1 Person Now Dead In Case Against Rape Victim – When Will Governor DeSantis, the Attorney General & Florida Bar Intervene?

I’ve been reporting on the Deanna Williams story, a Florida rape victim, who continues to be pursued by the court and an attorney that had zero interest in representing her during her rape case, but is now seeking more than $1 million and her arrest.  Governor Ron DeSantis has been contacted, Attorney General Ashley Moody has been contacted.  The Florida Bar has been contacted, and though they have assigned a Bar investigator to Ms. Williams complaints, the investigator has failed to contact her.  Now, the first casualty in this injustice has occurred.

To catch up on this ongoing story, please check out the links below.

Last week, I was informed that Ms. Williams, who is not only the victim of rape but also has multiple sclerosis and was carrying a child in a high-risk pregnancy which she told the court and the attorneys involved over and over again in correspondence, gave birth to a stillborn baby boy.  The reason for the delay on this information was out of respect for Ms. Williams to notify family, as well as an attorney dealing with a paternity suit against the Sheriff of Lee County, Carmine Marceno, who wanted Williams to murder her baby after he unethically pursued her following her attempt to have him investigate the alleged grand theft of $200,000 of her money by attorney Ware Cornell.

The stress leveled against Ms. Williams due to what appears to be a plethora of injustices she has faced from her own attorneys, a judge busted in a prostitution ring and the failure of the attorney pursuing her to depose her in a timely manner that the court order has ultimately resulted in the death of her child.

Williams sent a letter to the court near the end of March explaining the situation and asking for the court to accommodate her concerns regarding her health.  She wrote in part:

The level of Mager’s hubris while requesting that a rape victim with multiple sclerosis dealing with complications of a high-risk pregnancy and PTSD be jailed for contempt for not turning over extensive financial documents which are nearly impossible to provide after losing her home due to Mr. Mager’s theft of hundreds of thousands of dollars is astonishing.  It would shock the conscience of anyone who possesses a conscience.  Mr. Mager is not a victim of anything but an individual who knowingly bought the rights to sue a rape victim for profit after Michael Dolce abandoned the case after Dolce missed important deadlines and walked out of mediation in the underlying case crying when opposing counsel didn’t want to hear explicit details of Dolce being anally raped as a child.

It is in light of Mr. Mager’s repeated dishonesty and omission of relevant fact before the court that I ask that all attempts to threaten and intimidate using the court as a weapon stop immediately.  I asked that deposition respect my disabilities as a woman with multiple sclerosis and and complex medical issues at present.  I ask that deposition is set at a time that works for both parties and I am no longer threatened with arrest.

Unfortunately, due to Mr. Mager’s continued possession of funds stolen from me by fraud upon the court, I am unable to be represented by counsel.  I cannot even afford necessary medical care.  I am most vulnerable as I have been denied the right to have representation due to the thefts erroneously reflected in court records as legitimate funds received by Scott Mager.

I am asking that my health and safety be respected during and before deposition.  I am requesting deposition be scheduled at a time agreeable to both parties.  I look forward to the record accurately reflecting what has happened in this case as opposed to Mr. Mager’s version of events as a party who did not participate in the underlying case.  Additionally, I ask that it be noted that I am being denied representation in this matter due to impossibility noted above.

Ms. Williams has contacted each of the above authorities in the state to ask for help in sorting out what appears to be grand theft of at least $200,000 by attorney Ware Cornell, apparent malpractice and negligence that has cost her at least another $200,000 by her previous attorney and ousted Oklahoma judge Michael Chionopoulos, and the substitution of a third party who never represented her in her rape case and had no legitimate interest in the case, but was allowed to be substituted in the place of attorney Michael Dolce, Scott Mager of Mager Paruas.

It should also be pointed out that there were conversations that took place between Mr. Mager and Mr. Cornell, as well as Mr. Mager and Mr. Chionopoulos that Ms. Williams still has no idea of what was discussed prior to her money being taken.  She alleges that Mr. Cornell said he “promised” her money to Mr. Mager and would not turn it over to her after he intercepted it.  Ms. Williams also alleges that Mr. Chionopoulos pushed her to sign under duress, a form that relinquished the money that Cornell intercepted, telling her she would get the money back later.

Additionally, family members of Ms. Williams contacted then-governor Rick Scott about then-under sheriff Marceno’s unethical pursuit of Ms. Williams via Facebook, as well as inappropriate comments on her pictures on Facebook, which he has since deleted.

It’s not like people in positions of authority don’t know what’s happening to this woman or the names involved.  It’s that they apparently do not care or aren’t motivated enough to get an investigation moving forward.

I say this as a reporter who has sought comment from Governor DeSantis, as well as his lt. governor, the attorney general and the Florida Bar.  So far, there is absolute silence.  Even from the Bar, I received a simple, “We’ll get back to you.”

The Washington Standard made several attempts to see whether the Bar was even aware and active in providing the investigator they assigned to Ms. Williams.  Ms. Francine Walker was helpful in at least confirming that Ms. Williams did contact the Bar and specify to them that she was seeking special assistance from an investigator to help her file a sworn complaint, but apparently, this information was not conveyed in the notes that the Bar has on file.

Additionally calls to Ann Marie Craft of the Bar by The Washington Standard to ask why the Bar investigator was dragging his feet, not having even contacted Ms. Williams to introduce himself and start things moving forward have gone unreturned.

Furthermore, Ms. Williams has had to request a new investigator, which I have been informed is a man by the name of James Monroe due to the fact that the Bar assigned her an investigator named Mike Fox, whose wife was… ready for it?  Good friends with Sheriff Marceno, which is an obvious conflict of interest here.

Due to the enormous costs she has incurred in attorney’s fees that Williams has paid out since her settlement in 2012, along with the loss of $300,000 of the money mentioned above, Ms. Williams has been unable to obtain any representation, as attorneys demand a retainer of $15,000 to represent her.

Additionally, all of this seems to have stemmed from what Williams alleges was the failure on the part of attorney Gloria Allred to pay the previous attorneys their fees as agreed upon in Ms. Williams’ retainer agreement with Ms. Allred and the attorney she brought in to help Ms. Williams at the time, Jonathan Heller.

The Lee County Sheriff’s Office, headed by none other than the man who pursued Ms. Williams via Facebook, is actively seeking to arrest Ms. Williams for contempt of court even though she attempted more than a dozen times to comply with a court order via email and phone calls to Mager Paruas only to be told that they would schedule a deposition nearly three weeks after the court deadline.  It should be noted that the Florida Department of Law Enforcement knows about Mr. Marceno’s unethical pursuit of Ms. Williams but did not make a fuss about because they would have had to suspend him, as well as local television stations who failed to report on for fear he might have to step down.

Not only does there appear to be a “good old boy” network in Lee County, Florida, among attorneys and judges, as well as some in law enforcement, but there also appears to be allowance by the state at the very top to let it exist.

I ask, where is Governor DeSantis?  Where is Attorney General Ashley Moody?  Ms. Williams has even been in touch with members of the Trump administration with a response.  America, you say you want to make America great again.  Well, you can’t make it great if you don’t stand up for the weak against injustice.  Who knows when you will need someone to stand up for you!

You can contact Governor DeSantis on behalf of Ms. Williams below:

Executive Office of Governor Ron DeSantis
400 S Monroe St
Tallahassee, FL 32399
(850) 488-7146

Email Governor DeSantis

Email Lt. Governor Nuñez 

Additionally, you can contact Attorney General Ashley Moody on behalf of Ms. Williams below:

Office of Attorney General
State of Florida
The Capitol PL-01
Tallahassee, FL 32399-1050

(850) 414-3300

Finally, it may even help to contact the Florida Bar on Ms. Williams’ behalf to see if they will begin to investigate ethics violations, negligence and corruption that appears to have taken place with regards to Ms. Williams’ representation, legal agreements and rulings by judges in the cases.

The Florida Bar contact information:

The Florida Bar 
651 E. Jefferson Street
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2300

(850)561-5600

By Email

If You Are Compelled To Help Ms. Williams With Funds To Acquire An Attorney, Which Will Cost $15,000 In Order To Retain One, In Order To Help Her Fight Back, Along With Money To Simply Survive, Please Click Here To Donate To Her Go Fund Me Account.

You can also sign this petition to demand the White House investigate the allegations of wire fraud by attorney Ware Cornell in the case.

Article posted with permission from The Washington Standard

Clinton Honoree Sentenced To 30 Months In Biggest “Green Energy” Scam In American History – $54 Million

A scam artist who was honored by former President Bill Clinton in 2009 for the Clinton Global Initiative has been sentenced to thirty months in prison for her involvement in a $54 million Ponzi scheme that has been dubbed the biggest green energy scam in American history, in which “many people lost their life savings.”

Amanda Knorr, 35, of Hellertown, Pennsylvania was one of three people who defrauded people out of money in the green energy scam.  She was sentenced to thirty months in federal prison.

According to NBC New York:

Knorr co-founded a company called Mantria Corp., which with the help of a slick-talking Colorado “wealth advisor” raised millions for a supposed clean energy product called “biochar.”

Knorr and fellow Mantria co-founder Troy Wragg both graduated in 2005 from Temple University and within four years had raised $54 million from hundreds of investors. Most of the investors were wooed through seminars run by Wayde McKelvey, of Colorado.

Their pitch about producing biochar, however, turned out to be completely baked, according to prosecutors, and eventually proved to be a giant Ponzi scheme.

Knorr pleaded guilty in 2016. Wragg pleaded guilty in 2017.

Following her sentencing, assistant U.S. Attorney Robert Livermore said, “Many people lost their entire life savings.”

In addition to her prison sentence, Knorr was also sentenced to 5 years parole and she was ordered to pay back $54 million in restitution.

Thus far, she has paid just $10,000, according to prosecutors, through wage garnishments.

NBC added:

Of the $54 million believed to have been invested in Mantria, $17 million was returned to early investors to perpetuate the Ponzi scheme and make later investors believe huge profits could be had.

By the time the Securities Exchange Commission shut down Mantria in 2009, just $790,000 remained from the other $37 million.

Additionally, Wayde McKelvy was also convicted by a jury in relation to the scam by providing seminars for potential victims.

The Justice Department released a statement in October 2018.

U.S. Attorney William M. McSwain announced that Wayde McKelvy, of Colorado, was convicted by a jury of the following crimes: Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud (one count); Wire Fraud (seven counts); Conspiracy to Engage in Securities Fraud (one count); and Securities Fraud (one count).  The trial was held before United States District Judge Joel H. Slomsky.

The government established at trial that McKelvy and his co-conspirators ran an elaborate Ponzi scheme operating as Mantria Corporation, which received more than $54 million in fraudulently obtained new investor funds.  The co-conspirators promised investors huge returns, as high as 484%, for securities investments in supposedly profitable business ventures in real estate and green energy.  In reality, Mantria was a classic Ponzi scheme in which new investor money was used to pay “returns” to early investors, and the business generated meager revenues and no actual profits.

To induce investors to invest money, McKelvy and his co-conspirators repeatedly made fraudulent representations and material omissions about the economic state of Mantria.   McKelvy also promoted himself as a financial wizard through aggressive marketing tactics, even though he had little financial acumen and was an unlicensed securities salesman.  McKelvy operated what he called “Speed of Wealth” clubs, which advertised on television, radio and the Internet, held seminars for prospective investors, and promised to make them rich.  During those seminars and other programs, McKelvy lied to prospective investors to dupe them into investing in Mantria.

Mantria, based in Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, sent McKelvy “commissions” via wire transfer to an entity he controlled called “Retirement TRACS, LLC.”  Mantria also used wire transfers to pay for other portions of the Ponzi scheme, including payments for both the real estate and green energy projects.  When the SEC shut down Mantria in November 2009, the pyramid scheme collapsed and was exposed.

“McKelvy repeatedly lied about Mantria’s bright future in the green energy business, often delivering his sales pitch before a live audience full of prospective investors in order to dupe as many people as he could into investing in the company.  McKelvy and his co-conspirators talked a big game, promising investment returns as high as 484 percent – but it was all a ruse,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain.  “Instead of high returns, the over 300 victims of this fraud unwittingly invested in uninhabitable land and a bogus trash-to-green energy business idea based on bogus scientific methodology.  We are pleased that the jury held McKelvy accountable for his part in this massive fraud.”

“Wayde McKelvy actively marketed himself as some kind of financial genius, when in fact he was nothing but a fraud,” said Michael T. Harpster, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI’s Philadelphia Division.  “He and his buddies lured investors in by promising sky-high returns on their money, taking full advantage of people’s trust and their hopes for the future.  Ponzi schemes can do real damage to victims’ lives, and the FBI is determined to hold the perpetrators accountable.”

Additionally, John Elway, the Hall of Fame football quarterback and current general manager of the Denver Broncos, spoke at investment seminars run by McKelvey.

McKelvey is appealing his conviction.

Tyler Durden points out, “The fraudsters were honored by former President Bill Clinton in a 2009 ceremony for the Clinton Global Initiative before the scam came to light. After Mantria was first charged by the Securities and Exchange Commission for selling millions in unlicensed securities in 2009, the case was known as “the biggest green scam” in the history of the United States, according to the report.”

Amazing how corrupt the Clintons are and what kind of people they surround themselves with, isn’t it?

Latest Clinton Email Documents Show “Cover-Up” Discussions By Vendors Who Managed Illegal Clinton Email Server

This is all we’re going to get to unless someone actually meant what they said when they promised the American people about appointing a special prosecutor to investigate Hillary Clinton.  In the latest release by government watchdog Judicial Watch, there are 422 pages of FBI documents that provide evidence of a “cover-up” discussions within Platte River Networks, one of the vendors who managed the Clinton email system.  Those same documents also reveal Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) Charles McCullough forwarding “concerns” about classified information in former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s emails.

Judicial Watch’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit, which led to the release of the documents was prefaced by a FOIA request that, as usual, failed to be addressed in a timely manner.

Judicial Watch reported extensively on the documents that were uncovered.

FBI notes of an interview with an unidentified Platte River Networks official in February 2016 (almost a year after the Clinton email network was first revealed) show that Platte River “gave someone access to live HRC archive mailbox at some point.” The same notes show that an email from December 11, 2014, exists that reads “Hillary cover up operation work ticket archive cleanup.” The interviewee said that the “cover up operation” email “probably related to change to 60 day [sic] email retention policy/backup.” The subject indicated that he didn’t “recall the prior policy.” The notes also indicated, “[Redacted] advised [redacted] not to answer questions related to conv [conversation] w/DK [David Kendall] document 49 – based on 5th amendment.”

The subject said that “everyone @ PRN has access to client portal.”

A December 11, 2014, Platte River Networks email between redacted parties says: “Its [sic] all part of the Hillary coverup operation <smile> I’ll have to tell you about it at the party”

An August 2015 email from Platte River Networks says: “So does this mean we don’t have offsite backups currently? That could be a problem if someone hacks this thing and jacks it up. We will have to be able to produce a copy of it somehow, or we’re in some deep shit. Also, what ever [sic] came from the guys at Datto about the old backups? Do they have anyway [sic] of getting those back after we were told to cut it to 30 days?”

In March 2015, Platte River Networks specifically discusses security of the email server.

[Redacted] is going to send over a list of recommendations for us to apply for additional security against hackers. He did say we should probably remove all Clinton files, folders, info off our servers etc. on an independent drive.

Handwritten notes that appear to be from Platte River Networks in February 2016 mention questions concerning the Clinton email system and state of back-ups

The documents show Platte River Networks’ use of BleachBit on the Clinton server. The BleachBit program was downloaded from a vendor called SourceForge at 11:42am on March 31, 2015, according to a computer event log, and over the next half hour, was used to delete the files on Hillary’s server.

The documents also contain emails and handwritten notes written in June and July 2015 from the Office of the Intelligence Community Inspector General discussing “concerns” over classified information. A redacted sender writes to State Department Official Margaret “Peggy” Grafeld that “inadvertent release of State Department’s equities when this collection is released in its entirety — the potential damage to the foreign relations of the United States could be significant. ICIG McCullough forwards the concern, saying: “Need you plugged in on this.”

From: [Redacted]

Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2015 2:46 PM

To: Grafeld, Margaret P [Peggy]

Subject: Concerns about the HRC Review …

While working with this inspector, I have personally reviewed hundreds of documents in the HRC collection. I can now say, without reservation, that there are literally hundreds of classified emails in this collection; maybe more. For example, there are comments by Department staff in emails relating to the Wikileaks unauthorized disclosures; many of the emails relating to this actually confirm the information in the disclosures. This material is the subject of FOIA litigation, and the emails will now have to be found, reviewed and upgraded. Under the EO 13526, it would be in in our right to classify the entire HRC collection at the Secret level because of the “mosaic effect.” While there may be IC equities in the collection, I am very concerned about the inadvertent release of State Department’s equities when this collection is released in its entirety — the potential damage to the foreign relations of the United States could be significant.

***

From: Chuck Mccullough [sic]

Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 11:16 AM

To: [Redacted]

Subject: FW: SBU FW: Concerns about the HRC Review …

[Redacted]

Need you plugged in on this. Need to coordinate w/ State’s WB person.

In an August 2015 classified memo prepared by the FBI Counterintelligence Division regarding the findings of the ICIG with respect to Hillary’s email server, the FBI noted that the ICIG had found that in a sampling of only 40 of Hillary’s 30,000 emails, four classified emails were found. A subsequent letter sent by Sen. Richard Burr (R-NC) to ODNI Clapper regarding this sample of Clinton’s emails noted that they were all classified at the secret level.

In an August 2015 internal FBI memo, the FBI notes that Hillary Clinton had signed a June 28, 2011, official correspondence advising all State Department employees that, “due to ‘recent targeting of personal e-mail accounts by online adversaries,’ State employees should ‘avoid conducting official Department business from (their) personal e-mail accounts.” The same FBI memo noted that Under Secretary of State for Management Patrick Kennedy had sent a memo to all senior State Department officials on August 28, 2014, in which Kennedy included excerpts from the Foreign Affairs Manual that said that “classified information must be sent via classified e-mail channels only…”

The documents uncovered by Judicial Watch also show infighting between State Department Under Secretary Patrick Kennedy and the ICIG over the processing of the potentially compromised Clinton email communications.

A June 15, 2015, memo for the record prepared by the ICIG regarding the State Department’s review of Hillary Clinton’s emails indicates among other things that the retired foreign service officers that State was using to review Hillary’s emails were not “not optimal.”

Evaluation of other agencies’ equities is not optimal. State Department is currently relying on retired senior Foreign Service Officers to review for other agencies’ equities in FOIA cases. For example, a review of the first set of 296 emails received from former-Secretary Clinton and released on the State Department FOIA website identified material that should have been referred to IC FOIA officials for review prior to release. Recommend State Department FOIA Office request staff support from IC FOIA offices to assist in the identification of intelligence community equities. [Emphasis in original]

***

According to State FOIA personnel, during the State Department Legal Office’s review, four of the Bl [national security] exemptions were removed and· changed to “B5” FOIA exemptions (Privileged Communications). Recommend State Department FOIA Office seek classification expertise from the interagency to act as a final arbiter if there is a question regarding potentially classified materials. [Emphasis in original]

It is unclear if the Department of Justice is reviewing the emails before FOIA release. Former-Secretary Clinton’s emails are the subject of numerous FOIA requests and multiple FOIA lawsuits. It may be prudent to integrate the Department of Justice into the FOIA process review to ensure the redactions can withstand potential legal challenges. If not already being done, recommend the State Department FOIA Office incorporate the Department of Justice into the FOIA process to ensure the legal sufficiency review of the FOIA exemptions and redactions.  [Emphasis in original]

An August 4, 2015, interview by the FBI of State Department IG Steven Linick mentions an incident on “May 13, 2011 2:28 am Huma – Phil Rein potential hack.”

On October 15, 2012, Clinton’s IT technician Bryan Pagliano, sent to Bill Clinton’s aide Justin Cooper a bill indicating that on July 28-29, 2012, Pagliano had to address the issue of “Mailbox Corruption” of Hillary Clinton’s email server, spending a total of 5.5 hours on the problem. Other invoices show that he had to “fix corruption in justin’s [Cooper’s] mailbox; ” have a “conference call with security team;” “Blocked spamer [sic] smtp address for Viagra message;” “virus investigation and cleanup;” “clean up virus from bb [BlackBerry] profile;” and multiple “brute force attacks” against Hillary Clinton’s server, requiring him to “reset password.” The documents show that Pagliano was paid $40,337.86 over four years by the Clinton Executive Service Corp.

In a 2016 deposition in a separate Judicial Watch lawsuit, Pagliano repeatedly invoked his Fifth Amendment right to not answer questions regarding IT support he provided to the Clinton email system.

An August 2015 letter from the United States Secret Service to the Counterintelligence Division of the FBI, addressing a request regarding preservation of records in connection with Clinton’s email system. The letter also cites Judicial Watch’s litigation concerning preservation of her email server records. The Secret Service writes that its searches “did not reveal any responsive documents … [n]otwithstanding, the Secret Service will send out a preservation request for the Agency records listed in your correspondence …”

A July 2015 letter from the National Archives requests information from the State Department regarding “the training, procedures and other controls” employed by the State Department to ensure key record management directives were implemented regarding “the management of email and other electronic records of senior agency officials.” Also, the Archives requests “that the Department contact the representatives of former Secretary Clinton to secure the native electronic versions with associated metadata” of the 55,000 hard copies of emails provided to the State Department.

November 2012 classified emails from Jake Sullivan, Clinton’s top foreign policy adviser, discuss a “Report of arrests – possible Benghazi connection” with her.

request for travel dated November 2015 shows that the FBI dispatched special agents to Spain and Bahrain to conduct interviews in the “Midyear Exam” regarding a “sensitive investigative matter.”

