.

Marshall, 49, who was a fourth generation marine who had served in Afghanistan and had gone through survival training, was last seen a little after 5 am after he left the local YMCA on January 25, 2016. His wife said that he typically went for a run around that time and was optimistic that he would be found safe.

Cynthia Johnson of KHQ has the story:

The Spokesman Review reported that surveillance video from the YMCA did show him entering and exiting. However, his car remained parked and his gym bag, phone, keys and wallet were still in a cubby where he left them at the YMCA.

According to a statement from the Spokane VA Hospital regarding Dr. Marshall’s death:

“We are deeply saddened to learn that local authorities confirmed Dr. John Marshall’s body was found this morning.  Dr. Marshall  was a fantastic surgeon who will be deeply missed.  He began his career at the VA Medical Center over five years ago.  Recently, he was serving as the Acting Chief of Surgery, a role in which he excelled.  Patients and staff alike talked regularly about his conscientious, empathetic and respectful nature.  A Marine, Army doctor, and combat Veteran, Dr. Marshall was an outstanding surgeon and consummate professional who cared about his patients and dedicated team of VA co-workers.  We express our deepest sympathies to his family and all those who were close to him.”

Though police investigated, I was unable to turn up any kind of discovery or follow up information. However, Dr. Marshall’s obituary was posted in the Spokane Review from February 7 to February 10. At that time the obituary read, “John was on his way to work after a morning jog in downtown Spokane, with his feet pounding the pavement and his favorite tunes in his ears. And that’s about all we know about that.”

If you have further information regarding Dr. Marshall’s untimely death, please feel free to add that in the comment section or email me.

This was the second death at the VA in two weeks. Brenda Thurman was laid to rest the day that Dr. Marshall’s body was discovered after she was accidentally shot by her husband while he was cleaning her gun. Her husband claimed responsibility, but what is amazing is that that Brenda was a military police officer in the Army and had completed SWAT and Sniper school, as well. Her husband was also an Army veteran. While this has been considered an accident, it should be a reminder to practice good gun safety.

Still, there are many questions that need to be answered in the death of Dr. Marshall.

Obama WILL NOT ATTEND Scalia Funeral

Whatever his obvious partisan sympathies, Barack Hussein Obama is President of the United States and there is protocol and (one would hope) a dignity we expect our President to maintain. But Obama is a whole other animal. That someone of such low character, limited experience and hatred for America could be elected President of these United States is a testament to the power the left wields in the media, culture, and academia.

Obama is a lowlife.

“Obama to skip Scalia funeral,” By Eliza Collins, Politico, February 17, 2016:

President Barack Obama will not attend Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia’s funeral on Saturday, the White House said Wednesday. Vice President Joe Biden and his wife Jill Biden will attend.

Obama and first lady Michelle Obama instead will go to the Supreme Court on Friday “to pay their respects to Justice Scalia” while the justice lies in repose in the Great Hall, press secretary Josh Earnest told reporters Wednesday.

The most recent member of the Supreme Court to die was Chief Justice William Rehnquist in 2005. In that instance, President George W. Bush not only attended the funeral, he also eulogized Rehnquist.

Scalia’s death ripped open a political seam when Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell almost immediately issued a statement calling for Scalia’s replacement to be delayed until the next president is in office. The White House has promised to nominate someone before the election.

Article reposted with permission from PamelaGeller.com, the opinions and views shared do not necessarily reflect the views of Freedom Outpost.
Pamela Geller’s commitment to freedom from jihad and Shariah shines forth in her books

Islam’s Muhammad: The White ‘Prophet’ with Black Slaves

Well, I’m sure we’re going to step in it here, but it must be done. Fortunately, our good friend and Christian Apologist David Wood has been kind enough to produce a video that points out the fact that, according to Islam’s most trusted sources, Muhammad was white. These same sources show that Muhammad also owned black slaves. How then can we reconcile these facts with the spread of Islam among African-Americans in recent decades?

Wood jokes at the beginning of his commentary, “What if I told you there was a ‘prophet’ out there that is so white, he makes Joseph Smith (another false prophet) look like Malcom X? He’s so white, he makes a bowl of vanilla ice cream yell, ‘Get him out of here, he’s blinding me!’ He’s so white, his 9-year-old child bride didn’t a night light.”

David is speaking of none other than the man who founded the death cult of Islam, who also referred to black Ethiopians as “raisin heads.”

Knowing this, would you call Muhammad a racist, or give him a pass because he founded Islam?

“Many people who don’t read the Muslim sources assume that Muhammad was dark-skinned, but Arabs are classified as Caucasians and they can exhibit a variety of shades and tones,” said Wood.

If we were to look for Muhammad in the midst of his fellow Arabs, al-Bukhari writes in his Hadith:

Narrated Anas bin Malik: While we were sitting with the Prophet in the mosque, a man came riding on a camel. He made his camel kneel down in the mosque, tied its foreleg and then said, “Who amongst you is Muhammad?” At that time the Prophet was sitting amongst us (his Companions) leaning on his arm. We replied, “This white man reclining on his arm.”

Of course, if that doesn’t have you laughing enough, Wood goes on to read more about Muhammad, whom he says “makes the Brady Bunch look like NWA.”

Sahih Muslim adds in 6081:

It was narrated that Abu Juhaifah said: “I saw the Messenger of Allah with a white complexion and some white hairs.”

“Who knew that Anderson Cooper with a 7th century prophet?” joked Wood.

However, he continue with Sahih Muslim (6071):

It was narrated from Al-Jurairi from Abu At-Tufail: “I said to him: ‘Did you see the Messenger of Allah?’ He said: ‘Yes, he was white with an elegant face.”

Wood goes on to point out that the Muslims sources go out of their way to point out the “whitness of his [Muhammad] shins,” the “whiteness of the thigh,” the “whiteness of his leg” the “whiteness of his stomach,” the “whiteness of his forearms,” the whiteness of his armpits” and the “whiteness of his cheeks.”

You will definitely want to see the video version of Wood’s presentation as he shows you what a police sketch artist rendered Muhammad as. I won’t spoil it for you, but trust me, it’s funny!

However, though Muhammad was as white as a bowl of Cool Whip, he did manage to set an example for his followers by keeping black slaves. Wood again, returns to al-Bukhari in 7263, who references Muhammad’s “black slave” who welcomed Umar bin Al-Khattab. Then, in 6161, we discover that “Allah’s Messenger was on a journey and he had a black slave called Anjasha.”

Wood also recounted the fate of a black slave named Mid’am. Abu Hurairah says that while unloading Muhammad’s luggage, Mid’am was struck with an arrow, and as people congratulated Mid’am on entering paradise, Muhammad seems to condemn him to hell fire.

So, the man who has sex with a 9-year-old girl, beheads Jews and others, steals from others is good, but a black man that took a cloak is going to Hell? Anyone see a problem with the lack of morality here?

According to one of the Muslim accounts, Muhammad had at least 40 slaves, 28 males and 12 females. Some of them were black and some were not. However, we know he had sex with some of his female slaves because she became pregnant, but for black Americans, that’s only bad if someone like Thomas Jefferson does it, right?

Even when slaves were put in positions to lead, they were still considered by Muhammad to be the least of the people.

If that was not bad enough, Satan is even depicted in Islam as a man named Nabtal b.al-Harith as a “sturdy black man with long flowing hair, inflamed eyes, and dark ruddy cheeks.”

So, how in the world did this racist cult ever garner the worship and adoration of Blacks around the world, including Blacks in America?

There is one word for it: ignorance!

Wood challenges Blacks who have bought into the idea that by joining with Islam, they are “sticking it to whitey. “Just remember that if you continue honoring a slave trader, who is about as dark as the cream filling of a Twinkie, and had black slaves and called Ethiopians ‘raisinheads’ and said that Satan looks like a Black man, you’re not a freedom fighter or a social justice warrior or a champion of civil rights. You are the ultimate ‘Uncle Tom.'”

Finally, Wood closes with a quote from one of Islam’s most respected books on the life and teachings of Muhammad.

Ahmad ibn Sulayman, Sahnun’s companion, said that whoever says that the Prophet was black is killed. The Prophet was not black.

Ever been called a racist for demonstrating what Islam truly is? Hmmm. That takes on new meaning now, doesn’t it? Islam is nothing more than a demonically spawned totalitarian ideology that has resulted in the slaughter and enslavement of millions of people down through the ages. As such, it should be exposed for what it is. My thanks to David Wood for doing just that!

Glenn Beck’s God Claim: Scalia Died to Point America to Elect Ted Cruz

Friends, I’m always skeptical when people tell me that God told them something apart from quoting the Word of God (The Bible – The Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments). While there has been some good information that Glenn Beck has provided to the public, I do believe that the man’s theology is in such error that it affects him to the point where he just thinks and says not only ridiculous things, but attributes those things to the true and living God. Beck did this on Tuesday as he claimed that God told him Scalia died as a way to wake the American people up to elect a true constitutionalist, and according to Beck, that is none other than Senator Ted Cruz.

Recently on The Glenn Beck Program, Beck’s sidekick Pat showed concern over a Supreme Court justice pick by Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah.

“This is critical,” Pat said. “If Obama appoints another person here, we’re in real trouble.”

Stu, who was also filling in for Beck on Tuesday spoke of the need for the senate to not confirm an appointee should Obama make one. “They’re there to specifically slow down the president or impede his progress if he starts to do things that are irrational. That’s what they’re there for.”

“I don’t know the bigger plan, you know, that the Lord has in mind,” Pat asked. “But I couldn’t help, but wonder, why? Why now? Why did you have to take Antonin now? Couldn’t you have waited just until November? Couldn’t you have waited just a little longer? Did he have to come home this soon?”

This set up Glenn who was calling in via telephone from Boston.

“Sitting here looking right now at the Old North Church in Boston,” Beck said. “You know, I was listening to you guys, and I just want to say, Pat, I think I have an answer for you on that.”

And what was that answer? Well, it came in the form of Beck’s “thoughts” on the subject, but if you pay attention to how he says it, he is attributing these words to God speaking to him.

“I just woke the American people up,” Beck said, speaking of God doing what he is talking about. “I took them out of the game show moment and woke enough of them up to say, ‘Look how close your liberty is to being lost.'”