Other released materials include letters from Clinton’s personal lawyer David Kendall throughout the production. On June 24, 2015, Kendall writes to the State Department Inspector General that the State Department is in possession of “all Secretary Clinton’s work-related … emails:” He continues that, as Hillary’s personal counsel, “We continue to retain a preservation copy of the .pst file containing the electronic copies of those e-mails, on a thumb drive that is stored in a secured safe at the offices of Williams and Connolly …”

I note at the outset that the Department of State is in possession of all of Secretary Clinton’s work-related and potentially work-related e-mails. Specifically, in response to an October 2014 letter request from the Department of State, Secretary Clinton’s counsel identified all work-related or potentially work-related e-mail in her possession, custody, or control. In total, 30,490 e-mails, all of which were from her @clintonemail.com account, were identified and provided in hard copy to the Department of State in _December 2014. A3 her personal counsel, we continue to retain a preservation copy of the .pst file containing the electronic copies of those e-mails, on a thumb drive that is stored in a secured safe at the offices of Williams & Connolly LLP, 725 12th Street NW, Washington DC 20005. The only two persons authorized to access that thumb drive are me and my law partner, Katherine Turner.

According to Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton, “Judicial Watch uncovered new ‘cover-up’ records on the illicit Clinton email system that further demonstrate the sham nature of the FBI/DOJ ‘investigation’ of her.  These shocking new documents show that various Obama agencies were protecting Hillary Clinton from the consequences of her misconduct. It is well past time for the DOJ to stop shielding Hillary Clinton and hold her fully accountable to the rule of law.”

And that’s called “obstruction of justice.”

Additionally, Judicial Watch released “186 pages of records from the DOJ that include emails documenting an evident cover-up of a chart of potential violations of law by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton” and “215 pages of records from the DOJ revealing former FBI General Counsel James Baker discussed the investigation of Clinton-related emails on Anthony Weiner’s laptop with Kendall.”

Furthermore, there is a plethora of documentation herehere and here that clearly shows the criminal and reckless distribution of classified information through Hillary Clinton’s illegal email server.

One wonders where people like Rep. Devin Nunes and others will be on forwarding any of this for criminal referrals to the Justice Department.

Article posted with permission from Sons Of Liberty Media

Transvestite Del Rio Texas Mayor Is An Open Sodomite Who Wears 4″ Heels

Texas still has anti-sodomy laws, they have just decided to bow to an institution that has no right to deal with the state’s laws regarding this behavior.  Yet, not only have we seen Houston elect a lesbian mayor, but now we see Del Rio’s openly sodomite Mayor Bruno “Ralphy” Lozano donning women’s clothing and 4-inch heels.

The openly homosexual Lozano is also a veteran of the US Air Force, and was elected to the office of mayor with 62% of the vote.  This should tell you that either there is a majority of lawbreaking sodomites in Del Rio or a whole lot of election fraud going on.

“I don’t even think people during the primary – Democrats or Republicans — even knew who I was until I won,” said Lozano.

Dr. Eowyn reports:

Lozano is a homosexual man who wore a tutu and 4″ high heels in Del Rio’s Veterans Day parade the year before he was elected mayor.

Prompted by the military’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (DADT) policy, Lozano joined the Air Force in 2004 on a 15-month special needs contract — whatever that means.

Kunal Dey reports for Meaww:

While the DADT policy was the sole reason why Lozano was able to join the forces, it is also the reason why he decided to step down. He recounts his time in uniform: “It’s an awkward position to be in when you’re in security forces, you’re abiding by the policy, but others are not.”

There was once a time when a friend of his brought his boyfriend onto the base. The friend, who was highly discreet when in uniform, was busted, and it was Lozano who had to give him the bad news. Immediately after, he said to himself, “I just can’t do this,” and put in his papers.

Lozano says politics is addictive: “Realizing that you’re the guy who has the potential to make or break the city, and then continue moving forward. If I make it, great and then I can do the district. I can go to the Senate. From there, who knows?

Dr. Eowyn went on to ask, “Does that mean we should brace ourselves for a transvestite U.S. senator or even president?”

Good question.  We’ve already had a sodomite usurper in the White House along with several adulterers.  One would hope the people would have had their fill of this perversion, but they continue to tolerate it.

Texas law states:

Sec. 21.06. HOMOSEXUAL CONDUCT. (a) A person commits an offense if he engages in deviate sexual intercourse with another individual of the same sex.

(b) An offense under this section is a Class C misdemeanor.

Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.

Of course, Texas kowtowed to the Supreme Court in 2006 when it unconstitutionally ruled against the state’s sodomy law and so now, Texas whimpishly declares: “Section 21.06 was declared unconstitutional by Lawrence v. Texas, 123 S.Ct. 2472.”

It’s not unconstitutional.  The Supreme Court’s ruling is simply a rebellion against God and a usurpation of the kinds of cases it is supposed to be hearing.  After all, nowhere in the Constitution is there a right to engage in that which our Creator abhors and declares an abomination.

Our forefathers, on the other hand, dealt with things a bit different.  I’ve previously written concerning our history and the laws of the states at our founding.

…our founding fathers would have been outraged that sodomites would be out in the open. They knew that such perversion would both undermine and erode the moral foundations of civilization. Under the British common law, the term sodomy was used to identify same-sex relations and was a capital crime. Understand that the founders referenced Sir William Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England extensively. He was a British attorney, jurist, law professor, author, and political philosopher.

Blackstone’s commentaries were the premiere legal source used by the Founding Fathers in America. So this should carry some weight with those who claim they know what the Founding Fathers knew and wanted concerning the issue of sodomy, but I’m guessing they will dismiss it. In Blackstone’s Book the Fourth of Public Wrongs: Of Offences against the Persons of Individuals, Chapter Fifteen, he writes the following on pages 215-216 (emphasis added):

IV. WHAT has been here observed…, which ought to be the more clear in proportion as the crime is the more detestable, may be applied to another offence, of a still deeper malignity; the infamous crime against nature, committed either with man or beast…. But it is an offence of so dark a nature…that the accusation should be clearly made out….

I WILL not act so disagreeable part, to my readers as well as myself, as to dwell any longer upon a subject, the very mention of which is a disgrace to human nature. It will be more eligible to imitate in this respect the delicacy of our English law, which treats it, in it’s very indictments, as a crime not fit to be named; peccatum illud horribile, inter chriftianos non nominandum [“that horrible sin not to be named among Christians”—DM]. A taciturnity observed likewise by the edict of Constantius and Constans: ubi fcelus eft id, quod non proficit fcire, jubemus infurgere leges, armari jura gladio ultore, ut exquifitis poenis fubdantur infames, qui funt, vel qui futuri funt, rei [“When that crime is found, which is not profitable to know, we order the law to bring forth, to provide justice by force of arms with an avenging sword, that the infamous men be subjected to the due punishment, those who are found, or those who future will be found, in the deed”—DM]. Which leads me to add a word concerning its punishment.

THIS the voice of nature and of reason, and the express law of God, determine to be capital. Of which we have a signal instance, long before the Jewish dispensation, by the destruction of two cities by fire from heaven: so that this is an universal, not merely a provincial, precept. And our ancient law in some degree imitated this punishment, by commanding such miscreants to be burnt to death; though Fleta
says they should be buried alive: either of which punishments was indifferently used for this crime among the ancient Goths. But now the general punishment of all felonies is the fame, namely, by hanging: and this offence (being in the times of popery only subject to ecclesiastical censures) was made single felony by the statute 25 Hen. VIII. c. 6. and felony without benefit of clergy by statute 5 Eliz. c. 17. And the rule of law herein is, that, if both are arrived at years of discretion, agentes et confentientes pari poena plectantur.

Most Americans are completely unaware that the “Father of our country,” George Washington, who would also be considered this country’s first “Commander-in-Chief” approved the dismissal from the service at Valley Forge in 1778 of Lt. Frederick Gotthold Enslin. Why did he do this? According to the orders, which are held at the Library of Congress, Enslin was “attempting to commit sodomy” with another soldier. Under the title of “Head Quarters, V. Forge, Saturday, March 14, 1778” there is the following entry:

At a General Court Martial whereof Colo. Tupper was President (10th March 1778) Lieutt. Enslin of Colo. Malcom’s Regiment tried for attempting to commit sodomy, with John Monhort a soldier; Secondly, For Perjury in swearing to false Accounts, found guilty of the charges exhibited against him, being breaches of 5th. Article 18th. Section of the Articles of War and do sentence him to be dismiss’d the service with Infamy. His Excellency the Commander in Chief approves the sentence and with Abhorrence and Detestation of such Infamous Crimes orders Lieutt. Enslin to be drummed out of Camp tomorrow morning by all the Drummers and Fifers in the Army never to return; The Drummers and Fifers to attend on the Grand Parade at Guard mounting for that Purpose.

What’s even more interesting is that Enslin’s dismissal came less than two weeks after another soldier, Ensign Anthony Maxwell, was acquitted of the charge of “propagating a scandalous report prejudicial to the character of Lieutt. Enslin” on Feb. 27, 1778. Penny Star cites the transcription of the court martial dated March 3, 1778: “At a Brigade Court Martial whereof Colo. Burr was President (Feby. 27th. 1778,) Ensign Maxwell of Colo. Malcom’s Regiment tried for propagating a scandalous report prejudicial to the character of Lieutt. Enslin. The Court after maturely deliberating upon the Evidence produced could not find that Ensign Maxwell had published any report prejudicial to the Character of Lieutt. Enslin further than the strict line of his duty required and do therefore acquit him of the Charge.”

Note that our first President viewed “sodomy” or homosexual relations with “Abhorrence and Detestation.” He was not a spineless, wishy washy, panty waisted man like the current occupant of the White House, who claims his views have “evolved.” He was a man that recognized perverse behavior for what it was, perversion. He was not alone either. In all thirteen colonies, sodomy was treated as a criminal offense and eventually that grew to encompass each and every one of the fifty states. By the way, that fell under “equal treatment under the law.”

The law was based upon Leviticus 20:13:

“If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death.”

This verse was “adopted into legislation and enforced by the colonies of Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Connecticut.” Oh the irony that 2012’s GOP Mormon nominee for President Mitt Romney was the one to “legalize” homosexual “marriage” in Massachusetts. Here are just a few of the states and the punishments they executed for sodomy.

That the detestable and abominable vice of buggery [sodomy] . . . shall be from henceforth adjudged felony . . . and that every person being thereof convicted by verdict, confession, or outlawry [unlawful flight to avoid prosecution], shall be hanged by the neck until he or she shall be dead. NEW YORK

That if any man shall lie with mankind as he lieth with womankind, both of them have committed abomination; they both shall be put to death. CONNECTICUT

Sodomy . . . shall be punished by imprisonment at hard labour in the penitentiary during the natural life or lives of the person or persons convicted of th[is] detestable crime. GEORGIA

That if any man shall commit the crime against nature with a man or male child . . . every such offender, being duly convicted thereof in the Supreme Judicial Court, shall be punished by solitary imprisonment for such term not exceeding one year and by confinement afterwards to hard labor for such term not exceeding ten years. MAINE

That if any person or persons shall commit sodomy . . . he or they so offending or committing any of the said crimes within this province, their counsellors, aiders, comforters, and abettors, being convicted thereof as above said, shall suffer as felons. 13 [And] shall forfeit to the Commonwealth all and singular the lands and tenements, goods and chattels, whereof he or she was seized or possessed at the time . . . at the discretion of the court passing the sentence, not exceeding ten years, in the public gaol or house of correction of the county or city in which the offence shall have been committed and be kept at such labor. PENNSYLVANIA

[T]he detestable and abominable vice of buggery [sodomy] . . . be from henceforth adjudged felony . . . and that the offenders being hereof convicted by verdict, confession, or outlawry [unlawful flight to avoid prosecution], shall suffer such pains of death and losses and penalties of their goods. SOUTH CAROLINA

That if any man lieth with mankind as he lieth with a woman, they both shall suffer death. VERMONT

Ah, but some will say, “Thomas Jefferson would have never stood for this. He wanted liberty and equal rights for homosexuals to get married.” Not according to the record he didn’t. In Notes on the State of Virginia by Matthew Carey (1794) Jefferson indicated that in his home state of Virginia, “dismemberment” of the offensive organ was the penalty for sodomy. I’m guessing there weren’t too many sodomites wanting that to take place. You might say that is Jefferson’s home state, but not Jefferson’s thoughts on the issue. Not so fast. Jefferson actually authored a bill penalizing sodomy by castration (The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Andrew A. Lipscomb, editor (Washington, D. C.: Thomas Jefferson Memorial Association, 1904), Vol. I, pp. 226-227, from Jefferson’s “For Proportioning Crimes and Punishments)). The below capture of Jefferson’s legislation is courtesy of The Library of Congress and Apologeticspress.org.

Because we have not dealt lawfully with the lawless, we have now been so demoralized as to not ever recognize their lawlessness for what it is. We have done so to the point that a man like Mr. Lozano, an open enemy of the Creator parades around his lawlessness in the streets as the usurper of the office of the “minister of God” (Romans 13:1-5).

Court Records: Senator Kirsten Gillibrand’s Father Worked For The NXIVM Sex Cult – She Took Money From Cult Member

The entire NXIVM sex cult is not only criminal but simply bizarre.  In all that we are learning about those involved and what they were doing, it’s come to light through court documents that US Senator Kirsten Gillibrand’s (D-NY) father worked for the NXIVM cult, and we know that Gillibrand took money from Seagram heiress Clare Bronfman, who is also charged in the case.

Big League Politics reports:

Former NXIVM employee Frank Parlato provided Big League Politics with copies of the court documents in NXIM’s suit against Rutnik, which prove Rutnik’s employment by the group. (READ THE FULL DOCUMENTS HERE).

“I worked as the publicist,” Frank Parlato told Big League Politics. “We ran into a major disagreement and we split. At the time I worked for them I thought they were a little peculiar but it wasn’t until the end that I realized they were a downright evil group.”

“There are women on the record who are now adults who have accused Raniere of statutory rape and there are some very suspicious incidents where Mexican girls came under the perimeters of Raniere’s control and left under suspicious circumstances. They came from Chihuahua Mexico. I reported this to the authorities,” Parlato said.

“Her father Doug Rutnik came to work as a consultant for NXIVM…he was fired, they sued him, and he had to pay them $100,000,” Parlato said, referring Gillibrand’s father.

Parlato is the NXIVM whistleblower who blew the lid off the case, including the revelation that NXIVM leader Keith Raniere’s cult was branding women with his initials.

“Her father’s wife, her stepmother, was also a member of NXIVM…Doug got her into the cult, Gillibrand’s father got Gillibrand’s future stepmother into the cult. Doug left the cult because he was sued. Clare Bronfman after her father was sued donated money to Gillibrand. Gillibrand accepted it.”

“One is inclined to call her a liar,” Parlato says of Gillibrand.

At least one witness, John Tighe, claims that Gillibrand sat at the NXIVM table at a Hillary Clinton fundraiser.

“The very first time I ever met Gillibrand she was at an event for Hillary Clinton in the Hall of Springs in the State Park. This was in 2006. I was at a table with a Russian friend and Mike Roohan and his wife. I was on the Democratic committee at the time and was given two comp tickets. Gillibrand came up to me introduced herself and said she was running against John Sweeney. This was before all the stories of his drunken behavior came out. He was still congressman kickass at that time. I promised my support and wished her well. I then commented to Mike that with her baby voice and demeanor that she was a lightweight. Boy, was I wrong. But the kicker was when the mixing was over and Clinton went to speak. Gillibrand sat with one of the front tables. Yeah, the three front VIP tables were all brought by NXIVM and she was sitting with Nancy Salzman. You can quote me on that.”

Keith Raniere, the group’s leader who is known as Vanguard, and the group have been accused by former members of forcing women into sex slavery and branding them like cattle with Raniere’s initials.

Several women claimed that they were forced to hand over nude photos of themselves in case they disobeyed him and were forced to perform manual labor, according to the Page Six.

Of course, Gillibrand has denied knowing anything, claiming she had never heard of the group.

“Senator Gillibrand had never heard of this group until she recently read about them in the newspaper,” a spokesman for Gillibrand told the Washington Free Beacon in March 2018. “She is glad that federal and state prosecutors have taken action in this case.”

Right, sounds like Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah.  Completely oblivious to what her family and political accomplices were involved in until she read the papers, something she probably doesn’t even do.

US District Court Judge Rules Against California’s Unconstitutional Gun “Law”

On Friday, a US District Court Judge ruled that California’s new “law” that bans high-capacity gun magazines is “unconstitutional in its entirety.”  Of course, this is no surprise to those who actually believe the words of the US Constitution’s Bill of Rights and the Second Amendment, as well as the clear limitations of government to infringe in any way on the rights of the citizens to keep and bear arms of all kinds, including accessories that are used in conjunction with those arms.

“Individual liberty and freedom,” said US District Court Judge Roger Benitez, “are not outmoded concepts. This decision is a freedom calculus decided long ago by Colonists who cherished individual freedom more than the subservient security of a British ruler. The freedom they fought for was not free of cost then, and it is not free now.”

The ruling forbids California Attorney General Xavier Becerra from enforcing the state’s unconstitutional pretended legislation that does not allow for magazines that hold more than ten rounds.

“California’s law prohibiting acquisition and possession of magazines able to hold any more than 10 rounds places a severe restriction on the core right of self-defense of the home such that it amounts to a destruction of the right and is unconstitutional under any level of scrutiny,” he wrote in an 86-page decision.

Not only did the judge shoot down the illegal “law,” but he also took aim at the ridiculous notion that high-capacity magazines served little purpose when it comes to self-defense.

“In one year in California (2017), a population of 39 million people endured 56,609 robberies, 105,391 aggravated assaults, and 95,942 residential burglaries,” wrote Judge Benitez. “There were also 423 homicides in victims’ residences. There were no mass shootings in 2017.

“Nationally, the first study to assess the prevalence of defensive gun use estimated that there are 2.2 to 2.5 million defensive gun uses by civilians each year,” he added. “Of those, 340,000 to 400,000 defensive gun uses were situations where defenders believed that they had almost certainly saved a life by using the gun. Citizens often use a gun to defend against criminal attack.”

The judge also ripped into California representatives and the governor by declaring that they were, in essence, making them a victim which more criminals would prey on as they infringed on the God-given right of law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms while being oblivious to the fact that criminals could care less about their ban.

“A magazine is an essential mechanical part of a firearm,” said the judge.  “The size limit directly impairs one’s ability to defend one’s self. Neither magazines, nor rounds of ammunition, nor triggers, nor barrels are specifically mentioned in the Second Amendment. Neither are they mentioned in Heller. But without a right to keep and bear triggers, or barrels, or ammunition and the magazines that hold ammunition, the Second Amendment right would be meaningless.”

“California’s ban is far-reaching, absolute, and permanent,” the judge continued.  “The ban on acquisition and possession on magazines able to hold more than 10 rounds, together with the substantial criminal penalties threatening a law-abiding, responsible, citizen who desires such magazines to protect hearth and home, imposes a burden on the constitutional right that this Court judges as severe.”

“The magazine ban arbitrarily selects 10 rounds as the magazine capacity over which possession is unlawful.  The ban on magazines that hold more than 10 rounds amounts to a prohibition on an entire class of ‘arms’ that is overwhelmingly chosen by American citizens for the lawful purpose of self-defense,” he ruled.

The National Rifle Association praised the ruling in a statement.

“Indeed, he characterized the California law as ‘turning the Constitution upside down.’  He also systematically dismantled each of the state’s purported justifications for the law, demonstrating the factual and legal inconsistencies of their claims.”

Benitez, a George W. Bush appointee who serves on the bench for the Southern District of California, also wrote that California’s ban unfairly impacts a wide swath of the state’s gun owners, as many choose to use magazines containing over 10 rounds for their defense.

Well done, Judge Benitez!  Finally, someone in the judicial system in California with a brain and seems to hold to constitutionality!

Minnesota House Votes To Allow Illegal Immigrants To Have Driver’s Licenses – Senate Opposes

Well, just like California, the Minnesota State House voted to advance a bill, an unconstitutional one I might add, that would provide driver’s licenses to immigrants who are in the country illegally.  For those who don’t understand that, it means there are in the country in violation of law, and the Minnesota House just voted to reward those who have knowingly broken the law.

The Minnesota Star Tribune reported:

The Democratic-led Minnesota House voted Friday to give immigrants the ability to get driver’s licenses even if they are in the country illegally, setting the stage for a potential clash with Senate Republicans who argue that the change rewards those who break the law.

The 74-52 vote was a victory for the DFL House majority and Democratic Gov. Tim Walz, who have made it a top priority for this session. But it faces strong opposition in the Republican-controlled Senate, where some conservatives see it as an invitation to illegal immigration and possibly even fraudulent voting.

If the measure were to clear the Minnesota Legislature, still a distant prospect, the state would become the 13th in the nation to provide licenses to residents who cannot prove legal status, fueling the national debate over immigration and access to social benefits.

The Minnesota Voters Alliance and other conservative groups that favor stricter voter ID laws have cast the measure as part of a liberal effort to undermine the integrity of elections, a charge that DFL lawmakers denied. Minnesota has no photo ID requirements at polling stations, and the licenses mandated in the House bill would carry explicit warnings that they can’t be used for voting.

Immigrants, regardless of their status, previously were able to obtain licenses in Minnesota if they could pass the driver’s test and buy insurance. That changed in 2003 amid heightened security measures taken across the nation in response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks. The House bill would restore that right.

Actually, I’m not quite sure where the Star Tribune claims it is a “right” to get a driver’s license.  Rights come from God and if that is the case, why is there a need for a license to exercise such a right?  Me thinks they use a word they do not understand.

What’s even more incredible is that everyone knows exactly where this is going and that is so they can provide an ID when they go to vote illegally in elections.

However, this is being branded as being about safety.  Isn’t that always the claims of tyrants?

“It’s common sense,” said Rep. Samantha Vang, D-Brooklyn Center. “This will allow people to simply open a bank account, to drive safely on the road to their jobs, to their school.”

These people actually believe this will lead to safer roads by giving people driver’s licenses to drive on the road who are here in violation of the law in the first place.  No!  It actually endangers every citizen and non-citizen who are in the state of Minnesota, as well as the rest of the country to where these people might drive.

My perspective is that we want immigrants coming here legally and [to] create a ladder to the middle class,” said Rep. Glenn Gruenhagen, R-Glencoe. “Incentivizing people to come here illegally defeats that purpose.”

This is exactly right.

Muslim Rep. Mohamud Noor, whose family came to the United States after fleeing Somalia, said the bill as a “moral obligation.”

“This is about dignity, it is about respect, it is about inclusion,” Noor said.

Dignity?  Respect?  Inclusion?  For people who are in violation of the law?  So, Mr. Noor wants Minnesotans to respect lawbreakers and dignify them.  Isn’t that what he is saying?  Yep, you better believe it is.

This is a man who fled a country that is dominated by Muslims, seeks refuge in America, only to then turn around and spit on the very laws which allowed him and his family a place of refuge here in the first place.

“Immigrants, whether they are documented or undocumented, are Minnesotans. They are part of the fabric of our communities,” said House Majority Leader Ryan Winkler (D).  “It is time that we helped take away this shadow of not having a driver’s license.”

No, they are not.

“Minnesota shouldn’t be in the business of incentivizing illegal behavior, and by allowing illegal and undocumented immigrants access to driver’s licenses, that’s exactly what our state would be doing,” state Sen. Bill Ingebrigtsen (R) added.

The bill is not expected to clear the Republican-controlled Minnesota Senate.

Newly elected Governor Tim Walz, a Democrat who previously served as a representative in the U.S. House, has not indicated whether he would sign the bill.

Those who voted for the measure should be considered traitors to the people they serve as they are ignoring the violations of law these immigrants are engaged in only to reward them and aid them in being successful in Minnesota while telling the people that they are simply looking out for their well-being, rights and safety.  They are doing none of that.

Article posted with permission from Sons Of Liberty Media

Ousted Oklahoma Judge Turned Florida Attorney Michael Chionopoulos Involved In Possible Malpractice In Depriving Rape Victim Of Hundreds Of Thousands Of Dollars

As I have asked many times, where is Governor DeSantis?  Where is Attorney General Ashley Moody and where in God’s name is the Florida Bar?  The case in Florida against Deanna Williams, a victim of rape, is enough to not only move the hearts of law-abiding Americans, but enough to make the blood of those same Americans boil when it comes to what appears to be utter corruption and malpractice, as well as possible collusion between attorneys to deprive a rape victim of hundreds of thousands of dollars, including a former Oklahoma judge, Michael Chionopoulos.

If you are unfamiliar with the case of Deanna Williams, please have a look at the previous articles to be up to speed on it.

Florida attorney Michael Chionopolis represented Deanna Williams in a case brought against her, which the appellate court in Florida ruled there was no basis to bring against her.  

However, before I divulge what Chionopoulos did in Williams’ case, which any man with a conscience would have gone to any lengths to reconcile, let me give you a bit of background on Mr. Chionopoulos.

In a report from 2006, we know that Chionopoulos was a divorce judge in Oklahoma.  He was also voted to be replaced after district judges voted to remove him because of “inappropriate behavior with female attorneys, female law students and women with cases before him.”

Chionopoulos’ position was considered a special position that was the result of district judges hiring him.

Nolan Clay reported for The Oklahoman at the time:

Among the accusations is that Chionopoulos ordered an attractive stripper in a child-custody case to personally deliver to him the results of drug tests every Friday.

“He took her into his office by himself. … It’s unethical,” said her attorney, Steven Holden. “No other judge I’ve ever met would ask a litigant into his office and close the door and spend two hours with them while a case is ongoing or afterward, ever.”

He allegedly told another woman going through a divorce, “I wish I would have met you before I met my wife,” according to a written complaint given to district judges.

Other complaints
Attorneys reported the judge acted too familiar and flirty with female attorneys.

Attorneys also reported the judge treated female attorneys more harshly than male attorneys, being nice, mean, then nice again.

“It was strange,” attorney Doug Merritt said. “There were multiple incidents. That was part of the problem.”

Several female attorneys reported Chionopoulos would call them repeatedly on their cell phones, sometimes late at night.

“It was just kind of weird,” said attorney Michelle Roper, who gathered the information given to the judges. “A lot of phone calls, I avoided. … The latest one from my cell phone records was 10:30 … on a Friday night.”

Another attorney reported he touched her inappropriately on the back.

Understand that Chionopoulos was a senior vice president and general counsel of a public company in Oklahoma before serving with the U.S. Army in the Middle East during 2003.

This is a guy that should know better.

However, he moved to Florida and established a business as an attorney.

According to information provided to The Washington Standard, an anonymous source has confirmed that there is evidence that he has continued this behavior as an attorney in the state of Florida.

Mr. Chionopoulos has not only been conducting himself in this fashion with clients, but has also admitted by affidavit with the court in Florida that he “made an error” regarding a client of his, Deanna Williams.

Mr. Chionopoulos has been contacted no less than four times to retain a comment from him about his negligence regarding an agreed order in which he turned over at least $200,000 from his client, Ms. Williams, without her permission. He admits in the affidavit below, which was part of a motion he filed with the court, he admits it was his error, but he never sought a hearing to rescind the order and have Ms. Williams’ money retunred to her.

Here’s the court record dated June 1, 2018.

In the same motion, Chionopoulos says the error was his and his alone. He claims, “Ms. Williams is attempting to resolve a deeply personal and sensitive matter,  which has caused significant strife in other areas of her life.  The funds mentioned in the paragraph at issue in the Order are necessary for WILLIAMS to save her home in an unrelated matter.”

Chionopoulos acknowledges in the documents filed 6/13/2019 that it was his fault for misunderstanding and then not reading the agreement sent to him by Scott Mager of Mager Paruas, in which Chionopoulus turned over all future payments from a rape settlement case that Ms. Williams had coming to her to Scott Mager.

However, the question remains, if Chionopoulos really cared about his client, why did he not file for a hearing so that the judge could actually hear the “error” and reverse the order?  Was it so that time would run out and that Mr. Mager would be $200,000 richer and that Ms. Williams would be vulnerable to his and the court’s threats, seeing that she would no longer have any money to fight against such oppression?  It sure seems that way.

That’s not all.

Emails obtained by The Washington Standard between Mr. Chionopoulos and Scott Mager that the goal in the case against Ms. Williams seems to be to cause as much harm to her as possible in order to obtain a bigger prize… a lawsuit against attorney Gloria Allred.

Understand that Mager Paruas was allowed in the case by a judge that was busted in a prostitution sting after turning over stolen funds of $100,000 to Scott Mager by Ms. Williams previous attorney, G. Ware Cornell.  When Cornell was contacted by The Washington Standard, he claimed that he had “inherent rights” to intercept a payment of $200,000 to Ms. Williams despite the fact that no written authorization was given to him to do so and in direct contradiction of his retainer agreement with Ms. Williams.

The email from Mr. Mager, however, seems to imply that there is a manipulation of both Mr. Chionopoulos and Ms. Williams.

Mr. Mager wrote:

‘As you also know, we were entitled to the original $200,000 that was paid at the time of the trial/judgments.  As a special courtesy to YOU (and we would not have done this for anyone else), and in specific reliance upon your client’s agreed upon cooperation to help us secure payment of our judgment, we released $100,000 of that entitled-to money to your client.”

Nothing in the court record that I can find at LeeClerk.gov indicates that Mager had anything to do with the distribution of funds that were intercepted unauthorized by Mr. Cornell by Ms. Williams.  In fact, the order is by the corrupt judge, Jay B. Rosman, the man busted in a prostitute ring sting.  Was there a back door deal somewhere?  Perhaps in the chambers of the judge and off the record by a judge that was busted in a prostitution ring sting just weeks later?  It certainly is possible.

Both Mr. Mager and Mr. Chionopoulus have failed to return numerous phone calls from The Washington Standard for comment.  It appears that Mr. Mager failed to comply with working with Ms. Williams in setting up a deposition last month, which resulted in the judge in the case issuing an arrest warrant for Ms. Williams while Mr. Mager’s firm continues to push her for a deposition on April 17, 2018, long after the court deadline of March 27.

Ms. Williams has at least $200,000 stolen from her by one of her attorneys.  She has had another $200,000 given to Scott Mager, who had no interest in the original case whatsoever and that an appellate court ruled that the attorneys going after her provided no evidence for even freezing her assets, because of either negligence, malpractice or collusion by her attorney at the time, Michael Chionopoulus.

I mention collusion simply because I find it incredibly hard to believe that both Chionopoulous and Cornell had discussions with Scott Mager and just after those discussions, the woman who has paid them handsomely to represent her is out of nearly $400,000, of which $100,000 was reissued to her by an alleged criminal judge who got off without so much as a slap on the wrist.

Now, Mr. Mager is using the court to go after Ms. Williams after setting up an appropriate time for deposition to the point that he has demanded the court enforce the contempt issue against Ms. Williams and arrest her.

I ask, where is the governor, the attorney general and the Florida Bar?

When is someone going to step forward, put the brakes on all of this and settle this matter fairly and justly in the light of day with proper representation for Ms. Williams?  Furthermore, when will someone come forward from the Florida Bar and actually begin the investigation into the allegations of malpractice, fraud and theft in the matter?

We can’t make America great again if we don’t stand up for the weak against injustice.  Who knows when you will need someone to stand up for you!

You can contact Governor DeSantis on behalf of Ms. Williams below:

Executive Office of Governor Ron DeSantis
400 S Monroe St
Tallahassee, FL 32399
(850) 488-7146

Email Governor DeSantis

Email Lt. Governor Nuñez 

Additionally, you can contact Attorney General Ashley Moody on behalf of Ms. Williams below:

Office of Attorney General
State of Florida
The Capitol PL-01
Tallahassee, FL 32399-1050

(850) 414-3300

Finally, it may even help to contact the Florida Bar on Ms. Williams’ behalf to see if they will begin to investigate ethics violations, negligence and corruption that appears to have taken place with regards to Ms. Williams’ representation, legal agreements and rulings by judges in the cases.

The Florida Bar contact information:

The Florida Bar 
651 E. Jefferson Street
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2300

(850)561-5600

By Email

If You Are Compelled To Help Ms. Williams With Funds To Acquire An Attorney, Which Will Cost $15,000 In Order To Retain One, In Order To Help Her Fight Back, Along With Money To Simply Survive, Please Click Here To Donate To Her Go Fund Me Account.

This weekend, I’ll be releasing a bombshell in this story, and you don’t want to miss it.  Share it far and wide and let’s help this woman take on those who have used the court to weaponize it against her, as well as the attorneys who have failed to represent her properly.

UPDATE: 04-07-2019. Mr. Chionopoulos contacted me after midnight, early Saturday morning when I was asleep. Upon returning his call later that morning and being asked about why he failed to follow through with a hearing on the motion presented in which he admitted the “error,” Mr. Chionopoulos deflected to a previous agreed order that Ms. Williams signed over the $200,000 intercepted illegally by Mr. Cornell, but never addressed his own failure to represent his client and his own failure to follow through to retrieve another $200,000 that went to Mr. Mager. “Write what you want,” was his reply.

Here’s What is Behind Ilhan Omar’s Hijab & Her Anti-American Assault

The US Congress has stood down with reference to their decades-old rule regarding head coverings with Muslims like Rep. Ihan Imar (D-MN). However, the question should be raised, what is behind bigamist Ilhan Omar, her head covering and her anti-American, antichristian theology that drives her ideology. Well, we’re glad you asked.

Simply put, Muslims are pushing for Shariah law, which runs counter to American law.

Anni Cyrus escaped Islamic theocracy in Iran which leaves her all too qualified to talk about mandatory ‘hijabization’ and the Omar Effect.

Hey, don’t blame me, though I agree. Believe this woman who lived under the totalitarianism of Islamic supremacy in Iran.

Cyrus pointed out that a 181-year-old ban on no hats in Congress was simply dismissed for the anti-American, antichrist representative from Minnesota, Ilhan Omar.

Cyrus explains in her latest video, The Truth Behind Ilhan Omar’s Hijab, that the reality behind the hollow empowerment claims of Omar that what she is really advancing is not liberation and liberty but oppression and slavery.

Article posted with permission from Sons Of Liberty Media

In Wake Of Synagogue Shooting, Pittsburgh Decides To Make Easy Targets Of Law-Abiding Citizens By Illegally Banning Their Guns

The attack on the Tree of Life synagogue building in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania in October 2018 has given way to the tyrants of the Pennsylvania City Council approving an illegal gun confiscation package, which seeks to disarm citizens and make them soft targets for more criminals who would make easy pray for their crimes.

The public was asked to comment before the vote.

One woman said “It’s not the weapon that’s the problem. It’s the intent of the person handling the weapon that’s the problem.”

However, what someone should have said was that the council had no authority to even consider such legislation since the right to keep and bear arms is just that, a right.  It’s is not something that can be legislated away.

CBS reports:

Pittsburgh City Council took a final vote Monday morning, passing a package of controversial gun laws introduced after last year’s mass shooting at the Tree of Life Synagogue.

Council members voted 6-3 to pass the bills. They now head to Democratic Mayor Bill Peduto for his expected signature.

The legislation will place restrictions on military-style assault weapons like the AR-15 rifle that authorities say was used in the Oct. 27 rampage at Tree of Life Synagogue in Squirrel Hill, which killed 11 people and wounded seven.

It also bans most uses of armor-piercing ammunition and high-capacity magazines, and allows the temporary seizure of guns from people who are determined to be a danger to themselves or others.

Furthermore, the Jewish Telegraphic Agency adds:

The measures also ban ammunition and accessories, such as large capacity magazines, and allow courts to temporarily remove guns from a person deemed to be a public threat. A companion bill passed by the council directs additional funding to city anti-violence programs.

City residents who own guns and accessories outlined in the bills would be grandfathered. Violators of the laws could be fined $1,000, or face up to 90 days in prison, for each offense.

Second Amendment advocates say they will challenge the illegal legislation due to the fact that the city does not have authority to issue such measures.

Time Magazine reports:

Pittsburgh has a home rule charter, which affords the city some independence from the state legislature. But Pennsylvania’s law on the charter says a municipality “shall not enact any ordinance or take any other action dealing with the regulation of the transfer, ownership, transportation or possession of firearms.” The state’s firearms code has an amendment that expressly prohibits municipalities from regulating the “lawful ownership, possession, transfer or transportation of firearms, ammunition or ammunition components.” That inherent tension has set in motion a legal battle over gun rights in Pittsburgh and Pennsylvania more broadly.

Time went on to state something completely unconstitutional.

Pennsylvania’s legislature is the only entity that can change the state law to grant cities and municipalities the right to regulate firearms on their own, according to David Harris, a professor at the University of Pittsburgh’s law school. Right now, Pittsburgh and the courts can battle it out over the specificity of wording in the bills and the state legislation, Harris tells TIME. Because the provision from the city bans the use of certain weapons, one could argue that the state law does not technically stipulate anything about firearms usage. “In order to have this stand up, courts will have to find that the idea of using these items that are now part of the city’s law is different than all the other ways the state prohibited cities from regulating firearms,” Harris says.

Sorry, no, the state legislature has no more authority under the Constitution to infringe on the right to keep and bear arms of law-abiding citizens than the municipality does.  All gun laws are unconstitutional by the very definition outlines in the Second Amendment as a protected right.

The Pittsburgh City Council has become the enemy of the people of Pittsburgh, not it’s representation.

DOJ & FBI Sued For Top Officials’ Communications About Russian Interference in 2016 Elections

Now, that it’s been confirmed that the Russian Collusion scam was nothing more than a conspiracy theory cooked up by the Hillary Clinton campaign that was disseminated by the FBI, the media and the Democrat Party, it’s on to what the real story is about the alleged Russian interference in the 2016 elections.  Government watchdog Judicial Watch filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Department of Justice and the FBI to obtain communications records from then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, as well as then-FBI Director James Comey, former Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and the Office of General Counsel regarding possible Russian interference in the 2016 presidential elections in the united States.

The original May 21, 2018 FOIA request sought from the DOJ:

All records of internal DOJ communications, including emails (whether on .gov or non-.gov email accounts), text messages or instant chats, of officials in the offices of the Attorney General and Deputy Attorney General regarding possible Russian involvement and/or interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign.

The original May 21, 2018 FOIA request to the FBI was similar in its request:

All records of internal FBI communications, including emails (whether on .gov or non-.gov email accounts), text messages or instant chats, of officials in the offices of the FBI Director, FBI Deputy Director and Office of General Counsel regarding possible Russian involvement and/or interference in the 2016 US presidential campaign.

Like everything else, both agencies dragged their feet and as a result, they failed once again to respond to the FOIA requests.

The communications that were being sought dated between January 2016 and May 2017.

Judicial Watch reports:

In July 2018 the DOJ claimed that it needed additional time to respond to Judicial Watch’s request but has since been unresponsive. The DOJ’s answer to Judicial Watch is due April 21, 2019.

The FBI asserted in June 2018 that all records responsive to the request were exempt from disclosure, claiming that release would result in interference with law enforcement proceedings.

This is the latest FOIA lawsuit in Judicial Watch’s ongoing, in-depth investigation regarding the FBI’s involvement in the Russian investigation. Judicial Watch’s extensive investigation includes discovering information on the Clinton funded anti-Trump dossier and its use to obtain FISA warrants in order to spy on the Trump campaign; politically biased messages against President Trump between former FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page; the leaking of former FBI Director Comey’s memos; and the relationship between FBI official Bruce Ohr, his wife Nellie Ohr and Fusion GPS.

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton explained, “Americans deserve to know the truth about what the corrupted DOJ and FBI leadership were saying when they were ginning up the bogus Russia investigation.  The targeting of President Trump by the Obama administration and the Deep State.”

My guess is that we are probably going to discover that there really wasn’t all the interference we’ve been led to believe by the Russians.  Rather, we already know that social media outlets like Facebook and Twitter were actively involved in manipulating news and commentary regarding the election, and on top of that, we know there was a ton of voter fraud around the country.

When are we going to stop pointing the finger at foreign countries and take care of our own corruption?

7 Women Come Forward To Accuse Former Vice President Joe Biden

It’s absolutely amazing this man held any public office, especially the office of vice president.  Even more concerning is his bid for the White House in 2020, after his embarrassment as the usurper’s VP.  Still, as we have reported with documented video evidence, Joe Biden clearly cannot keep his hands nor his lips to himself.  One wonders if he has kept other parts of his anatomy to only his wife and himself.  It looks like the Deep State doesn’t want Biden in the White House in 2020 and so they are sending the CIA-controlled media after him about things that are actually true.

The Washington Post reports:

Biden addressed critics in a video posted to Twitter as three additional women told The Washington Post on Wednesday about encounters with him that made them feel uncomfortable. Their stories bring the total number of people who have expressed concerns about alleged interactions with Biden to seven.

Wow, former Senator Al Franken took quite a while to get that many accusers and look, basically within a week, Biden has done it with ease.  No doubt, there are hundreds if not thousands to whom Biden has acted inappropriately, and no doubt, many more are to emerge in the coming days.

WaPo adds:

Vail Kohnert-Yount said she was a White House intern in the spring of 2013 and one day tried to exit the basement of the West Wing when she was asked to step aside so Biden could enter. After she moved out of the way, she said, Biden approached her to introduce himself and shake her hand.

“He then put his hand on the back of my head and pressed his forehead to my forehead while he talked to me. I was so shocked that it was hard to focus on what he was saying. I remember he told me I was a ‘pretty girl,’ ” Kohnert-Yount said in a statement to The Post.

Of course, Biden sought to exercise some damage control and issued a video on Wednesday in an attempt to justify his behavior.


<p\>Biden acknowledged shifting social norms and promised to be “more respectful of people’s personal space,” he defended his style of interacting and did not offer an apology.

“I’ll be much more mindful. That is my responsibility, my responsibility, and I’ll meet it. But I’ll always believe governing, quite frankly, and life, for that matter, is about connecting, about connecting with people. That won’t change,” Biden said in the video.

Everyone understands a hug from people you know, but we’ve all seen how Biden does lengthy hugs, has his hands everywhere and kissing and just being all around creepy.  He isn’t encouraging any of the women I’ve seen.  Does it appear that way to you?

In fact, it’s interesting that he’s just now saying he gets it about personal space.  I thought he said he understood that in 2018.

“Nothing justifies a man laying a hand on a woman without her consent. Look, you need consent,” Biden said in an April 2018 video interview with feminist media outlet Makers.

Notice the “Never, never, never, never…” comments he makes about it.

Let those “nevers” be that he serves in public office again.

Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media

As Democrats Subpoena White House Over “Security Issues,” Just Remember 44 House Democrats Exempted Muslim IT Spies From Background Checks

On Tuesday, The House Oversight Committee voted to authorize a subpoena for a former adjudications manager in the White House Personnel Security Office to testify behind closed doors as part of an investigation into the security clearance process of the Trump administration.  The whistleblower said the White House overturned 25 denials of security clearances.  However, not one of these Democrats raised even a peep when 44 House Democrats hired Muslim brothers as IT professionals, who turned out to be spies, and exempted them from background checks posing a serious national security issue.

As was reported on Tuesday, “Tricia Newbold, who was the adjudications manager in the White House Personnel Security Office told Cummings and a bipartisan staff that her office had issued 25 denials of security clearances that have been overturned by the White House.”

“However, the Republican staff on the committee responded to both Cummings and Newbold. The members complained that Cummings “cherrypicked” partisan information and didn’t not give ample opportunity for Republican members to respond to Newbold.”

Of course, I don’t want to belittle the allegations if there truly is a security issue here.  I should be looked at.  However, given the past two years and millions of dollars spent on a nothing burger of an investigation, one has to wonder if this isn’t the next distraction coming from House Democrats against the Trump administration.  I think it is.

Yet, not one of these Democrats on the committee voiced so much as a peep when 44 of their colleagues exempted Muslim IT spies from background checks.