“You replace one guy, and you now have a 5-4 decision in the other direction,” Glenn added. “And just with one guy, you’ve lost your liberty. So you better elect somebody that is going to put somebody on. Because for the next 30 years, if you don’t, the Constitution as you know it — Pat, you and I have said this for a long time. The Constitution is hanging by a thread. That thread has just been cut.”

Ladies and Gentleman, God said no such thing. These are the musings of a man following the heretical teachings of Joseph Smith and the Mormon Church. Beck is claiming to speak for the God of the Bible that he does not know.

Liberty has not been lost with the death of Scalia. America, you’ve been losing your liberties since the tyranny of Abraham Lincoln! Your freedoms have been under constant attack since then from Lincoln’s usurpation of the Constitution to the institution of the Federal Reserve to the implementation of gun laws to the funding of the United Nations and all of the DC government growth that has taken place since 9/11. No, liberty was not lost with Scalia, it’s been on a steady line for a long time.

While I grant that Scalia’s death is a part of God’s plan, as we can affirm that nothing happens apart from God’s decree, to then tie Scalia’s death to some plan, assuming he knows the mind of God in this and then pointed to exactly who he was referencing as the one who should be elected, Ted Cruz.

As Stu made reference to someone being elected who “knows the Supreme Court who has maybe argued in front of the Supreme Court,” Beck said, “Well, here’s the most important thing, and I don’t want to bring this to Cruz, but we’re obviously there now.”

Beck went on to speak of a conversation with Cruz concerning an appointment under George W. Bush, whom he served under.

However, the point in all of this is like the comment that Beck made about Mitt Romney’s loss to Obama in 2012 in which he blasphemously said “God sucks,” Beck does not have a right understanding of Scripture nor a right understanding of the God of the Bible. As such, when this man claims that he is speaking for God, understand America that he is not. He is speaking the vain imaginations of his own heart and nothing more.

What Beck should have done was reference Deuteronomy 28 and point to the curses on our nation as we have rebelled against God and His Law, and called everyone to repentance. That’s what a prophet of God would do. Second, he should know that Cruz is constitutionally ineligible because he is not a natural born citizen. So, Glenn Beck is pushing his own agenda, not the words of the Creator nor the words of the Constitution.

The reason we are in the shape we are in is because of men like Beck who claim to speak for God, but do not stand in His counsel. Here, listen to what God Himself said of such men:

Thus saith the LORD of hosts, Hearken not unto the words of the prophets that prophesy unto you: they make you vain: they speak a vision of their own heart, and not out of the mouth of the LORD. They say still unto them that despise me, The LORD hath said, Ye shall have peace; and they say unto every one that walketh after the imagination of his own heart, No evil shall come upon you. For who hath stood in the counsel of the LORD, and hath perceived and heard his word? who hath marked his word, and heard it? Behold, a whirlwind of the LORD is gone forth in fury, even a grievous whirlwind: it shall fall grievously upon the head of the wicked. The anger of the LORD shall not return, until he have executed, and till he have performed the thoughts of his heart: in the latter days ye shall consider it perfectly. I have not sent these prophets, yet they ran: I have not spoken to them, yet they prophesied. But if they had stood in my counsel, and had caused my people to hear my words, then they should have turned them from their evil way, and from the evil of their doings. Am I a God at hand, saith the LORD, and not a God afar off? Can any hide himself in secret places that I shall not see him? saith the LORD. Do not I fill heaven and earth? saith the LORD. I have heard what the prophets said, that prophesy lies in my name, saying, I have dreamed, I have dreamed. How long shall this be in the heart of the prophets that prophesy lies? yea, they are prophets of the deceit of their own heart; Which think to cause my people to forget my name by their dreams which they tell every man to his neighbour, as their fathers have forgotten my name for Baal. The prophet that hath a dream, let him tell a dream; and he that hath my word, let him speak my word faithfully. What is the chaff to the wheat? saith the LORD. Is not my word like as a fire? saith the LORD; and like a hammer that breaketh the rock in pieces? Therefore, behold, I am against the prophets, saith the LORD, that steal my words every one from his neighbour. Behold, I am against the prophets, saith the LORD, that use their tongues, and say, He saith. Behold, I am against them that prophesy false dreams, saith the LORD, and do tell them, and cause my people to err by their lies, and by their lightness; yet I sent them not, nor commanded them: therefore they shall not profit this people at all, saith the LORD. Jeremiah 23:16-32

Listen to the full interview:

Federal Judge: Cliven Bundy Must Remain in Jail – He is “Lawless and Violent”

It’s interesting, isn’t it? Not one shot was fired by Cliven Bundy, his family or peaceful protestors, some of whom were armed during the 2014 Bundy Ranch siege by the Bureau of Land Management. Not one shot was fired by the Bundys or any of the people who took over the Oregon Wildlife Refuge either. The only people that we know of who have acted unlawfully and violent have been the DC government and those tied to it. It was those who work for the state that fired on an unarmed LaVoy Finicum, murdering him in cold blood, and then sought to kill the other passengers in his vehicle who never fired a shot. Yet, a federal judge has said following Cliven Bundy’s arrest in Oregon last week, the Mr. Bundy must remain behind bars because he is “lawless and violent.”

U.S. Magistrate Judge Janice Stewart claims that Bundy is a danger to the community there.

“If he is released and he goes back to his ranch, that is likely the last the government will see of him,” Stewart said.

Bundy’s sons, Ammon and Ryan, remain in jail over three weeks after their arrest, and so do several others, including Pete Santilli, who did several live reports to keep the public informed of exactly what was going on minute by minute.

According to the Associated Press:

Bundy’s attorney, Noel Grefenson, said his client could not be a danger if authorities waited to charge him for 22 months. The judge dismissed that argument and set his next hearing for Friday.

A family member said the patriarch isn’t dangerous or a criminal and should be released to live at home.

“Cliven believes in the proper role of government and proper jurisdiction. Where’s the jurisdiction?” daughter-in-law Briana Bundy told The Associated Press by telephone from Bunkerville, Nevada.

“He’s not a flight risk. This is his home. This is where his livelihood is,” she said.

As with everything the DC government does, Bundy’s arrest was calculated. He was arrested at the Portland airport where authorities knew he would be unarmed and there would not be a scene. They were just as calculated in both the ambush and the video footage of the shooting of LaVoy Finicum.

However, Bundy, unlike the others who have been arrested, did not received charges related to the standoff in Oregon, but rather is charged with unlawfully directing more than 200 followers to stop federal agents and contract cowboys who were attempting to enforce a court order to round up nearly 400 of his cattle at the Bundy Ranch siege in 2014.

The aftermath of that was just as telling concerning the lawless and criminal behavior of federal agents.

Prosecutors also allege the Bundy and those who stood with him set up traffic checkpoints on public roads and attempted to follow and intimidate federal agents trying to conduct plant surveys.

“Witnesses have described the level of threatened violence as so intense that something as innocent as the backfire of (a) vehicle, or someone lighting a firecracker, would have set off a firefight,” according to a 34-page document filed by prosecutors Tuesday.

Prosecutors claimed that neither the Constitution nor any other law “gives anyone the right to use or carry, let alone brandish, raise or point, a firearm” at federal law enforcers performing official duties, “whether one thinks the officer is acting constitutionally or not.”

Au contraire mon frere! Federal agents are not spelled even listed in the Constitution, but a citizen militia and their duties are.

The Congress shall have Power To …provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress…. – ARTICLE I, SECTION 8, CLAUSE 16

As we have pointed out before, the laws of the union, contained in the Constitution regarding land were being dealt with peacefully and according to law. I will grant that Congress had not called up the militia, but I would also point out the that same section of the Constitution also states that Congress is to provide for the organizing, arming and disciplining of that militia, which they don’t do because they do not want it to exist, but rather funnel unconstitutional spending to other interests. So, I ask, who really are the lawless and violent ones in this matter? Is it really Mr. Bundy and his sons, or is it a criminal DC government?

A Nurse’s Perspective: Justice Scalia’s Death in Texas is the 21st Century Version of the Assassination of JFK

The death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia shocked the nation, especially when hearing the distinguished Justice appeared to be in good spirits, “entertaining,” and active the night before. What is even more shocking to some is the post death procedures. It has led to many speculating foul play was involved despite what those at the scene claim. A primary area of concern centered on reports that Justice of the Peace Cinderela Guevara never examined Scalia’s body, but pronounced Scalia dead over the phone. As a friend likes to say, “What’s wrong with this picture?”

From a nursing perspective, there is quite a bit wrong with this picture. Let’s start from the beginning. In looking at the circumstances surrounding the finding of Justice Scalia dead, there will be a look at Texas Statutes and many rhetorical questions will be posed because it is being evaluated through a nurse’s eye based on medical perspective.

On Friday evening, Justice Scalia spent the evening with a private group. No one noticed any health related issues compromising Justice Scalia. The next day, John Poindexter found Justice Scalia in his bed, a pillow over his head without any disturbance of the bed sheets or pajamas. Poindexter used the description “looked like he had not quite awakened from a nap.” Poindexter determined resuscitation would be futile since Justice Scalia was cold and had no pulse.

Where did John Poindexter receive his medical degree to determine whether or not resuscitation efforts would be futile? Poindexter did not describe Scalia as pale with blue discoloration (cyanosis) of the lips, eye orbits or fingernails. Neither did Poindexter take Justice Scalia’s temperature via the rectum or liver (common in forensic investigations). A person’s skin can be cold yet still be in a state to revive using resuscitation efforts. Did Scalia have a blocked airway from an object lodged in the throat? No one knew how long Scalia had been dead. The rule of thumb or what any reasonably prudent individual would do is call emergency services, begin resuscitation efforts and continue until arrival of EMS to assume the duty. Considering the remoteness of the resort, Poindexter should know the proper procedure from a first responder standpoint and first aid perspective.

How was the pillow positioned over Scalia’s head? No one has described this very important detail. Neither has anyone indicated the position in which they found Scalia’s body. If Scalia was lying on his side with the pillow under his head but folded over his ear or another pillow over the ear, it would possibly indicate drowning out noise or getting in a comfortable position. However, if Scalia was lying on his back with a pillow over his head and one under his head, it could suggest foul play or that Scalia was shielding his face and eyes from some outside interference.

Finding Scalia in a pristine bed and unwrinkled pajamas is akin to the “magic bullet” theory on the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, as well as hint to the pristine bullet found on the gurney with JFK. Take the test. Put on your pajamas then crawl into bed. Now, make sure your pajamas aren’t wrinkled. Smooth out the areas you “damaged” as you position yourself in a lying position. Regardless of how much you try, evidence of your efforts remain. It is almost as if Scalia were lifted by levitation and placed on the bed after dying.