Luke Rosiak reported in April 2018:

Every one of the 44 House Democrats who hired Pakistan-born IT aides who later allegedly made “unauthorized access” to congressional data appears to have chosen to exempt them from background checks, according to congressional documents.


All of them appear to have waived background checks on Imran Awan and his family members, even though the family of server administrators could collectively read all the emails and files of 1 in 5 House Democrats, and despite background checks being recommended for such positions, according to an inspector general’s report. The House security policy requires offices to fill out a form attesting that they’ve initiated background checks, but it also includes a loophole allowing them to simply say that another member vouched for them.

Among the red flags in Abid’s background were a $1.1 million bankruptcy; six lawsuits against him or a company he owned; and at least three misdemeanor convictions including for DUI and driving on a suspended license, according to Virginia court records. Public court records show that Imran and Abid operated a car dealership referred to as CIA that took $100,000 from an Iraqi government official who is a fugitive from U.S. authorities. Numerous members of the family were tied to cryptic LLCs such as New Dawn 2001, operated out of Imran’s residence, Virginia corporation records show. Imran was the subject of repeated calls to police by multiple women and had multiple misdemeanor convictions for driving offenses, according to court records.

If a screening had caught those, what officials say happened next might have been averted. The House inspector general reported on Sept. 20, 2016, that shortly before the election members of the group were logging into servers of members they didn’t work for, logging in using congressmen’s personal usernames, uploading data off the House network, and behaving in ways that suggested “nefarious purposes” and that “steps are being taken to conceal their activity.”

A pair of closely-held reports on Imran Awan, his brothers Abid and Jamal, his wife Hina Alvi, and his friend Rao Abbas, said, “the shared employees have not been vetted (e.g. background check).”

“Shared employees” means they were all hired as part-time, individual employees by individual members, cobbling together $165,000 salaries. Jamal began making that salary at only 20 years old, according to House payroll records; Abid never went to college, his stepmother said; and Rao Abbas’ most recent job experience was being fired from McDonald’s, according to his roommate. (“Whether they had formal training or not, they were trained on the job by Imran,” one of Imran’s lawyers said.)

Among the 44 employers, the primary advocate for the suspects has been Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida, who introduced a bill Monday that would require background checks on Americans purchasing ammunition. “Without bullets, a gun is just a hunk of useless metal,” she said, calling ammunition the “loophole” in gun control policy.

So, who were these Democrats?  Glad you asked.   Here’s the list.

Gregory Meeks (NY)

Robert Wexler (FL)

Xavier Becerra (CA)

Chris Bell (TX)

Stephanie Tubbs Jones (OH)

Jim Costa (CA)

Hilda Solis (CA)

Debbie Wasserman Schultz (FL)

Kendrick Meek (FL)

Melissa Bean (IL)

Sandy Levin (MI)

Tim Ryan (OH)

Baron Hill (IN)

John Sarbanes (MD)

Yvette Clarke (NY)

Dave Loebsack (IA)

Ron Klein (FL)

Joe Donnelly (IN)

Ben Chandler (KY)

Diana DeGette (CO)

Jackie Speier (CA)

Rahm Emanuel (IL)

Marcia Fudge (OH)

Martin Heinrich (NM)

Gabrielle Giffords (AZ)

Debbie Halvorson (IL)

Frederica Wilson (FL)

John Carney (DE)

Cedric Richmond (LA)

Karen Bass (CA)

Emanuel Cleaver (MO)

Ted Deutch (FL)

Henry Waxman (CA)

Ron Barber (AZ)

Patrick Murphy (FL)

Joe Garcia (FL)

Joyce Birdson Beatty (OH)

Lois Frankel (FL)

Mark Takano (CA)

Dan Kildee (MI)

Julia Brownley (CA)

Tammy Duckworth (IL)

Michelle Lujan Grisham (NM)

Kyrsten Sinema (AZ)

Tony Cardenas (CA)

Robin Kelly (IL)

Joaquin Castro (TX)

Katherine Clark (MA)

Hakeem Jeffries (NY)

Joe Crowley (NY)

Brad Ashford (NE)

Andre Carson (IN)

Gwen Graham (FL)

Pete Aguilar (CA)

Ted Lieu (CA)

Seth Mouton (MA)

Jacky Rosen (NV)

Donald McEachin (VA)

Stephanie Murphy (FL)

Charlie Crist (FL)

Lisa Blunt Rochester (DE)

Darren Michael Soto (FL)

Why were none of these people impeached due to their negligence, which may have compromised national security?  Why do several of these people continue to serve in both the House and Senate today?

What Do Gloria Allred & A Florida Judge Busted In A Prostitution Sting Have In Common?

What do attorney Gloria Allred and a Florida judge who was busted in a prostitution sting in 2018 have in common?  They both have apparently put a victim of rape in a very dangerous position.

I’ve been telling you the story of Deanna Williams, a single mother with multiple sclerosis who was the victim of rape in 2009.  Without going into all the details in this piece, I will simply post links to the previous articles on what has been an ongoing case in which she has lost virtually everything after settling with the man she accused in 2012.

For more on Williams’ allegations, along with the text of the agreement between Allred and Williams in a retainer agreement, please see “Rape Victim Claims Gloria Allred Failed To Honor Agreement – Now She Faces Threats Of Arrest & Judgments Of Over $1 Million.

That will present the information of the situation that Williams is involved in currently where she is no longer under threat of arrest, but is actively being pursued by the Lee County Sheriff’s Office due to something that the judge earlier in the case presided over.

That judge was Judge Jay B. Rosman.  Rosman became part of the case in mid to late 2015.  Less than a year later, he would have an order of his overturned as those pursuing Ms. Williams for what is now over $1 million were found to be without any evidence to preserve her assets, and the trial court had made several legal errors in its order to do so.

As I pointed out previously, Florida Second District Court of Appeals Judge Edward C. LaRose ruled that the plaintiffs in the case had no standing and that there was no evidence provided to substantiate their claims against Ms. Williams.

He wrote:

Appellees did not file a charging lien in the personal injury lawsuit.3 Instead, they instituted a new action against appellants. Pursuing a quantum meruit theory of recovery, they claim entitlement to some portion of the settlement proceeds for their efforts on Ms. Williams’ behalf. To forestall the further disbursement of settlement funds held by the Heller law firm, appellees filed a motion to preserve assets. They submitted no verified pleadings or affidavits in support of the motion. The trial court referred the motion to a magistrate who heard argument on the motion. No party presented evidence. Appellees feared that, absent a freeze of the funds, they might be unable to secure any meaningful relief if they succeeded on their quantum meruit claim. Appellees argued that appellants had a duty to disgorge any fees and to return any disbursed funds because they had been on notice of a charging lien. Appellants noted that appellees never filed a charging lien. Appellants also maintained that appellees were asking for the entry of a temporary injunction without an evidentiary hearing or bond.

The magistrate recommended that the trial court grant the motion to preserve assets, finding that:

Any assets presently in the custody of Law Offices of Jonathan A. Heller, P.A., derived from, or related to, their representation of Deanna Williams should be frozen, withheld and not distributed or spent. An order protecting the assets is designed not to allow wasting of assets nor permit harm to any party. The final determination of whether or not the frozen funds should be released should be made after the trial of the cause.

The trial court adopted the magistrate’s report and recommendation and entered the order now before us.

Though Judge LaRose acknowledged the plaintiffs pursuing Ms. Williams did seek relief, he clearly points out above that they provided zero evidence for why that relief should be granted.

He then went on to make the legal arguments why the plaintiffs had no standing citing several cases prior.

Then, Judge LaRose wrote a reversal of the order citing utterly embarrassing actions of Judge Rosman’s court.

“Neither the order nor the magistrate’s report and recommendation recite sufficient factual findings to show us that appellees satisfied each element needed for entry of a temporary injunction,” the judge stated.  “On this basis, alone, we must reverse and remand for further proceedings. See Randolph, 903 So.2d 384 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). It appears to us that there were disputed issues of fact between the parties. Yet, to our knowledge, neither the magistrate nor the trial court held an evidentiary hearing. Thus, substantial, competent evidence was not provided to establish entitlement to a temporary injunction.”

“We must also note that Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(b) requires that a bond be set for the issuance of a temporary injunction,” the judge added.  “The trial court did not require a bond. This, too, was error.  Because the trial court committed legal error in granting the motion to preserve assets, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.”

Now, this really should have made things come to a halt.  In fact, they should have come to a halt before it began.  According to documents in the case, which the public can view at LeeClerk.org, which the plaintiffs in the case filed well over a year after Ms. Williams reached a settlement with attorney Allred, they admit that they never filed any charged attorney liens.

The plaintiffs in the case claim that they served notices of charging liens for attorneys’ fees and costs related to Ms. Williams civil rape case, but they admit, “These notices were not filed with the Court.”

Understand, that plaintiffs did have communication with Williams’ attorneys regarding fees, but they never filed those liens with the court and that is an admission they made in the court record that was filed on 11/19/2013.

With that said, Judge Rosman enters the picture in 2015, just about a year before Judge LaRose’s ruling.  It’s clear from reports that Judge Rosman was engaging in unlawful activity with prostitutes and yet, presiding over many cases, including this case, which was the result of a sex crime.  Does anyone think this is a conflict of interest?

News-Press.com reported in February 2018:

Rosman and five other men were arrested Friday following a Naples Police Department prostitution operation.

Rosman pleaded not guilty, waived his arraignment and asked for a jury trial.

Chief Judge Michael T. McHugh will preside over Rosman’s docket, Miles said.

Rosman was one of three high-profile arrests in that operation, including a pastor and a Broadway actor

Rosman, 64, is also accused of resisting arrest.

Naples police say Rosman allegedly made contact with an undercover officer via phone and arranged to meet at a hotel. He agreed to pay $300 for a sexual act but instead was placed under arrest. He began to resist but officers were able to gain control and handcuffed Rosman.

Rosman sent a letter to then-Governor Rick Scott announcing his resignation on February 13, 2018.

In March 2018, it was reported that he agreed to deferred prosecution in the charges against him in the prostitution ring sting.  What happened to Rosman?  He didn’t even get a slap on the wrist, more like a tickle and a wink.

Rosman agreed to the following program:
– six months supervision with early termination when all conditions are met
– pay $1,000 fine with half going to the drug court program and that other half to a DCF trust fund
– pay $50 for cost of prosecution
– attend an AIDs workshop/STD screening
– complete the ‘More to Life Restorative Justice Program’ about the negative effects of prostitution/human trafficking

This came just months after he used the court overseeing the interception of $200,000 of Ms. Williams money by her attorney and then only giving Ms. Williams 50% of it back while giving the other $100,000 to the man Judge Rosman allowed to be substituted in place of plaintiff Michael Dolce, Scott Mager.  Though the substitution of Mager Paruas cited Florida Law (Schmidt v Mueller), as best I can tell, that case cited involved a man who had an interest in a case and because he started his own company, he merely substituted the company, which was his, for his name as a plaintiff.  Mager of Mager and Paruas was never a part of the original rape case.  So, how he or Mager Paruas had any interest in this ongoing lawsuit is beyond me.  The only connection was Dolce and Dolce didn’t begin working for Mager Paruas until after this case had begun.

Calls to Mager Paruas for comment have gone unreturned, something that Ms. Williams also faced as a court deadline approached last month.

Other cases were put under scrutiny immediately following Judge Rosman’s arrest.  Keep in mind, this judge has been on the bench for three decades!

I ask you, why is there no scrutiny in this case of every single one of Judge Rosman’s rulings that has deprived Ms. Williams of time, and hundreds of thousands of dollars, not to mention she is now being sought for arrest?  Again, where is Governor Ron DeSantis?  Where is Attorney General Ashley Moody?  Where is the Florida Bar besides simply assigning a Bar investigator to Ms. Williams for a complaint?

Williams is in physical danger due to complication she had with a pregnancy and the stress has only piled onto that, and she can find no attorney to help her without a huge retainer, which she would gladly pay if her money had not been taken from her.

This brings us right back to Ms. Allred.  As I pointed out, The Washington Standard reached out to Ms. Allred for comment.  Though we have the text of her retainer agreement that agrees to pay all previous attorney fees, which would have resulted in this years-long case even beginning, they apparently weren’t, and now Ms. Williams has been judged, wrongly I might add, for over $1 million to the plaintiffs under another Flordia judge.  Ms. Allred has written to The Washington Standard to state nothing more than, “Any legal problems that Ms. Williams faces has nothing to do with our representation of her and there is no factual basis for the assertions set forth in your email.”

Read for yourself the retainer agreement and the history here and you see if you don’t think it has everything to do with all the legal problems that Ms. Williams faces today.

Ms. Williams is in need of medical care, but cannot seek it.  She has no money.  She is in need of an attorney to represent her, but a good attorney in a civil matter like this requires a $15,000 retainer fee, which she does not possess.  If you read my first report, you will see that Ms. Williams had criminal actions against her by one of her attorneys who also failed to represent her which resulted in a judgment against her and negligence or purposed fraud committed against her by another attorney she acquired.

When is someone going to step forward, put the brakes on all of this and settle this matter fairly and justly in the light of day with proper representation for Ms. Williams?  Furthermore, when will someone come forward from the Florida Bar and actually begin the investigation into the allegations of malpractice, fraud and theft in the matter?

We can’t make America great again if we don’t stand up for the weak against injustice.  Who knows when you will need someone to stand up for you!

You can contact Governor DeSantis on behalf of Ms. Williams below:

Executive Office of Governor Ron DeSantis
400 S Monroe St
Tallahassee, FL 32399
(850) 488-7146

Email Governor DeSantis

Email Lt. Governor Nuñez 

Additionally, you can contact Attorney General Ashley Moody on behalf of Ms. Williams below:

Office of Attorney General
State of Florida
The Capitol PL-01
Tallahassee, FL 32399-1050

(850) 414-3300

Finally, it may even help to contact the Florida Bar on Ms. Williams’ behalf to see if they will begin to investigate ethics violations, negligence and corruption that appears to have taken place with regards to Ms. Williams’ representation, legal agreements and rulings by judges in the cases.

The Florida Bar contact information:

The Florida Bar 
651 E. Jefferson Street
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2300

(850)561-5600

By Email

If You Are Compelled To Help Ms. Williams With Funds To Acquire An Attorney, Which Will Cost $15,000 In Order To Retain One, In Order To Help Her Fight Back, Along With Money To Simply Survive, Please Click Here To Donate To Her Go Fund Me Account.

Article posted with permission from The Washington Standard

List Of Major Corporations Who Oppose Your Right To Keep & Bear Arms

Last year, we asked the question, “Should Major Corporations Be Influencing Gun Control?”  The problem here is when major, private companies have centralized control. In a free market, corporations should be able to do what they want. If you don’t like it, you support a competitor. But that’s not the system we have in the U.S.  Instead, it’s a system where cronyism has allowed a few large corporations to have massive control, and there are huge hurdles to anyone trying to create an alternative.  With that in mind, Here’s a list of 25 corporations who are attacking your right to keep and bear arms.

Gunpowder Magazine provides this list:

Amazon Web Services
Amazon restricted user access to codeisfreespeech.com,, where users could access blueprints for making guns with a 3D printer.

Avis and Budget Car Rentals
Avis and Budget ended its participation in the NRA rewards program in March 2018.

Bank of America
Bank of America said in April it would stop financing manufacturers that make military-inspired firearms for civilians, such as AR-15s.

Buffalo Wild Wings
“In 2009, [Buffalo Wild Wings] announced a blanket no-gun policy at all of its locations,” ConservativeReview.com reports.

Citi Bank
Citi Bank told its retail business partners to prohibit the sale of firearms to customers younger than 21 and to those who have not passed a background check.

Chipotle
In 2014, Chipotle asked that customers not bring guns into its restaurants because “the display of firearms in our restaurants has now created an environment that is potentially intimidating or uncomfortable for many of our customers.”

Craigslist
Craiglist’s user policy prohibits weapons; firearms/guns and components; BB/pellet, stun, and spear guns; etc., ammunition, clips, cartridges, reloading materials, gunpowder, fireworks, and explosives.

Delta Airlines
Delta tweeted in February 2018 that it was ending the NRA’s contract for discounted rates and “requesting that the NRA remove our information from their website.”

Dick’s Sporting Goods/Field & Stream
The chain store enacted a new policy in 2018 that halted the sale of so-called “assault-style weapons” in their Field & Stream stores. The company announced it would destroy all the weapons pulled from its shelves. Dick’s CEO has since announced sales are down, and they may have to close the Field & Stream line of stores.

Enterprise Holdings (Alamo, Enterprise, and National)
Enterprise ended its discount program with the NRA amid the #BoycottNRA movement of 2018.

Facebook
Facebook prohibits ads that “promote the sale or use of weapons, ammunition, or explosives. This includes ads for weapon modification accessories.”

FedEx
FedEx ended the discount it offered NRA members shipping firearms after Gays Against Guns staged protests.

Hertz
Hertz ended its discount program with the NRA amid pressure from gun control groups.

Instagram
Instagram’s user policy says it prohibits buying or selling firearms.

Kroger
Kroger owns Fred Meyer stores, which no longer sell firearms to people under the age of 21.

Levi Strauss
Levi Strauss’s CEO announced in 2018 the iconic American denim company will be donating $1 million to Michael Bloomberg and gun control groups.

L.L. Bean
L.L. Bean no longer sells guns or ammo to people under the age of 21.

Reddit
Reddit updated its policies to forbid “[soliciting] or [facilitating]” transactions involving firearms, including “gun sales, drug sales, prostitution, stolen goods, personal information, and counterfeit official documents.”

REI
“The Seattle-based outdoor retailer said March 1 [2018] that it was halting future orders of some popular brands — including CamelBak water carriers, Giro helmets and Camp Chef stoves — whose parent company, Vista Outdoor, also makes assault-style rifles,” The Los Angeles Times reported.

Shopify
Shopify changed its user policy to prohibit the sale of certain firearms and accessories. Retailers who use the platform say this move will likely cost them hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Starbucks
Starbucks published an open letter in 2013 from its CEO asking patrons not to bring firearms into Starbucks stores or seating areas.

Target
Target issued a statement in 2014 saying, “Bringing firearms to Target creates an environment that is at odds with the family-friendly shopping and work experience we strive to create. Starting today we will also respectfully request that guests not bring firearms to Target – even in communities where it is permitted by law.”

Toms Shoes
Toms announced it will use $5 million to advance universal background checks.

Twitter
Twitter’s user policy says it “prohibits the promotion of weapons and weapon accessories globally.”

United Airlines
United has ended its partnership with the NRA.

Walmart
Walmart raised the age for purchase of firearms and ammunition from 18 to 21 years old and removed “online items resembling assault-style rifles.”

Wyndham Hotel Group
Wyndham ended its affiliation with the NRA amidst pressure from the gun control lobby.

YouTube
YouTube curtailed content intending to sell firearms or provide instructions on firearm manufacturing.

Many of the corporations listed above are actively working to change the social perception about the right to keep and bear arms.  In other words, they are using their corporate status to propagandize the people against the law, the US Constitution.  Perhaps it’s time to rethink just granting corporate status indefinitely and start reining that status in every few years to keep them from having so much power.

Additionally, in the past, we have also listed a plethora of big banks that are also targeting guns, gun dealers and gun owners.

Finally, following the Parkland incident in 2018, a number of businesses cut off their relationship with Second Amendment advocates at the National Rifle Association.  These included:

Life Line Screening – link to email form

1-800-718-0961

Starkey Hearing Technologies – link to email form, access under “Contact”

1-800-328-8602

ManageUrID – no online form found for email

1-888-759-7866

Life Insurance Central —  link to email form

1-800-789-3112, ext. 6124

Medical Concierge Network – link to email form, still offering discounts to NRA members

1-800-352-6094

eHealth – no link for email, press inquiries can be made here

1-844-229-4337

Lockton – link to email form, various offices

1-816-960-9000 – Kansas City office

Hotel Planner – link to contact form,  use “General” in list on right side

1-800-898-1347

Vinesse Wines – link to snail mail address and phone number;  Still showing preference to NRA

1-800-331-5578

FedEx – link to email form;  Still showing alliance with NRA

1-800-GoFedEx;  1-800-463-3339

First National Bank of Omaha – link to email form;  number to request specific bank

1-800-642-0014

Enterprise Rent A Car – link to email form

1-855-266-9565, customer service

Alamo Rent A Care – link to email form

1-844-357-5138

National Rent A Car – link to email form “customer service and support”

1-844-393-9989

Symantec (Norton Security Products) – link to form, go through selections

1-650-527-8000

Life Lock Identity Protection – link to customer service page

1-800-543-3562

MetLife – link to contact info;  click “contact us” in upper right hand corner of page

1-800-MetLife

Chubb (carry guard insurance for gun owners) – link to contact page

No phone found

SimpliSafe (home security system) – link to email form

1-888-957-4675

TelaDoc (online doctor service) – link to corporate address page

1-844-798-3810

Hertz Rent A Car – link to customer support page featuring Live Chat

1-877-826-8782

Allied Van Lines – link to “contact us” page;  scroll halfway down for email

1-800-470-2851, option 3

North American Van Lines – link to “contact us” page with email

1-800-348-2111

Avis Rent A Car – link to “comments and feedback” page;  choose “other” in dropdown box

1-800-352-7900

Budget Rent A Car – link to snail mail address and phone number

1-800-214-6094

Wild Apricot (web hosting) – link to snail mail address

1-877-493-6090

TrueCar (automotive information and car discount) – link to email form

1-888-TrueCar;  1-888-878-3227

Article posted with permission from Guns In The News

Eric Holder In Custody On Suspicion Of Murder Of Nipsey Hussle

It was reported earlier that Grammy nominee Nipsey Hussle was murdered in broad daylight while working on a documentary following the life of Dr. Sebi—real name—Alfredo Darrington Bowman, and his alleged cures for cancer and AIDS.  Many have come forward and believe this is the reason for the murder.  On Tuesday afternoon, California police arrested a suspect in the killing of Hussle, Eric Holder.

No, this isn’t Fast and Furious, Contempt of Congress Eric Holder.