It’s no wonder many people are asking questions. It is these unusual circumstances and actions by the individuals involved that create suspicion.

It has been reported the Sheriff called a judge to inform the judge of Scalia’s death in order that a determination on autopsy be made.

The question is, “Who determined that Justice Scalia was dead?”

Under Texas State Statute, Health and Safety Code, Title 8: Death and Disposition of the Body; Subsection A: Death; Chapter 671, Determination of Death and Autopsy Reports, “A person is dead when, according to ordinary standards of medical practice, there is irreversible cessation of a person’s spontaneous respiratory and circulatory function.” This chapter acknowledges an unspoken fact that physicians have authority to declare someone as deceased in Section 671.001 (b). Additionally, Section 671.001 (d) declares a registered nurse or physician assistant may determine and pronounce death in situations other than those described in subsection (b).

So, who determined Justice Scalia was dead? Various reports stated Presidio County Judge/Justice of the Peace Cinderela Guevara pronounced Scalia dead over the phone. It has been in various reports and comments by many on various articles written that judges in Texas may pronounce death. However, the Texas State Statute cited would appear to contradict this. In reviewing Texas Statutes concerning judges pronouncing death, hours of review did not produce a statute. However, The Texas Association of Counties website provided descriptions of the duties of county officials through the “2014 Guide to Texas Laws for County Officials.” The duties of judges began on page 63 and justice of the peace duties on page 123. In reading the duties, no where did the document list a duty of a judge or justice of the peace to “determine” or “pronounce” death. As previously indicated, Texas Statute on Determination of Death outlined who may determine an individual dead, according to ordinary standards of medical practice.
Guevara should state exactly how she can determine Scalia died from “natural causes” without being a medical professional, conducting an investigation or inquest, and not seeing the body.

While I did not find the statute on justices of the peace pronouncing death, it is assumed it is within their authority despite not being listed in the Texas Statute on determination of death or listed in the guide as a duty of the justice of the peace or judge. It is an important duty to be excluded from the guide for county officials. The Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, Chapter 49: “Inquests Upon Dead Bodies” Art. 49.04 states, “A justice of the peace shall conduct an inquest into the death of a person who dies in the county served by the justice if: … (3) the body or body part of a person is found, the cause or circumstances of death are unknown, and: (A) the person is identified.” There is a distinct difference in determining death and determining the need for an inquest — the two are not the same or even similar.

Now, should an inquest into the death of Justice Scalia have occurred? His body was found in his room with the circumstance surrounding his death unknown and his identity verified. So, the answer is “yes.” Let’s go further in explanation.

While Justice Scalia had “health issues,” many health issues are treatable, manageable and non-terminal. There has been no indication Justice Scalia had a terminal illness or an illness one would presume to cause death. With that said, there are only two causes of death — respiratory failure or cardiac failure. No breath, no life; no heartbeat, no life. Now, which one did Scalia suffer? It is unknown which one came first meaning whatever caused his respiratory or cardiac failure or both is unknown. His body was found without anyone in witness to the circumstances surrounding his death, which means no one knows when exactly Scalia suffered the mechanism (s) to cause death or what that mechanism (s) is or are.

Is any of this indicative of foul play? It is plausible that it is. With that said, why was an inquest not done to determine what happened? Granted, the family did not want an autopsy, which is their right; however, blood samples, tissue samples, and other evidentiary samples taken discreetly during a forensic investigation could provide further answers. In the extended education obtained to specialize in forensic nursing, cases such as this were summed up as “It’s homicide until it’s not.”

All of this is quite interesting as this was not treated as a crime until proven it was not. Justice Scalia has no voice to speak for him as to what happened. Those in Texas involved in discovery and afterward silenced his voice by not pursuing an investigation or an inquest according to Texas Statute. All the important people were notified. The news organizations ran the story, claiming a Judge/Justice of the Peace declared Justice Scalia as dead. Still, who exactly determined Justice Scalia to be dead, according to ordinary standards of medical practice? It would appear Texas justice excluded the most important individual in this situation.

The public will never know the answers since no investigation was done, no inquest performed, and his body embalmed within 24 hours. Neither will his family. Justice Scalia’s death in Texas is the 21st century version of the 20th century assassination of President John F. Kennedy.

This Heart Attack Gun May Have Been Used To Kill Scalia: “Undetectable Toxin… Leaves a Tiny Red Dot… Would Not Appear In Autopsy”

Speculation abounds over the weekend death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia.

And for good reason, because the five-to-four conservative leaning court was to issue opinions on Obamacare, immigration, the Second Amendment, and various other key issues in coming weeks and months.

Early reports indicated that Scalia died of a heart attack, but within hours the public learned that he was found with a pillow over his head. Suspicions were further raisedafter the judge who pronounced him dead did so over the phone, without ever seeing the body. Moreover, Scalia was embalmed within 24 hours, leaving no possibility of an autopsy, a move that one veteran investigator says made him “almost fall out of his chair.”

“He’s not at home. There are no witnesses to his death, and there was no reported explanation for why a pillow is over his head,” Tufo said. “So I think under the circumstances it’s not unreasonable to request an autopsy. Despite the fact that he has pre-existing ailments and the fact that he’s almost 80 years old, you want to be sure that it’s not something other than natural causes.”

A justice of the Supreme Court of the United States has been found dead and no one thought an autopsy should be carried out?

Considering that the court cases in question will likely end up being part of Obama’s legacy and serve the agenda of a variety of interested partners with billions of dollars at stake, one could legitimately make the argument that Scalia’s death and how it was handled is quite suspicious.

Granted, Scalia was 79 years old, so it is quite probable that his death is the result of natural causes.

Yet, the skeptics have a strong case and their interest is further justified knowing that there exist very specialized weapons that have been designed specifically to carry out assassinations that make it look like someone died of natural causes when they didn’t.

Case in point: The Central Intelligence Agency designed a “Heart Attack Gun” that was created to do just that. 

It fires a heart-attack inducing dart into the victim leaving a tiny needle-sized hole that might not be discovered even by a keen-eyed professional medical examiner during an autopsy. As the projectile dart from the gun enters the body it melts, leaving no trace of the deadly chemical used to induce heart failure.

For those who think this is something out of the realm of fringe conspiracy theory, we direct your attention to the following Congressional testimony and whistle blower report:

It would appear as if they had a heart attack… I did find such a thing… The poison was frozen into some sort of dart and then it was shot at very high speed… So when it reached the person it would melt inside them… the only thing would be one little tiny red dot on their body, which was hard to detect.

… The toxin itself would not appear in the autopsy… so there was no way of perceiving that the target was hit.

(Watch at Youtube)

Did Justice Antonin Scalia die of natural causes?

Or does the evidence and the following “investigation,” or lack thereof, suggest foul play?

Article reposted with permission from SHTF Plan, the opinions and views shared do not necessarily reflect the views of Freedom Outpost.

Questions Raised in Lack of Autopsy of Justice Antonin Scalia

Questions abound after Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia’s untimely death, especially after his family has requested there be no autopsy of his body, even though it was found with a pillow over his head.

According to The Washington Post:

As official Washington tried to process what his demise means for politics and the law, some details of Scalia’s final hours remained opaque. As late as Sunday afternoon, for example, there were conflicting reports about whether an autopsy should have been performed. A manager at the El Paso funeral home where Scalia’s body was taken said that his family made it clear they did not want one.

One of two other officials who were called but couldn’t get to Scalia’s body in time said that she would have made a different decision on the autopsy.

Juanita Bishop, a justice of the peace in Presidio, Texas said, “”If it had been me ... I would want to know.”

After Cibolo Creek Ranch owner John Poindexter came out and said that Scalia was found with “a pillow over his head,” speculation has abound as to whether there was foul play, even though official source claim there was not.

Retired Brooklyn homicide Detective Patricia Tufo told the New York Post, “It’s not unreasonable to ask for an autopsy in this case, particularly knowing who he is.”

“He’s not at home. There are no witnesses to his death, and there was no reported explanation for why a pillow is over his head,” Tufo added. “So I think under the circumstances it’s not unreasonable to request an autopsy. Despite the fact that he has pre-existing ailments and the fact that he’s almost 80 years old, you want to be sure that it’s not something other than natural causes.”

Again, I want to ask how it is that without seeing the body someone can declare the person dead. This seems very strange. The timing of Scalia’s death making the matter even stranger and his death coming in an election year just after the Supreme Court put a halt to Obama’s climate change fraud policies furthers concerns that we are not getting all the facts coming from the death of Antonin Scalia.

We know that with Scalia’s passing, it will more or less cause the Supreme Court to be divided, especially concerning cases that are pending, including Obamacare, amnesty and gun owner rights. Nevertheless, there is an issue for states to step up should things go in an unconstitutional direction and that is toward nullification and interposition.

While many are concerned over an Obama appointee, history has shown the Democrats have favored being against confirmation of Supreme Court justices during an election year, even though there is no constitutional requirement to do so. Still, considering the appointments that Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah has made, even the most strident globalist and RINO Republicans should be wary of confirming such appointments to the court.

Gun Rights Would Not Survive an Obama-appointment to the Supreme Court

By now, you have no doubt heard that Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia passed away on Saturday.

His pro-gun leadership on the Court will be sorely missed.

But we are now in the fight for our lives, as President Obama will try to nominate a replacement to change the balance of the Court.

When ABC’s George Stephanopoulos quizzed Texas Sen. Ted Cruz over Scalia’s replacement, the Senator suggested that our Second Amendment rights are “hanging in the balance.”

Cruz is right.

No one should fail to understand what is at stake in Barack Obama’s scramble to appoint the “swing vote” on the Supreme Court.

If Obama appoints a replacement for Justice Antonin Scalia, the reconstituted court will declare the Second Amendment dead.


Those of us who are constitutionalists know that Obama and the Court can’t really obliterate the 2nd Amendment.  The Constitution trumps any unlawful action to the contrary.

But a change in the Court — with the anti-gun decisions that follow — will give the “green light” for all kinds of gun registration and gun bans, resulting in a chilling effect on the exercise of our gun rights.

Heller, the 5-4 decision which recognized the Second Amendment as an individual right, will be reversed.

McDonald, the 5-4 decision which recognized that the Second Amendment applies to the states, will be reversed.