CBS Los Angeles reports:

The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department told CBS2 that 29-year-old Eric Holder was caught by deputies sometime before 1:30 p.m. in the 9900 block of Artesia Boulevard. Los Angeles police responded to the scene and confirmed the man arrested was indeed Holder.

LAPD Chief Michel Moore told reporters Tuesday that Holder, a gang member, approached Hussle and the other men he was with several times Sunday and spoke with them. Holder then returned with a handgun and opened fire.

“Mr. Holder walked up on multiple occasions and engaged in a conversation with Nipsey and the others that were there. He left and subsequently came back armed with a handgun, and purposefully and r

Following the shooting, Holder fled in a 2016 Chevrolet Cruz being driven by an unidentified woman. Investigators were searching for the female getaway driver at last report.

Moore said that Holder had been engaged in some kind of dispute with Hussle, but did not specify the details of that dispute.

According to Moore, “At this point in our investigation, based on witness statements, and the background of those that we’ve identified, we believe this to be a dispute between Mr. Hussle and Mr. Holder.”

“It appears to be a personal matter between the two of them in regards to a dispute, and I’ll leave it at that,” Moore added.

Holder’s capture came just hours after LAPD Chief Michel Moore called upon Holder to surrender during a press conference, urging citizens to not provide shelter to him.

“To Mr. Holder, who I am confident is watching this … I ask him to surrender,” Moore pleaded.

“There should be no safe haven for this individual,” said Moore. “This is a man who is of substantial risk to public safety and willing to use violence and we want to see that stop.”

According to Page Six:

The slaying came just one day before Hussle, a reformed one-time gang member, was set to meet with LAPD brassto strategize on how to steer kids away from the streets, but Moore stressed that the slaying appeared motivated by a personal beef.

“We believe this to be a dispute between Mr. Hussle and Mr. Holder,” said Moore.

He declined to reveal the nature of their feud, but Holder reportedly had confronted Hussle minutes before the shooting, demanding to know whether he’d dropped a dime on him to cops.

Article posted with permission from Sons Of Liberty Media

Another Democrat Subpoena To The White House Issued After Security Clearance “Issues” Alleged By Whistleblower

The House Oversight Committee voted to authorize a subpoena for a former adjudications manager in the White House Personnel Security Office to testify behind closed doors as part of an investigation into the security clearance process of the Trump administration.

Prior to the hearing on Tuesday, Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD) claimed to have received a letter that alleged national security concerns that 25 officials had received security clearances “improperly.”  The allegations by the whistleblower claim that those 25 people were denied security clearance by the White House Personnel Security Office only to have those overturned by the White House.

Jennie Taer reports:

Tricia Newbold, who was the adjudications manager in the White House Personnel Security Office told Cummings and a bipartisan staff that her office had issued 25 denials of security clearances that have been overturned by the White House.

However, the Republican staff on the committee responded to both Cummings and Newbold. The members complained that Cummings “cherrypicked” partisan information and didn’t not give ample opportunity for Republican members to respond to Newbold.

In the rebuttal letter, Republican staff stated: 
  • Ms. Newbold generally focused her testimony on her concerns about Carl Kline, who served as OSCO’s Director of Personnel Security (and Ms. Newbold’s manager) until June 2018. Kline left the White House in January 2019.
  • Ms. Newbold’s primary concern with Kline was that he disagreed with her adjudication determinations in 25 cases, granting favorable adjudications when Ms. Newbold had recommended unfavorable outcomes.
  •  Ms. Newbold also lodged complaints about the office’s environment—ranging from how office files are stored, to the manner in which employees were required to scan documents into emails, to the physical position of aKline’s computer monitor on the desk inside of his office.

• Ms. Newbold testified that OSCO has been plagued by poor management during the majority of her 18-year tenure as an employee. She acknowledged, however, that the Trump Administration has implemented improvements to the office.

According to Cummings letter, Newbold’s concerns were serious and need further investigation. 
  • Why whistleblower came forward: “I would not be doing a service to myself, my country, or my children if I sat back knowing that the issues that we have could impact national security.”
  • The impact to national security: Security clearance applications for White House officials “were not always adjudicated in the best interest of national security.”
  • White House retaliation: “I’m terrified of going back. I know that this will not be perceived in favor of my intentions, which is to bring back the integrity of the office.”
  • Congress needs to act now: “this is my last hope to really bring the integrity back into our office.”

Now, if this is, in fact, going on, it is a serious concern.  After all, people wondered how in the world domestic terrorists Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn made it in the White House during the usurpers stay in the People’s House.

However, it was New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez who simply had to chime in with one of the most silly statements she could make.

“Every day that we go on without getting to the bottom of this matter is a day that we are putting hundreds if not potentially thousands of Americans at risk. I mean, really, what is next, putting nuclear codes in Instagram DMs?!? This is ridiculous.” said Ocasio Cortez.

Yeah, that’s not exactly the same thing and to be honest, unless someone had the particular security clearance, those codes would be meaningless anyway.  However, it’s not quite the same thing, but if there is an undermining of the security process, then that does need to be looked at.

The White House has referred to the security clearance investigation as “dangerous” and “shameful” and more than likely, they are probably correct, given the fact that the Democrat Party has been absolutely rabid to catch President Trump in anything at all in order to start impeachment proceedings against him.  This White House has been under investigation for two years with investigators having absolutely nothing to show for their investigation into alleged Russian collusion, and failing to arrest the actual colluders with Russia in the Obama administration.

On Monday, Kushner told Laura Ingraham, “I’ve been accused of all different types of things, all have been false.”

I guess we’ll find out whether or not this is more Christine Blasey Ford soap opera politics or whether there are any merits to the allegations soon enough.

Why Did The Florida Judicial System Render A Final Judgment Against A Rape Victim Without Giving Her Time To Defend Herself?

I’ve been bringing you the story of Deanna Williams, a single mother and grandmother who is currently pregnant and suffering from multiple sclerosis.  She is also the victim of rape.  Not nearly a day goes by now that I don’t learn something new in the case where attorneys are going after her for profit without any justification for doing so and seeking to use the court as a weapon against this defenseless woman.  In looking at the public record of documents near the end of 2017, it becomes clear that not only did the court render a final judgment against Ms. Williams to the tune of over $1 million, most of which was awarded to an attorney who had performed no legal services for Ms. Williams during her rape case nor was his firm a part of offering anything in that case, but it also deprived Ms. Williams right to defend herself and argue against a court order that came two full days after the final judgment.

To catch up on this case, please view the following previous articles:

According to attorney Nicole Spence of Affordable Law, who filed a motion to vacate on behalf of Ms. Williams, the order is to come before a final judgment.  Once the final judgment is issued, that is basically the end of the case.  However, as you will see, that did not happen, and I will let the reader and the Florida Bar, as well as Governor DeSantis and Attorney General Ashley Moody determine just how much corruption, negligence, conspiracy, malpractice, ethics violations and downright criminality has been engaged in by the court, Ms. Williams’ attorneys and the plaintiff in the case by the actual records of the court.

All of the documents below can be easily obtained from the public record at LeeClerk.org under case 13-CA-003181.

First, understand that three final judgments were entered into the record, along with the report and recommendation of the general magistrate on the same day, 11-27-2017.

All three final judgments were signed on November 20, 2017, by Judge Jay B. Rosman, who would be busted in a prostitution ring sting only a few weeks later.  Keep that in mind.

Here are those documents.

 

Notice that Scott Mager and Mager Paruas, an attorney and firm that never offered nor were part of the original civil rape case of Ms. Williams were ever involved nor render any services, even though, according to court records, Scott Mager of Mager Paruas LLC claimed that it was “the law firm that handled the litigation for which Judge Rosman awarded entitlement to all reasonable fees and costs.”  Ms. Williams alleges that Mager purchased the rights to sue her from attorney Michael Dolce, and Mr. Dolce claims that is untrue.  Yet, Mager and Mager Paruas are attempting to collect more than $1 million from Ms. Williams when they provided absolutely no litigation services to Ms. Williams.

Now, take a look at the date on the report and recommendation of the general magistrate, November 22, 2017, a full two days after the final judgment.

Where I come from, we say “something is more crooked than a dog’s hind leg here.”   I’m not the only one that thinks so either.  Attorney Nicole Spence also believes something is out of order here because the Magistrate is not a judge, and a recommendation must come before a final judgment as to give the defense a time to argue against it.  That never happened.

There seems to be a serious violation of the rights of Ms. Williams here.

Additionally, as I have pointed out, a higher court ruled that the attorneys who were suing Ms. Williams had no standing and no evidence of such standing and reverse the lowered court’s ruling to hold Ms. Williams’ assets, but not Judge Rosman.  He acted against the court’s ruling and ordered the $200,000 illegally intercepted without authorization by Ms. Williams’ attorney at the time, Ware Cornell, to be split 50-50 between Ms. Williams and Scott Mager.  That money, according to Ms. Williams, is stolen funds, which is in the possession of Scott Mager of Mager Paruas.

Additionally, Mager also received another $200,000 of Ms. Williams money due to what Ms. Williams previous attorney, Mike Chianopolis, called an error and which Ms. Williams claims was a fraud upon the court.  Mr. Mager sought to receive all of the remaining settlement payments promised to Ms. Williams, even though that was not the agreement reached by her and her counsel, Mr. Chianopolis, and he even filed a motion and affidavit to the effect that what was entered into court records was not what was agreed upon on June 1, 2018.  Yet, the money continued to go to Mager, money that she desperately needs now for medical care due to a high-risk pregnancy and to retain an attorney to represent her.

This woman’s life has been destroyed.  First, via a rape.  Second, attorneys who were supposed to represent her and look after her interests have time and again been negligent, engaged in malpractice, theft, and incompetence… or they have conspired to rob Ms. Williams and use her in a bigger plan to force Ms. Williams to sue Gloria Allred for an even bigger payout.  I don’t know which it is, but there is definitely enough for the governor, the attorney general, the Florida Bar and the governing body that deals with judges in the state to get involved and get involved quickly.

Ms. Williams has lost her home.  She is about to lose her car.  She is also about to lose the apartment she is living in, and all that can be done in this matter is that an attorney, Scott Mager, who provided no litigation services whatsoever to Ms. Williams, can do is push for a contempt of court enforcement against her that will seek to arrest her.

Deanna Williams and her grandchildren

If you are compelled to help Ms. Williams with funds to acquire an attorney, which will cost $15,000 in order to retain one, in order to help her fight back, along with money to simply survive, please click here to donate to her Go Fund Me account.

It should be noted that Mr. Mager wanted to depose Ms. Williams and was to do so by March 27, 2019.  Here is the record of attempts Ms. Williams made to set up deposition with Mr. Mager after her last attorney Daniel J. Endrizal, III withdrew from the case on March 19, 2019.

3/19/2019 – faxed fact info shett to Scott Mager

3/19/2019 – fax to set up depostion

3/19/2019 – phoned twice to set up deposition

3/19/2019 – emailed twice to set up deposition

3/20/2019 – emailed to set up deposition

3/20/2019 – phoned to set up deposition

3/21-2019 – emailed to set up deposition

3/21-2019 – phoned to set up deposition

3/22/2019 – emailed to set up deposition

3/22/2019 – phoned to set up deposition

3/25/2019 – emailed to set up deposition

3/26/2019 – emailed twice to set up deposition

3/27/2019 was the final day to be deposed as determined by the court order, and Scott Mager never returned her calls nor her emails to establish a time for deposition to meet the date of 3/27/2019.

Phone records and emails easily verify Ms. Williams’ claims.

Instead, Scott Mager’s assistant said that he would be available for deposition on April 17, 2019, nearly three weeks after he knew the court had set a date on, and Mr. Mager has been the one pressing the court to go after Ms. Williams.  All the final public records show this at LeeClerk.org.

Still, Ms. Williams made two final attempts as late as 3/29/2019 by phone to try and set up a deposition.

According to Ms. Williams, she spoke to an attorney about the April 17, 2019 date for deposition and was told that it was a trap set for her and that she should respond to the assistant by requesting deposition within the time frame allotted by the court or asking that they set aside the contempt order and writ of bodily attachment before agreeing to a deposition date outside of the court’s parameters.

Attorney Scott Mager never responded, but he did appeal to the court to enforce the contempt charges and have Ms. Williams arrested.

While the court claims that Williams is not compliant with the court, their own records show that the court infringed on Ms. Williams rights to be heard and that Mr. Mager failed to work with Ms. Williams in the constraints of what the court ordered.

Williams is alone, with child and threatened by a court that has not rendered justice to her, poor due to theft from her own attorney and alleged fraud upon the court by the attorney pursuing her, according to her previous attorney.

I ask you, can you not help this woman?  I ask putting my money where my mouth is.  I have helped and I’m asking you to do the same.  Additionally, if you are an attorney or know of an attorney who might take this case on contingency, please, click Contact at the top of the page and provide me a number to get in touch with you and I will have Ms. Williams contact you.  She is in desperate need of your help.

If you are compelled to help Ms. Williams with funds to acquire an attorney, which will cost $15,000 in order to retain one, in order to help her fight back, along with money to simply survive, please click here to donate to her Go Fund Me account.

Finally, there is already a Bar investigator that has been assigned to Ms. Williams concerning the attorneys involved in this case for which she is filing a complaint.  I ask, where is Governor DeSantis?  Where is Attorney General Ashley Moody?  Ms. Williams has even been in touch with members of the Trump administration with a response.  America, you say you want to make America great again.  Well, you can’t make it great if you don’t stand up for the weak against injustice.  Who knows when you will need someone to stand up for you!

You can contact Governor DeSantis on behalf of Ms. Williams below:

Executive Office of Governor Ron DeSantis
400 S Monroe St
Tallahassee, FL 32399
(850) 488-7146

Email Governor DeSantis

Email Lt. Governor Nuñez 

Additionally, you can contact Attorney General Ashley Moody on behalf of Ms. Williams below:

Office of Attorney General
State of Florida
The Capitol PL-01
Tallahassee, FL 32399-1050

(850) 414-3300

Finally, it may even help to contact the Florida Bar on Ms. Williams’ behalf to see if they will begin to investigate ethics violations, negligence and corruption that appears to have taken place with regards to Ms. Williams’ representation, legal agreements and rulings by judges in the cases.

The Florida Bar contact information:

The Florida Bar 
651 E. Jefferson Street
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2300

(850)561-5600

By Email

If you are compelled to help Ms. Williams with funds to acquire an attorney, which will cost $15,000 in order to retain one, in order to help her fight back, along with money to simply survive, please click here to donate to her Go Fund Me account.

Article posted with permission from The Washington Standard

Washington State Police Chief & Sheriff Declare Their Constitutional Duties To Not Infringe On Rights Of Gun Owners Despite Attorney General’s Threats

The Second Amendment Foundation and National Rifle Association filed a lawsuit in federal court challenging gun control Initiative 1639 in Washington state last year after voters voted to violate the rights of their fellow citizens and the Constitution that protects the rights of those citizens.  However, while the state’s attorney general has threatened that sheriffs and police officers are to enforce the law and also threatened that they could be held liable for those who purchase semiautomatic rifles under the age of 21, many are speaking out saying that they have a constitutional duty and have taken an oath to not infringe on the rights of the citizens.

In February, Washington state Attorney General Bob Ferguson wrote an open letter to the state’s law enforcement representatives demanding that they must enforce the state’s new unconstitutional gun law.

Not only does the new law violate the Second and Fifth Amendments to the US Constitution by adding background checks for those who purchase semiautomatic rifles, but also demands they must store them the way government claims they must store them, along with a waiting period to purchase firearms and not allowing anyone under 21 to purchase a semiautomatic rifle.

According to CNN:

Police chiefs who refuse to enforce Washington state’s new gun restrictions could be liable if that refusal results in someone buying a gun and committing a crime, state Attorney General Bob Ferguson says.

..
The section raising the minimum purchasing age went into effect January 1. The rest of the law, including the enhanced background checks, is to be implemented July 1. The new background checks would be identical to those the state has been performing for handgun buyers for years.

The Seattle Times reported that sheriffs from 13 of the state’s 39 counties have signaled they won’t enforce the law. The Chinook Observer put that number at 20.

In an open letter on Tuesday, Ferguson called out police chiefs and sheriffs who are refusing to enforce the law: “In the event a police chief or sheriff refuses to perform the background check required by Initiative 1639, they could be held liable if there is a sale or transfer of a firearm to a dangerous individual prohibited from possessing a firearm and that individual uses that firearm to do harm.”

The letter also said, “Local law enforcement officials are entitled to their opinions about the constitutionality of any law, but those personal views do not absolve us of our duty to enforce Washington laws and protect the public.”

The attorney general’s open letter noted that local law enforcement has discretion to prioritize its resources, but said, “Enforcement discretion, however, cannot subvert the rule of law.”

Sorry, Mr. AG, but when that “law” is repugnant to the Constitution, it is null and void, and you have no authority to either write the “law” nor enforce it.

“Following other law enforcement officials across Washington, including Grays Harbor County Sheriff Rick Scott, Pacific County Sheriff Robin Souvenir came out Friday to voice concerns with voter-approved Initiative 1639,” according to KXRO.

The problem is all of this is that voters do not have a right to vote down the God-given rights of other citizens.

Furthermore, threats from the AG to hold sheriffs and police officers accountable for the crimes of other individuals is unconstitutional and highly immoral (Deuteronomy 24:16; Ezekiel 18:20).

Lincoln County Sheriff Wade Magers told Gunpowder Magazine, “The bottom line is that we have Constitutional duties with our oath of office,  There’s not anything for sheriffs to enforce yet. Other than the laws sounding good, there’s not much we can do.”

Gunpowder Magazine also reported:

Magers contends that the laws were written and sold to the public in such a way that they distort the duties of a law enforcement officer. The police do not play a part in selling weapons; they do not handle background checks – those are left to the National Crime Information Center within the Federal Bureau of Investigations – and they cannot legally knock on doors to ensure firearm owners are securing their weapons properly. Such action would violate the Fourth Amendment.

“Hypotheticals aside, there really is no practical scenario in which we can enforce any of 1639,” Magers said. “Just because you start an initiative and get a bunch of signatures doesn’t mean it’s right.”

Sheriffs in Okanogan, Cowlitz, Douglas, Benton, Pacific, Stevens, Yakima, Wahkiakum, Mason, and Klickitat Counties also said they will wait until the courts decide on the legality of the laws.

Washington Police Chief Loren Culp rightly stated in a Facebook post the state’s gun confiscation initiatives don’t supersede the Second Amendment of the US Constitution.

“I’ve taken three public oaths, one in the US Army and Two as a police officer,” Culp wrote on his Facebook page. “All of them included upholding and defending the Constitution of the United States of America. The second amendment says the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. As long as I am Chief of Police, no Republic Police Officer will infringe on a citizen’s right to keep and Bear Arms, PERIOD!”

Sheriff Souvenir, who was placed in office this year, issued a statement saying that his office “will continue to investigate all complaints we receive from our community members but until the legality of Initiative 1639 is resolved by the courts these Initiative matters will be documented only.”

No matter what the courts say, the Constitution is clear:  the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.  That right is not up for debate, mob vote or majority rule.  It is an established God-given right, or liberty, that all men are endowed with by their Creator.

Tyrants don’t believe this because, just as Lucifer did, they want to be God.  By the way, this is exactly what the Beast is all about.  It’s about a government that believes its laws are higher than the Creator’s laws.

New Zealand: Door-to-Door Gun Confiscation Targets Thousands – One Man Already Reported Dead

Listen carefully.  Your right to both keep and bear arms is a right given to you by your Creator and any man who attempts to deprive you of that right is a tyrant, period.  Yet, this is what the government of New Zealand, which has bowed to Islam as evidenced by their Prime Minister, a woman wearing a hijab, pontificating on installing pretended laws to disarm the population after the alleged Christchurch mosque shooting.  Now, after thousands have been targeted in door-to-door gun confiscations, it’s being reported that at least one man is dead due to the tyrannical policies of New Zealand.

Following questionable video of an alleged attack in Christchurch on a mosque, a video which has been outlawed in New Zealand with threats around the world for anyone even posting it online to comment (If you need a copy of it, I have one), Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and the tyrants in government there, issued ex post facto “laws” to outlaw firearms that were previously considered legal.

Like what took place in Maryland last year while executing the unconstitutional red flag “laws” there in which one man was killed, the same has apparently occurred in New Zealand.

The Truth About Guns reports:

According to members of New Zealand’s largest firearm forum, Kiwi police are starting to go to gun owners’ places of employment, homes, and even visiting gun ranges in an attempt to gather information and get gun owners to relinquish their firearms.

Police are apparently trolling social media websites in an attempt to spot the newly outlawed firearms and seeking to steal them from their owners.

And what has been the result? According to Stuff which appears to be the New Zealand equivalent of The Patch . . .

A former Russian soldier who feared going back to prison tried to call his son before dying of a suspected suicide following a three-hour standoff with police.

The family of 54-year-old Troy Dubovskiy told Stuff he was sought by police after his property in the Christchurch suburb of St Martins was searched on Tuesday.

Police acted on information from the public.

His son posted a photo of him wearing a Russian Army Helmet and posing with an airsoft rifle on social media.

Dubovskiy’s 16-year-old son, who Stuff has decided not to name, said police searched the homes of his father, mother and grandparents after someone reported a photo the teen made his profile picture on Facebook five days ago.

The photo, which he first posted to Facebook several years ago, shows the teen holding a replica rifle and wearing a Russian helmet. The teen used the equipment along with his father while playing Airsoft, a team sport where people shoot each other with pellets using replica guns.

During a search of the home, police found a blank pistol, an airsoft rifle, and an SKS carbine; the latter is now illegal under the new “assault rifle” ban.

Sadly, both Democrats and Republicans are pushing for the same kinds of unconstitutional “laws” in states and in DC, including President Donald Trump.

Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) warned the American people that both parties were going after your guns and to be vigilant.

This is going on in New Zealand.

It’s also going on in many states in our nation.

It’s long past time for the men of the counties to band together behind constitutional sheriff to oppose this tyranny.  If we don’t, we are surely going to be destroyed.

CO Sheriff On Unconstitutional Red Flag Bill: “I’ll Go To Jail Before I’ll Violate Somebody’s Constitutional Rights”

I have always appreciated constitutional sheriffs, especially when it comes to them taking a stand that might even put themselves and their freedom in jeopardy.  In a recent report, a Colorado sheriff said that he would rather go to jail than enforce the unconstitutional red flag bill that the House is seeking to pass which would infringe upon the constitutional rights of citizens in his country.

House Bill 19-1177 is a tyrannical bill that seeks to operate under the terms of Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs), or what is commonly called “red flag laws.”  They aren’t laws since they violate the Constitution and the rights of the people.  They are lawless pretended laws.

Weld County Sheriff Steve Reams was asked by CNN, “Are you willing to sit in your own jail to avoid enforcing this law?” according to the Greeley Tribune.

“Well obviously no sheriff wants to be confined in their own jail, but if that’s what it takes to get this bill ironed out, then I guess that’s a sacrifice I’ll be forced to make,” Reams replied. “The worst way to bring attention to it is for me to be put in that position, but I’ll do that before I’ll violate somebody’s constitutional rights.”

Sheriff Reams is currently in court to seek to keep the bill from being made into “law.”

“We’re working hard to try to figure out a mechanism to get this into the courts before anybody is harmed by it,” Reams said. “Unfortunately, someone has to be damaged by it first. It comes down to whether I want to take this to court for violating somebody’s rights or for me refusing to enforce a court order.”

You might say, well, what good is just one sheriff?  I ask you, what good was one little shepherd boy with a sling and some rocks against an armored giant?

The fact of the matter is that it isn’t just one sheriff.

More than half of the 64 counties in Colorado have declared themselves to be “Second Amendment Sanctuary County,” which means they are ignoring these types of unconstitutional gun laws.  Many counties in New Mexico are also declaring themselves to be Second Amendment Sanctuary Counties, as well.  I wish they would ignore every gun law, which would make them completely constitutional in the matter.

Should the bill pass and be signed by the governor, it could be used against sheriff’s like Reams to either arrest them or fine them indefinitely.  Of course, since the sheriff is the supreme law officer in the county, he could simply deputize every able man he desires to do so that is on his side and mount and opposition against anything the state wanted to try and do to him.

However, the Communists advancing the unlawful bill, such as Democratic House Majority Leader Alec Garnett, aren’t worried about the sheriffs being arrested and spending time in jail.

Garnett said he “won’t lose any sleep” over the arrest of sheriffs being jailed for standing for the Constitution.

No, Garnett claims, “What I’m going to lose sleep over is, if that’s the choice that they make and someone loses their life, someone in crisis goes on a shooting spree, (or) someone commits suicide” because the gun was not stolen from the individual.

First, Garnett will sleep sound in his little bed.  He won’t lose a wink of sleep.  Second, I use the term “stolen” because unless a crime has occurred or there is an indictment, per our Constitution, to go and take people’s property or liberty is a violation of their rights.

Mr. Garnett is promoting theft by the government of Colorado.  So is Rep. Tom Sullivan, whose son was killed in the Aurora shooting in 2012.  He is a co-sponsor of the bill.

While I sympathize with the loss of his son, Rep. Tom Sullivan is also promoting government theft of law-abiding citizens’ property.  Both of these men should be called out for the criminals they are and impeached from their seats of representation by the people.

As for Sheriff Reams and others like him in the state of Colorado and across the country, there are plenty citizens such as myself you can call on in your respective counties that will stand with you against the tyrants and their pretended laws.  All you have to do is call on us.

Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media

Rape Victim Claims Gloria Allred Failed To Honor Agreement – Now She Faces Threats Of Arrest & Judgments Of Over $1 Million

I’ve reported on the story of Deanna Williams in a series of articles.  In those articles, I have referenced the woman who refers to herself as “the most famous female attorney in the country” to the wishes of Ms. Williams concerning the report.  However, following another interview with Ms. Williams and seeing her case is desperate to the point of threats of arrest, Williams believes attorney Gloria Allred has failed to honor their agreement.

If you are unfamiliar with the story, there are three previous reports:

The last report and video interview took place just a few days ago.

Ms. Allred has been hailed in the media as an attorney who comes to the aid of women, and no doubt she did so in the matter of Ms. Williams, but Ms. Williams claims that Allred failed to honor her retainer agreement by making sure that previous attorneys were paid.

Ms. Williams has desperately attempted to have attorneys come to her aid after numerous attorneys she employed acted inappropriately, unprofessionally, negligently and even what seems to be criminally, according to Williams.

As Ms. Williams awaits being interviewed by a Florida Bar investigator for several attorneys she has hired to represent her who seem to have engaged in malpractice, theft and negligence, she remains under threat of arrest.  However, though the case may be confusing to many because it seems to have “many working parts,” it appears that Ms. Williams’ problems come down to one specific thing.  She claims, and her retainer agreement with Gloria Allred and Jonathan Heller appear to confirm, that her attorneys were to pay her previous attorney fees and liens from the money they received in her rape settlement case.

The specific words of the retainer agreement dated August 14, 2012, read exactly, including underline, as follows under the heading “Attorney’s Fees.”

“As for attorneys fees, you agree to pay us a fee equal to forty (40%) percent of the gross amount recovered.  This percentage constitutes the entire amount of fees you will be responsible to pay us, as well as all your prior counsel.  Towards that end, we will take all reasonable steps to negotiate prior counsels’ undetermined fees which they may claim by way of their respectively filed charging liens.  This includes the claim of your first layer, Peter Itzler.”

Williams told The Washington Standard that she had a great concern with changing attorneys because she wanted to make sure prior attorneys fees would be paid out of the money the new attorneys would receive if they were able to settle the case.

As you can see from the direct words of the retainer, which is not part of the non-disclosure agreement in the rape case, attorneys Jonathan A. Heller, Gloria Allred and Nathan Goldberg agreed to receive 40% of the final settlement in the case, which they were able to resolve in a matter of weeks.

The amount of the settlement is unknown due to a non-disclosure agreement signed by Ms. Williams.  That amount is irrelevant to her claim.

If these fees and liens were paid, there would never have been a suit against her by attorneys in 2013, and the subsequent court allowing what it calls a “substitution” of attorney Scott Mager of Mager Paruas to the plaintiffs in place of Michael Dolce, a man who purchased the right to sue Williams from  Dolce, according to Ms. Williams.  Williams claims that if Mager had purchased a settled judgment, it would be legal under Florida law, but she says that a third party, who never aided her in her rape case interfering is illegal.

To be fair, I have contacted an attorney and paralegal for assistance in simply understanding a couple of phrases in the section I mentioned.  When I mentioned the fact that the wording read “respectively filed charging liens,” I was told that is where the loophole was and that since a 2016 ruling by Judge LaRose reversed a previous temporary injunction on the holding of Ms. Williams’ assets in this case.  The reason, according to Judge LaRose was “because the trial court committed legal error in granting the motion to preserve assets,” as well as “neither the magistrate nor the trial court held an evidentiary hearing… substantial, competent evidence was not provided to establish entitlement to a temporary injunction.”

Williams claims that the attorneys did speak about the payment to the attorneys between themselves.  So, clearly, they were aware of liens and fees prior to taking on the case.

During transition, Ms. Williams previously retained her new attorney Gloria Allred and they did speak with one another about fees and whether or not they were wanted to stay on the case at the service of Mr. Heller.

Calls to Mr. Heller have gone unreturned, and according to Ms. Williams, when she asked for canceled checks or verification that her previous attorney fees and liens were taken care of, he failed to provide evidence.

Thus, this is why she has been placed in the situation she is in from 2013 to the present.  While it is true that the court is merely acting as the court, one would think that seeing the dire nature of this woman’s condition and threat of arrest in a case in which a man, Scott Mager, who had no skin in the game during her original rape case though he continues to claim to have been in this “from the beginning,” is awarded over $1 million dollars.  This was largely due to the fact that Williams’ attorney had filed his appearance in the inactive rape case rather than the one he was retained to represent her in.  This led to Williams not having any representation in the court and ultimately a final judgment against her for over $1 million.  Additionally, that attorney, G. Ware Cornell, intercepted a $200,000 payment that was to be paid to Ms. Williams, which she never authorized him to do and at least $100,000 of that money was issued to Scott Mager under direction of Judge Jay B. Rosman, who just weeks later would be arrested in a prostitution ring sting.

It’s interesting that a judge who was busted for a sex crime is presiding over a case resulting from a sex crime.

In a letter submitted to the court on March 19, 2019, Williams pleaded with the court about the unethical nature of what has transpired.  Here is the full text of her letter as typed via the Lee County court documents in the case (13-CA-3181).

As you’re aware, I’m the rape victim Mr. Mager purchased the rights to sue for profit after attorney Ware Cornell made the error of entering his appearance under the inactive rape case which allowed a default judgment opening the door for Mr. mager to profit after my rights were denied and funds were stolen by wire fraud by Attorney G. Ware Cornell who then promised the intercepted fund to Mr. Mager.

As Mr. Mager is aware, by email to Mike Corso in Octboer 2017, Ware Cornell falsely claimed authorization to receive funds on my behalf and requested that a $200,000 payment be wired to Mr. Cornell instead of being sent to me.  The stolen funds were later distributed by Judge Jay B. Rosman who distributed stolen funds more than a month after the theft.  The attempt to clean up the stolen funds by Distributing them through a judge who was arrested for a sex crime while presiding over a case arising from a sex crime makes the funds that Mr. Mager is still in receipt of no less stolen.

Mr. Mager continues to commit crimes against me using the court as a weapon and a shield to conceal his illegal acts.  In May of 2018, Mr. Mager, submitted to the court and agreed entry that was absolutely fraudulent.  Both sides had not agreed to irrevocably transfer any funds in the underlying case to Mr. Mager.  It flies in the face of reason to believe I would have agreed to such a thing.  It is simply preposterous.  In an affidavit filed with the court upon discovery of the fraudulent order, my attorney at the time Mike Chionopoulos details the “error.”

The level of Mager’s hubris while requesting that a rape victim with multiple sclerosis dealing with complications of a high-risk pregnancy and PTSD be jailed for contempt for not turning over extensive financial documents which are nearly impossible to provide after losing her home due to Mr. Mager’s theft of hundreds of thousands of dollars is astonishing.  It would shock the conscience of anyone who possesses a conscience.  Mr. Mager is not a victim of anything but an individual who knowingly bought the rights to sue a rape victim for profit after Michael Dolce abandoned the case after Dolce missed important deadlines and walked out of mediation in the underlying case crying when opposing counsel didn’t want to hear explicit details of Dolce being anally raped as a child.

It is in light of Mr. Mager’s repeated dishonesty and omission of relevant fact before the court that I ask that all attempts to threaten and intimidate using the court as a weapon stop immediately.  I asked that deposition respect my disabilities as a woman with multiple sclerosis and and complex medical issues at present.  I ask that deposition is set at a time that works for both parties and I am no longer threatened with arrest.

Unfortunately, due to Mr. Mager’s continued possession of funds stolen from me by fraud upon the court, I am unable to be represented by counsel.  I cannot even afford necessary medical care.  I am most vulnerable as I have been denied the right to have representation due to the thefts erroneously reflected in court records as legitimate funds received by Scott Mager.

I am asking that my health and safety be respected during and before deposition.  I am requesting deposition be scheduled at a time agreeable to both parties.  I look forward to the record accurately reflecting what has happened in this case as opposed to Mr. Mager’s version of events as a party who did not participate in the underlying case.  Additionally, I ask that it be noted that I am being denied representation in this matter due to impossibility noted above.

Thank you,

Deanna Williams

Several calls to Mager Paruas for comment by The Washington Standard have gone unreturned.

What Ms. Williams is currently going through since 2013, following the settlement, appears to be because her previous attorneys were not paid as agreed to in the retainer.  If payment was made at the time, then this entire lawsuit is a fraud.  The lawsuit and prior settlement of fees cannot both be true.

Ms. Williams is in contact with both federal authorities, as well as the Florida Bar and Florida Attorney General in the matter and an interview is being scheduled with a Florida Bar investigator in the matter.

When The Washington Standard reached out to attorney Allred regarding the payment of previous attorneys, she responded directly in an email stating,

We represented Ms. Williams approximately 7 years ago.  She has had a number of lawyers since then.

Any legal problems that Ms. Williams faces has nothing to do with our representation of her and there is no factual basis for the assertions set forth in your email.

We suggest that you review the public documents in the case of Victim Justice, P.C., et al v. v. Deanna Williams, Case number 13-CA-003181 pending in Lee County, Florida, prior to making any further false statements.

Also, you do not appear to have possession of all the relevant confidential documents. Your statements are based on incomplete information which has led you to a false and misleading conclusion. Ethical rules which prohibit disclosure of attorney client communications preclude us from providing additional documents to you or commenting further.

It is true, I don’t have certain confidential documents.  I agree.  I have read the signed retainer agreement, and it seems fairly clear that if prior attorneys had been paid, Ms. Williams’ current situation would not be what it is, as an attorney who had nothing to do with the case is going after her for over $1 million.

Ms. Williams has also left voicemail messages at Ms. Allred’s office pleading with her and her associates to honor their agreement and pay the prior fees and liens with no response.

Now, I ask, why is that?

If you would like to help Ms. Williams not only survive as she has had virtually all her money stolen in the process of this, but acquire an attorney to fight back because they demand a retainer fee to take the case, there is a Go Fund Me page set up here.

You can contact Governor DeSantis on behalf of Ms. Williams below:

Executive Office of Governor Ron DeSantis
400 S Monroe St
Tallahassee, FL 32399
(850) 488-7146

Email Governor DeSantis

Email Lt. Governor Nuñez 

Additionally, you can contact Attorney General Ashley Moody on behalf of Ms. Williams below:

Office of Attorney General
State of Florida
The Capitol PL-01
Tallahassee, FL 32399-1050

(850) 414-3300

Finally, it may even help to contact the Florida Bar on Ms. Williams’ behalf to see if they will begin to investigate ethics violations, negligence and corruption that appears to have taken place with regards to Ms. Williams’ representation, legal agreements and rulings by judges in the cases.

The Florida Bar contact information:

The Florida Bar 
651 E. Jefferson Street
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2300

(850)561-5600

By Email

Article posted with permission from The Washington Standard

SPLC Employees Claim Organization Suffers From “Systemic Problems With Racism & Sexism”

Just a week after Southern Poverty Law Center President Richard Cohen resigned and two weeks after its co-founder Morris Dees was terminated, more employees are stepping forward and calling out the nonprofit group saying that the environment that they were in at SPLC was a culture of “systemic problems with racism and sexism.”

At least two dozen employees of SPLC signed a letter alleging “mistreatment, sexual harassment, gender discrimination, and racism” by the SPLC after Dees was fired.

Three current employees spoke to CNN.

CNN spoke with three current employees of the organization who talked on condition of anonymity because of fears over possible retribution.

It was one of those employees who cited the systemic problems with racism and sexism, and a second employee agreed with that assessment.

But one of the employees who spoke to CNN alleged the organization suffers from a “pervasive racist culture” and an environment in which a woman is not seen or heard. She also said qualified African-American employees were regularly passed over for promotions — including one African-American colleague she describes as brilliant. She added, “My boss only hires white people.”

I have to admit that while the situation is very serious and sad, it is interesting watching this hateful, bigoted organization eat itself.

Zero Hedge adds:

Conservative pundit Gavin McInnes has said that the SPLC wants everyone to believe that America is “frothing with bigots.” McInnes is suing the nonprofit for labeling his fraternal organization, the Proud Boys, a hate group

And as the Washington Examiner‘s Beckett Adams wrote last week, the Southern Poverty Law Center is a “scam,” which has taken “no care whatsoever for the reputational and personal harm it causes by lumping Christians and anti-extremist activists with actual neo-Nazis.”

As it turns out, the SPLC is a cynical money-making scheme, according to a former staffer’s blistering tell-all, published this week in the New Yorker. The center’s chief goal is to bilk naive and wealthy donors who believe it’s an earnest effort to combat bigotry.

The only thing worse than a snarling partisan activist is a slimy conman who merely pretends to be one. –Washington Examiner

““Outside of work,” recalls Bob Moser of his days working for the organization, “we spent a lot of time drinking and dishing in Montgomery bars and restaurants about … the hyperbolic fund-raising appeals, and the fact that, though the center claimed to be effective in fighting extremism, ‘hate’ always continued to be on the rise, more dangerous than ever, with each year’s report on hate groups. ‘The S.P.L.C.—making hate pay,’ we’d say.”

Of course, hiring the chief of staff of Michelle Obama, who was instrumental in fixing the Jussie Smollett “fake hate hoax” is probably not going to be a good public relations move for the SPLC in all of this, but not to worry, the media who has been using their lies for years, funded by George Soros, will no doubt continue to provide for this hateful, sexist, racist, bigoted criminal organization.

Article posted with permission from The Washington Standard

Pentagon Putting Your Tax Dollars To Work: Lobster, Crab, Alcohol, Golf Carts, Tubas & Trombones!

We’ve known for years the US government unconstitutionally spends money it doesn’t have and then puts the burden of that debt on the citizens.  And it’s continuing.  In the latest report this month, it was revealed that the Pentagon has been engaged in more wasteful spending of taxpayer dollars with purchases of lobster, crab, alcohol, golf carts, tubas, trombones and more.

In a report by Rick Sanchez breaks down the Pentagon’s wasteful spending.

Then constitutional attorney and president of the Rutherford Institute John Whitehead joins to weigh in on the colossal waste of tax money that the US “defense” budget represents and which puts the country ever deeper in debt.

None of this is about defense, and none of it is authorized in the US Constitution for Congress to fund nor the executive branch to spend on.

You’ll be astounded at what our government is spending our money on outside of the law, the US Constitution.

According to the report, $97 billion were spent on tubas and trombones, $1.7 million dollars on lobster and crab for many of the government contractors, $309,000 on alcohol and $567,000 on golf carts.

Let’s not even talk about the other unconstitutional spending that takes place in other agencies of the federal government.

President Trump promised an end to wasteful spending.  Why are things like this not being addressed?

Soros Bankrolled “Hate Crime” Database Used By Media With Claims By Debunked SPLC & Hamas-CAIR

The mainstream media is being exposed as the corporate, state-controlled puppets they are.  In a report this week, a massive “hate crime” database, which was used by more than 100 media outlets to report alleged hate crimes, was funded by none other than George Soros, according to tax documents and interviews.

Among those that contributed to the database are known liars such as the discredited SPLC and designated terror group Hamas-CAIR.

The Washington Free Beacon reports:

ProPublica, an investigative reporting nonprofit based in New York City, launched the project, known as “Documenting Hate,” in 2017. The New York Times backed the project in January 2017 editorial, “Why We Need a Project to Document Hate Crimes.”

“Reliable data on hate crimes is hard to come by. As reports of racist, anti-Semitic and Islamophobic harassment and attacks poured in after the election of Donald Trump, many Americans wondered whether they represented a nationwide increase in hate crime,” the Times editorial board wrote. “While the Southern Poverty Law Center saw a dramatic increase in reports after the election, it’s not yet clear whether this indicates a nationwide trend.”

ABC News later ran a piece titled, “Help ABC News, ProPublica and other newsrooms across America track hate crimes across the US” that also cites the SPLC as to why it is needed. The announcement urges the public to share their stories if they have been a victim of a hate crime.

The Beacon then added that the project received substantial backing by Soros.

The project received hundreds of thousands of dollars in funding from George Soros’s Foundation to Promote Open Society, according to the group’s most recent tax forms.

On page 321 of the Foundation to Promote Open Society’s 2017 tax forms, a $200,000 contribution is shown to ProPublica “to create a well-reported data set of hate crimes and to produce high-quality investigative reporting on the subject” while another $375,000 donation was made to ProPublica “to support the hate crimes tracking project.” Soros gave $200,000 more to the group, which was split between “general support” and a separate initiative on online price discrimination.

Soros vowed to put $10 million into combating hate crimes following Trump’s election.

Additionally, the Free Beacon reported:

While “Documenting Hate” is not specifically mentioned by name on the tax forms, the Soros donations were, in fact, for the project, which made it possible for the initiative to launch and maintain itself, according to a phone interview with Richard Tofel, the president of ProPublica.

Tofel said that the $375,000 contribution was used for “Documenting Hate” in 2017, while the $200,000 donation was used for 2018 so the group could maintain and continue the project. Soros was the first funder of the project; his grants expired in December. Google is now the funder of the project, according to Tofel.

Of course, we know that the leadership of the SPLC have either been fired or are headed for the exit doors about scandals of their own, which is not surprising in the least.

Two weeks ago, the SPLC fired it’s co-founder Morris Dees over sexual harassment and racism.  On the heels of that revelation, SPLC President Richard Cohen also let it be made known that he was on the way out as well.

Immediately following that news, the SPLC just stepped right into another controversy by hiring the usurper Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah’s senior advisor who fixed Jussie Smollett’s “hate crime” hoax, Tina Tchen.  Isn’t it nice to know that an organization that often brands decent, moral and upstanding, law-abiding citizens and organization as hateful, not only has a history of promoting “fake hate,” but then brings someone in that has recent history is fixing a “fake hate crime”?  It’s scandalous, which should be the first word now in SPLC.

Not only did the Free Beacon report that many of the alleged “hate crimes” were hoaxes and often self-inflicted, like Smollett’s, but that they were promoted by the SPLC and CAIR through media outlets as though it were actual real news.  I guess NewsGuard is going to need to work a little harder to prop up the mainstream media by red badging those they disagree with.

WND adds:

The author of “Hate Crime Hoax,” Wilfred Reilly, found more than 400 hate crime hoaxes while conducting research for his book.

Reilly, an assistant professor of political science at Kentucky State University, wrote in USA Today that the Jussie Smollett hoax is one of many widely reported instances.