Even sooner, the court will recognize Obama’s illegal efforts to grant amnesty to 5+ million anti-gun voters.

And the consequence will be that the entire U.S. government will soon be the same gun-hating “utopia” which California’s government became as a result of a 1986 amnesty bill.

The Leftist media has already begun their White House-coordinated campaign to bludgeon Senate Republicans into approving Obama’s efforts to pack the Supreme Court with a “jurist” who will repeal the Second Amendment — and achieve Obama’s life-long dream.

But all of their arguments are, transparently, lies and false propaganda.

FIRST: Everyone knows that the Obama appointment would result in the reversal of Heller — and the effective repeal of the Second Amendment — at least, as recognized by a corrupt court system.

SECOND: Obama’s ultimate nominee will lie.

He or she will say that they have no opinion on the Second Amendment.  And they will talk about legal doctrines like stare decisis — which supposedly gives a presumption to retaining “settled law.”

Justice Sonia Sotomayor also swore, under oath, that she had no preconceived opinions on the Second Amendment.  But as soon as she got her lifetime appointment, she couldn’t move fast enough to call for the Second Amendment’s repeal.

If there is one thing we have learned from Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and the gaggle of Obama lower court appointees, it is this:  They will say whatever needs to be said to get on the Court, but they will run fast and hard to the Far Left once they are confirmed.

THIRD:  There is no constitutional principle which requires the Senate to approve a lawless nominee.

Besides, Obama has had no problem using the Constitution and the laws as toilet paper.

So he is the last one to lecture others on their “constitutional obligations” — particularly when the goal is to confirm lawless jurists who would rubber-stamp Obama’s unconstitutional and lawless actions.

You might be surprised to know — but then again, maybe not — who it was that, as a Senator, loudly protested the ability of the President to simply get anyone he wants on the Supreme Court.

Remember who said this:

“There are some who believe that the President, having won the election, should have complete authority to appoint his nominee … that once you get beyond intellect and personal character, there should be no further question as to whether the judge should be confirmed. I disagree with this view.”

That was then-Senator Barack Obama in 2007, stating that the Senate can vote down a presidential nominee to the Supreme Court, based on his views alone.

Ironically, Obama was right then, and his words are true today — even more so than ever before!

You can be sure that GOA is going to remind every Senator of Barack Obama’s words before he became President.

And you can tremendously help by demanding that your Senators filibuster anyone who is nominated by President Obama — even if both of your Senators are Democrats.

We are going to remind every Democrat of what their “leader,” Barack Obama, said back in 2007.

We are going to make sure they feel the heat from the grassroots, so they know that their colleagues will pay a political price if they choose to listen to the leftist media.

Senator Ted Cruz promised ABC’s Stephanopoulos over the weekend that he would be willing to lead a filibuster against Obama’s nominee.

He’s led filibusters before.  He has the experience and knows what to do.

But we need to raise a national outcry like never before.

So please urge your Senators to reject and oppose — in every possible way — any anti-gun “swing vote” nominated by President Obama.

Tell them that any support for an Obama-nominee will be tantamount to a vote to reverse Heller and repeal the Second Amendment.

Florida Senators Called Out by Students for Stalling Bill Recognizing Right to Carry Guns on Campus

There are many things that we see in the younger generation that makes us concerned for the future of the united States. However, there are also many things that we see in the younger generation that give us hope that many will have courage when it is time to take a stand. Such an instance occurred in Florida as students are calling out state senators over the fact that they are infringing upon their rights by not acknowledging their right to keep and bear their arms on campus.

One campus carry bill has already passed in the Florida State House. However, a companion Senate bill has been put on the backburner, even though it has a couple of committee endorsements.

So, who is to blame in the matter?

Apparently it is Senator Miguel Diaz de la Portilla (R-Miami).

Guns.com reported in January:

A Miami area Republican is refusing to schedule a hearing on a proposal to allow concealed carry on public college and university campuses.

The measure, backed by State Sen. Greg Evers, R-Baker, had already won approval from the Criminal Justice and Higher Education committees but is stalling in the Judiciary Committee where the chair, Sen. Miguel Diaz de la Portilla, R-Miami, is refusing to schedule a hearing on the bill.

Last April, de la Portilla did much the same thing to stop the progress of a similar bill by Evers saying at the time, “there doesn’t seem to be too much support for that bill.”

Now, a student group is calling him and other senators out.

In an open letter from Bekah Hargrove, state director for Florida Students for Concealed Carry, she wrote, “Senator Diaz de la Portilla has taken it upon himself to unilaterally decide the future of a bipartisan bill that the vast majority of legislative members support. He has made a mockery of the American legislative branch and turned Florida’s legislative process into a one-man show, without respect for the safety of college students.”

“In fact, Senator Diaz de la Portilla has continued to ignore campus rape survivor, Shayna Lopez-Rivas who has been attempting to schedule a short meeting with him since October of 2015,” the letter continued. “She asserts that if she had been old enough to have a gun and if she had been allowed to carry on campus, she never would have been raped. Yet Senator Diaz de la Portilla does not want to give her the time of day, so she has made all of her emails to him public on social media in an effort to share her story.”

According to Ms. Lopez-Rivas, “Senator Portilla would rather have me be raped again than even schedule a bill.”

Hargrove claims that the Florida senator is “ignoring his job description” by “ignoring his role as a servant to the people” and refusing “meetings with the bill sponsors.”

While Hargrove acknowledged that the senator could vote “no” on campus carry, he should at least put the bill up for a vote. However, if he is unwilling to do that, Hargrove writes, “He should be removed from his office.”

Finally, she called out those complicity with Senator Portilla.

“If this type of behavior is permitted to continue, the legislative system will be fundamentally changed forever. Senator Diaz de la Portilla represents exactly what is wrong in politics and the people must not let him continue to act as judge, jury, and executioner. Senate President Andy Gardiner is just as much to blame. Senator Gardiner has the power to ensure the campus carry bill gets a vote, but refuses to do anything and uses Senator Diaz de la Portilla as a scapegoat.”

She then asked that others contact the senators to voice their opinion.

Senator Miguel Diaz de la Portilla

[email protected]

Phone: 850-487-5040

Senate President Andy Gardiner

[email protected]

Phone: 850-487-5013

Twitter Sued for Knowingly Hosting 70,000 ISIS Accounts

NBC News reported that Tamara Fields, the widow of slain federal contractor Lloyd Carl Fields Jr., is suing Twitter for knowingly allowing ISIS to use 70,000 accounts on its network, which abetted her husband’s murder. ISIS took credit for his death.

He was killed last fall while training a Jordanian police captain, which was part of a U.S. State Department initiative.

His widow asserts: “Without Twitter, the explosive growth of ISIS over the last few years into the most feared terrorist group in the world would not have been possible.”

Fields alleges that Twitter knowingly allowed ISIS operatives to amass a large following on its social media network, through numerous accounts, enabling it to establish a formative online presence to help terrorists plan and coordinate attacks. The federal complaint states:

“As of December 2014, ISIS had an estimated 70,000 twitter accounts, at least 79 of which were ‘official’, and it posted at least 90 tweets every minute.”

Fields’ suit states that one ISIS account has nearly 20,000 followers as of June, 2014. Her suit also cites problems with Twitter’s ability to shut down terrorist accounts, which can easily be re-opened using an altered Twitter handle. And, it references Twitter’s lax response to federal government pressure to curb terrorists using its network.

It’s no secret that ISIS has been using Twitter accounts to find new recruits, raise financial and other support, and reach people through its Direct Message function.

A Twitter spokesperson responded to questions about her suit in a statement, claiming her lawsuit carries no weight, and Twitter is “saddened to hear of this family’s terrible loss.” The company also stated it prohibits “violent threats” and “promotion of terrorism” on Twitter. It also claims to have teams “investigating reports of rule violations,” who are also working with law enforcement to squash terrorist-related content.

It’s unclear how many ISIS-related accounts remain open. Not to mention how many have been permanently closed or reopened under new accounts.

It’s hard to believe with Twitter’s algorithmic technology that it is having such difficulty blocking terrorists from using its site.

Article reposted with permission from Constitution.com, the opinions and views shared do not necessarily reflect the views of Freedom Outpost.

Cruz: ‘The Second Amendment Will Be Written Out of the Constitution’ if Trump is President

As previously reported by Truth In Media, Senior Associate Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia was found dead of apparent natural causes at a ranch in West Texas Saturday morning.

The passing of Scalia sparked different reactions from presidential candidates and political organizations. Both the National Rifle Association and Republican presidential candidate Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) are emphasizing the importance of replacing Scalia’s seat with a pro-2nd Amendment Justice.

According to Washington Examiner, the NRA will spend $20 million during the election to push for gun rights and will lobby for pro 2nd Amendment justices.

The NRA tweeted Senator Ted Cruz’s statement at the news of Scalia’s passing.


Senator Cruz told This Week‘s George Stephanopoulos the importance of the next election and how it will affect the SCOTUS’ decision on important issues like the 2nd Amendment. Cruz also told Stephanopoulos that he intends to filibuster any Supreme Court nominee brought forward by President Obama.

“I don’t think the American people want a court that will write the 2nd Amendment out of the Constitution,” said Cruz.

But Cruz went a step further by attacking his opponent Donald Trump.

Cruz said, “And if Donald Trump becomes president, the Second Amendment will be written out of the Constitution because it is abundantly clear that Donald Trump is not a conservative. He will not invest the capital to confirm a conservative.”

Cruz added, “Whether it’s Hillary, Bernie or Donald Trump. The Second Amendment will go away.”

“He says you’re wrong. He says he will and he says your judgment should be questioned because you supported John Roberts,” said Stephanopoulos.


Cruz said, “Listen, number one, I did not appoint John Roberts. George W. Bush did. Now once the president made the appointment, I supported that nomination. That was a mistake.”

Article reposted with permission from Truth in Media, the opinions and views shared do not necessarily reflect the views of Freedom Outpost.

Guess What Senate Democrats Passed in 1960 that is going to Bite them if Obama Appoints a Supreme Court Justice this Year

Well, here is what happens when the shoe is on the other foot. After the death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, you can bet that the Democrats will pitch a temper tantrum over this and spineless Republican senators will be prone to capitulate. Anyone realize what senate Democrats passed in 1960 to fight off President Dwight Eisenhower’s Supreme Court appointments? They passed S.RES 334, which expressed “the sense of the Senate that the president should not make recess appointments to the Supreme Court, except to prevent or end a breakdown in the administration of the Court’s business.”