He said “these cases are not isolated outliers.”

The website Fake Hate Crimes, citing news sources, has a running list of 353 hate-crime hoaxes.

Watch The Prayer That Made Democrats & Muslims Lose Their Minds (Video)

Islamic totalitarianism reared its ugly head this past week as an opening prayer of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives cause Democrats and Muslims, particularly the first Muslim woman to be sworn in to be offended and act completely inappropriately.

Rep. Movita Johnson-Harrell, D-Philadelphia, the first Muslim woman member of the House was to be sworn in on the same day the prayer occurred.

Of course, freshman Rep. Stephanie Borowicz, R-Clinton County, offered the opening prayer that day.  Here it is.

There is nothing controversial about the prayer for any red-blooded American.  It is documented history that America is a Christian nation, though she has departed from her God.

One simple look to the first governing document establishing the people here was the Mayflower Compact and it was just as explicit as Ms. Borowicz’s prayer.

IN THE NAME OF GOD, AMEN. We, whose names are underwritten, the Loyal Subjects of our dread Sovereign Lord King James, by the Grace of God, of Great BritainFrance, and Ireland, King, Defender of the Faith, &c. Having undertaken for the Glory of God, and Advancement of the Christian Faith, and the Honour of our King and Country, a Voyage to plant the first Colony in the northern Parts of Virginia; Do by these Presents, solemnly and mutually, in the Presence of God and one another, covenant and combine ourselves together into a civil Body Politick, for our better Ordering and Preservation, and Furtherance of the Ends aforesaid: And by Virtue hereof do enact, constitute, and frame, such just and equal Laws, Ordinances, Acts, Constitutions, and Officers, from time to time, as shall be thought most meet and convenient for the general Good of the Colony; unto which we promise all due Submission and Obedience. IN WITNESS whereof we have hereunto subscribed our names at Cape-Cod the eleventh of November, in the Reign of our Sovereign Lord King James, of EnglandFrance, and Ireland, the eighteenth, and of Scotland the fifty-fourth, Anno Domini; 1620.

Notice, it was the advancement of the Christian Faith, whose head and king is Jesus the Christ.  We were not established as a Muslim nation, but a Christian one.  The only people who are offended by a prayer mentioning Jesus are antichrists, and that’s the only people who were offended.

“Jesus, you are our only hope,” Borowicz said, before going on to pray for the House Republican leaders, Gov. Tom Wolf, and President Trump.

She invoked the name of Jesus some 13 times during the prayer, exalting Him as “the King of Kings; the Lord of lords; the great I Am; the One who’s coming back again; the One who came, died and rose again on the third day.”

She also prayed for forgiveness for the nation’s sins and ended her prayer declaring, “At the name of Jesus, every knee will bow and every tongue will confess Jesus, that you are Lord.”

Of course, she took a position about modern-day Israel, which is unbiblical.  Nevertheless, her prayer caused quite a controversy, something that would never have been a controversy just 20 years ago.

Johnson-Harrell, as well as other Democrats, denounced the prayer.

“I knew I was going to receive some discrimination because of my religion,” Johnson-Harrell said, according to WHYY radio in Philadelphia. “Because I’m a hijabi woman. And I am the first … but I did not think it would come on the actual day of my swearing-in.”

Johnson-Harrell said the prayer was “highly offensive to me, my guests, and other members of the House.”

“It blatantly represented the Islamophobia that exists among some leaders — leaders that are supposed to represent the people,” Johnson-Harrell said in a statement. “I came to the Capitol to help build bipartisanship and collaborations regardless of race or religion to enhance the quality of life for everyone in the Commonwealth.”

Democratic House Minority Whip Jordan Harris claimed that the prayer was weaponized to “intimidate, demean and degrade.”

No, ma’am, that’s what Islam and totalitarians do and her comments are evidence of that.

“Let me be clear,” Harris said in a statement.  “I am a Christian. I spend my Sunday mornings in church worshiping and being thankful for all that I have.  But in no way does that mean I would flaunt my religion at those who worship differently than I do. There is no room in our Capitol building for actions such as this, and it’s incredibly disappointing that today’s opening prayer was so divisive.”

There’s her problem.  She leaves her “religion” at the door of the church.  She doesn’t actually practice any of it and you watch, this professed Christian, given enough time, will convert to antichrist Islam.  She’s already openly denying Christ by blasting the prayer mentioning His name.

Additionally, WND reported:

The Daily Caller noted an Islamic prayer called Takbir was recited before the legislature during Johnson-Harrell’s swearing-in.

The Islamic prayer ended, however, before its last line, which denounces the central Christian doctrine that Jesus is the Son of God.

House Minority Leader Frank Dermody condemned Borowicz’s prayer, PennLive.com reported.

“It was not meant to bring us together. It was not meant to inspire us. It was beneath the dignity of the House,” he said to the applause of members.

But the state’s legislature applauded Muslim Democratic Pennsylvania State Rep. Jason Dawkins’ invocation Tuesday in which he recited from the Quran.

The reality is that if the Church would repent and start getting its doctrine and practice right, it would once again influence the politics of our land properly.  Until God grants such repentance, we can expect to see the enemies of Christ and His Church rise to power to be used in judgment by God against His people (Deuteronomy 28).

Article posted with permission from Sons Of Liberty Media

Christchurch Shooting Being Used To Silence Free Speech & Questioning Of The False Flag Event Globally

Since the shooting that took place in Christchurch, New Zeland at a mosque two weeks ago, there has been a global attack on free speech and the press as I’ve never seen before.  New Zealand has arrested people for simply possessing the video of the shooting and threatening them with over a decade in jail.  Australia has threatened American companies who provide internet infrastructure to paying customers who post the video.  Things are way out of control, and this is happening not just in New Zealand, Australia and the US, but globally.

In a short presentation of just how dangerous this is and the rise of Islam in New Zealand, a short video produced by Infowars lays out exactly what is taking place and people better wake up and pay attention.

I’ve seen the video.  I know what’s in it.  Some things appear to be authentic, but there are several anomalies also in the video.  Some of those are referenced in the video along with the absolute tyranny that is taking place not only in New Zealand but practically in every civilized nation in the world.

Take a look for yourself and see what you think.

Colorado Senate Votes To Pass Unconstitutional Red Flag Bill – Sheriff Vows Not To Comply

Colorado, the state that couldn’t determine whether a woman committed murder when she cut an unborn baby from the abdomen of a pregnant woman due to their pretended abortion “laws,” has now seen their Senate pass a red flag bill, which would authorize law enforcement to  take people’s guns if a court rules them to be a risk to themselves or others, something that violates the Second, Fourth and Fifth Amendments of the US Constitution.

On Thursday, the Senate voted 18-17 in favor of the legislation, House Bill 1177.  No Republican supported the bill and even Senate President Leory Garcia, a Democrat, voted no against the bill.

“I want to continue working with my colleagues to find a Colorado solution,” Garcia said earlier this week in a written statement.

The unlawful bill is expected to be signed by Governor Jared Polis.

The Colorado Sun reported, “The Senate, where Democrats hold a slim 19-16 majority, was where the bill faced its only real challenge.”

That hurdle has now been crossed.

However, there are some constitutional sheriffs who have said that they will not comply with the unconstitutional bill if it is signed by the governor.

“If you pass an unconstitutional law, our oaths as commissioners or myself as the sheriff — we’re going to follow our constitutional oath first,” said Sheriff Steve Reams.

Other sheriffs would rather mental health facilities be funded properly, which I question whether that is the role of government or not.

“It’s time we quit trying to put lipstick on a pig and start funding our mental health facilities, instead of trying to take the rights from our people,” said another sheriff.

The state’s attorney general, Democrat Phil Weiser, said that these men should leave office if they can’t follow a “law” that is unconstitutional.

“If a sheriff cannot follow the law, the sheriff cannot do his or her job,” Weiser said. “The right thing to do for a sheriff who says, ‘I can’t follow the law’ is to resign.”

Yet, Governor Polis is not exactly cozying up to Weiser’s comments.  Instead, he is leaving it up to the discretion of the police.

“Every law enforcement agency has limited resources, and they do have to prioritize what they choose to enforce or not enforce,” said Polis.

That’s a coward’s way out.

What the governor should do is state that the Constitution does not allow any state to engage in authoring red flag laws because they are an attack on the rights of the people.  He won’t do that because he’s playing politics…. with your rights.

I hope these sheriffs come through for their people and don’t kowtow to the pressure of the beast.  Let’s pray God gives them courage.

Muslim Rep. Rashida Tlaib Submits Impeachment Resolution With Support Of One Other Democrat

Muslim and alleged fraudulent representative Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) formally submitted her impeachment resolution on Wednesday with the support of just one other representative, a Democrat who is also Muslim, Al Green (TX).

Green has also tried to advance impeachment of President Donald Trump before and utterly failed.  Tlaib will probably do the same.

CNN reports:

“Just Al Green and I,” Tlaib said, adding that she does not think there will be any others who come forward with their support.
Tlaib has been working behind-the-scenes to get colleagues to put their name on the resolution that directs the House Judiciary Committee to inquire whether President Donald Trump committed impeachable offenses.

Earlier this week she sent a “Dear Colleague” letter to a targeted list of members who in the past had shown an openness to pushing for impeachment and that she thought could be open to signing their name to her resolution.

Asked if she is disappointed that others didn’t sign on, especially those in her freshman class who may have called for impeachment on the campaign trail, she said no.

In a last-minute news conference outside the Capitol, Tlaib brushed aside concerns that she failed to get more than one other Democrat to sign on to her resolution.

“For many of my colleagues, not one told me not to,” she said, explaining she wasn’t discouraged from pursuing her resolution. “And that’s important to know. Not one single person told me not to do this — and I think that speaks volumes, more than whether or not they signed on.”

The text of her letter to colleagues read in part:

We all swore to protect our nation, and that begins with making sure that no one, including the President of the United States, is acting above the law. I urge your support in recommending that the House Committee on Judiciary begin hearings, take depositions, and issue subpoenas to answer this question that is fundamental to the rule of law and the preservation of our democracy.

Clearly, she is suffering from a delusion, just like Adam Schiff.

“For many of my colleagues, not one told me not to,” she said, explaining she wasn’t discouraged from pursuing her resolution. “And that’s important to know. Not one single person told me not to do this — and I think that speaks volumes, more than whether or not they signed on.”

Yeah, it speaks volumes that they are going to let you hang yourself with your own rope.

Even House leadership isn’t considering her plans, which seems questionable at face value, sort of like her legitimacy to be in Congress.

“You can ask her how she’s doing on her resolution,” Pelosi told CNN earlier Wednesday. “That is not an initiative of our House caucus.”

“I’ve made it really clear on impeachment,” Pelosi added. “Everybody can do whatever they want to do but that’s not a place where we are right now. Right now, we are talking about health care, we are talking about climate and building the infrastructure of America in a green way. Just like we promised in the campaign. That is what we are spending our time on.”

Tlaib used vulgarity in a speech back in January in which she stated she was going to “impeach the m***erf**ker,” referring to President Trump.

Shortly after, there were nearly 300,000 people who signed a petition to have her removed from office for fraud, claiming that Tlaib lied about living in the district she ran to represent.

Clearly, this resolution is dead.  It’s a way to make Tlaib feel like she is special and doing something when she’s really doing nothing.

When are we going to see a real investigation into her Islamic terror ties and her alleged election fraud?  Hmmm.  Don’t hold your breath.

Article posted with permission from Sons Of Liberty Media

Why Are We Not Referring To MainStream Media & Democrats As “Conspiracy Theorists” Now? The Truth About “Russian Collusion”

“WMD damaged the media’s reputation.  Russiagate may have destroyed it.” -Matt Taibbi

You’ve heard it all before.  You are called a “conspiracy theorist” in order to silence any questioning of the narrative you’re fed from the state-controlled, propaganda outlets known as the mainstream media.  You are also called that if you start connecting the dots to criminal politicians, whether in DC, State or local politics.  More on that in a moment, but these people assume there is no evidence to connectin the dots or questioning an official narrative when there is evidence to suggest otherwise.  So, since there is now officially no, nada, zero, zip evidence that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians in the 2016 election cycle, should we not start labeling mainstream media outlets like MSNBC, CNN and others, as well as high and low ranking Democrats as “conspiracy theorists,” only with an emphasis of not a shred of evidence of their claims?

First, keep in mind a report by Corey Lynn on the terms “conspiracy theory” and “conspiracy theorists.”  She writes:

In 1976, the New York Times obtained a document they requested via the Freedom of Information Act.

This document was a C.I.A. Dispatch labeled “psych” for “psychological operations” that was distributed in 1967, indicating they coined the phrase “conspiracy theory” and “conspiracy theorists” to attack anyone who challenged the official narrative from the Warren Commission. It also has a CS indicated on it, which stands for “clandestine services” unit.

These labels have continued ever since they coined the phrase in the 1960’s, with the intention of stifling any truths from getting out. Pay close attention to those using the labels and the information they are referring to. This will be your first clue that truth lies within and they are trying to deflect it. The bottom line is there are hundreds if not thousands of conspiracies taking place all around us – legitimate ones. While they are busy misdirecting with their “conspiracy theorist” labels, evidence is being dug up, they are being exposed, and what they claim to be theory is TRUTH.

There are some disputes out there as to whether the C.I.A. was the first to use the term because it has been printed in a handful of political books from the late 1800’s. The inception of the C.I.A. was in 1947 and this “psych” dispatch went out in 1967. It is from that point on that the term “conspiracy theory” and “conspiracy theorist” have been shoved down our throats. It was weaponized, just as so many other labels have been used to distract, manipulate and change the narrative to suit their agenda.

See and Read the full C.I.A. Dispatch here.

This brings us to the topic of conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorists who promoted for over two years the nonsense we now refer to as “Russian collusion.”  They have done so not based on actual, verified evidence, no actual videos, or anything else, but only on a dossier that was funded by Trump’s political opponent and handled by the FBI.

Even after two years of investigating, there is still no evidence of Russian collusion by the Trump campaign, and Democrats and media alike are continuing to profess there is.  There is ample evidence of Russian collusion in the Obama administration though, which included Hillary Clinton.

Will the media be held accountable?  Don’t hold your breath.

So, what is the truth in all of this?

Paul Joseph Watson comments on the “fake news conspiracy theory” the media has been pushing on the American people for the last two years in his new video commentary as the “biggest fake news conspiracy theory since Saddam Hussein’s non-existent weapons of mass destruction.”

Article posted with permission from Sons Of Liberty Media

San Diego Parents Successfully Repel Designated Terror Group CAIR From Classrooms

Finally, some parents have had it with Islamic terror groups seeking access to their children to indoctrinate them.  Now, if we can only get them away from state indoctrination and move towards true education, we’ll begin to see things truly reversed in the long term.  With that said, parents have stood their ground in California, repelling the Islamic invasion into San Diego schools by designated terror group Hamas-CAIR.

The report comes by way of Freedom of Conscience Defense Fund.

The settlement agreement ensures an equally safe and supportive learning environment for students of all religious beliefs.

Yesterday, FCDF attorneys finalized a settlement agreement with the San Diego Unified School District that resolves a federal lawsuit challenging the District’s “Anti-Islamophobia Initiative.” FCDF representing five families, along with two advocacy organizations, San Diego Asian Americans for Equality and Citizens for Quality Education, sued the District in 2017, alleging that the anti-Muslim bullying program violated the First Amendment because it was religiously preferential.

“Nowhere is religious liberty and equal protection more critical than in our schools,” said Charles LiMandri, FCDF’s Chief Counsel. “We commend the District for taking affirmative steps to ensure that students of all faiths may learn and thrive in a safe and nondiscriminatory environment.”

The District’s Initiative, which was developed in collaboration with the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), mandated training on “how to become allies to Muslim students,” provided for CAIR officials to teach students about Islamic religious practices, and authorized the Islamic group to revise school curricula to ensure more a “inclusive” portrayal of Islam.

The complaint alleged that the Initiative violated the Constitution because it (1) singled out Muslim students for preferential benefits and (2) empowered CAIR with governmental decision-making authority, thereby constituting government entanglement with religion.

Under the terms of the settlement agreement, the District distributed a policy memo to area superintendents and principals regarding the First Amendment’s “limits on the conduct of public school officials as it relates to religious activity.” These directives include:

To address religious preferentialism:

  • “Educators should treat each religion with equal respect, with the time and attention spent discussing each religion being proportionate to its impact on history and human development and the material presented in its historical context.”

  • “Educational material on religious subjects must be neutral and may not be presented in a manner that promotes one religion over another.”

In response to CAIR’s activism:

  • “Educators or other staff sponsoring guest speakers at District events must ask them not to use their position or influence on students to forward their own religious, political, economic or social views or and shall take active steps to neutralize whatever bias has been presented.”

  • “Guest speakers from religious organizations are not permitted to present to students on religious topics.”

“Every child, regardless of their race or religion, should be able to attend school without fear of being harassed and bullied,” said Frank Xu, Vice President of San Diego Asian Americans for Equality.  “We are pleased that the District has agreed to take these steps to ensure that all students attending San Diego schools are equally protected under the Constitution without discrimination or preferential treatment.”

“It is paramount schools at every level not only provide a quality education for children but also ensure a safe and impartial environment in which to learn their lessons,” added Mary Baker, President of Citizens for Quality Education San Diego.  “Biased outside groups, such as CAIR, have no business influencing policies in our public schools. We hope this agreement will encourage school districts nationwide to reject appeals to build coalitions offered by controversial sectarian organizations.”

FCDF filed the complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California. The case is titled Citizens for Quality Education San Diego, et al. v. Richard Barrera, et al., Case No. 3:17-cv-1054. Now that the parties have settled, they filed a joint motion asking the Court to dismiss the case. Yesterday, the court granted the motion and dismissed the case with prejudice.

Pamela Geller reminds us that San Diego still has a “severe” CAIR problem.

I agree that all children need to not face bullying no matter their background.  The only place I disagree here is in the section of respecting all religions as equal.  They simply are not.  Historically, the united States, while often providing a short synopsis of what world religions believed and even some history, was clearly in favor of teaching the Bible in schools.

Our founders provided Bibles and hymnals as the curriculum in schools in AmericaThe Bible was the primary instrument of education in early America.

In fact, the New England Primer, which was also used in early America, was filled with Biblical references.

All religions are not equal.  There can only be one that is true, and that fact cannot be disputed.  Furthermore, no one, and I mean no one, believes the nonsense that all religions are equal.  No one believes the worship of Molech should be practiced today, even though many are murdering their own babies through abortion.  No one believes the religion of the ancient Mayans should be practiced in America.  No one, except devout Muslims, believes that the true Islam as taught by Muhammad should actually be practiced in America today.  In fact, the vast majority of humanity would oppose it anywhere.

Therefore, everyone knows that religions are not all equal and they do not bear the same message.  Only in Christianity does God not only forgive sinners who repent of their sins (violations of His law), but he saves them from their sins, cleanses them, makes them new and clothes them in righteousness because of the life and death of another on their behalf, the Lord Jesus Christ… and He does this all by grace, not by how good man thinks he can be.  Because the truth is, man can never be good enough to meet the standard God has established.

Once upon a time when America was truly great, it was great because of the Bible and the God of the Bible was revered.  If we want America to be great again, then stop listening to the politicians and start turning back to the Bible and repenting before the God of the Bible.  Don’t just push the Islamists out and leave the vacuum of secular humanism.  Restore true education by restoring it in the home and restoring it with the Bible.

In the meantime, this is a small victory to celebrate.

Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media

In The Wake Of Threats Over New Zealand Shooting Posts, Brighteon Seeks Long-Term Goal To Protect Free Speech On Video

Last week, following the mosque shooting in New Zealand, the government of Australia put pressure on an American company that seeks to protect free speech in video format.  By threatening their internet infrastructure, Brighteon had to do what its main purpose was not to do and that is they had to remove all videos that contained any footage of the shooting.  However, founder Mike Adams has put forth his agenda going forward, installing a couple of new rules that will hopefully be temporary, as he seeks a long-term solution to insulate Brighteon and its users from such threats in the future.

In an emergency message put out on Monday, Adams wrote to users of his platform and explained the situation.

Following the Christchurch shootings in New Zealand, the governments of both New Zealand and Australia attempted to annihilate Brighteon by threatening our upstream providers, claiming our hosting of the shooting videos constituted “promotion of violence.”

In response to that imminent threat, we were forced to remove all videos that contained footage from the New Zealand shooting, even against our principles of working to protect free speech. We were also forced to temporarily suspend some accounts to prevent further posting of videos that could have resulted in us being de-platformed within hours. (Nearly all those suspensions are now being reversed.)

Today, we are fighting both a short-term and a long-term battle to protect free speech and defend your right to post controversial content in the interests of public debate.

Until the company is able to achieve the planned improvements to maintain self-reliance in their infrastructure without being so dependent upon outside forces, Brighteon has implemented the following changes to their rules.

  1. All videos will now be moderated before being approved for public viewing. We apologize in advance that this may introduce a few minutes’ delay into the time required for your video to go live.
  2. We are rejecting all videos that “visually depict violence against living beings,” meaning videos that contain graphic footage showing people or animals being harmed or killed. Notably, this rule does not, for example, restrict videos of firearms shooting steel targets, or firearms used in self-defense training.
  3. We are rejecting all videos that call for violence against anyone based on their religion, skin color, country of origin, sexual orientation, etc. Actually, this rule has been in place for quite some time.

Adams added the free speech to criticize and post commentary on shootings would still be welcome, and even still images that don’t “depict active violence against living beings” would be welcome also until things are sorted out, which will take several months.

So, what is Adams long-term plan to defend your right to post such videos and fight against censorship?  He says that it is to build an entirely new internal infrastructure that reduces reliance upon upstream infrastructure such as Amazon AWS.  By the way, I have known Adams for some time and know that he hates being beholden to people like Amazon or Google and is seeking a model that eliminates services like that in order to be a fully-functional, independent business that doesn’t rely on such companies in order to survive.