The vote ended with 48 Democrats in favor and 4 opposed, along with 33 Republicans against the resolution.

According to GovTrack:

This vote was to kill a nonbinding resolution proposed by the Democrats who hoped to prevent President Eisenhower from using recess appointments to fill a vacancy in the Supreme Court. A recess appointment is made while the Senate is in recess, and while such appointments do not require Senate approval they instead expire at the end of the subsequent legislative session (these days, a calendar year).

The Washington Post explained:

Each of President Eisenhower’s SCOTUS appointments had initially been a recess appointment who was later confirmed by the Senate, and the Democrats were apparently concerned that Ike would try to fill any last-minute vacancy that might arise with a recess appointment. Not surprisingly, the Republicans objected, insisting that the Court should have a full complement of Justices at all times.

These days, the Senate often holds pro forma sessions, by gaveling-in for one minute each day, rather than go on recess in a time when the President is expected to use the recess appointment or pocket veto power. On Feb. 14, 2016, President Obama stated that he would not use the recess appointment power to fill the vacancy caused by the death of Justice Scalia, which occurred during a Senate recess.

The problem in all of this is there is nothing in the Constitution that allows for the Senate to restrict a President from appointing judges in an election year. However, they do have the power to confirm or not confirm those appointments.

We already know that Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah has engaged in making illegal recess appointments, but the Congress has failed to hold him constitutionally accountable through impeachment for his actions. And that illegal action was one of hundreds for which Congress should have dealt with him constitutionally.

Frankly, I can see this being thrown in the faces of Democrats over the next few weeks and used as political fodder in campaign ads, of which, to be honest, I’m already sick of the politicking on both sides. Give America 500 farmers and regular Americans who know their Constitution and who fear the God of the Bible and know His Law in DC for one month a year, and justices who are trained in constitutional law not case law, and we would see a drastic turnaround overnight. However, that would require Americans to actually repent of their own wickedness and political idolatry, wouldn’t it?

What’s even more hypocritical in this situation is that as Obama claims to be doing his constitutional duty by appointing a judge to the Supreme Court and calls on Congress to fulfill their constitutional duty, we need to be reminded that in January 2006, Obama joined then senator John Kerry and 23 other senators in filibustering the nomination of now-Justice Samuel Alito. I think it’s high time to return the favor.

Justice Scalia: Judicial Lawlessness and the Need for Interposition

The passing of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia has the political pundits prognosticating, the talk-show hosts prophesying, and the conservatives palpitating. Who will nominate the next Supreme Court Justice is all the buzz.

Already, the GOP rustlers are proclaiming the perceived threat in order to stampede the faithful into voting for their Presidential nominee. The perceived threat is that “A Democrat President will appoint Supreme Court Justices.” Therefore, “You must vote for the GOP Presidential nominee so he can nominate justices to the Supreme Court and Roe v. Wade can be overturned.”

Actually, the GOP has stampeded the faithful using this ruse for over 40 years now. Every four years they bring out the scarecrow – a Democrat President who will appoint liberal, pro-abortion justices. Scalia’s passing has given fresh vigor to the ruse.

The truth is – though the faithful have voted for the Republican Presidents and the Republican Presidents have nominated many justices – Roe v. Wade still stands.

In fact, a short history lesson shows that when Roe v. Wade was decided – six of the nine justices on the court were Republican-appointed. And over the next 40 years the Republican-appointed justices always outnumbered the Democrat-appointed justices either seven to two or eight to one. And yet, Roe remains intact.

And now this year, they will stampede the faithful yet again using the same ruse.

Regardless of what Party nominates the justices – this problem with the judiciary declaring evil to be good and good to be evil will not be remedied, adjudicated, or fixed in the courts. The courts are the dispensers of injustice and immorality in this nation.

To end this blithering cycle, conservatives and Christians need to come to grips with the cold, stark reality that there is no federal solution to our nation’s ills – rather – the federal government is the problem. Sitting around waiting for this four-year cycle to endlessly repeat itself so we can do it all again only ensures our nation’s demise.

Regardless of your desire to be a Pollyanna, or agreement that “Yes Virginia – there is a Santa Claus,” or insistence that the Emperor really does have new clothes, the reality is the federal judiciary is a tyrant that will not correct itself. It is incapable of correcting itself, as they are drunk on their own hubris. Nor will our spine-less Congress correct it, as most of them are bought and paid for by wealthy men and special interests.

Understand, you cannot appease a tyrant – you must confront him.

Governors, and Attorney Generals, and state legislatures (as well as county and local governments) simply must interpose against such judicial lawlessness. The Emperor needs to be told – “You have no clothes!” Roe v. Wade is not “the law of the land” – it is a court opinion and nothing more. Obergefell is not “the law of the land” – it is a court opinion and nothing more.

A true federalism understands that whenever one branch of government begins to play the tyrant – it is then more incumbent than ever for all other branches (whether federal, state, county, or local) to uphold the Constitution and resist the branch playing the tyrant – even if that branch is the Supreme Court.

Antonin Scalia understood that the Supreme Court needs to be resisted by the other branches of government. In his scathing dissent, he wrote that the Obergefell opinion “is a naked judicial claim to legislative—indeed, super-legislative—power; a claim fundamentally at odds with our system of government;” Id. at *43 (Scalia, J., dissenting)

Scalia understood that the courts do not have law-making power. Legislators write laws. The federal judiciary has usurped the legislative branch and given itself powers the Constitution did not give to it.

Through so-called “Judicial Supremacy” the federal courts claim to be the lone and final arbiter of what is constitutional and what is not. They claim this through the so-called “Supremacy Clause” – Article 6, paragraph 2 of the Constitution. But when one actually reads Article 6, paragraph 2 they see that the Supreme Court is not mentioned there (nor any federal court). Rather – it is the Constitution itself that has supremacy.

The Supreme Court wrote themselves into this role – as lone and final arbiter of the Constitution – through their rulings. They did this early on. Thomas Jefferson wrote extensively against the Court. He stated in 1820 in a letter to William Jarvis: “You seem . . . to consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions; a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy.”

Even Abraham Lincoln spoke of it in his first Inaugural Address: “The candid citizen must confess that if the policy of the government, upon vital questions, affecting the whole people, is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court, the instant they are made, in ordinary litigation between parties, in personal actions, the people will have ceased to be their own rulers, having, to that extent, practically resigned their government into the hands of that eminent tribunal.”

Though men will always try to forbear, the judiciary’s lawlessness is bringing this 200 year old debate to a head. Men are realizing they no longer have the convenience of acting indifferent towards the unjust and immoral actions of their government.

On October 8th, 2015, the week that the Supreme Court began its current session, 72 prominent legal scholars issued a statement that Obergefell is not “the law of the land.”

At the end of their statement, they wrote:

We remind all officeholders in the United States that they are pledged to uphold the Constitution of the United States, not the will of five members of the Supreme Court.
We call on all federal and state officeholders:
1.) To refuse to accept Obergefell as binding precedent for all but the specific plaintiffs in that case.
2.) To recognize the authority of states to define marriage, and the right of federal and state officeholders to act in accordance with those definitions.
3.) To pledge full and mutual legal and political assistance to anyone who refuses to follow Obergefell for constitutionally protected reasons.

This is the interposition of the lesser magistrates. This is true federalism.

The time for pondering political theory is ending. The day for application is here. Bravery and sacrifice are essential in this hour. May we humble ourselves under the mighty hand of the Lord and do what is needed and necessary.

Article reposted with permission from LesserMagistrate.com, the opinions and views shared do not necessarily reflect the views of Freedom Outpost.

Cibolo Creek Ranch Owner: We Found Scalia with “A Pillow Over His Head”

From the moment that the death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia was announced, there was speculation that it was a hit put out by the Obama administration.  Even I questioned the official narrative coming out about Scalia’s death.  However, now Cibolo Creek Ranch owner John Poindester’s account of how Scalia was found is beginning to add fuel to that fire as he told the press that Scalia was discovered with “a pillow over his head.”

Pindexter was recounting Scalia’s final hours as he arrived at the 30,000 acre ranch.

“He was seated near me and I had a chance to observe him. He was very entertaining. But about 9 p.m. he said, ‘it’s been a long day and a long week, I want to get some sleep ,” he said.

That was on Friday evening.  On Saturday morning, around 8:30 am, Poindexter went to awaken Scalia, but he did not answer the door and the door was locked.  Poindexter, assuming Scalia wanted to sleep in, went on an outing and returned approximately three hours later with a friend who had accompanied Scalia from Washington.

“We discovered the judge in bed, a pillow over his head. His bed clothes were unwrinkled,” said Poindexter.  “He was lying very restfully. It looked like he had not quite awakened from a nap.”

My San Antonio reported, “Scalia, 79, did not have a pulse and his body was cold, and after consulting with a doctor at a hospital in Alpine, Poindexter concluded resuscitation would have been futile, He then contacted federal authorities, at first encountering a series of answering services because he was calling on a weekend.”

“Ultimately they became available and handled it t superbly. They flew in by helicopter. They told me to secure the ranch, which I did until this morning,” Poindexter said.

Presidio County Judge Cinderela Guevara told WFAA on Sunday that Scalia had likely died from a heart attack, but she did so without looking at the body.  Scalia also had a personal physician with him, whom Judge Guevara said she would confer with later.

Texas law demands that a body be embalmed before it leaves the state.  Scalia was embalmed on Sunday afternoon.

Now, it’s a shame we have to even ask questions of foul play in this instance, but considering the criminal administration in the Oval Office, this seems to be necessary.

According to Judge Guevara, she sought details before deciding on whether or not to order an autopsy.

“As part of my investigation one of the things I did ask the sheriff and the U.S. Marshal: ‘Were there any signs of foul play? And they said, ‘Absolutely not.’ At that time, I still wanted to be careful and asked them if [Scalia’s] physician would call me.”

Scalia’s physician told the judge that he had just had an MRI taken on Wednesday and Thursday and that she believed that indicated what Scalia was facing physically.  He had also been to the doctor recently over a shoulder injury and suffered from several chronic ailments.

“After I did my job, yes… I kept playing it over and over in my mind and thought, ‘Oh my God. History is being made in Presidio County,” Guevara told WFAA. “It’s something I’ll never forget.”

Apparently, it won’t easily be forgotten on the internet either, as many of us just think the timing of Justice Scalia’s death is questionable, even as Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah is pushing the senate to confirm the person he will seek to appoint to the Supreme Court.

Merkel Says She Will Convert Muslims to Respect Women

The illegal alien Muslim invasion of Europe has been covered every step of the way. Reports of increased crime, rapes and assaults are prevalent in nations where these invaders have inserted themselves into towns and cities across the nations of Europe. In Germany, women cannot leave home without being harassed, assaulted, or intimidated, thanks to one Angela “Erkel” Merkel. The situation has become grave for some especially in small towns. Not to worry since Merkel has a plan — “‘convert’ misogynistic migrants, and bring them in line with Germany’s more progressive attitudes.” 

Honestly, a search was done to see if this was satire or irony. It isn’t. Feel free to shake your head, laugh hysterically and make a “stupid” sign to honor the idiocy of the German chancellor.

Peter Altmaier, the German federal refugee coordinator and member of Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union Party (CDU), told the Kurier, “Erkel” Merkel will convert the refugees’ misogynistic attitudes toward women to something more “in line with German progressive attitudes.”

Breitbart reported:

He [Altmaier] sat on a panel at the Munich Security Conference Friday when a local politician told him that many migrants in local asylum centres refused to listen to the instructions of female workers and refused food and money from them demanding that they would only accept aid from fellow men.

Altmaier answered the question by saying that the asylum workers should tell each migrant who does not listen to a woman that he must respect women like he would respect Chancellor Merkel. “You have to explain to him that there are hundreds of thousands of “Angela Merkels” in Germany who have just as much to say,” and that they should treat women with the same reverence.

The minister is one of the inner circle of the German chancellor and regarded by many as one of the last ‘true believers’ left in the Merkel cabinet. He spent much of the Munich conference this week defending the migration policies that have unfolded in the last year after Mrs. Merkel gave a broad invite to anyone who was a refugee or merely thought they were one.

Merkel doesn’t care and Altmaier wrongly believes explaining to Muslims to listen to women as if she were Angela Merkel has to be one of the most stellar displays of intelligent ignorance. Altamaier actually believes that explaining how all women are “Angela Merkel” will instantaneously “convert” Muslim misogyny into “respect” for women. Aretha Franklin singing, “R-E-S-P-E-C-T, find out what it means to me,” will accomplish the same thing — nothing.

Altmaier is making a last attempt at getting European nations and German politicians to view this illegal alien Muslim invasion as optimistic despite deteriorating conditions being felt all over the continent. The exact plan is to have other European nations adopt the stance of the German government, to take more migrants, and change Germany’s crisis by invitation into a European continent-wide problem. Talk about a “slick trick.”

Altmaier had praise for only one nation — Turkey. He claimed Turkey has exhibited more humanitarianism toward “migrants” that the European nations. Yes, this is the same Turkey that has a poor track record on human rights, routinely arrests journalists engaging in free press by criticizing Erdogan and still has laws that “imprison academics and others who give legitimacy to the Armenian genocide that killed over a million at the end of World War I. The same Turkish government threatened Europe with more illegal Muslim invaders if the EU did not pay the nation billions of Euros. In fact, the Hungarian Prime Minister, Viktor Orban accused Germany and Turkey of engaging in secret talks to overwhelm the EU with thousands of illegal alien Muslim invaders.

At the rate the invasion is occurring and the sneaky way Altmaier is trying to involve all of Europe, Hungarian Prime Minister Orban has plenty of credibility especially with his claim of having knowledge of such an agreement.

The nation that gave rise to Hitler, who intended on conquering Europe, now gives rise to implementation of illegal alien Muslim invaders throughout Europe in order to bring into submission an entire continent and governmental system. Hitler buckled almost the whole of Europe under the thumb of Germany for a short time until the United States, Britain, Canada and Russia liberated the continent. This time, Madame “Adolf” Merkel will attempt to buckle the whole of Europe under Islam. Unfortunately, there is no one to come to the aid of Europe, except maybe Russia. Russia has a tendency to keep what it occupies or liberates. The nations of Europe may have to choose between conquering by Islam or conquering by Russia.

In the meantime, Merkel will have the German government working to “convert” the misogynistic attitudes of Muslim men to a more tolerable attitude taken in Europe. Good luck with that Madame “Adolf.” More than likely, it will be Muslims trying to convert Germans with the resulting murders of those who refuse. As distasteful as it may be, one might say Germany’s chickens are coming home to roost proving the nation learned nothing from World War II and the atrocities perpetrated by Hitler’s Third Reich.

Trashing the 12th Amendment with the National Popular Vote

The compact for a National Popular Vote (NPV) is a destructive scheme. Yet it’s been approved by several States; and is pending in others. Since the text of the compact no longer seems to be set forth on the NPV website, we’ll look at the NPV bill now pending in Tennessee.

In a nutshell, the compact seeks to evade the 12th Amendment to our Constitution (where the States elect the President); and substitutes a national popular vote where inhabitants of major metropolitan areas elect the President.

The Constitution our Framers gave us

The federal government created by our Constitution is a Federation of Sovereign States united under a federal government for those limited purposes itemized in the Constitution; with all other powers reserved by the States or the People.

So that The States – The Members of the Federation – could maintain their independence and sovereignty, our Framers wrote these provisions into our Constitution:

  • State Legislatures were to choose the U.S. Senators for their State (Art. I, §3, cl. 1); and,
  • The States, as separate political entities, were to elect the President (Art. II, §1, cls. 2 & 3).

The People were to elect only their Representatives to the House (Art. I, § 2, cl.1).

James Madison explains in Federalist No. 45 (7th para), why this ensured that The States would maintain control over the federal government:

“The State governments may be regarded as constituent and essential parts of the federal government …Without the intervention of the State legislatures, the President of the United States cannot be elected at all. They must in all cases have a great share in his appointment, and will, perhaps, in most cases, of themselves determine it. The Senate will be elected absolutely and exclusively by the State legislatures. …Thus, each of the principal branches of the federal government will owe its existence more or less to the favor of the State governments …” [boldface mine]

The result of State Legislatures choosing the U.S. Senators and controlling the election of the President [via the selection of Electors], was that the States would be able to control the federal government.

The 17th Amendment

But we threw away one of these safeguards when we foolishly ratified the 17th Amendment with the popular election of U.S. Senators. This is how The States – The Members of the Federation – lost their representation in Congress and their control of the Senate.

Art. II, §1, cl. 2 and the 12th Amendment

We abandoned the other safeguard when we foolishly ignored the procedures in the 12th Amendment where small bodies of specially chosen wise and prudent men (Electors) made the selections of President and Vice President for their State. We allowed Electors to become rubber stamps for the popular vote in their State.

Our Framers didn’t want popular election of the President because they recognized that People are easily manipulated by those who take advantage of their “hopes and fears”, to steer them towards candidates favored by powerful groups (Federalist No. 64 (3rd & 4th paras; Federalist No. 68, etc.)

Furthermore, under the 12th Amendment, the electoral votes of each State are split according to how the Electors vote. If Tennessee obeyed the 12th Amendment, it would work like this when selecting President: 5 Electors vote for Candidate X; 4 vote for Candidate Y; and 2 vote for Candidate Z. Those would be the vote totals for President which would be sent to Congress. The same procedures are to be followed in a separate vote for Vice-President. 1 The “winner takes all” practice followed in most States is unconstitutional!

How The National Popular Vote Scheme Will Work.

Under the scheme incorporated in the NPV bill pending in Tennessee, all of Tennessee’s electoral votes would be awarded to the presidential candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 States and the District of Columbia.

The wording of the compact is deliberately obscure. In plain English, this is what it does:

Art. II

Each Member State will conduct a statewide popular election for President and Vice President.

Art. III

(a) & (b) The State Election official in each Member State will add up the votes cast in all the States and the D.C. to get the total number of votes cast nationally for each presidential ticket. The State official will then designate the presidential ticket with the largest number of votes nationally as the “national popular vote winner”.

(c) & (g) Electors will then be appointed in each Member State who are to cast all their votes for the national popular vote winner.

So! If the popular vote in Tennessee is for James Madison, but the total national popular vote favors Adolf Hitler, then all of Tennessee’s 11 Electoral Votes are awarded to Adolf Hitler.

Indeed, the winner of the national popular vote will end up with all the electoral votes for every State.  And do not think that the winner will fail to claim a “Mandate” for whatever he wants to do.

The States Can’t Lawfully Enter Into A Compact Which Violates The U.S. Constitution!

Every aspect of the NPV violates the 12th Amendment.  It sets up a method of electing the President and vice-President which is altogether repugnant to our Constitution.

Furthermore, Art. I, §10, last clause, prohibits States from “enter[ing] into any Agreement or Compact with another State” “without the Consent of Congress”.  So, whether the NPV Compact also violates Art. I, §10, last clause, depends on whether Congress consents to it. But Congress may not lawfully consent to unconstitutional compacts of the States!

Under The NPV Scheme, Votes From Major Metropolitan Areas Will Decide Presidential Elections.

Most of the Population of these United States is located in a few major metropolitan areas. Under the NPV scheme, these areas would decide the elections for President!

See the 3D map below showing how the major metropolitan areas voted in the last presidential election.

Presidential Election: Winners by County

Note: Please upgrade your Flash plug-in to view our enhanced content.

SOURCE: Associated Press | CREDITS: Map by Nathaniel Vaughn Kelso; 3-D map by Gene Thorp, The Washington Post; Flash development by Alyson Hurt and Nelson Hsu, washingtonpost.com; data processing by Larry Sanderson and Hailong Wang, washingtonpost.com



The NPV is not about “making every vote count”. The NPV is about guaranteeing that every future presidential election is decided by inhabitants of major metropolitan areas. And it further diminishes State sovereignty.

What Should We Do?

Repeal the 17th Amendment. We must henceforth elect to Congress only those who are committed to repealing the 17th Amendment. This is the only way The States can regain control of the Senate.

Return to the 12th Amendment. We must dismantle the present unconstitutional and corrupt system and return to the method of electing the President and Vice President established in our Constitution. State Legislators could restore to their States right now the power to control the President! All States have to do is obey the 12th Amendment! Also, specially chosen Electors are far more likely to choose good Presidents than the ignorant masses which fill our major cities.