With that in mind, he said that there will be two big benefits to the improvements.

  1. A 90% reduction in the cost of video storage, which will allow Brighteon to break even and perhaps even turn a small profit that can be invested into more R&D.
  2. Greatly reduced dependence on upstream infrastructure providers such as Amazon AWS, meaning we will have greater control over our content and be less able to be threatened by upstream providers.

Adams also said this new infrastructure rollout would come in two phases.

The first phase will achieve point #1 (the cost savings), and the second phase will completely eliminate any reliance on Amazon AWS. Realistically, phase 1 will likely be completed around the beginning of May, 2019. Phase 2 may take until August. This timeline is subject to additional interruptions, of course.

“Once this is completed, we will be much more insulated from infrastructure providers (though not 100% insulated) and we will revisit our current rules to see how we can expand speech and host videos that dare to ask questions of the status quo,” Adams said.

Adams added, “We are fighting for survival in an age of extreme techno-fascism and censorship. We are still alive and still functioning, despite the attempts to completely take us down and silence all our videos.”

Indeed, in the world we are in today, the internet has almost become a necessity to function in business today and it is invaluable to the free flow of information and the fight against government and media propaganda.  Brighteon is working to be on the front lines of that fight when it comes to video.

You can support Brighteon by becoming a member and setting up a channel of your own or by shopping the Brighteon store.

Rape Victim Pursued By Attorney, Who Bought Right To Sue Her, Threatened With Arrest Within 24 Hours – Here’s Why

I’ve been sharing with you the story of Deanna Williams,  a mother of two, who alleged that she was raped by a Major League Baseball player back in 2009.  As I wanted to continue to unpack the ongoing story, Williams is under a deadline to be deposed by the attorney that is seeking to make a profit by suing her.  She has been threatened with arrest within the next 24 hours if she does not comply, but according to Williams, she has attempted to contact this attorney to establish a deposition twelve times without a response.

The attorney that “bought the right to sue” Ms. Williams from another attorney is named Scott Mager.  I have made two calls to Mager and left messages in an attempt to get a comment.  His office has failed to respond.

However, I’m not the only one to which Mager will not respond.

Scott Mager has failed to respond to at least twelve different attempts by Deanna Williams to contact her to set up a deposition.  Throughout the years of this going on, Ms. Williams has failed to be heard by the court.

On Monday’s Pete Santilli Show, Williams explained the situation and also pointed out that though she has been trying to comply with the court order to be deposed, Mager’s office simply will not return her calls or emails to set up a deposition.

Williams believes this is to force her to sue her attorney, who refers to herself as the “most famous female attorney in the country,” for a multi-million dollar lawsuit so that he can pocket even more money, while taking virtually all of Williams settlement money in the 2009 settlement.

Her interview begins around the 01:17:00 mark.

https://youtu.be/Y6fUGC8lRzM

As I pointed out in a previous article, this famous female attorney responded to questions I posed to her about her retainer agreement with Williams to pay all previous attorney fees and liens by sidestepping the question and attempting to point to Williams’ attorneys she hired after the settlement.

Williams believes that on top of the interception of one of her payments by G. Ware Cornell, who never had written authorization to receive the funds, that quite a bit of money was also pocketed by the famous female attorney because her previous attorneys were never paid, thus resulting in the lawsuit, financial hardships and threats of arrest she is facing now.

While this is going on, Williams has lost her home due to what she alleges is theft by her attorney, who then turned over those funds to Scott Mager.  According to Williams, that money, which was from her rape settlement case, was going to be used to appeal what is currently going on with her.

Williams has lost her home, may lose her car and is completely helpless at this stage, as many attorneys have said that she has a solid case and that they’ve never seen such a level of corruption, but so far, no attorney will step up to actually represent her in the matter.

If there is an attorney with any integrity out there that can help Ms. Williams, please click the “Contact” button at the top and contact me and I can put you in touch with her.

Till then, she needs a couple of things.

The first is prayer.  Williams is a professed Christian and feels the weight of all that she is facing on top of having MS and being pregnant.

The second is to donate to her to help her just survive until she can get justice.

A Gofundme page has been set up, in which all donations will go directly to her, not to attorneys.  Click here to donate.

Third, though she has reached out to local law enforcement to bring about justice in the thefts, she has received no help.  In fact, you will note in the interview, that the then undersheriff of Lee County, now current sheriff, who was appointed by then-Governor Rick Scott last year, Carmine Marceno, unethically pursued Williams via Facebook and abused his authority in an attempt to establish a sexual relationship with her that left her pregnant.  I’ll have more on that in a future installment as the sheriff has sought to have her murder her unborn baby to preserve his career and issued what she believes are threats against her and the baby.

This requires reaching out to state authorities.  If you are able, please contact the following on behalf of Ms. Williams and request immediate action to ensure the Deanna Williams receives justice instead of the injustice that she has been receiving for several years.

You can contact Governor DeSantis on behalf of Ms. Williams below:

Executive Office of Governor Ron DeSantis
400 S Monroe St
Tallahassee, FL 32399
(850) 488-7146

Email Governor DeSantis

Email Lt. Governor Nuñez 

Additionally, you can contact Attorney General Ashley Moody on behalf of Ms. Williams below:

Office of Attorney General
State of Florida
The Capitol PL-01
Tallahassee, FL 32399-1050

(850) 414-3300

Finally, it may even help to contact the Florida Bar on Ms. Williams’ behalf to see if they will begin to investigate ethics violations, negligence and corruption that appears to have taken place with regards to Ms. Williams’ representation, legal agreements and rulings by judges in the cases.

The Florida Bar contact information:

The Florida Bar 
651 E. Jefferson Street
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2300

(850)561-5600

By Email

Attorney Michael Avenatti Arrested – Charged With Extortion Of Nike For $20 Million

Attorney Michael Avenatti, who represented porn star Stormy Daniels against President Donald Trump and was later arrested for allegedly beating a woman, has been arrested and charged after trying to extort athletic company Nike for $20 million.

Avenatti took to Twitter to announce a press conference he was going to hold to disclose a huge high school/college basketball scandal that was allegedly perpetrated by Nike that he claims to have uncovered.

However, according to the criminal complain, Avenatti devised “a scheme to extort a company by means of an interstate communication by threatening to damage the company’s reputation if the company did not agree to make multi-million dollar payments to Avenatti and [co-conspirator], and further agree to pay an additional $1.5 million to a client of Avenatti’s.”

Avenatti Complaint by on Scribd

https://twitter.com/lachlan/status/1110231120069709824

Federal authorities also claimed Avenatti and a cooperating witness spoke by phone with lawyers for Nike “during which Avenatti stated, with respect to his demands for payment of millions of dollars, that if those demands were not met ‘I’ll go take ten billion dollars off your client’s market cap… I’m not f—ing around.’”

And there’s more.  Avenatti isn’t just charged with extortion, but also bank fraud.

Tyler Durden reported:

A second set of charges allege he embezzled a client’s money in order to pay his own expenses and debts — as well as those of his coffee business and law firm — and also defrauded a bank by using phony tax returns to obtain millions of dollars in loans.

Avenatti also allegedly defrauded a bank in Mississippi by submitting to the lender false tax returns in order to obtain three loans totaling $4.1 million for his law firm and coffee business in 2014. According to the affidavit, Avenatti obtained the loans by submitting fabricated individual income tax returns (Forms 1040) for 2011, 2012, and 2013, reporting substantial income even though he had never filed any such returns with the Internal Revenue Service.

The phony returns stated that he earned $4,562,881 in adjusted gross income in 2011, $5,423,099 in 2012, and $4,082,803 in 2013, according to the affidavit. Avenatti allegedly also claimed he paid $1.6 million in estimated tax payments to the IRS in 2012 and paid $1.25 million in 2013. In reality, Avenatti never filed personal income tax returns for 2011, 2012 and 2013 and did not make any estimated tax payments in 2012 and 2013.

Instead of the millions of dollars he claimed to have paid in taxes, Avenatti still owed the IRS $850,438 in unpaid personal income tax plus interest and penalties for the tax years 2009 and 2010, court papers state. The affidavit also alleges that, as part of his loan applications, Avenatti also submitted a fictitious partnership tax return for his law firm.

Avenatti reportedly negotiated a $1.6 million settlement on behalf of a client, then turned around and gave the client a “bogus settlement agreement” with a fake date and fake amount. He used the stolen money to pay “expenses” for his coffee business.

That office said “Avenatti misappropriated his client’s settlement money and used it to pay expenses for his coffee business, Global Baristas US LLC, which operated Tully’s Coffee stores in California and Washington state, as well as for his own expenses.”

“When the fake March 2018 deadline passed and the client asked where the money was, Avenatti continued to conceal that the payment had already been received, court documents said,” according to prosecutors.

“A lawyer has a basic duty not to steal from his client,” said U.S. Attorney for Los Angeles Nick Hanna.

“Mr. Avenatti is facing serious criminal charges alleging he misappropriated client trust funds for his personal use and he defrauded a bank by submitting phony tax returns in order to obtain millions of dollars in loans.”

Full complaint here.

It’s been a bad few days for the #resistance.

https://twitter.com/nickmon1112/status/1110234584531329025

As for Stormy Daniels, she put in her two cents on Avenatti, which was less than glowing seeing that she was trusting him to represent her.  Her statements are quite telling about him and her.

All I have to say is, it couldn’t happen to a nicer guy.

Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media

US 10th Circuit Court Issues Stay On Federal Bump Stock Ban For Utah Man

On Thursday, the US 10th Circuit Court issued a temporary stay on a pending federal bump stock ban that was scheduled to take place this week.  However, the temporary stay is only for one Utah man who brought the case.

Anyone who has read my previous articles knows that the bump stock ban is nothing more than an outright attack on the rights of American citizens.  It is also a post facto “law,” something the executive branch does not have constitutional authority to do.

Guns.com reports:

The stay comes in the case of Utah gun rights advocate W. Clark Aposhian, backed by the nonprofit New Civil Liberties Alliance, which takes issue with how government regulators moved to outlaw the devices last year. As such, it blocks enforcement, set to take effect on March 26, only against Aposhian while his case is in the courts.

“Today the Court of Appeals told the ATF that it could not rush through the bump stock ban without meaningful judicial review,” said Caleb Kruckenberg, NCLA’s litigation counsel, in a statement to Guns.com. “The Court understands the stakes and is refusing to let an innocent owner be declared a felon, as scheduled.”

The lawsuit, filed in January in a Salt Lake City U.S. District Court, challenges the proper role of administrative agencies– such as the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives– and whether their regulations may contradict a law passed by Congress, specifically the definition of a “machine gun” as set by lawmakers in 1934 and 1968. The case argues that ATF essentially rewrote the definition as set out by previous laws, something that was not in the agency’s power to do.

Guns.com adds:

Going back to 2017, regulators had researched federal law to determine if certain bump stock devices fall within the definition of “machine gun,” which led to President Trump last February to order the Department of Justice to craft regulations to “write out” the devices himself. Since then, the primary maker of bump stocks in the country stopped taking orders for the controversial devices, although they were still readily available from dealers until this week.

Attorneys for Aposhian further argue that the government is also retroactively punishing otherwise lawful purchasers of the devices– with punishable up to 10 years in federal prison for first-time offenders– who may not hear about the ban before it turns them into felons.

While U.S. District Judge Jill N. Parrish, a 2015 appointment by President Obama, turned away Aposhian’s request for an injunction on Wednesday, saying his case has “not shown a likelihood of success,” NCLA filed an emergency request to the 10th Circuit who granted the injunction. Both sides have until March 29 to file a further response with the court.

“The Court’s decision to stay the bump stock rule is an important recognition of the high stakes in this case,” noted NCLA. “While the order is limited, the Court recognizes that Mr. Aposhian has raised a substantial basis to question the rule’s validity.”

Several other cases have been filed, something that shouldn’t have to be done if those put in office actually read and understood the Constitution they swear to uphold.

While Guns.com estimates that about half a million bump stocks are in circulation, I would venture to say that number is probably at least three times that.

In either case, the action by the Trump ATF to ban the very things that they approved under the Obama administration, demonstrates that none of these people know a thing about the law, the Constitution in this matter.  Furthermore, I suggest that President Trump, if he was actually a friend of the Second Amendment, would have shot this down, but he supports it, along with unconstitutional red flag laws.

Banning bump stocks is not the job of the executive branch.  In fact, it’s not even the job of Congress, since the right of the people to keep and bear arms, and it’s implied any kind of arms, shall not be infringed.  See my previous article “All Federal Gun Laws Are Unconstitutional.”

Furthermore, if this ban is allowed to stand, it opens the door to ban every single semi-automatic weapon in the country.

If you have a bump stock, don’t turn it in.  Don’t comply with an unconstitutional usurpation by the executive branch that the Constitution never authorized to legislate for the citizens.

Judge Tossed Right To Sue Rape Victim – Florida Attorneys Still Pursue Her, Threaten Arrest

Last week, I reported on a decade’s long story concerning a Florida woman who was raped in 2009.  Following that rape, she settled with the defendant for an undisclosed amount of money.  However, while the attorneys who settled the case were paid handsomely, they failed to pay previous attorney fees and liens that were outlined in the woman’s retention agreement, which has led to her having hundreds of thousands of dollars stolen from her, the “right” to sue her by an attorney who was owed nothing sold to another attorney for profit and “authorized” by a judge who was busted in a prostitution ring, and finally threats of arrest.

This is the Deanna Williams story.

If you have not read the previous long version, step by step of Williams’ story, you can click here to read it.  It will provide you with a summation of all that has gone on, but not every detail.

Following a review of several redacted documents, I have determined that Ms. Williams had obtained the services of an attorney who refers to herself as “the most famous female attorney in the country.”  According to the retainer agreement that Williams signed with this female attorney, along with her Florida partner, any settlement that Williams got would be divided between her and the attorneys providing the services, as with any lawsuit.  However, Williams, having had previous counsel involved, believed there would be other legal fees and liens against her and wanted to ensure that her new legal team would pay all previous legal fees and liens from prior attorneys from the amount they obtained in the settlement.

That agreement was not only made, but underlined clearly in the retainment agreement.

Following the settlement, those fees were to be paid, but apparently, they never were, as attorney Michael Dolce, who had placed Ms. Williams in several compromised and vulnerable positions during his representation of her that nearly destroyed her case, something for which Mr. Dolce should be questioned by the Florida Bar, “sold” his right to sue Ms. Williams to another attorney who intended to make a handsome profit from the lawsuit.  That attorney is Scott Mager.  Mager has declined to return calls made to him to comment on the suit.

However, in 2016, a judge ruled that there was no evidence submitted that substantiated the claim that Williams owed any money to Dolce, since he has worked on a contingency basis and has bowed out as her attorney.

In the link cited above, attorney Johnathan Heller was the partner of the “most famous female attorney in the country.”  He was also the attorney for Ms. Williams in the case and ultimately saw it settled.  However, his signature is also on the retainer agreement and he was responsible for ensuring that prior attorney fees and liens were paid.  They weren’t.

The judge ruled:

Appellees did not file a charging lien in the personal injury lawsuit.3 Instead, they instituted a new action against appellants. Pursuing a quantum meruit theory of recovery, they claim entitlement to some portion of the settlement proceeds for their efforts on Ms. Williams’ behalf. To forestall the further disbursement of settlement funds held by the Heller law firm, appellees filed a motion to preserve assets. They submitted no verified pleadings or affidavits in support of the motion. The trial court referred the motion to a magistrate who heard argument on the motion. No party presented evidence. Appellees feared that, absent a freeze of the funds, they might be unable to secure any meaningful relief if they succeeded on their quantum meruit claim. Appellees argued that appellants had a duty to disgorge any fees and to return any disbursed funds because they had been on notice of a charging lien. Appellants noted that appellees never filed a charging lien. Appellants also maintained that appellees were asking for the entry of a temporary injunction without an evidentiary hearing or bond.

The magistrate recommended that the trial court grant the motion to preserve assets, finding that:

Any assets presently in the custody of Law Offices of Jonathan A. Heller, P.A., derived from, or related to, their representation of Deanna Williams should be frozen, withheld and not distributed or spent. An order protecting the assets is designed not to allow wasting of assets nor permit harm to any party. The final determination of whether or not the frozen funds should be released should be made after the trial of the cause.

The trial court adopted the magistrate’s report and recommendation and entered the order now before us.

The judge did acknowledge the fact that the plaintiffs in the case could file for a temporary injunction for relief and assets could be preserved according to several court case precedents.

“There can be no question but that appellees sought injunctive relief,” the judge ruled.  “Indeed, they specifically asked the trial court to enter an injunction or other order protecting the settlement funds.”

However, Judge LaRose reversed and remanded the injunction because the plaintiffs failed to provide evidence of their claims.

To demonstrate entitlement to a temporary injunction, appellees had to demonstrate “(1) a likelihood of irreparable harm and the unavailability of an adequate remedy at law; (2) a substantial likelihood of success on the merits; (3) a threatened injury to the petitioner that outweighs any possible harm to the respondent; and (4) that the granting of the injunction will not disserve the public interest.” Polk Cty. v. Mitchell, 931 So.2d 922, 926 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); see also Liberty Fin. Mortg. Corp. v. Clampitt, 667 So.2d 880 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996) (reversing injunction where the order did not address the likelihood of success on the merits).

Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(c) requires that every injunction entered by a trial court “shall specify the reasons for entry, [and] shall describe in reasonable detail the act or acts restrained without reference to a pleading or another document.” We have observed that “the trial court’s order must contain ‘[c]lear, definite, and unequivocally sufficient factual findings [to] support each of the four conclusions necessary to justify entry of a preliminary4 injunction.’ “ Clampitt, 667 So.2d at 881 (quoting City of Jacksonville v. Naegele Outdoor Advert. Co., 634 So.2d 750, 754 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)); Randolph v. Antioch Farms Feed & Grain Corp., 903 So.2d 384, 385 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (“Of primary importance is the trial court’s obligation to state sufficient factual findings in support of each element entitling a party to a temporary injunction․ The single error of failing to provide sufficient findings requires us to reverse and remand for further proceedings.”). The trial court’s order fails this requirement.

“Neither the order nor the magistrate’s report and recommendation recite sufficient factual findings to show us that appellees satisfied each element needed for entry of a temporary injunction,” the judge stated.  “On this basis, alone, we must reverse and remand for further proceedings. See Randolph, 903 So.2d 384 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). It appears to us that there were disputed issues of fact between the parties. Yet, to our knowledge, neither the magistrate nor the trial court held an evidentiary hearing. Thus, substantial, competent evidence was not provided to establish entitlement to a temporary injunction.”

“We must also note that Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(b) requires that a bond be set for the issuance of a temporary injunction,” the judge added.  “The trial court did not require a bond. This, too, was error.  Because the trial court committed legal error in granting the motion to preserve assets, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.”

This should have been the end of it, but it wasn’t.

Williams is now currently being threatened with arrest, facing a lawsuit that will utterly destroy her and all because her previous attorney fees and liens were not paid by her attorneys in the settlement of the rape case, which are stipulated in her retainer agreement.

I reached out to the “most famous female attorney in the country” to ask her about this issue and why the fees and liens were never paid because if they were, there would never have been this temporary injunction filed nor the sale of a “right to sue” from Dolce to Mager nor assessed fines and other feed in excess of $1 million against Ms. Williams by a judge that was busted in a prostitution sting nor threats of arrest towards Ms. Williams.

This attorney responded to my requests by dodging what I asked and that was about prior legal fees and liens Ms. Williams had acquired.  Instead, she wrote:

We represented Ms. Williams approximately 7 years ago.  She has had a number of lawyers since then.

Any legal problems that Ms. Williams faces has nothing to do with our representation of her and there is no factual basis for the assertions set forth in your email.

We suggest that you review the public documents in the case of Victim Justice, P.C., et al v. v. Deanna Williams, Case number 13-CA-003181 pending in Lee County, Florida, prior to making any further false statements.

Also, you do not appear to have possession of all the relevant confidential documents. Your statements are based on incomplete information which has led you to a false and misleading conclusion. Ethical rules which prohibit disclosure of attorney client communications preclude us from providing additional documents to you or commenting further.

Actually, it appears that all of Ms. Williams’ legal problems stem from the attorneys in the case she is citing not being paid from the settlement as promised in the retainer agreement. If they were paid, then this entire fiasco of a lawsuit against Ms. Williams should be shown for the fraud it is, all her funds returned and attorneys involved barred from practicing law ever again.

It’s one thing or the other, but it cannot be both.

In fact, the case against her currently is due to her previous attorney filing in her inactive rape case and failing to represent her properly in this matter of attorneys attempting to get money they claim they are entitled (one of which was not even involved but bought rights to sue for profit), something for which the Florida Bar should open an investigation into this conduct in the matter, as well.

This isn’t just my assessment, it is also the opinion of other attorneys who have submitted this in writing.

Imagine this:  a rape victim who fails to obtain the very settlement that she is promised due to attorneys failing to properly render her justice, and judges who fail to do the same.  Would you stand for this?

You can help her financially, as she has lost her home due to this and on the verge of losing her car.  Click here to donate directly to her at GoFundMe.

If you wish to encourage the State of Florida to get involved in this matter, here are the contacts.

You can contact Governor DeSantis on behalf of Ms. Williams below:

Executive Office of Governor Ron DeSantis
400 S Monroe St
Tallahassee, FL 32399
(850) 488-7146

Email Governor DeSantis

Email Lt. Governor Nuñez 

Additionally, you can contact Attorney General Ashley Moody on behalf of Ms. Williams below:

Office of Attorney General
State of Florida
The Capitol PL-01
Tallahassee, FL 32399-1050

(850) 414-3300

Finally, it may even help to contact the Florida Bar on Ms. Williams’ behalf to see if they will begin to investigate ethics violations, negligence and corruption that appears to have taken place with regards to Ms. Williams’ representation, legal agreements and rulings by judges in the cases.

The Florida Bar contact information:

The Florida Bar 
651 E. Jefferson Street
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2300

(850)561-5600

By Email