Even in its present perverted form, the “Electoral College” serves two important purposes: (1) It balances the influence of the heavily populated urban areas with the more sparsely populated rural areas; and (2) gives the smaller States a voice in the election of President.

As a People, we need to STOP being so eager to amend a Constitution we have never read and don’t understand.


1 For an illustration of how voting under the 12th Amendment is to be conducted, see THIS under the subheading, “The 12th Amendment Establishes Procedures For Voting By Electors.”

Barry Soetoro: He Fixed Nothing – He Broke Everything

“[I]t’s been noted often by pundits that the tone of our politics hasn’t gotten better since I was inaugurated, in fact it’s gotten worse; that there’s still this yawning gap between the magnitude of our challenges and the smallness of our politics. Which is why, in my final State of the Union address, and in the one before that, I had to acknowledge that one of my few regrets is my inability to reduce the polarization and meanness in our politics. I was able to be part of that here (in the Illinois Senate) and yet couldn’t translate it the way I wanted to into our politics in Washington.” — Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Soebarkah, Feb. 2016.

Yes, that is correct. The boy king wannabe stated those very words standing in front of the Illinois State Senate on Wednesday. But, according to him, America is better off today than when he was inaugurated. The questions are what measuring stick is he using and what are the incremental measurements?

If Hussein Soetoro is looking at the united States being fundamentally changed into some totalitarian dictatorship based on socialist/communist ideology, America certainly is closer to that today than when the “emperor with no clothes” assumed office. However, in all other areas, America is worse off today than when the “straw man” was inaugurated, despite the manipulation of numbers presented to the public making the nation appear better.

Another question to ask is does this man ever listen to himself? Does he even pay attention to what in the world he is saying?

Not only have we had to listen to this man’s lies when saying, “our immigration system is broken,” or “our Constitution is broken,” or “I can act on my own when Congress doesn’t,” the American people are listening to more bull manure now than it would take to create an environmental crisis. If this man somehow “fixed” the polarization and meanness in politics in Illinois, what happened in that State and the city of Chicago? It looks fairly polarized and mean there. In truth, he fixed nothing. He broke everything.

According to CNSnews.com, Hussein Soetoro cares about “fixing politics” because he will one day leave the presidency and “become an ordinary citizen.” He didn’t say “return to being” an ordinary citizen and did not classify himself as “president and citizen.”

“And as an American citizen, I understand that our progress is not inevitable — our progress has never been inevitable. It must be fought for, and won by all of us…It requires citizenship and a sense that we are one.

“And today that kind of citizenship is threatened by a poisonous political climate that pushes people away from participating in our public life. It turns folks off. It discourages them, makes them cynical.

“And when that happens, more powerful and extreme voices fill the void. When that happens, progress stalls. And that’s how we end up with only a handful of lobbyists setting the agenda. That’s how we end up with policies that are detached from what working families face every day. That’s how we end up with the well-connected who publicly demand that government stay out of their business but then whisper in its ear for special treatment.

What interesting statements to make — “our progress is not inevitable — our progress has never been inevitable.” No explanation to what he means because he wants everyone to fill in the blanks. It’s his Obama-ese classic rhetoric of saying nothing, but letting the individual listening provide the framework based on their experience.

He then states, “it” must be fought for and won by everyone. Based on the structure, Hussein Soetoro is talking about “progress,” but “progress” to where, what or when. Again, he claims “it” requires citizenship and a feeling of being as one. All open ended with no explanation but letting the audience fill in the blanks. The “sense that we are one” sounds more like functioning as a “collective,” think Borg, than being individuals. Governments are instituted among men to preserve individual God-given unalienable rights, meaning recognizing society as a group of individuals. However, the phrase “sense that we are one” is closely reminiscent of the old communist style of thinking — government rules the people, where the collective good comes first. The “collective good” overrules the individual and governments bestow “rights” to society if society can handle it.

In my personal opinion, progress is inevitable. However, the progression can be positive or negative, good or bad, or a mixture of both. What some may term as “progression” others might see as regression and vice versa. If taking these words and looking at the policies from the White House, Hussein Soetoro’s ideas of progress is incompatible with our current form of government. Whether it be foreign policy, the economy, or societal issues, the nation progresses by virtue of the stance taken coming out of the White House.

More than likely, Hussein Soetoro is speaking about “world” citizenship. In his very next statements, he mentions “that kind of citizenship” is being threatened by a “poisonous political climate.” Never does he mention the “kind of citizenship” to which he is referring. It’s left to the listener to fill in the blanks.

Most people hearing this would pass it by — the in one ear and out the other deal. However, in his next vague sentences, he is basically telling leftist, progressive liberals to get busy because the “conservative and Christian” portion of society are directing policy that will harm families in daily life. Hussein Soetoro is declaring the “voice” calling for government to abide by the Constitution is directing everything while asking for preferential treatment. It is not surprising that he would throw this segment of America under the bus, claiming it is that segment stalling progress. Again, the “progress” could be the transformation of the nation from a republic to a totalitarian, oppressive, dictatorship.

In reality, the opposite is true. Hussein Soetoro speaks in mirror image — take his statements, turn them around, and get the true picture. The segment of America who possesses conservative, Christian values and principles are not controlling anything. Congress is following Hussein Soetoro. In fact, Hussein Soetoro and Congress are working for their enrichment while garnering support by catering to fringe groups comprising less than 2-4 percent of the population.

Continuing on, he told the Illinois Senate:

“That’s how our political system gets consumed by small things when we are a people that are called to do great things — to give everybody a shot in a changing economy; to keep America safe and strong in an uncertain world; to repair our climate before it threatens everything we leave for our kids.

“So that’s what’s on my mind as I come back to Illinois today. This is what will be a focus of mine over the course of this year and beyond: What can we do, all of us, together, to try to make our politics better? And I speak to both sides on this. As all of you know, it could be better, and all of you would feel prouder of the work you do if it was better.”

Here is where he touched on illegal alien invasion — “…when we are a people that are called to do great things — to give everybody a shot in a changing economy; … .” He moved quickly to wealth redistribution at home and abroad through “repairing our climate.” Money doesn’t do anything to change, influence or “repair” our climate because it is out of our control. If this man were truly interested in the strength and safety of America, our borders would not be open. The federal government would deny Muslims entry instead of importing them into our nation. State and federal governments would not be trying to implement some type of gun confiscation scheme. Our debt would be way below +/- $20 trillion.

What is on this man’s mind is destroying the remainder of the united States before his time is up. Like a used car salesman trying to make that quota, this is Hussein Soetoro’s last “big pitch” to wrap up the sale. But, does all of America know what he is selling? Unfortunately, they do not since he speaks in vague terms in order for listeners to fill in the blanks from their perspective.

He had the nerve to plead for compromise, discovering a common ground, ending the influence of “money in politics,” make voting easier, and ending congressional district gerrymandering. He lied about those things because it would interfere with the agenda.

The State of Georgia has gerrymandered Congressional districts so many times in order to create and maintain a certain number of districts comprised of predominantly black residents for representation. It is how the district in which I live ended up with Hank Johnson (D-GA). It’s a subject that neither Governor Nathan Deal nor any representative or senator at the State level will consider speaking to an average citizen voter to discuss the feeling of non-representation. Governor Deal ignores individuals who have documented evidence of State agency violations and no local news affiliates will even touch it.

If all of this wasn’t enough, the Liar-in-Chief, criminal, traitor Hussein Soetoro had the audacity to request civility in public discourse. Seriously? This man instigates uncivilized behavior among black citizens by supporting black criminal thugs over police officials because of a false narrative. Once that is accomplished, he sends in the [In]Justice Department to find fault in order to instill federal influence within local law enforcement agencies. If there is uncivil discourse in public, Hussein Soetoro not only instigates it; he participates in it ever so subtly.

The reason people don’t like politics is because of politicians. Politicians are liars and cheaters. When they aren’t kissing babies, they are stealing their lollipops. [See The Hunt for Red October for reference] Everything that parts their lips has to do with winning an election and keeping their comfortable position from where they can destroy this nation and fleece the people. This is why people hate politics.

People do not mind government. In fact, having government is preferable to having none. No one wants to be involved in “politics;” but, people do want to be involved in government. This is where statesmen enter the picture.

Statesmen are versed in government. Sometimes a politician as well, a statesman argues for or against something based on its merit found within the Constitution. If it is unconstitutional, a statesman will argue for its exclusion. He supports, promotes, defends and protects the Constitution while honoring his oath of office. Unfortunately, statesmen are an extinct species.

Government functioning outside the limelight inevitably becomes corrupt. This is what citizens are witnessing at this point. While we are given “glimpses” of the happenings and workings of the government by the government, the majority of it is hidden from the public venue. It is the wheeling and dealing of the garbage in Washington no one sees but ends up having to accept through congressional legislation or some agency rule and regulation.

Hussein Soetoro had the brass cajones to say, “Rather than reward the most extreme voices, or the most divisive language, or who is best at launching schoolyard taunts, we should insist on a higher form of discourse in our common life, one based on empathy and respect.”

Again, Hussein Soetoro is guilty as charged for rewarding “the most extreme voices” and “most divisive language.” The “emperor with no clothes” frequently engages in “schoolyard taunts” and rarely exhibits empathy or shows respect. He is the pot calling the kettle black.

Someone call all the fire battalions because more than his pants are on fire. He’ll need a tree surgeon afterward if the “Pinocchios” survive the blaze.

With the 2016 elections around the corner, Hussein Soetoro is hoping to influence electoral votes for the Democratic candidate who will continue his “legacy” by further enslaving united States citizens. The rhetoric is strong in Hussein Soetoro because it is the electoral college that elects the president. The DNC nominee could turn out to be Hillary Clinton if the FBI cannot get this woman charged with a crime to prevent her from bidding for the highest office in the land. If Clinton happens to make it to the “elitist prison,” which favors a resort more so than a prison, Bernie Sanders will be the choice for Democratic nominee. Either way it goes, the united States is up the creek without a paddle.

Obama to Select Scalia Replacement for US Supreme Court as Fear Grips (and Steers) the Hearts of American “Christians”

The US Supreme Court that imposed “gay marriage” and ObamaCare upon America is about to take a lunging lurch leftward.

With today’s passing of Antonin Scalia, the laughably unfree “land of the free” is almost certain to see a significant slide even further down the rat-hole of DC-down tyranny and the perversion of law. A proud, unrepentant nation that exalts its “freedom” and “liberty” to enjoy “legal” porn, “legal” divorce on demand, “legal” strip clubs in “legal” casinos, “legal” adultery-themed businesses like Ashley Madison“legal” “gay marriage,” “legal” child sacrifice and, of course, the “legal” right to openly worship any false god one choosesincluding Allah and even Satan himself – that “land of the free” is even now experiencing the wrath of God pouring down upon it, as has been the case for generations now. Yet, amazingly, and as a testament to the blindness of the unrepentant, few seem to even recognize what’s going on…and of those who do recognize it, few are yet willing to admit why and repent accordingly.

In blind idolatry of the American State and its advocates, masses of professing Christians in America will predictably and right on cue use this as an occasion not to advance the Gospel-fueled repentance and submission of America to Christ the King as King in practice and in detail where law and civil government are concerned, but instead as another “compelling reason” to advance the cause of the Republican Party….again…

Once again, fear will grip the hearts of these professing evangelicals and fear will motivate them to play the same old games and pursue the same old secular routes to salvation.

Once again, Americans will turn to secular saviors rather than to Christ, the Devil will laugh, and the wrath of God will continue to flow.

News of Scalia’s passing during Obama’s presidency will trigger heart-gripping, chill-inducing fear, and that fear will once again be used by the Pagan Political Right to strengthen its already iron grip over the hearts and minds of millions of professing Christians in America.

Fearfearfear…panic, panic, panic…

American Christianity, and thereby American culture, is now dominated and defined by fear of man and fear of the world in direct opposition to the repentance-inspiring, obedience-producing, and life-restoring fear of the Lord that can actually save American lives and culture through the Gospel-fueled Great Commission. (For more on this subject, please read The Fear-Driven Voting of America’s “Conservative Christians” and The Fear-Fueled Politics of American Statism.)



In the areas of law and civil government?

Nah, we’re way too proud and way too smart for that sort of thing.

We’re America, after all.

We’d much rather be practical and continue to pour our passion, time, talent and treasure into the Republican Party as opposed to taking up our cross for the sake of Christ and His Gospel-fueled Great Commission to repent and obey Him in all things…including law and civil government.

It matters not how clearly God has spoken.

It matters not how plain the Republican record of rank Statism and anti-Christian approaches to law, economics, politics and civil government.

We hear Christ’s crystal clear claim to Lordship over every realm of life, and what is our answer? What is the typical fear-driven, self-centered American evangelical answer to the proposition of Christ as King over us?

Consider the following reaction of record, which so closely (and so painfully) models our own:

He said to the Jews, “Behold your King!” They cried out, “Away with him, away with him, crucify him!” Pilate said to them, “Shall I crucify your King?” The chief priests answered, “We have no king but Caesar.” So he delivered him over to them to be crucified.

~ John 19:14-16

So the next time you’re wondering why this is all happening – why we have “legal” porn, “legal” divorce on demand, “legal” strip clubs in “legal” casinos, “legal” adultery-themed businesses like Ashley Madison“legal” “gay marriage,” “legal” child sacrifice and the “legal” right to openly worship any false god one choosesincluding Allah and even Satan himself – don’t blame Obama or the democrats or MSNBC or the LGBT lobby. Not first, anyway.

It’s American evangelicals who are most responsible for this nightmare…and we need to be lovingly confronted and corrected with that fact.

Limp-wristed Gospels make limp-wristed cultureswicked leadership is God’s judgment upon us, and judgment begins with the house of the Lord.

Article reposted with permission from Fire Breathing Christian, the opinions and views shared do not necessarily reflect the views of Freedom Outpost.

Armed and Ready: Early American Tradition of Bringing Guns to Church

Due to living in a hostile, anti-Christian environment with Indians who did not know the Lord, the New England Puritans thought it best to come to services armed in order to protect their fellow Christians from attack.

The following account by Alice Morse Earle in “The Sabbath in Puritan New England,” discusses this in detail, and explains the tradition of men sitting on the ends of the pews so they could quickly grab their arms in the case of attack.

From “The Sabbath in Puritan New England” 

For many years after the settlement of New England the Puritans, even in outwardly tranquil times, went armed to meeting; and to sanctify the Sunday gun-loading they were expressly forbidden to fire off their charges at any object on that day save an Indian or a wolf, their two “greatest inconveniencies.” Trumbull, in his “Mac Fingal,” writes thus in jest of this custom of Sunday arm-bearing:– 

“So once, for fear of Indian beating,
Our grandsires bore their guns to meeting,–
Each man equipped on Sunday morn
With psalm-book, shot, and powder-horn,
And looked in form, as all must grant,
Like the ancient true church militant.”

In 1640 it was ordered in Massachusetts that in every township the attendants at church should carry a “competent number of peeces, fixed and compleat with powder and shot and swords every Lords-day to the meeting-house;” one armed man from each household was then thought advisable and necessary for public safety. In 1642 six men with muskets and powder and shot were thought sufficient for protection for each church.

In Connecticut, similar mandates were issued, and as the orders were neglected “by divers persones,” a law was passed in 1643 that each offender should forfeit twelve pence for each offence. In 1644 a fourth part of the “trayned hand” was obliged to come armed each Sabbath, and the sentinels were ordered to keep their matches constantly lighted for use in their match-locks.

They were also commanded to wear armor, which consisted of “coats basted with cotton-wool, and thus made defensive against Indian arrows.” In 1650 so much dread and fear were felt of Sunday attacks from the red men that the Sabbath-Day guard was doubled in number. In 1692, the Connecticut Legislature ordered one fifth of the soldiers in each town to come armed to each meeting, and that nowhere should be present as a guard at time of public worship fewer than eight soldiers and a sergeant. In Hadley the guard was allowed annually from the public treasury a pound of lead and a pound of powder to each soldier.

No details that could add to safety on the Sabbath were forgotten or overlooked by the New Haven church; bullets were made common currency at the value of a farthing, in order that they might be plentiful and in every one’s possession; the colonists were enjoined to determine in advance what to do with the women and children in case of attack, “that they do not hang about them and hinder them;” the men were ordered to bring at least six charges of powder and shot to meeting; the farmers were forbidden to “leave more arms at home than men to use them;” the half-pikes were to be headed and the whole ones mended, and the swords “and all piercing weapons furbished up and dressed;” wood was to be placed in the watch-house; it was ordered that the “door of the meeting-house next the soldiers’ seat be kept clear from women and children sitting there, that if there be occasion for the soldiers to go suddenly forth, they may have free passage.” The soldiers sat on either side of the main door, a sentinel was stationed in the meeting-house turret, and armed watchers paced the streets; three cannon were mounted by the side of this “church militant,” which must strongly have resembled a garrison. …

In spite of these events in the New Haven church (which were certainly exceptional), the seemingly incongruous union of church and army was suitable enough in a community that always began and ended the military exercises on “training day” with solemn prayer and psalm-singing; and that used the army and encouraged a true soldier-like spirit not chiefly as aids in war, but to help to conquer and destroy the adversaries of truth, and to “achieve greater matters by this little handful of men than the world is aware of.”

The Salem sentinels wore doubtless some of the good English armor owned by the town,–corselets to cover the body; gorgets to guard the throat; tasses to protect the thighs; all varnished black, and costing each suit “twenty-four shillings a peece.” The sentry also wore a bandileer, a large “neat’s leather” belt thrown over the right shoulder, and hanging down under the left arm. This bandileer sustained twelve boxes of cartridges, and a well-filled bullet-bag. Each man bore either a “bastard musket with a snaphance,” a “long fowling-piece with musket bore,” a “full musket,” a “barrell with a match-cock,” or perhaps (for they were purchased by the town) a leather gun (though these leather guns may have been cannon). Other weapons there were to choose from, mysterious in name, “sakers, minions, ffaulcons, rabinets, murthers (or murderers, as they were sometimes appropriately called) chambers, harque-busses, carbins,” …

The armed Salem watcher, besides his firearms and ammunition, had attached to his wrist by a cord a gun-rest, or gun-fork, which he placed upon the ground when he wished to fire his musket, and upon which that constitutional kicker rested when touched off. He also carried a sword and sometimes a pike, and thus heavily burdened with multitudinous arms and cumbersome armor, could never have run after or from an Indian with much agility or celerity; though he could stand at the church-door with his leather gun,–an awe-inspiring figure,–and he could shoot with his “harquebuss,” or “carbin,” as we well know.

These armed “sentinells” are always regarded as a most picturesque accompaniment of Puritan religious worship, and the Salem and Plymouth armed men were imposing, though clumsy. But the New Haven soldiers, with their bulky garments wadded and stuffed out with thick layers of cotton wool, must have been more safety-assuring and comforting than they were romantic or heroic; but perhaps they too wore painted tin armor, “corselets and gorgets and tasses.”

In Concord, New Hampshire, the men, who all came armed to meeting, stacked their muskets around a post in the middle of the church, while the honored pastor, who was a good shot and owned the best gun in the settlement, preached with his treasured weapon in the pulpit by his side, ready from his post of vantage to blaze away at any red man whom he saw sneaking without, or to lead, if necessary, his congregation to battle. The church in York, Maine, until the year 1746, felt it necessary to retain the custom of carrying arms to the meeting-house, so plentiful and so aggressive were Maine Indians.

Not only in the time of Indian wars were armed men seen in the meeting-house, but on June 17, 1775, the Provincial Congress recommended that the men “within twenty miles of the sea-coast carry their arms and ammunition with them to meeting on the Sabbath and other days when they meet for public worship.” And on many a Sabbath and Lecture Day, during the years of war that followed, were proved the wisdom and foresight of that suggestion.

The men in those old days of the seventeenth century, when in constant dread of attacks by Indians, always rose when the services were ended and left the house before the women and children, thus making sure the safe exit of the latter. This custom prevailed from habit until a late date in many churches in New England, all the men, after the benediction and the exit of the parson, walking out in advance of the women. So also the custom of the men always sitting at the “head” or door of the pew arose from the early necessity of their always being ready to seize their arms and rush unobstructed to fight. In some New England village churches to this day, the man who would move down from his end of the pew and let a woman sit at the door, even if it were a more desirable seat from which to see the clergyman, would be thought a poor sort of a creature.

Alice Morse Earle, The Sabbath in Puritan New England (NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1891), 19-25.

Article reposted with permission from Stephen Halbrook, the opinions and views shared do not necessarily reflect the views of Freedom Outpost.